Are insiders making millions off Trump tweets ?

Oh, I think I will be okay. The pain is subsiding.

If I feel like it, I'll be sure to let you know if I do.
You will. For sure. You will also make the same, unevidenced claims you were dancing around.

For sure.
 
You will. For sure. You will also make the same, unevidenced claims you were dancing around.

For sure.
How do you explain Piglosi outperforming any and all professionals by huge margins? Not a one time deal, a decades long deal.
 
How do you explain Piglosi outperforming any and all professionals by huge margins?
The same way others have outperformed professionals. Skill and luck.

It happens. Some people owned just NVidia stock. Look at their performance.

Got anything real? No?

Thought not.

"They did so well, like 100s of 1000s of other people have!"

Yawn
 
Hes not a nice guy but that girl he was ******* was 17. Legal.
Let’s assume that the young woman was of legal age in that location. That doesn’t make him any less of a pedo.

You, for instance, can’t claim that she was the only one he ever screwed at Epstein land. Nor would you know the ages of those victims.

Even if she was 17, being forced to have sec with him is still rape. So your defense of the royal formerly known as as PRINCE is “he may be a rapist but he’s not technically a rapist.
 
The same way others have outperformed professionals. Skill and luck.

It happens. Some people owned just NVidia stock. Look at their performance.

Got anything real? No?

Thought not.

"They did so well, like 100s of 1000s of other people have!"

Yawn
Link us up to someone else with a 16,930% return, Dumbass.
 
Let’s assume that the young woman was of legal age in that location. That doesn’t make him any less of a pedo.

You, for instance, can’t claim that she was the only one he ever screwed at Epstein land. Nor would you know the ages of those victims.

Even if she was 17, being forced to have sec with him is still rape. So your defense of the royal formerly known as as PRINCE is “he may be a rapist but he’s not technically a rapist.
Hes as big a paedo as trump,
 
There is simply no credible evidence of President Trump ever being a pedo.
So, if i burst into your 15 year old daughter's dressing room unannounced, while she and her friends were half naked, then stood there and looked around and gave a little speech, you would tell everyone to calm down and then defend me and say there is no evidence I am a pedophile.

Noted.

Very strange.

Cultism certainly does strange things, to a mind.
 
15th post
So, if i burst into your 15 year old daughter's dressing room unannounced, while she and her friends were half naked, then stood there and looked around and gave a little speech, you would tell everyone to calm down and then defend me and say there is no evidence I am a pedophile.

Noted.

Very strange.
If I ever allowed a daughter of mine to be in one of those freak shows, I would hardly be surprised that some males get backstage access.

It’s sadly a well documented phenomenon.

It strikes me as unacceptable, but not a valid basis for any claim of pedophilia.
 
If I ever allowed a daughter of mine to be in one of those freak shows, I would hardly be surprised that some males get backstage access.

It’s sadly a well documented phenomenon.

It strikes me as unacceptable, but not a valid basis for any claim of pedophilia.
So you would defend me as not being a pedophile. Te everyone to calm down, nothing wrong with bursting into the 15 year old's dressing room.

Very strange.

You're lying.
 
So you would defend me as not being a pedophile.

First off, your use of slanted rhetoric is too obvious to be meaningful. He didn’t “burst in.”

And if you did manage to get some of your jollies by seeing a room full of scantily clad or naked young female contestants, I would still deny that this constitutes being a pedophile. A bit pervy. No doubt. But pedophilia has an actual meaning which your scenario doesn’t meet.
Te everyone to calm down, nothing wrong with bursting into the 15 year old's dressing room.
No bursting in. And in a better world, perhaps we could instead just make that potential pervy behavior impossible.
Very strange.

You certainly are
You're lying.
No. I’m not. I don’t think that you are, wither. You’re simply a moron.
 
First off, your use of slanted rhetoric is too obvious to be meaningful. He didn’t “burst in.”

And if you did manage to get some of your jollies by seeing a room full of scantily clad or naked young female contestants, I would still deny that this constitutes being a pedophile. A bit pervy. No doubt. But pedophilia has an actual meaning which your scenario doesn’t meet.

No bursting in. And in a better world, perhaps we could instead just make that potential pervy behavior impossible.


You certainly are

No. I’m not. I don’t think that you are, wither. You’re simply a moron.
You magas will excuse any behaviour if its your guy.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom