AOC and Lunatic Mainstream Democrats Call Trump “War Criminal”

[charwin95]

Do you want to talk about any Asian countries affaires? Or Europe?

I can do that too. Like judicial killings in the Philippines. Any countries.

 

[ABikerSailor]

what these bumbling idiots don't realize is that button could very well have been a nuclear missile rather than a surface to air missile at the jet. That's how bumbling of idiots the operations teams in their military are. Yep, instead of 176 dead, it could have been over a million. But the leftists fks in our country are far to sophisticated to ever understand that logic.

Hey stupid, Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons yet, so how in the hell could it have been a nuke? Not only that, but using a nuke as a first strike weapon is something that could bring the whole world down on them.

how the fk do you know? when did you go and inspect their facilities exactly? I like again, you all think you got all the news. it's fking hilarious I tell you. No mthr fkr, you haven't a clue in hell on what they got. so shut the fk up and save some face.

The original Iran nuclear deal said that they had to get rid of a lot of their nuclear material (which they did, as it was verified by inspections), as well as slow down on a lot of their nuclear production, which they also did under the agreement. They hadn't yet acquired material suitable for building a bomb, and the agreement made sure they wouldn't for at least 10 years. Since they don't have the material to build a nuke, how in the hell are they going to fire a nuclear missile? Short answer, they can't. And no, using a nuke as a first strike weapon isn't something that any country with nuclear weapons would consider.

 

[Cellblock2429]

what these bumbling idiots don't realize is that button could very well have been a nuclear missile rather than a surface to air missile at the jet. That's how bumbling of idiots the operations teams in their military are. Yep, instead of 176 dead, it could have been over a million. But the leftists fks in our country are far to sophisticated to ever understand that logic.

Hey stupid, Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons yet, so how in the hell could it have been a nuke? Not only that, but using a nuke as a first strike weapon is something that could bring the whole world down on them.

how the fk do you know? when did you go and inspect their facilities exactly? I like again, you all think you got all the news. it's fking hilarious I tell you. No mthr fkr, you haven't a clue in hell on what they got. so shut the fk up and save some face.

The original Iran nuclear deal said that they had to get rid of a lot of their nuclear material (which they did, as it was verified by inspections), as well as slow down on a lot of their nuclear production, which they also did under the agreement. They hadn't yet acquired material suitable for building a bomb, and the agreement made sure they wouldn't for at least 10 years. Since they don't have the material to build a nuke, how in the hell are they going to fire a nuclear missile? Short answer, they can't. And no, using a nuke as a first strike weapon isn't something that any country with nuclear weapons would consider.

/—-/ You said slow down nuke production. Why the hell would you want a terror state to have any nuke production? Are you an idiot?

 

[Cellblock2429]

what these bumbling idiots don't realize is that button could very well have been a nuclear missile rather than a surface to air missile at the jet. That's how bumbling of idiots the operations teams in their military are. Yep, instead of 176 dead, it could have been over a million. But the leftists fks in our country are far to sophisticated to ever understand that logic.

Hey stupid, Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons yet, so how in the hell could it have been a nuke? Not only that, but using a nuke as a first strike weapon is something that could bring the whole world down on them.

That's the point Comrade. Obama paved the way for a nuclear Iran, he even paid for it. Trump stopped that shit, and you Communists are outraged, OUTRAGED I TELLS YA.

How the hell in the world you can say that?

Trump did not stop anything. None. You are very ignorant BG TIME.

Trump went in with no clue how and what he is doing. Trump is very dumb.

I love it when you accused people of communist or Marxist just because we are telling you the truth. But that shows we are winning.

In reality Trump helped and speed up the Iranians nuclear program. That’s a fact dude. Only way to stop that is an all out war.
For your ignorance read the link.



Iran abandons nuclear limits, says it is enriching more uranium than ever before

/—-/ What kind of fool believes anything coming out of a terror state?

Do you have anything else to add to your lousy rebuttal?

Because of Trump they abandoned the agreement. Is that supposed to be a lie? Is that supposed to be a Trump accomplishment?

/——/ Iran never signed the agreement. It’s was non binding so what did Trump walk away from? State Department: Iran Never Signed Nuclear Deal, Which Isn't 'Legally Binding'

 

[ABikerSailor]

what these bumbling idiots don't realize is that button could very well have been a nuclear missile rather than a surface to air missile at the jet. That's how bumbling of idiots the operations teams in their military are. Yep, instead of 176 dead, it could have been over a million. But the leftists fks in our country are far to sophisticated to ever understand that logic.

Hey stupid, Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons yet, so how in the hell could it have been a nuke? Not only that, but using a nuke as a first strike weapon is something that could bring the whole world down on them.

how the fk do you know? when did you go and inspect their facilities exactly? I like again, you all think you got all the news. it's fking hilarious I tell you. No mthr fkr, you haven't a clue in hell on what they got. so shut the fk up and save some face.

The original Iran nuclear deal said that they had to get rid of a lot of their nuclear material (which they did, as it was verified by inspections), as well as slow down on a lot of their nuclear production, which they also did under the agreement. They hadn't yet acquired material suitable for building a bomb, and the agreement made sure they wouldn't for at least 10 years. Since they don't have the material to build a nuke, how in the hell are they going to fire a nuclear missile? Short answer, they can't. And no, using a nuke as a first strike weapon isn't something that any country with nuclear weapons would consider.

/—-/ You said slow down nuke production. Why the hell would you want a terror state to have any nuke production? Are you an idiot?

You do know that there is a difference in producing nuclear material capable of running a plant, and the nuclear material capable of making a bomb, right? The treaty allowed Iran to keep nuclear production for power plants, but banned them from refining it to the point it could be used for weapons.

Nuclear Reactors and Nuclear Bombs: What Defines the Differences?

 

[jc456]

You don’t have a clue what you are talking about dude. None. All what you are saying is just pure crap. You are not making sense at all son.

The missiles attacked is a total slapped in our face.

Because WAHHHHHHH.

The attacks killed nor harmed any American. Either our defenses or so superior that your allies simply can't hit targets, or your Iranian masters know that if they harm or kill an American they will be fucked 5 ways from sunday and are deliberately missing.

Slap in the face? You're ******* stupid, you're desperately flinging shit like a feral baboon.

*** You cheered that this terrorist was killed and won’t kill any more Americans. Do you realized how dumb for you to say that? Why would killing Soleimani one lousy Iranian will stop any of that? Is there only one Iranian commander in Iran, no lieutenants that can easily take over. This proved that you don’t have a clue of what you are talking about.


I’m a a very patriotic Americans but I hate being represented by an inept lousy president. A total embarrassment who don’t give a shit to anybody but for his own interest. Nothing more.

Patriotic my ass. You cheer terrorists who kill thousands of Americans. You're an America hating Marxist scumbag. Did you dance in the streets on 9-11? Come on, you know you did....

Do you see my post admiring or cheering a terrorist?
Where in my post I cheered terrorist?

Just because I’m telling you exactly what is happening how dumb we look.
And how stupid you are.

You gave zero or nothing to counter act I’m Marxist?

Dude. You are a low life scumbag.

the minute you bashed Trump for killing a devil.

#506 this comment:The idea of these Iranians that can shot at us with 12 ballistic missiles. Made thousands of US. soldiers run for their lives is an embarrassment for world super power to take witness worldwide.

How many more do you need? Going against the president is all about backing the terrorists. even making excuses for them.

Wrong again.

Prove it

 

[jc456]

This shit is getting far too easy for me. Not one leftist puke in here can debate me. Not one. They insult me, then they put me on ignore. The reason? Because I don't back off my points. I expect they prove me wrong, and they can't. They can't because they have no facts to back any information they pander to in here. It has gotten too easy to win these days. They even stop now. Charwin executed one attack at me and then claimed I was correct, yet insulted me by calling me stupid and ignorant. I truly don't care, but I wanted it published that the left in here have absolutely nothing to debate.

What debate? I’m here.
You have zero none to counter act. NOTHING.
You don’t know anything dude..

Okay slim, where’s the money coming from?

Where’s the jobs?tens of millions will be out of work!

 

[jc456]

\

Wrong again dude. I don’t mind killing a terrorist but you just don’t kill a terrorist just for the heck of killing a terrorist.

Look at the results, impact and consequences. Is it worth all that troubles by killing one lousy Iranian? Americans are not safer.

I already explained to you why Bibi or Obama never took out these commanders.

I already explained to you the different results in killing Gaddafi and Soleimani. Sadly you are sticking with your nonsense.

Demonstrably not true, You throw a FIT because we killed a terrorist leader BEFORE he could do his 9-11. That gives you a sadz, as it does all your fellow terrorist loving democrat scum.

And we know with Gadaffi, he switched sides, he was helping the Americans hunt down Al Qaeda. Obama HAD to kill him for that, as a lesson to any other leader who might start cooperating with the Americans.

I throw a fit?
Let me repeat it again. Do you see anybody celebrating or cheering with your boy? NOBODY. Not even the republicans but 3 voted with democrats including Gaetz limiting Trump what he can with Iran.



He killed a terrorist BEFORE he can do his 9-11. Do you realized how dumb and ignorant you are saying that.
Soleimani is a commander. Are you saying there’s only one commander in Iran? Are you saying he doesn’t have generals and lieutenants that can carry attacks after him?

Look idiot like I said repeatedly that you don’t have have a clue of what you are saying......... If the Iranians wants to blow up US embassies. They can do that piece of cake...... very easily. But they are NOT that stupid.
YOU GOT THAT?

Soliemani was a terrorist who killed over 4000 Americans. Now democrats LOVE IT when Americans are killed. But decent folk like STOPPING terrorists before they put on a big show like 9-11.

You are a very good example of moron.

Where in my post that I love killing Americans?

Just because I’m telling you facts and reality. You ******* don’t like it. Too bad.
In reality like your buddies here you don’t know anything.

Let me repeat it again............. Is it worth all that troubles in killing one lousy Iranian? Look at the results? Is there any one cheering or celebrating with us in killing Soleimani? NOBODY NONE. Not even Bibi.
Have you seen a Republicans or any celebrating with Trump in killing Soleimani?

Now stick that to your ignorance and stupidity.

If the Iranians wants to blow up embassies. They can do that very easily. But they are not that stupid. Idiot.

What results? One evil fk dead thousands of lives saved. Turmoil in Iran. Seems all good

 

[jc456]

what these bumbling idiots don't realize is that button could very well have been a nuclear missile rather than a surface to air missile at the jet. That's how bumbling of idiots the operations teams in their military are. Yep, instead of 176 dead, it could have been over a million. But the leftists fks in our country are far to sophisticated to ever understand that logic.

Hey stupid, Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons yet, so how in the hell could it have been a nuke? Not only that, but using a nuke as a first strike weapon is something that could bring the whole world down on them.

how the fk do you know? when did you go and inspect their facilities exactly? I like again, you all think you got all the news. it's fking hilarious I tell you. No mthr fkr, you haven't a clue in hell on what they got. so shut the fk up and save some face.

The original Iran nuclear deal said that they had to get rid of a lot of their nuclear material (which they did, as it was verified by inspections), as well as slow down on a lot of their nuclear production, which they also did under the agreement. They hadn't yet acquired material suitable for building a bomb, and the agreement made sure they wouldn't for at least 10 years. Since they don't have the material to build a nuke, how in the hell are they going to fire a nuclear missile? Short answer, they can't. And no, using a nuke as a first strike weapon isn't something that any country with nuclear weapons would consider.

/—-/ You said slow down nuke production. Why the hell would you want a terror state to have any nuke production? Are you an idiot?

You do know that there is a difference in producing nuclear material capable of running a plant, and the nuclear material capable of making a bomb, right? The treaty allowed Iran to keep nuclear production for power plants, but banned them from refining it to the point it could be used for weapons.

Nuclear Reactors and Nuclear Bombs: What Defines the Differences?

Why is Europe going to raise sanctions for non compliance

 

[jc456]

what these bumbling idiots don't realize is that button could very well have been a nuclear missile rather than a surface to air missile at the jet. That's how bumbling of idiots the operations teams in their military are. Yep, instead of 176 dead, it could have been over a million. But the leftists fks in our country are far to sophisticated to ever understand that logic.

Hey stupid, Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons yet, so how in the hell could it have been a nuke? Not only that, but using a nuke as a first strike weapon is something that could bring the whole world down on them.

That's the point Comrade. Obama paved the way for a nuclear Iran, he even paid for it. Trump stopped that shit, and you Communists are outraged, OUTRAGED I TELLS YA.

BTW, I heard this morning that the European allies are about to put sanctions on Iran because......... Iran violated the agreement.

Funny, every mthr fking asset in here says they've been following the agreement. oops, don't they prove stupid today?

charwin95 is Iranian military/government. His posts are simply deranged on a Baghdad Bob level.

Did I hurt your feelings?

I’m pure American very patriotic. I’m not an expert in ME but I consider myself far educated about ME affairs than any body in this site.
Do you want to talk other countries? Any countries.
Trump got elected suddenly ignorant people like you become an expert that knows nothing about ME.

Far educated? Nope

 

[jc456]

what these bumbling idiots don't realize is that button could very well have been a nuclear missile rather than a surface to air missile at the jet. That's how bumbling of idiots the operations teams in their military are. Yep, instead of 176 dead, it could have been over a million. But the leftists fks in our country are far to sophisticated to ever understand that logic.

Hey stupid, Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons yet, so how in the hell could it have been a nuke? Not only that, but using a nuke as a first strike weapon is something that could bring the whole world down on them.

how the fk do you know? when did you go and inspect their facilities exactly? I like again, you all think you got all the news. it's fking hilarious I tell you. No mthr fkr, you haven't a clue in hell on what they got. so shut the fk up and save some face.

The original Iran nuclear deal said that they had to get rid of a lot of their nuclear material (which they did, as it was verified by inspections), as well as slow down on a lot of their nuclear production, which they also did under the agreement. They hadn't yet acquired material suitable for building a bomb, and the agreement made sure they wouldn't for at least 10 years. Since they don't have the material to build a nuke, how in the hell are they going to fire a nuclear missile? Short answer, they can't. And no, using a nuke as a first strike weapon isn't something that any country with nuclear weapons would consider.

There were no inspections

 

[Crepitus]

If he attacks "cultural heritige sites" like said he will be. That's a war crime.

If your terrorist heroes hide missiles in "cultural heritage sites", good bye "cultural heritage sites" If they hide them among women and children, well that's too bad too.

**** you for suggesting I approve of terrorists.

That's a RWNJ thing.

Obama gave Iran billions $$$ while they tortured women at same time. Democrats love Iran.
Iranian Women Prisoners Detail Torture: 'Death Was Like a Desire'

What don't you take Obama and stick him up your ass next to tRump.

I am sure you will be there to help when your friends like Omar, Pelosi and all raise The ISIS Flag over The White House, right?

Because that is how twisted you demonic children of Hell are. You will sleep with The Devil, worship him if it means Ollie Assburn can get you one step closer to your Fake Paradise.

Dude, you have completely lost your mind.

 

[Dragonlady]

what these bumbling idiots don't realize is that button could very well have been a nuclear missile rather than a surface to air missile at the jet. That's how bumbling of idiots the operations teams in their military are. Yep, instead of 176 dead, it could have been over a million. But the leftists fks in our country are far to sophisticated to ever understand that logic.

Hey stupid, Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons yet, so how in the hell could it have been a nuke? Not only that, but using a nuke as a first strike weapon is something that could bring the whole world down on them.

how the fk do you know? when did you go and inspect their facilities exactly? I like again, you all think you got all the news. it's fking hilarious I tell you. No mthr fkr, you haven't a clue in hell on what they got. so shut the fk up and save some face.

The original Iran nuclear deal said that they had to get rid of a lot of their nuclear material (which they did, as it was verified by inspections), as well as slow down on a lot of their nuclear production, which they also did under the agreement. They hadn't yet acquired material suitable for building a bomb, and the agreement made sure they wouldn't for at least 10 years. Since they don't have the material to build a nuke, how in the hell are they going to fire a nuclear missile? Short answer, they can't. And no, using a nuke as a first strike weapon isn't something that any country with nuclear weapons would consider.

There were no inspections

There were so inspections and Iran passed every one of them. Iran was in compliance but Dumb Donald tore up the treaty anyway.

Trump wants war with Iran. He c made that clear before the election.

 

[Daryl Hunt]

what these bumbling idiots don't realize is that button could very well have been a nuclear missile rather than a surface to air missile at the jet. That's how bumbling of idiots the operations teams in their military are. Yep, instead of 176 dead, it could have been over a million. But the leftists fks in our country are far to sophisticated to ever understand that logic.

Hey stupid, Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons yet, so how in the hell could it have been a nuke? Not only that, but using a nuke as a first strike weapon is something that could bring the whole world down on them.

how the fk do you know? when did you go and inspect their facilities exactly? I like again, you all think you got all the news. it's fking hilarious I tell you. No mthr fkr, you haven't a clue in hell on what they got. so shut the fk up and save some face.

The original Iran nuclear deal said that they had to get rid of a lot of their nuclear material (which they did, as it was verified by inspections), as well as slow down on a lot of their nuclear production, which they also did under the agreement. They hadn't yet acquired material suitable for building a bomb, and the agreement made sure they wouldn't for at least 10 years. Since they don't have the material to build a nuke, how in the hell are they going to fire a nuclear missile? Short answer, they can't. And no, using a nuke as a first strike weapon isn't something that any country with nuclear weapons would consider.

There were no inspections

There were so inspections and Iran passed every one of them. Iran was in compliance but Dumb Donald tore up the treaty anyway.

Trump wants war with Iran. He c made that clear before the election.

Shades of Bush Jr and Iraq.

 

[Cellblock2429]

what these bumbling idiots don't realize is that button could very well have been a nuclear missile rather than a surface to air missile at the jet. That's how bumbling of idiots the operations teams in their military are. Yep, instead of 176 dead, it could have been over a million. But the leftists fks in our country are far to sophisticated to ever understand that logic.

Hey stupid, Iran doesn't have nuclear weapons yet, so how in the hell could it have been a nuke? Not only that, but using a nuke as a first strike weapon is something that could bring the whole world down on them.

how the fk do you know? when did you go and inspect their facilities exactly? I like again, you all think you got all the news. it's fking hilarious I tell you. No mthr fkr, you haven't a clue in hell on what they got. so shut the fk up and save some face.

The original Iran nuclear deal said that they had to get rid of a lot of their nuclear material (which they did, as it was verified by inspections), as well as slow down on a lot of their nuclear production, which they also did under the agreement. They hadn't yet acquired material suitable for building a bomb, and the agreement made sure they wouldn't for at least 10 years. Since they don't have the material to build a nuke, how in the hell are they going to fire a nuclear missile? Short answer, they can't. And no, using a nuke as a first strike weapon isn't something that any country with nuclear weapons would consider.

/—-/ You said slow down nuke production. Why the hell would you want a terror state to have any nuke production? Are you an idiot?

You do know that there is a difference in producing nuclear material capable of running a plant, and the nuclear material capable of making a bomb, right? The treaty allowed Iran to keep nuclear production for power plants, but banned them from refining it to the point it could be used for weapons.

Nuclear Reactors and Nuclear Bombs: What Defines the Differences?

/—-/ Ever hear of a dirty bomb? You think it’s cool for terrorists who shout Death to America 24/7 to have access to nuclear material.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Did I hurt your feelings?

I’m pure American very patriotic. I’m not an expert in ME but I consider myself far educated about ME affairs than any body in this site.
Do you want to talk other countries? Any countries.
Trump got elected suddenly ignorant people like you become an expert that knows nothing about ME.

You're either Iranian military or part of the Mullahs. Either way, you are an enemy of America, You're a Baghdad Bob type of fool.

Oh and fool, what happened to WWIII? I guess we kicked your Arab (because the Persians are just ***** bois to the Arabs who rule Iran) asses all over the sand...

Kind of takes the fun out of attacks when your guidance systems get fried at take off....

 

[Uncensored2008]

Do you want to talk about any Asian countries affaires? Or Europe?

I can do that too. Like judicial killings in the Philippines. Any countries.

Anywhere there are Muslim insurgents, eh Farouk?

So are you the religious, or military caste?

 

[Uncensored2008]

\

Wrong again dude. I don’t mind killing a terrorist but you just don’t kill a terrorist just for the heck of killing a terrorist.

Look at the results, impact and consequences. Is it worth all that troubles by killing one lousy Iranian? Americans are not safer.

I already explained to you why Bibi or Obama never took out these commanders.

I already explained to you the different results in killing Gaddafi and Soleimani. Sadly you are sticking with your nonsense.

Demonstrably not true, You throw a FIT because we killed a terrorist leader BEFORE he could do his 9-11. That gives you a sadz, as it does all your fellow terrorist loving democrat scum.

And we know with Gadaffi, he switched sides, he was helping the Americans hunt down Al Qaeda. Obama HAD to kill him for that, as a lesson to any other leader who might start cooperating with the Americans.

I throw a fit?
Let me repeat it again. Do you see anybody celebrating or cheering with your boy? NOBODY. Not even the republicans but 3 voted with democrats including Gaetz limiting Trump what he can with Iran.



He killed a terrorist BEFORE he can do his 9-11. Do you realized how dumb and ignorant you are saying that.
Soleimani is a commander. Are you saying there’s only one commander in Iran? Are you saying he doesn’t have generals and lieutenants that can carry attacks after him?

Look idiot like I said repeatedly that you don’t have have a clue of what you are saying......... If the Iranians wants to blow up US embassies. They can do that piece of cake...... very easily. But they are NOT that stupid.
YOU GOT THAT?

Soliemani was a terrorist who killed over 4000 Americans. Now democrats LOVE IT when Americans are killed. But decent folk like STOPPING terrorists before they put on a big show like 9-11.

You are a very good example of moron.

Where in my post that I love killing Americans?

Just because I’m telling you facts and reality. You ******* don’t like it. Too bad.
In reality like your buddies here you don’t know anything.

Let me repeat it again............. Is it worth all that troubles in killing one lousy Iranian? Look at the results? Is there any one cheering or celebrating with us in killing Soleimani? NOBODY NONE. Not even Bibi.
Have you seen a Republicans or any celebrating with Trump in killing Soleimani?

Now stick that to your ignorance and stupidity.

If the Iranians wants to blow up embassies. They can do that very easily. But they are not that stupid. Idiot.

What results? One evil fk dead thousands of lives saved. Turmoil in Iran. Seems all good

ONLY for the Great Satan. For charwin95 this is a tragedy on every level. He faces the very real possibility that the people will revolt and overthrow the rule of the Mullahs. His life expectancy will be rather short if that happens....

 

[LaDairis]

Two recent Presidents were war criminals - W and LBJ.

They both started or escalated wars not in the US national interest over 100% pure lies to enrich, empower, and arm another country = Israel.

 

[Mac-7]

I haven't seen where he's said exactly what sites are part of the 52. I think you are reading into things on this one.

tRump's words, not mine.

"Let this serve as a WARNING that if Iran strikes any Americans, or American assets, we have.........targeted 52 Iranian sites (representing the 52 American hostages taken by Iran many years ago), some at a very high level & important to Iran & the Iranian culture, and those targets, and Iran itself, WILL BE HIT VERY FAST AND VERY HARD"

"important site" "important to Iranian 'culture' " does not seem to me
to be "cultural heritage sites" ------HOWEVER I would agree that if the
aggressions of Iranian sponsored groups like Hezbollah do involve trashing
of the cultural or holy sites of ---OTHERS----that equity demands an equal
and opposite reaction

So, what you're saying is you're ok with tRump committing war crimes.

There is Iran's side, and there is Trump's side. You are here to defend Iran's side.

So, what you're saying is you're OK with the whole war crimes thing?

Trump is not a war criminal and calling him one is divisive to the extreme