Zone1 Antisemites lie about Israel being an apartheid state

[Dogmaphobe]

Was that question?..... Should have been a statement of fact yes.... So he can't help but stuff he has a psychosis an anti-Jewish

Hope you don't think any of that contradicted my opinion that you have psychological issues ....you confirmed it... And your favorite country China is still using slave labor in Africa and in China for that matter ....you should move there... Being in the military when you were 20 years old doesn't mean much.... Your psychosis happen after that

20 is right about the time that paranoid schizophrenia usually hits.

 

[alang1216]

The world is most certainly finite. If it weren't there wouldn't be a need for wars over territory. So it's you who is wrong. We're just animals competing for survival fighting over finite resources. You shouldn't be expecting a kinder, more gentle evolution and you shouldn't be condemning anyone when you don't get it. Apparently you'd like to see us as more than animals when it is convenient for you. You can't have it both ways. If you live by the evolutionary sword, you die by the evolutionary sword. You can't have your cake and eat it too.

Land may be finite but prosperity is not. I can make new cake as I eat the old cake.

 

[ding]

Land may be finite but prosperity is not. I can make new cake as I eat the old cake.

So it's not Darwinian for animals to fight over territory? Why would you ever get upset over animals doing what animals do. Do sheep believe wolves are evil because they eat their young?

It's fundamentally Darwinian for animals to fight over territory because territoriality secures vital resources like food, mates, and shelter, directly boosting survival and reproductive success (fitness) through natural selection, a core concept in Darwin's theory of evolution. Animals that successfully defend their space pass on their advantageous traits, while those that lose out are less likely to reproduce, making territorial fighting an "evolutionary stable strategy" for resource control, as described in evolutionary biology.

Why territorial fighting is Darwinian:

• Secures Resources: Territories provide concentrated food, water, nesting sites, and mates, which are essential for survival and raising young.
• Increases Reproductive Success: By controlling these resources, a dominant animal ensures its genes are passed to the next generation, a key measure of fitness.
• "Survival of the Fittest": Individuals with better fighting ability, displays, or strategies (like deterring rivals) are more likely to win and reproduce, embodying natural selection.
• Resource Holding Potential (RHP): Evolution has favored traits like larger size, weapons (antlers, teeth), or aggressive displays to help animals defend their claims, as noted in Nature's Scitable article.
• Universal Strategy: Territorial behavior appears across the animal kingdom (mammals, birds, insects, fish), suggesting it's a successful evolutionary solution to the problem of securing essential resources, according to this Belfer Center article.

 

[JoeB131]

Your psychosis continues I heard that fat overweight people are more prone to psychological problems ...you confirm that

Yeah, getting called crazy by a guy so angry he can't put together a coherent sentence doesn't mean much to me.

I do sense a lot of projection.... as someone who had his yarmulke flushed down the toilet by the goyim when he was young.

 

[JoeB131]

You know what the question was. You responded to it it to tell me you were still ignoring me.

Yes, I'm still ignoring you.

20 is right about the time that paranoid schizophrenia usually hits.

Well, you should know.

 

[ShahdagMountains]

I do sense a lot of projection.... as someone who had his yarmulke flushed down the toilet by the goyim when he was young.

Totally asinine thing to say. Shows the level of your intellect.

 

[alang1216]

So it's not Darwinian for animals to fight over territory? Why would you ever get upset over animals doing what animals do. Do sheep believe wolves are evil because they eat their young?

It's fundamentally Darwinian for animals to fight over territory because territoriality secures vital resources like food, mates, and shelter, directly boosting survival and reproductive success (fitness) through natural selection, a core concept in Darwin's theory of evolution. Animals that successfully defend their space pass on their advantageous traits, while those that lose out are less likely to reproduce, making territorial fighting an "evolutionary stable strategy" for resource control, as described in evolutionary biology.

Why territorial fighting is Darwinian:

• Secures Resources: Territories provide concentrated food, water, nesting sites, and mates, which are essential for survival and raising young.
• Increases Reproductive Success: By controlling these resources, a dominant animal ensures its genes are passed to the next generation, a key measure of fitness.
• "Survival of the Fittest": Individuals with better fighting ability, displays, or strategies (like deterring rivals) are more likely to win and reproduce, embodying natural selection.
• Resource Holding Potential (RHP): Evolution has favored traits like larger size, weapons (antlers, teeth), or aggressive displays to help animals defend their claims, as noted in Nature's Scitable article.
• Universal Strategy: Territorial behavior appears across the animal kingdom (mammals, birds, insects, fish), suggesting it's a successful evolutionary solution to the problem of securing essential resources, according to this Belfer Center article.

I understand Darwin but whatever point you're making eludes me completely.

 

[Hector12]

He really should be banned. He’s smearing Jews and trying to advance antisemitism. This type of thing would not be tolerated against blacks.

I do not want JoeB131 to be banned. He keeps things interesting. His attacks on Jews are easy to refute because Jews are wonderful people.

 

[ShahdagMountains]

He keeps things interesting

What?

He keeps saying the same thing over and over again. Ad infinitum.

 

[JoeB131]

I do not want JoeB131 to be banned. He keeps things interesting. His attacks on Jews are easy to refute because Jews are wonderful people.

I'm sure some are.

Doesn't take away from the fact Israel is committing genocide and running an apartheid state.

At least you are honest enough to admit they are. You just don't have a problem with it because you don't have a conscience

For myself, "Never Again" shouldn't mean, "It's Okay When We Do It".

Of course, this is a very human thing. We detest behavior in others we engage in ourselves.

 

[Hector12]

What?

He keeps saying the same thing over and over again. Ad infinitum.

Moreover, JoeB131 is immune to facts that discredit what he wants to believe.

Nevertheless, JoeB131 tests our civility and our intellects. It is easy to counter his hateful diatribes against the Jews with insults, name calling, and obscene words.

There are only two civilized ways to refute an argument:

First, prove that the argument is based on factual assertions that is not true.

Second, prove that the argument is based on logical fallacies.

I doubt that JoeB131 has read Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf, or much of anything else for that matter. Nevertheless, his excuses for hating Jews are similar to Hitler's. For example, he blames Jews for the economic problems Germans had after World War I.

 

[JoeB131]

I doubt that JoeB131 has read Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf, or much of anything else for that matter. Nevertheless, his excuses for hating Jews are similar to Hitler's. For example, he blames Jews for the economic problems Germans had after World War I.

Not at all, HItler's dislike of the Jews was based on discredited racial theories.

My dislike of them is what they are actually doing as policy.

Big difference.

Oh, SOME Jews absolutely were responsible for the November Revolution that overthrew the Kaiser. The "Stabbed in the Back" theory didn't start with the Nazis. It showed up as early as 1919.

 

[Hector12]

I'm sure some are.

Doesn't take away from the fact Israel is committing genocide and running an apartheid state.

At least you are honest enough to admit they are. You just don't have a problem with it because you don't have a conscience

For myself, "Never Again" shouldn't mean, "It's Okay When We Do It".

Of course, this is a very human thing. We detest behavior in others we engage in ourselves.

When a superior nation displaces an inferior nation civilization, and the progress of human evolution advance. Now I have pointed out earlier that there is plenty of room for the Palestinians elsewhere in the Arab world. They should take their dysfunctions there, so that the Jews can settle and develop the land they occupy.

 

[Lisa558]

I do not want JoeB131 to be banned. He keeps things interesting. His attacks on Jews are easy to refute because Jews are wonderful people.

No, people like JoeB131 are dangerous to Jews. He is spreading vile hate against us - and that is how Hitler eventually got Germans to view Jews as inferior, subhuman creatures who should be eradicated.

I live in a liberal area, where the hate for Jews is strong and the love for “Palestians” is strong, and it’s especially bad around the high schools - where lib teachers and administrators side against the Jews. We’ve had everything from “Death to Jews!” chants to swastikas painted on school grounds.

The antisemites need to be silenced.

 

[ShahdagMountains]

Moreover, JoeB131 is immune to facts that discredit what he wants to believe.

Nevertheless, JoeB131 tests our civility and our intellects. It is easy to counter his hateful diatribes against the Jews with insults, name calling, and obscene words.

There are only two civilized ways to refute an argument:

First, prove that the argument is based on factual assertions that is not true.

Second, prove that the argument is based on logical fallacies.

I doubt that JoeB131 has read Adolf Hitler's Mein Kampf, or much of anything else for that matter. Nevertheless, his excuses for hating Jews are similar to Hitler's. For example, he blames Jews for the economic problems Germans had after World War I.

Mein Kampf. The most boring book on the planet.

 

[ShahdagMountains]

No, people like JoeB131 are dangerous to Jews. He is spreading vile hate against us - and that is how Hitler eventually got Germans to view Jews as inferior, subhuman creatures who should be eradicated.

I live in a liberal area, where the hate for Jews is strong and the love for “Palestians” is strong, and it’s especially bad around the high schools - where lib teachers and administrators side against the Jews. We’ve had everything from “Death to Jews!” chants to swastikas painted on school grounds.

The antisemites need to be silenced.

Do they know anything about Palestinians?

 

[Lisa558]

Do they know anything about Palestinians?

They know that they hate Jews, and that’s all it takes for them to side with them.

 

[Jroc]

I'm sure some are.

Doesn't take away from the fact Israel is committing genocide and running an apartheid state.

At least you are honest enough to admit they are. You just don't have a problem with it because you don't have a conscience

For myself, "Never Again" shouldn't mean, "It's Okay When We Do It".

Of course, this is a very human thing. We detest behavior in others we engage in ourselves.

You don't care about anybody but yourself fraud

 

[Hector12]

No, people like JoeB131 are dangerous to Jews. He is spreading vile hate against us - and that is how Hitler eventually got Germans to view Jews as inferior, subhuman creatures who should be eradicated.

I live in a liberal area, where the hate for Jews is strong and the love for “Palestians” is strong, and it’s especially bad around the high schools - where lib teachers and administrators side against the Jews. We’ve had everything from “Death to Jews!” chants to swastikas painted on school grounds.

The antisemites need to be silenced.

First of all, no one views "Jews as inferior, subhuman creatures." It is generally understood that the Ashkenazim stand at the pinnacle of human evolution. Jew haters resent them for this. I admire them for it.

Shouting "Death to Jews" advocates criminal behavior and should be punished for that reason. Painting swastikas on school grounds is vandalism, and should be punished for the same reason.

I oppose silencing opinions because for me the most important freedom is intellectual freedom. i want to be able to investigate different points of view make up my own mind, and express my opinions without fearing legal, economic, or social sanctions. My opinions are often controversial. I welcome the opportunity to defend my opinions. I can do so without the insults, name calling, and obscene words that are often directed against me, as well as the threats of violence I occasionally receive.

Banning JoeB131 would set a bad precedent for banning me.

 

[ShahdagMountains]

Banning JoeB131 would set a bad precedent for banning me.

No point banning him. His arguments, if you can call them that, are primitive.