Any debate on global warming now OVER!?

[abu afak]

Yup, the "debate is over."
Skookerasbil LOST.
He Started the Wrongest thread EVER made here with his NINE Year running "Skeptics are Winning" thread in 2013-2022.
Nailed it!
Astonishing Call in 2013!

`

 

[ding]

This is the boilerplate answer from the Co2 FRAUD about all FUDGE....


There is ZERO way to test that.

There is hence ZERO reason to say that with any credibility. Other factors than temperature affect isotopes. Volcano eruptions are one.

No wonder it has that pathetic zig zag chart.... laughable.

You are full of shit. Post a link disputing oxygen isotopes, fudge packer.

 

[ding]

This is the boilerplate answer from the Co2 FRAUD about all FUDGE....


There is ZERO way to test that.

There is hence ZERO reason to say that with any credibility. Other factors than temperature affect isotopes. Volcano eruptions are one.

No wonder it has that pathetic zig zag chart.... laughable.

https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/2021-11/1%20Glacial-Interglacial%20Cycles-Final-OCT%202021.pdf

 

[ding]

This is the boilerplate answer from the Co2 FRAUD about all FUDGE....


There is ZERO way to test that.

There is hence ZERO reason to say that with any credibility. Other factors than temperature affect isotopes. Volcano eruptions are one.

No wonder it has that pathetic zig zag chart.... laughable.

Glacial period - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ding]

This is the boilerplate answer from the Co2 FRAUD about all FUDGE....


There is ZERO way to test that.

There is hence ZERO reason to say that with any credibility. Other factors than temperature affect isotopes. Volcano eruptions are one.

No wonder it has that pathetic zig zag chart.... laughable.

Timeline of glaciation - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ding]

This is the boilerplate answer from the Co2 FRAUD about all FUDGE....


There is ZERO way to test that.

There is hence ZERO reason to say that with any credibility. Other factors than temperature affect isotopes. Volcano eruptions are one.

No wonder it has that pathetic zig zag chart.... laughable.

Why did glacial cycles intensify a million years ago?

About a million years ago, something big happened to the planet. There was a major shift in the response of Earth's climate system to variations in our orbit…

new.nsf.gov

 

[ding]

This is the boilerplate answer from the Co2 FRAUD about all FUDGE....


There is ZERO way to test that.

There is hence ZERO reason to say that with any credibility. Other factors than temperature affect isotopes. Volcano eruptions are one.

No wonder it has that pathetic zig zag chart.... laughable.

14.6: Ice Age Glaciations

A glaciation (or ice age) occurs when the Earth’s climate is cold enough that large ice sheets grow on continents. There have been four major, well-documented glaciations in Earth’s …

geo.libretexts.org

 

[ding]

This is the boilerplate answer from the Co2 FRAUD about all FUDGE....


There is ZERO way to test that.

There is hence ZERO reason to say that with any credibility. Other factors than temperature affect isotopes. Volcano eruptions are one.

No wonder it has that pathetic zig zag chart.... laughable.

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2015RG000482

 

[ding]

This is the boilerplate answer from the Co2 FRAUD about all FUDGE....


There is ZERO way to test that.

There is hence ZERO reason to say that with any credibility. Other factors than temperature affect isotopes. Volcano eruptions are one.

No wonder it has that pathetic zig zag chart.... laughable.

16.1 Glacial Periods in Earth’s History – Physical Geology

opentextbc.ca

 

[ding]

This is the boilerplate answer from the Co2 FRAUD about all FUDGE....


There is ZERO way to test that.

There is hence ZERO reason to say that with any credibility. Other factors than temperature affect isotopes. Volcano eruptions are one.

No wonder it has that pathetic zig zag chart.... laughable.

Glacial and interglacial periods - Energy Education

energyeducation.ca

 

[ding]

This is the boilerplate answer from the Co2 FRAUD about all FUDGE....


There is ZERO way to test that.

There is hence ZERO reason to say that with any credibility. Other factors than temperature affect isotopes. Volcano eruptions are one.

No wonder it has that pathetic zig zag chart.... laughable.

Eight glacial cycles from an Antarctic ice core - Nature

The Antarctic Vostok ice core provided compelling evidence of the nature of climate, and of climate feedbacks, over the past 420,000 years. Marine records suggest that the amplitude of climate variability was smaller before that time, but such records are often poorly resolved. Moreover, it is...

www.nature.com

 

[EMH]

You are full of shit. Post a link disputing oxygen isotopes, fudge packer.

A confession that the oxygen isotope method of "determining past temperature" has no authenticity, no validation, is blurred and distorted by volcano eruptions, asteroid impacts, and the general truth that "temperature" is far from the only variable affecting it.

 

[EMH]

Eight glacial cycles from an Antarctic ice core - Nature

The Antarctic Vostok ice core provided compelling evidence of the nature of climate, and of climate feedbacks, over the past 420,000 years. Marine records suggest that the amplitude of climate variability was smaller before that time, but such records are often poorly resolved. Moreover, it is...

www.nature.com

Translation - ice cores provide useful data about the content of the atmosphere in the past, and the claim of "temperature" based on isotopes is nothing more than a guess based on flawed data that changes on issues unrelated to temperature. But since the Co2 FRAUD needs to keep itself alive, it wipes out the "distortions" and claims the "temperature data" is authentic, never mind all the other factors that cause isotopes, and hence Co2 FRAUD "faux skpetics" like Ding can keep putting that "temperature data" out there as "evidence" of something, when it is in fact evidence of absolutely nothing.

 

[EMH]

Every one of Ding's above links is COMPLETELY REFUTED by the following basic truth, from the very same ice cores...

During the so called interglacials...

"During an interglacial period, ice sheets and glaciers retreat,"


Both Antarctica and Greenland GREW ICE STRAIGHT THROUGH THE BULLSHIT "interglacials"

and hence every link above is COMPLETELY REFUTED by that truth.

Greenland has 130k ice core layers, and that is about halfway down the glacier.

Antarctica has 800k ice core layers and that is not even halfway down...

 

[EMH]

One of the things about the "spikes" in the Vlostok ice core "temperature" records is that those "spikes" did nothing in reality, because they did not happen, and the ice cores themselves prove it.

Those "spikes" are events like volcano eruptions that distorted the data, and the Co2 FRAUD has no explanation for them...

 

[alang1216]

It really isn't that hard to find...

jurassic surface air pressure - Google Search

www.google.com

The atmospheric pressure during the Jurassic Period was likely much higher than it is today, at least 3.2–5.0 bar compared to the current 1 bar.

I found no direct evidence only inferences or fudged data as you might say.

and THAT is what is trapped in ice age glacier on Antarctica and Greenland today, the difference...

or not

 

[ding]

Translation - ice cores provide useful data about the content of the atmosphere in the past, and the claim of "temperature" based on isotopes is nothing more than a guess based on flawed data that changes on issues unrelated to temperature. But since the Co2 FRAUD needs to keep itself alive, it wipes out the "distortions" and claims the "temperature data" is authentic, never mind all the other factors that cause isotopes, and hence Co2 FRAUD "faux skpetics" like Ding can keep putting that "temperature data" out there as "evidence" of something, when it is in fact evidence of absolutely nothing.

A confession that the oxygen isotope method of "determining past temperature" has no authenticity, no validation, is blurred and distorted by volcano eruptions, asteroid impacts, and the general truth that "temperature" is far from the only variable affecting it.

Every one of Ding's above links is COMPLETELY REFUTED by the following basic truth, from the very same ice cores...

During the so called interglacials...

"During an interglacial period, ice sheets and glaciers retreat,"


Both Antarctica and Greenland GREW ICE STRAIGHT THROUGH THE BULLSHIT "interglacials"

and hence every link above is COMPLETELY REFUTED by that truth.

Greenland has 130k ice core layers, and that is about halfway down the glacier.

Antarctica has 800k ice core layers and that is not even halfway down...

One of the things about the "spikes" in the Vlostok ice core "temperature" records is that those "spikes" did nothing in reality, because they did not happen, and the ice cores themselves prove it.

Those "spikes" are events like volcano eruptions that distorted the data, and the Co2 FRAUD has no explanation for them...

No one can be as dumb as you are portraying yourself. It's got to be an act.

 

[EMH]

I found no direct evidence only inferences or fudged data as you might say.


or not

Where else did the additional atmospheric gas come from during Jurassic??

LOL!!

 

[EMH]

No one can be as dumb as you are portraying yourself. It's got to be an act.

Vlostok has Co2 data, and it has isotope data, and calling isotope "temp" data is laughable.

And we know from the satellite and balloon data that Co2 does absolutely nothing...

 

[skookerasbil]

Whoooops

Another reason voters don't give a fcuk about climate change...yuk...yuk...nut sacks freezing up already in NYS

Freezing Cold Outbreaks In New York: Weakest Polar Vortex In 40 Years