THAT is your response? I point out that when the Arabs drove out the Jews - close to a million of them - they didn’t pay ONE single Jew any compensation whatsoever, while Jews paid Arabs in Israel 10x the value for their land…. your answer is: well, not all the Arabs were paid. How about the fact that NO Jews were paid at all?
Once again, even when the Arabs’ treatment of Jews is worse than the converse, you default right back to defending the Arabs.
And finally, while your compassion goes all out to the Muslims, who lost their land, where is your sympathy for the Jews who lost so much more? Land is one thing, but what about watching your parents, your children, your siblings marched away to their deaths, and you yourself starved to such a point that you suffer physical ailments the rest of your life? (My grandfather was one such man - major digestive problems until the day he died. His first wife and son were murdered.)
If your answer is to acknowledge that what happened to the Jews was horrible, but that doesn’t mean the Palestinians should have to lose their homes, that against shows that while you sympathize that Jews were murdered by the millioms and the survivors were left not only homeless, but without their family, your primary concern goes to those who lost only their homes.
So what is YOUR answer to what to do with these suffering Jews, the ones who survived horrors you can’t even dream of? NOBODY IN THE WORLD WANTED THEM, including America. The logical answer was to take their ancestral homeland, divide it, but the Arabs rejected it. The Arabs, time has shown since, will reject ANY two-state solution. Although Arabs have 22 Muslim countries, they simply do not want a single Jew country to exist.