Are Republicans going to make sure the Georgia Senate runoff counts are fair?

ColonelAngus

Diamond Member
Feb 25, 2015
52,117
52,059
3,615
There should be 1 Dem and 1 Pub count watcher for EVERY SINGLE COUNTER. PERIOD.

Each watcher should agree on EVERY SINGLE BALLOT COUNTED. PERIOD.

Those not agreed to by both parties should be separated and viewed by additional poll watchers and officials to determine validity.


Its not complicated.
 
There should be 1 Dem and 1 Pub count watcher for EVERY SINGLE COUNTER. PERIOD.

Each watcher should agree on EVERY SINGLE BALLOT COUNTED. PERIOD.

Those not agreed to by both parties should be separated and viewed by additional poll watchers and officials to determine validity.


Its not complicated.

Should libertarians trust either one?
 
There should be 1 Dem and 1 Pub count watcher for EVERY SINGLE COUNTER. PERIOD.

Each watcher should agree on EVERY SINGLE BALLOT COUNTED. PERIOD.

Those not agreed to by both parties should be separated and viewed by additional poll watchers and officials to determine validity.


Its not complicated.

Should libertarians trust either one?

Is there a Liberatarian candidate in the 2 Georgia Senate runoff elections?

I ust have missed that. Post a link.
 
There should be 1 Dem and 1 Pub count watcher for EVERY SINGLE COUNTER. PERIOD.

Each watcher should agree on EVERY SINGLE BALLOT COUNTED. PERIOD.

Those not agreed to by both parties should be separated and viewed by additional poll watchers and officials to determine validity.


Its not complicated.

Just like the Presidential election.

If there's a Civil War, maybe it's a coinflip today, I hope people will remember GA GOP for the heroes they were for Biden and the CCP
 
There should be 1 Dem and 1 Pub count watcher for EVERY SINGLE COUNTER. PERIOD.

Each watcher should agree on EVERY SINGLE BALLOT COUNTED. PERIOD.

Those not agreed to by both parties should be separated and viewed by additional poll watchers and officials to determine validity.


Its not complicated.

Should libertarians trust either one?

Is there a Liberatarian candidate in the 2 Georgia Senate runoff elections?

I ust have missed that. Post a link.

There isn't. So?

Why should anyone believe the observers?
 
There should be 1 Dem and 1 Pub count watcher for EVERY SINGLE COUNTER. PERIOD.

Each watcher should agree on EVERY SINGLE BALLOT COUNTED. PERIOD.

Those not agreed to by both parties should be separated and viewed by additional poll watchers and officials to determine validity.


Its not complicated.

Should libertarians trust either one?

Is there a Liberatarian candidate in the 2 Georgia Senate runoff elections?

I ust have missed that. Post a link.

There isn't. So?

Why should anyone believe the observers?

In a non-Clown world, you would think that party members would work for the party.

But we are indeed, in a clown world.
 
Isn't that the point of the proposed boycott? To force Republicans to ensure voters the Senate elections will be fair. Although judging by the so-called leadership there, not sure anything will help.
 
There should be 1 Dem and 1 Pub count watcher for EVERY SINGLE COUNTER. PERIOD.

Each watcher should agree on EVERY SINGLE BALLOT COUNTED. PERIOD.

Those not agreed to by both parties should be separated and viewed by additional poll watchers and officials to determine validity.


Its not complicated.

This year Republicans are the 250 pound heavyweight champions of the world who accepted bribe money to take a fall in the fifth round. So . . . the answer is: no. My guess, and it's a damn good one, is Republicans are gonna smile and pretend to fight the "good" fight even as evil sodomizes them over and over again at the polls. Yes, technically, I am a Republican and I support this message and shall support it until a single actual elected Republican politician stands up for America rather than bends over for the democrats.
 
There should be 1 Dem and 1 Pub count watcher for EVERY SINGLE COUNTER. PERIOD.

Each watcher should agree on EVERY SINGLE BALLOT COUNTED. PERIOD.

Those not agreed to by both parties should be separated and viewed by additional poll watchers and officials to determine validity.


Its not complicated.

Right! It's not complicated.

But cheaters always find a way.

Hear tell Ms. Abrams, that model of integrity, has hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots all ready to go.
 
Out of control paranoia.

The way you guys are acting, I'm beginning to think NO watchers should be allowed to observe. The ones you had obviously didn't know what in hell they were doing, or their affidavits wouldn't have been thrown out of court FORTY times.
 
There should be 1 Dem and 1 Pub count watcher for EVERY SINGLE COUNTER. PERIOD.

Each watcher should agree on EVERY SINGLE BALLOT COUNTED. PERIOD.

Those not agreed to by both parties should be separated and viewed by additional poll watchers and officials to determine validity.


Its not complicated.
That's how it works for hand recounts right now, 1 dem, 1 republican, and one arbitrator if there is disagreement.
 
Isn't that the point of the proposed boycott? To force Republicans to ensure voters the Senate elections will be fair. Although judging by the so-called leadership there, not sure anything will help.

Boycott is stupid. Handing over the Senate to the Dims is a bad idea.
Which is why Georgia Republicans had better find a way to make sure people are confident in the process. The full signature audit only helps if they also audit eligibility. I guess we'll see.
 
There should be 1 Dem and 1 Pub count watcher for EVERY SINGLE COUNTER. PERIOD.

Each watcher should agree on EVERY SINGLE BALLOT COUNTED. PERIOD.

Those not agreed to by both parties should be separated and viewed by additional poll watchers and officials to determine validity.


Its not complicated.
But that's like another poll tax.

Besides, we can't have clansmen intimidating voters.

(Just getting you ready for the Prog BS)
 
Isn't that the point of the proposed boycott? To force Republicans to ensure voters the Senate elections will be fair. Although judging by the so-called leadership there, not sure anything will help.

Boycott is stupid. Handing over the Senate to the Dims is a bad idea.
Which is why Georgia Republicans had better find a way to make sure people are confident in the process. The full signature audit only helps if they also audit eligibility. I guess we'll see.
"Eligibility?"
 
Isn't that the point of the proposed boycott? To force Republicans to ensure voters the Senate elections will be fair. Although judging by the so-called leadership there, not sure anything will help.
How would it do that? All it would "ensure" is that Trump lost.
 

Forum List

Back
Top