Are all of Biden’s pardons that were autopenned signed INVALID?

[ThisIsMe]

Nope. One thing we know is that pardons can’t cover future crimes. None of Biden’s pardons do that.

Where does it say that? You are trying to use the letter of the law, "it doesn't say that", and you are trying to say no crime need he committed, or articulated, and that you can pardon someone on the speculation that they might at some point in the future, be investigated for crimes, so, then where does it say that trump can't pardon all republican members of congress and president's now and into the future.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Nope. I know exactly what it covers. It’s actually far more concrete than Trump’s pardon for Jan 6th rioters. Courts are having to try to figure out who and what is covered by it.

No, "any and all' doesn't articulate a crime and if you are saying to crime is needed, then trump should simply offer a blanket pardon for every republican in office, forever.

 

[Marener]

Where does it say that? You are trying to use the letter of the law, "it doesn't say that", and you are trying to say no crime need he committed, or articulated, and that you can pardon someone on the speculation that they might at some point in the future, be investigated for crimes, so, then where does it say that trump can't pardon all republican members of congress and president's now and into the future.

It’s the definition of the word pardon.

 

[Blisterfinger]

Nope. I know exactly what it covers. It’s actually far more concrete than Trump’s pardon for Jan 6th rioters. Courts are having to try to figure out who and what is covered by it.

Unsigned documents are not valid. Biden was not mentally competent, you were fooled.

Because Trump is a vindictive man and his corrupt DoJ would persecute his family.

That is your opinion however untrue it is. Biden was incompetent however, that is proven.

The case was dismissed. The documents stayed with the government.

We don’t need to admit any documents in court. The constitution doesn’t say anything about pardons having to be documents.

Unsigned documents typically are not valid and cannot hold up in court. You are wrong (corrupt also )you might as well admit it. Let the investigations begin! I am so excited to finally find out what was going on. The levels of depravity and dishonesty that you and your ilk are willing to sink to makes me sick to my stomach. See Hunters laptop

 

[Marener]

No, "any and all' doesn't articulate a crime and if you are saying to crime is needed, then trump should simply offer a blanket pardon for every republican in office, forever.

Any and all adequately identifies what crimes they are pardoned for.

Trump absolutely can issue a pardon for every Republican for all time in the past. The constitution allows it.

 

[Marener]

Unsigned documents are not valid. Biden was not mentally competent, you were fooled.

That is your opinion however untrue it is. Biden was incompetent however, that is proven.

Unsigned documents typically are not valid and cannot hold up in court. You are wrong (corrupt also )you might as well admit it. Let the investigations begin! I am so excited to finally find out what was going on. The levels of depravity and dishonesty that you and your ilk are willing to sink to makes me sick to my stomach. See Hunters laptop

You’re so obsessed with the document when there’s nothing in the constitution that requires it.

 

[Invisibleflash]

https://nypost.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/03/chrome-capture-2025-3-17.jpeg?quality=75&strip=all

How hilarious would this be?

Trump says Biden’s autopen pardons are ‘void, vacant and of no further force or effect,’ vows probe of Jan. 6 House select committee

President Trump claims pardons made by Biden in the last minutes of his presidency have been “VOID, VACANT, AND OF NO FURTHER FORCE OR EFFECT” since the former commander-in-chief used “Autopen.”…

nypost.com

If none of the pardons of valid, some of these bad actors are in deep doody.

Adam Schiff? Hunter? Fauci?

I hope so. But puss reps won't do anything. Have you seen any arrests yet?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

For what federal crime?

You do not need to specify the crime. What part of that are you not getting?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

So, I'll ask you the same question. Can trump pardon all future republican presidents and members of congress? From now until the end of time?

Simple answer. No.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Let's say we find out next week that Hunter is being implicated in a murder committed in 2017.

You're fine with him not being charged?

He could be charged by the state where he committed the murder. Not federally because the crime was not against the United States.

 

[WEATHER53]

A pardon is a forgiving of what you did wrong. If you did not step on anyone’s foot then you don’t need a “pardon me”

 

[Marener]

A pardon is a forgiving of what you did wrong. If you did not step on anyone’s foot then you don’t need a “pardon me”

Michael Flynn took a pardon. Are you guys finally agreeing that he lied to the FBI and committed a crime?

 

[ThisIsMe]

It’s the definition of the word pardon.

Please give us that definition and from where you got it

 

[ThisIsMe]

Any and all adequately identifies what crimes they are pardoned for.

Trump absolutely can issue a pardon for every Republican for all time in the past. The constitution allows it.

And future, the cotus doesn't forbid it.

"Any and all" doesn't specify a crime...again, you are going with the "whatever crimes you may have committed, even if we don't even know you committed a crime" blanket idea. If a crime does not need to be specified, then there is nothing stopping a president from pardoning future people.

 

[ThisIsMe]

You do not need to specify the crime. What part of that are you not getting?

A pardon is for a federal crime only. If you don't have a federal crime, then what are you pardoning?

 

[SeaMajor7]

Nixon was likely going to be impeached, removed and then would have endured a federal prosecution for any number of crimes. His resignation eliminated the first two, but not the last one, which was removed by Ford's pardon.

The only way to prove Biden didn't authorize the use of his auto-pen to sign the pardons is for him to personally admit that he did not. Why would he ever do such a thing?

In the military, I had "by direction" authority of my commanding officer. It was a letter stating what and under which circumstances that I could assume my commanding officer's authority to sign for the command. Waivers for enlistment had to be done by the commanding officer himself in most cases. If he was unavailable, he could authorize me to sign in his stead. I had the same authorization if my executive officer was unavailable.

I doubt Biden signed a letter listing all the people he was pardoning and authorized use of the auto-pen to sign the repetitive paperwork of the pardons, but he very well could have.

Biden was told who he "pardoned".
You are excusing serious bullshit that is antithetical to the rule of Law.
The last "administration" was a puppet show, and all HELL should fall upon the marionettes.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Simple answer. No.

Why not? You don't need a crime, you don't even need a crime to have been committed. You are just saying "eh...whatever crimes against the country you may have committed are pardoned"

if a crime need not be committed, then why forbid pardons on future crimes?

 

[Marener]

Please give us that definition and from where you got it

Law dictionary.

PARDON

An act of grace, proceeding from tlie power intrusted with the execution of the laws, which exempts the individual on whom it is bestowed from the punishment the law inflicts for a crime he has committed. U. S. v. Wilson, 7 Pet. ICO, 8 L. Ed. 040; Ex parte Garland, 4 Wall. 3S0, 18 L. […]

thelawdictionary.org

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

A pardon is for a federal crime only. If you don't have a federal crime, then what are you pardoning?

The pardon specifically states it is for any and all crimes against the United States during the period X to Y.

 

[Marener]

And future, the cotus doesn't forbid it.

"Any and all" doesn't specify a crime...again, you are going with the "whatever crimes you may have committed, even if we don't even know you committed a crime" blanket idea. If a crime does not need to be specified, then there is nothing stopping a president from pardoning future people.

No. The definition of pardon is for past crimes. SCOTUS said as much in ex parte Garland.