Apparently Dinosaurs Are Also Bad For The Environment

[Weatherman2020]

Climate activists glue themselves to dinosaur display in Germany​

The museum should have done what Volkswagen did - leave them there glued down and turn off the lights and gone home. Let them crap their pants for everyone to see.

Climate activists glue themselves to dinosaur display in Germany - National | Globalnews.ca

The women used superglue to attach themselves to poles holding up the skeleton of a large four-legged dinosaur that lived tens of millions of years ago.

globalnews.ca

 

[wamose]

So, these ladies yearn for the good old days when you could walk outside and get eaten by a hungry dinosaur? The disappearance of dinosaurs means change can be good. The problem is that Democrat bigots will never see two sides of a story because they refuse to open their minds. They're too lazy to think for themselves so they let their totalitarian party tell them what to think.

 

[JoeB131]

Dinosaurs are a menace?

 

[JoeB131]

So, these ladies yearn for the good old days when you could walk outside and get eaten by a hungry dinosaur? The disappearance of dinosaurs means change can be good. The problem is that Democrat bigots will never see two sides of a story because they refuse to open their minds. They're too lazy to think for themselves so they let their totalitarian party tell them what to think.

I thought you wingnuts didn't believe in evolution and you think Dinosaur Bones were planted by the Devil to fool us?

 

[Carl in Michigan]

I thought you wingnuts didn't believe in evolution and you think Dinosaur Bones were planted by the Devil to fool us?

View attachment 718584

You thought wrong. As usual.

There are MANY theories.

 

[Weatherman2020]

I thought you wingnuts didn't believe in evolution and you think Dinosaur Bones were planted by the Devil to fool us?

View attachment 718584

Go read up on all of the Dino fossils found with soft tissue in them and get back to us with a report.

 

[JoeB131]

I thought you wingnuts didn't believe in evolution and you think Dinosaur Bones were planted by the Devil to fool us?

Wingnut irony alert...

You thought wrong. As usual.

There are MANY theories.

Wait for it... wait for it...

Go read up on all of the Dino fossils found with soft tissue in them and get back to us with a report.

Dinosaur fossils have no soft tissue... they are all fossilized rock.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Wingnut irony alert...



Wait for it... wait for it...



Dinosaur fossils have no soft tissue... they are all fossilized rock.

Scientists Find Soft Tissue in 75‑Million‑Year‑Old Dinosaur Bones | HISTORY

In a pile of unpromising dinosaur fossils dug up in Canada a century ago, British scientists find soft tissue materials preserved for some 75 million years.

www.history.com

 

[alang1216]

Climate activists glue themselves to dinosaur display in Germany​

The museum should have done what Volkswagen did - leave them there glued down and turn off the lights and gone home. Let them crap their pants for everyone to see.

Climate activists glue themselves to dinosaur display in Germany - National | Globalnews.ca

The women used superglue to attach themselves to poles holding up the skeleton of a large four-legged dinosaur that lived tens of millions of years ago.

globalnews.ca

One the one hand, very silly. On the other, you have heard their protest and are spreading it around. I'm sure they'll be thanking you soon.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Wingnut irony alert...



Wait for it... wait for it...



Dinosaur fossils have no soft tissue... they are all fossilized rock.

You’re always wrong because you live in a bubble world.

Scientists Find Soft Tissue in 75-Million-Year-Old Dinosaur Bones​

Which dovetails right into ‘it’s not 75 million years, it’s 7,500 years’.
Which explains why Cambodians knew what a stegosaurus looked like in 1,000 AD.

And why I found this 13th century painting in Estonia.

Scientists Find Soft Tissue in 75‑Million‑Year‑Old Dinosaur Bones | HISTORY

In a pile of unpromising dinosaur fossils dug up in Canada a century ago, British scientists find soft tissue materials preserved for some 75 million years.

www.history.com

 

[JoeB131]

Scientists Find Soft Tissue in 75‑Million‑Year‑Old Dinosaur Bones | HISTORY

In a pile of unpromising dinosaur fossils dug up in Canada a century ago, British scientists find soft tissue materials preserved for some 75 million years.

www.history.com

Wow... you clearly didn't understand the science.

They did not find organic material.. They found soft tissue that was fossilized - turned to stone - because of the way the animal was preserved.

Oh, History.com... isn't that the same website that claims aliens are real?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Wow... you clearly didn't understand the science.

They did not find organic material.. They found soft tissue that was fossilized - turned to stone - because of the way the animal was preserved.

Oh, History.com... isn't that the same website that claims aliens are real?

Wow... you clearly didn't understand the science.

They did not find organic material.. They found soft tissue that was fossilized - turned to stone - because of the way the animal was preserved.

Oh, History.com... isn't that the same website that claims aliens are real?

Red blood and bone cells have been found.
But you think masks keep you safe, the jab prevents the spread of the ChiCom flu, and humans can change sex on a whim.

 

[JoeB131]

You’re always wrong because you live in a bubble world.

Scientists Find Soft Tissue in 75-Million-Year-Old Dinosaur Bones​

Which dovetails right into ‘it’s not 75 million years, it’s 7,500 years’.
Which explains why Cambodians knew what a stegosaurus looked like in 1,000 AD.

Wow... holy shit.

Here's something from REAL scientists.

Stegosaurus, Rhinoceros, or Hoax?

www.smithsonianmag.com

Even so, the sculpture only vaguely looks like a rhino or boar. We can be certain that it is not a representation of a living Stegosaurus, but could it be a more recent attempt at depicting a dinosaur? Indeed, it is quite possible that this carving has been fabricated. There are many sculptures at the temple, and the origin of the carving in question is unknown. There are rumors that it was created recently, perhaps by a visiting movie crew (the temple is a favorite locale for filmmakers), and it is possible that someone created something Stegosaurus-like during the past few years as a joke.

Either way, the temple carving can in no way be used as evidence that humans and non-avian dinosaurs coexisted. Fossils have inspired some myths (see Adrienne Mayor's excellent book The First Fossil Hunters), but close scrutiny of geological layers, reliable radiometric dating techniques, the lack of dinosaur fossils in strata younger than the Cretaceous, and other lines of evidence all confirm that non-avian dinosaurs became extinct tens of millions of years before there was any type of culture that could have recorded what they looked like. As scientist Carl Sagan said, "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence", and in the case of modern dinosaurs the evidence just isn't there.

 

[JoeB131]

Red blood and bone cells have been found.

No, they haven't. History.com is a bullshit site.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Wow... holy shit.

Here's something from REAL scientists.

Stegosaurus, Rhinoceros, or Hoax?

www.smithsonianmag.com

Even so, the sculpture only vaguely looks like a rhino or boar. We can be certain that it is not a representation of a living Stegosaurus, but could it be a more recent attempt at depicting a dinosaur? Indeed, it is quite possible that this carving has been fabricated. There are many sculptures at the temple, and the origin of the carving in question is unknown. There are rumors that it was created recently, perhaps by a visiting movie crew (the temple is a favorite locale for filmmakers), and it is possible that someone created something Stegosaurus-like during the past few years as a joke.

Either way, the temple carving can in no way be used as evidence that humans and non-avian dinosaurs coexisted. Fossils have inspired some myths (see Adrienne Mayor's excellent book The First Fossil Hunters), but close scrutiny of geological layers, reliable radiometric dating techniques, the lack of dinosaur fossils in strata younger than the Cretaceous, and other lines of evidence all confirm that non-avian dinosaurs became extinct tens of millions of years before there was any type of culture that could have recorded what they looked like. As scientist Carl Sagan said, "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence", and in the case of modern dinosaurs the evidence just isn't there.

I’ve seen it with my own eyes.
It’s real and it’s a stegosaurus.

 

[Weatherman2020]

No, they haven't. History.com is a bullshit site.

It so in several scientific journals, denier.

BTW - this is in a 13th century church that has Bible scenes throughout the church because most couldn’t read then.

It’s a scene from Job.

How’d they know what a brontosaurus looked like?
Job 40:
What strength it has in its loins,what power in the muscles of its belly! “Look at Behemoth,which I made along with youand which feeds on grass like an ox. Its tail sways like a cedar;the sinews of its thighs are close-knit. Its bones are tubes of bronze,its limbs like rods of iron. It ranks first among the works of God,yet its Maker can approach it with his sword.

 

[Crick]

It so in several scientific journals, denier.

BTW - this is in a 13th century church that has Bible scenes throughout the church because most couldn’t read then.

It’s a scene from Job.

How’d they know what a brontosaurus looked like?
Job 40:
What strength it has in its loins,what power in the muscles of its belly! “Look at Behemoth,which I made along with youand which feeds on grass like an ox. Its tail sways like a cedar;the sinews of its thighs are close-knit. Its bones are tubes of bronze,its limbs like rods of iron. It ranks first among the works of God,yet its Maker can approach it with his sword.

View attachment 719034

How about a link to the source of this image?

 

[JoeB131]

I’ve seen it with my own eyes.
It’s real and it’s a stegosaurus.

Really, because most people concluded that it's a picture of a Rhino and the plates are actually leaves.

Should also point out that Stegosaurus was native to North America, and this temple is in Cambodia.

It so in several scientific journals, denier.

BTW - this is in a 13th century church that has Bible scenes throughout the church because most couldn’t read then.

It’s a scene from Job.

How’d they know what a brontosaurus looked like?

Actually, no, it isn't.

What is pictured there are pretty clearly camels, drawn by someone who probably never saw a camel before.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Really, because most people concluded that it's a picture of a Rhino and the plates are actually leaves.

Should also point out that Stegosaurus was native to North America, and this temple is in Cambodia.



Actually, no, it isn't.

What is pictured there are pretty clearly camels, drawn by someone who probably never saw a camel before.

‘Most’ people.