Anybody but Palin or Romney...

[Samson]

But don't get me wrong, Buckwheat isn't getting my vote again, that's for shit sure.

If the republicans nominate either Palin or Romney, I'll be voting third party or not at all.

A third party vote is a vote for Barrack.

And a Republican vote is a vote for the anti-Barrack.

You guys need to either shake up the Repubs from their fucking coma (McCain Anyone?), or get used to losing elections because 3rd parties garner votes, but the fear mongering using the Barrack Boogie Man isn't gonna hack it.

 

[VaYank5150]

Do We support the free expression of Ideas? Let them be Voiced. Seek out the merit and run with it soberly. Fuck the Puppet Masters from both Parties. Fuck the Control Freaks. Are We American's or Americant's? I support the Right of The Tea Party movement to Vent, to Question, and to challenge the status quo. The Process of picking Our Candidates is too bought and paid for. The chance that the Tea Parties can contribute to the platform and exposure of Candidates that otherwise have no chance of even being heard, is a risk I personally am willing to accept. Elections need desperately to transform from voting for the lesser Evil. Progressivism has infested both Parties. The vetting system insures outcome either way, one track faster, one track slower. We need another option, before Primary Season. Who else here is tired of fixed Races, fixed outcome? The Power of the State grows with every cycle. We need defense from both the State and Corporate Tyranny. Both in silent partnership are eating Us alive. The only thing We can bank on is We will fall before Them, if the course does not change.

This really isn't a question about the Tea Baggers. As Americans, they can pretty much do as they please, minus spitting on our members of Congress, of course. The problem here is that the GOP has aligned themselves with the Tea Baggers. So now, the GOP must be willin gto deal with the consequences of aligning themselves with a group that has no leadership and often attracts individuals with individual axes to grind. The GOP cannot be sort of in bed with the Tea Baggers, much like one cannot be sort of pregnant.

 

[Samson]

Whether anyone wants to admit it or not, the Tea Baggers are making the Democrats' job of paiting Republicans as racists easier and easier...

Immigration has always been a sticky issue for Republicans. Hispanics are a growing portion of the electorate. They vote, and many hispanics are legal citizens. On a great many issues they're aligned with the GOP.

However, every time Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, or Coulter open their mouth on immigration, they tend to tread dangerously close to the line on racism. And they tend to cost the GOP votes in the Hispanic community.

I think the problem for the GOP is that they are FOR upholding our immigration laws, but "appear" lenient to the corporations that hire them. If they got more consistent with their message, I do believe it would help them with the Hispanic vote.

Absolutely

The GOP is fucking themselves by not allowing as natural a constituancy as Hispanics to become registered voters.

Plus Salma Hayek would make a Helluva Candidate:

 

[Dr.Traveler]

I think the problem for the GOP is that they are FOR upholding our immigration laws, but "appear" lenient to the corporations that hire them. If they got more consistent with their message, I do believe it would help them with the Hispanic vote.

I see that as being the big issue. The use of Illegal immigrants in this country is the closest thing to slavery we've seen in America since the Civil Rights era. If the GOP were to come out hard on corporations, and portray them as the exploiters of hard working hispanic immigrants looking to improve their lives, the GOP would make big gains in the Hispanic Community, and probably across the board.

However, they'd alienate the big business part of the Tent, and as such they've stayed away from this angle. The bad guy for the GOP in the immigration issue becomes the illegal sneaking into America looking to improve their lives, when it should be the corporation that lures them here and puts them in deplorable working conditions to save a buck.

 

[VaYank5150]

Immigration has always been a sticky issue for Republicans. Hispanics are a growing portion of the electorate. They vote, and many hispanics are legal citizens. On a great many issues they're aligned with the GOP.

However, every time Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, or Coulter open their mouth on immigration, they tend to tread dangerously close to the line on racism. And they tend to cost the GOP votes in the Hispanic community.

I think the problem for the GOP is that they are FOR upholding our immigration laws, but "appear" lenient to the corporations that hire them. If they got more consistent with their message, I do believe it would help them with the Hispanic vote.

Absolutely

The GOP is fucking themselves by not allowing as natural a constituancy as Hispanics to become registered voters.

Plus Salma Hayek would make a Helluva Candidate:

She'd get my vote if she wore that top and a thong!

 

[Samson]

I think the problem for the GOP is that they are FOR upholding our immigration laws, but "appear" lenient to the corporations that hire them. If they got more consistent with their message, I do believe it would help them with the Hispanic vote.

Absolutely

The GOP is fucking themselves by not allowing as natural a constituancy as Hispanics to become registered voters.

Plus Salma Hayek would make a Helluva Candidate:

She'd get my vote if she wore that top and a thong!

Barry won, and didn't even have these credentials!

 

[rightwinger]

Anybody but Palin or Romney...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

...and the Republicans have my vote in 2012.

Michelle Bachmann 2012!

 

[caddis]

Absolutely

The GOP is fucking themselves by not allowing as natural a constituancy as Hispanics to become registered voters.

Plus Salma Hayek would make a Helluva Candidate:

She'd get my vote if she wore that top and a thong!

Barry won, and didn't even have these credentials!

I'm sorry....what were we talking about?

 

[ihopehefails]

...and the Republicans have my vote in 2012.

Anyone but communist and the democratic party will have my vote but that, by itself, eliminates the democratic party.

 

[Skull Pilot]

There is no choice but to vote third party.

Republicans have increased the size, scope, intrusiveness and expense of government just as much as democrats.

GWB expanded government to unprecedented levels only to be outdone by Obama.

How does that saying go?

The definition of insanity is to keep doing the same things over and over and yet expect a different result.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Immigration has always been a sticky issue for Republicans. Hispanics are a growing portion of the electorate. They vote, and many hispanics are legal citizens. On a great many issues they're aligned with the GOP.

However, every time Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, or Coulter open their mouth on immigration, they tend to tread dangerously close to the line on racism. And they tend to cost the GOP votes in the Hispanic community.

I think the problem for the GOP is that they are FOR upholding our immigration laws, but "appear" lenient to the corporations that hire them. If they got more consistent with their message, I do believe it would help them with the Hispanic vote.

Absolutely

The GOP is fucking themselves by not allowing as natural a constituancy as Hispanics to become registered voters.

Plus Salma Hayek would make a Helluva Candidate:

She does nothing for me.

I prefer buxom blonds and that accent of hers would drive me fucking up a wall.

 

[kwc57]

There is no choice but to vote third party.

Republicans have increased the size, scope, intrusiveness and expense of government just as much as democrats.

GWB expanded government to unprecedented levels only to be outdone by Obama.

How does that saying go?

The definition of insanity is to keep doing the same things over and over and yet expect a different result.

Agreed and so far the Republican response to the Democratic spending has only been, "yeah we were bad, but at least we weren't this bad" and they hope to win with that strategy.

 

[rightwinger]

Third parties don't work....never have...never will

 

[Skull Pilot]

Third parties don't work....never have...never will

So you opt for the insanity plan.

 

[manifold]

She does nothing for me.

I prefer buxom blonds and that accent of hers would drive me fucking up a wall.

We all have our preferences.

But if she does "nothing" for you, then you got a little queer in you dude.

Seriously.

 

[Skull Pilot]

She does nothing for me.

I prefer buxom blonds and that accent of hers would drive me fucking up a wall.

We all have our preferences.

But if she does "nothing" for you, then you got a little queer in you dude.

Seriously.

I really do not find her that attractive.

Nothing queer about liking what one likes.

 

[Toro]

Romney is a bit of a sleazebag since he'll tell you whatever you want to hear to get elected, but I think he'd be a pretty good President.

However, he might have a hard time getting elected, if the Dems had any brains and cahones. As head of private equity firm Bain Capital, he made his fortune taking companies private, loading them up with debt and firing tons of people while taking hundreds of millions of dollars out in what is known as "dividend recapitalizations," i.e borrowing money and channeling that money into his firm. That's probably not the resume of someone to solve our jobs problem. But the Democrats are such little girls, they probably would have no idea how to exploit that.

 

[Ravi]

Romney is a bit of a sleazebag since he'll tell you whatever you want to hear to get elected, but I think he'd be a pretty good President.

However, he might have a hard time getting elected, if the Dems had any brains and cahones. As head of private equity firm Bain Capital, he made his fortune taking companies private, loading them up with debt and firing tons of people while taking hundreds of millions of dollars out in what is known as "dividend recapitalizations," i.e borrowing money and channeling that money into his firm. That's probably not the resume of someone to solve our jobs problem. But the Democrats are such little girls, they probably would have no idea how to exploit that.

At least they know how to spell cajones.

 

[Intense]

I support the Right of The Tea Party movement to Vent, to Question, and to challenge the status quo.

...so do i..

...unfortunately, the tea baggers in my area are LARGELY nothing but loud, whining republican cheerleaders..

GET IT STRAIGHT DUMMIES, "CONSERVATIVES'--BY DEFINITION-- DON'T WANT TO "CHALLENGE" THE STATUS QUO...THEY WANT TO MAINTAIN IT..

...get and use a fucking dictionary..

..and have a good day!..

Both Parties have their internal conflicts. Try visualizing the concept of Conservatism V.S. Progressivism. That battle crosses Party Lines, though the Blue Dog Democrats are close to extinct. There are those that think that Government can be as big a part of the problem as what it competes against. There are those that thing the solution to every problem is expanded government. There are many so called fixes that are not compatible with Representative Government or Government by Consent. Wake Up.

"Teabagger's" is a derogatory term.

 

[Immanuel]

If I were Colin Powell, I would not be taking any phone calls from anyone on the Republican National Committee over the next two years or so.

They made this mess, I would not be bailing them out of it.

Immie