Are the numerous dog breeds proof of evolution?

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There is ZERO functional difference between them.

But there are genetic differences. I know they are the same species. But it is, indeed, an example of evolution, in the strict sense.

Birds evolved from dinosaurs but I'm sure there are genetic differences.

Uh...okay. That's a safe bet.

Is a feather a modified scale ? OR is a scale a modified feather ???

Feathers are modified scales. Reptiles and their scales existed before birds.

 

[LittleNipper]

I don't have a science background and don't know much about evolution but I believe the answer to my question is YES. What say you? Here's an article that delves into the topic.

From Wolves to Pugs and Great Danes – The History of Dog Breeds

Updated October 24, 2024 – Learn about the evolution of dogs and how they went from wolves to the loving pets we keep in our homes.

www.morrisanimalfoundation.org

It's more a demonstration of evolution. Evolution itself is simply change in the genetic code over a population of a species.

But the shift of a wolf to a dog. Is like the shift of an Negro to a Swed. You may get a different look, but one isn't inferior to the other in aptitude.

 

[LittleNipper]

There is ZERO functional difference between them.

But there are genetic differences. I know they are the same species. But it is, indeed, an example of evolution, in the strict sense.

Birds evolved from dinosaurs but I'm sure there are genetic differences.

Uh...okay. That's a safe bet.

Is a feather a modified scale ? OR is a scale a modified feather ???

 

[LittleNipper]

Your history is in error. There were approximately 700 years to repopulate the planet from the FLOOD to the building of the TOWER.

That is provably false. Please keep this magical nonsense out of the science section.

Nothing magical about it. It is based on archaeological research.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

there is not all you have is similarity in DNA.

Lie. We have way more than that. Especially when it comes to DNA. Has it occured to you that you have no idea what you are talking about?

LOL you ignore the Fact that science has no real evidence just conjecture and tell me I am ignorant? You ignore the fact science has no clear connection between all the supposed ancestor of man and call me ignorant? And there is no clear DNA foot print except to Neanderthal

 

[Hollie]

there is not all you have is similarity in DNA.

Lie. We have way more than that. Especially when it comes to DNA. Has it occured to you that you have no idea what you are talking about?

LOL you ignore the Fact that science has no real evidence just conjecture and tell me I am ignorant? You ignore the fact science has no clear connection between all the supposed ancestor of man and call me ignorant? And there is no clear DNA foot print except to Neanderthal

While science marches on with new discoveries, even the clear connection to Neanderthal DNA is a refutation to a 6,000 year old planet, A&E fables and Noah's pleasure cruise.

Mystery ancestor mated with ancient humans. And its 'nested' DNA was just found.

Today's humans carry the genes of an ancient, unknown ancestor, left there by hominin species intermingling perhaps a million years ago.

www.google.com

 

[K9Buck]

I don't have a science background and don't know much about evolution but I believe the answer to my question is YES. What say you? Here's an article that delves into the topic.

From Wolves to Pugs and Great Danes – The History of Dog Breeds

Updated October 24, 2024 – Learn about the evolution of dogs and how they went from wolves to the loving pets we keep in our homes.

www.morrisanimalfoundation.org

the horse proves in bred evolution. However there is no clear proof or real evidence that a single mammal has ever evolved into 2 or more distinctly different species.

Interesting point.

 

[Hollie]

I don't have a science background and don't know much about evolution but I believe the answer to my question is YES. What say you? Here's an article that delves into the topic.

From Wolves to Pugs and Great Danes – The History of Dog Breeds

Updated October 24, 2024 – Learn about the evolution of dogs and how they went from wolves to the loving pets we keep in our homes.

www.morrisanimalfoundation.org

the horse proves in bred evolution. However there is no clear proof or real evidence that a single mammal has ever evolved into 2 or more distinctly different species.

False.

The term you're not familiar with is speciation and there are many examples.

Observed Instances of Speciation

CB910: New species

Some More Observed Speciation Events

There are lots more. What does Jimmy Swaggert have in response?

 

[TNHarley]

It's not natural evolution

beat me to it

 

[RetiredGySgt]

there is not all you have is similarity in DNA.

Lie. We have way more than that. Especially when it comes to DNA. Has it occured to you that you have no idea what you are talking about?

LOL you ignore the Fact that science has no real evidence just conjecture and tell me I am ignorant? You ignore the fact science has no clear connection between all the supposed ancestor of man and call me ignorant? And there is no clear DNA foot print except to Neanderthal

While science marches on with new discoveries, even the clear connection to Neanderthal DNA is a refutation to a 6,000 year old planet, A&E fables and Noah's pleasure cruise.

Mystery ancestor mated with ancient humans. And its 'nested' DNA was just found.

Today's humans carry the genes of an ancient, unknown ancestor, left there by hominin species intermingling perhaps a million years ago.

www.google.com

already debunked your ignorant claim to 6000 year old earth being anything other then a fringe belief.

 

[Hollie]

there is not all you have is similarity in DNA.

Lie. We have way more than that. Especially when it comes to DNA. Has it occured to you that you have no idea what you are talking about?

LOL you ignore the Fact that science has no real evidence just conjecture and tell me I am ignorant? You ignore the fact science has no clear connection between all the supposed ancestor of man and call me ignorant? And there is no clear DNA foot print except to Neanderthal

While science marches on with new discoveries, even the clear connection to Neanderthal DNA is a refutation to a 6,000 year old planet, A&E fables and Noah's pleasure cruise.

Mystery ancestor mated with ancient humans. And its 'nested' DNA was just found.

Today's humans carry the genes of an ancient, unknown ancestor, left there by hominin species intermingling perhaps a million years ago.

www.google.com

already debunked your ignorant claim to 6000 year old earth being anything other then a fringe belief.

A 6,000 year old planet is not such a fringe belief. Otherwise, how does anyone resolve other fables; Noah's Ark, people living for 900 years, the lack of humans frolicking with dinosaurs, etc.?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

But the shift of a wolf to a dog. Is like the shift of an Negro to a Swed.

Yes and no. Dogs and wolves have mich more genetic variability than humans. But this still is evolution. And you have already admitted evolution on the larger scale. You admit genetics can change. Given enough tome, they change a LOT. And you have NO argument to the contrary.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

already debunked your ignorant claim to 6000 year old earth being anything other then a fringe belief.

Its stupid and wrong. The only reason it is not a laughingstock across the entire population is because there are a billion christians who were brainwashed as children.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It's not natural evolution

beat me to it

Yet still evolution. And it demonstrates the concept of genetic changes over a population. Which is evolution.

 

[Dadoalex]

There is ZERO functional difference between them.

But there are genetic differences. I know they are the same species. But it is, indeed, an example of evolution, in the strict sense.

Birds evolved from dinosaurs but I'm sure there are genetic differences.

Uh...okay. That's a safe bet.

Is a feather a modified scale ? OR is a scale a modified feather ???

Both and neither.

 

[Mr Natural]

No, they’re proof of intra species breeding.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

I don't have a science background and don't know much about evolution but I believe the answer to my question is YES. What say you? Here's an article that delves into the topic.

From Wolves to Pugs and Great Danes – The History of Dog Breeds

Updated October 24, 2024 – Learn about the evolution of dogs and how they went from wolves to the loving pets we keep in our homes.

www.morrisanimalfoundation.org

God said "kknd" can only reproduce after "kind"

Show us where a dog has been bred into a cat. Or a fish

 

[RetiredGySgt]

there is not all you have is similarity in DNA.

Lie. We have way more than that. Especially when it comes to DNA. Has it occured to you that you have no idea what you are talking about?

LOL you ignore the Fact that science has no real evidence just conjecture and tell me I am ignorant? You ignore the fact science has no clear connection between all the supposed ancestor of man and call me ignorant? And there is no clear DNA foot print except to Neanderthal

While science marches on with new discoveries, even the clear connection to Neanderthal DNA is a refutation to a 6,000 year old planet, A&E fables and Noah's pleasure cruise.

Mystery ancestor mated with ancient humans. And its 'nested' DNA was just found.

Today's humans carry the genes of an ancient, unknown ancestor, left there by hominin species intermingling perhaps a million years ago.

www.google.com

already debunked your ignorant claim to 6000 year old earth being anything other then a fringe belief.

A 6,000 year old planet is not such a fringe belief. Otherwise, how does anyone resolve other fables; Noah's Ark, people living for 900 years, the lack of humans frolicking with dinosaurs, etc.?

you are beyond stupid and yes it is fringe few people believe it.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

God said "kknd" can only reproduce after "kind"

A principle evolution does not violate. Maybe you should learn the basic concepts before commenting.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

us where a dog has been bred into a cat. Or a fish

This is the kind of statement one would expect from an 8 year old hearing about evolution for the first time.