Zone1 Anti White Racism/Discrimination In Law or Policy? Where?

.

On Topic you made the connection between Whites and Affirmative Action.
I asked you how Whites oppressed your ancestors and through Affirmative Action.

The examples you gave clearly define that governmental actions and societal circumstances,
are how Whites used Affirmative Action to oppress others of another race.

Instead of talking about what you may disagree with, even though you are still incorrect ...
Can we agree that Affirmative Action implemented and enforced through Government,
was used to oppress citizens ... And that has always been the intent?

Keep in mind that is what you were expressing in your OP.

.
How about you stop using stupid terms lile oppression. Because there are no examples shown where whites use AA to oppress anyone. The fact that white females are the biggest beneficiary is no indication of oppression because white women were cheated. I make my references to whites getting the most from AA because there are white women here who talk crazy and since white is a race and if quotas were done, whites would be the majority.

AA does not oppress anyone and what we see racists arguing about is that they don't want blacks to have 13 percent of the jobs, college admission, promotions, contracts or anything else. Those who argue as you do, think whites are entitled to 100 percent of everything and never consider the possibility that such a thing as unqualified whites exist.

No, I was not expressing that AA administered by the government is oppressing people, thats what you want out of it because that's what you believe. So before you can argue about AA, you first must be able to admit to the reality that whites have not followed the policy and in many cases such as the example I presented looked for ways to circumvent it. Furthermore, the policy has not been strictly enforced nor have the appropriate penalties been assessed to those who violate the policy.

Then you have to recognize 246 years of white racial preferences you and others take for granted to make claims of a merit based nation that has never existed.
 
No, I was not expressing that AA administered by the government is oppressing people, thats what you want out of it because that's what you believe.
.

I was simply using your own words and ideas.
If you find an inconsistency in your ideas and examples, then you need to address that.

You have previously identified the following as examples of Government and Affirmative Action ...

The Great Charter of Privileges, Orders and Laws
The Three Fifths Compromise
The Naturalization Act of 1790
Dredd Scott v Standford
Anti-Literacy Laws
The Homestead Act
The Reconstruction Act of 1867
Plessy v Ferguson
The National Housing Act
The Social Security Act of 1935
The Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
The Servicemen's Readjustment Act
Black Codes
Jim Crow Laws
Anti-Firearms Laws towards Blacks

Would you like to say that the things listed above are not associated with Oppression,
facilitated through Government, and Affirmative Action ...
Or would you like to go back and revise your previous statements?

.
 
Last edited:
Yawn! Small white owned firms are not being discriminated against in NYC.

Here is the requirements from the NYCHA.

"all vendors who want to bid on a NYCHA contract will be required to subcontract 30 percent of that work to City-certified M/WBEs (15 percent to minority and 15 percent to women-owned businesses)."

The other 70 percent is available to white men. Because some of those WBE's will be white. So now if whites can get more than 70 percent of all housing contracts and are 43 percent of the population, where is the discrimination?

I'm assuming this is pretty much the standard for all NYC city contracting opportunities. So there is no discrimination against white owned businesses in NYC.

You can only subcontract up to 40%, so basically you have to subcontract out to MBE/WBE's.

How about we reverse it and make a 30% requirement for white men?
 

There are no laws or policies that discriminate against whites.​

FDNY drops physical test requirement amid low female hiring rate

In 2014 the NYFD dropped the physical test so they could hire women, and that includes WHITE WOMEN. This was a BFOQ dropped just for women. Now, there has not been any instance that I know of that a BONAFIDE OCCUPATIONAL QUALIFICATION was dropped for blacks. And while right wing whites have continued running their mouths about the Connecticut case, this happened 5 years after Ricci v. DeStefano.

College Student Demographics
55% of enrolled college students are White.

Whites are the majority of college students.
So when you look at this, where is the anti white racism?

College Enrollment Statistics: 2022 Data by State, Race, Gender & Age | Research.com
Whites are 77 percent of the workforce.
They are 80 percent of the management.
Blacks are 12.3 percent of the workforce
Blacks are 9 percent of the management.
According to the 2020 census, Non hispanic whites are 60 percent of the population.
Blacks-13 percent

Employed persons by detailed occupation, sex, race, and Hispanic or Latino ethnicity

Whites are overrepresented relative to their population relative to employment and management. And this isn't because blacks are not qualified.,

Where is the anti-white racism/discrimination?

What right wingers call anti white racism is opposition to whites who continue doing things like this:

“I can say for sure that happens because I did it. Before retirement, I was an Engineer. For the last 20 years of my career, I was a Manager and Director and I hired hundreds of people. I reviewed well over a thousand resumes for all kinds of positions. Everything from Secretaries to Engineering Managers. Both Salary and Hourly. I always culled out the resumes with Black Ethnic names. Never shortlisted anybody with a Black Ethnic name. Never hired them.”

“Since the Fortune 50 company I worked for had a stupid "affirmative action" hiring policies I never mentioned it to anybody and I always got away with it. A couple of times I was instructed to improve my departmental “diversity" demographics but I always ignored it and never got into any trouble. My stereotype is that anybody with a stupid ghetto Black ethnic name is probably worthless. I could have been wrong a couple of times but I was also probably right 99% of the time.

Glad I did it. I would do it again.”


Once again I remind you of the words posted by one of your fellow right wing USMB members . He is not the only one doing this, and he is not the only one here doing this.

“Plausible deniability is the ability to deny any involvement in illegal or unethical activities, because there is no clear evidence to prove involvement. The lack of evidence makes the denial credible, or plausible.”
-
Teagan Goddards Political dictionary

You guys do this every day in regards to a specific behavior. You need to understand this reality:


There is no anti white racism/discrimination.

“The spectacle of members of a racial demographic that comprises 75% of the nation's populace and dominates both the political and economic spheres whining that they are oppressed is pathetic.”
-white USMB member

Whites are not entitled to everything.
There are no laws or policies that discriminate against blacks.
 
There are no laws or policies that discriminate against blacks.
The only discrimination is against whites and Asians with better grades and scores who are rejected from a university than blacks with lower grades and scores who are welcomed with open arms.

This fall will be a good time as we begin to abolish the anti-white racism that has swept the nation: first, when the SCOTUS puts a stop to the perversion of AA laws; and second, when we retake the House and possibly the Senate.

White actors, and models, and hopefuls for VP or Press Secretary or SCOTUS nominee, will not be excluded because their white skin is the ”wrong” color.
 

Forum List

Back
Top