Anti-Gunners, Gunning For Mall Shooting Hero.

[Vastator]

Now comes the backlash against this young hero. Enraged anti-gunners furious that this young man isn’t being charged for possessing a gun, in a gun-free zone; and recoil from the notion that this man be deemed a “Good Samaritan”.

Yes folks. These fuckers want more dead innocents. As many as it takes to get to your guns. Anything, or anyone that gets in the way, is the enemy.

Gun control advocates stunned man who allegedly shot Indiana mall shooter labeled 'Good Samaritan'

Critics took to Twitter to express frustration that a man with a concealed pistol permit who put a stop to a mass shooting in an Indiana mall was being hailed a hero.

www.foxnews.com

 

[johngaltshrugged]

Now comes the backlash against this young hero. Enraged anti-gunners furious that this young man isn’t being charged for possessing a gun, in a gun-free zone; and recoil from the notion that this man be deemed a “Good Samaritan”.

Yes folks. These fuckers want more dead innocents. As many as it takes to get to your guns. Anything, or anyone that gets in the way, is the enemy.

Gun control advocates stunned man who allegedly shot Indiana mall shooter labeled 'Good Samaritan'

Critics took to Twitter to express frustration that a man with a concealed pistol permit who put a stop to a mass shooting in an Indiana mall was being hailed a hero.

www.foxnews.com

The evil POS want everything a gun free zone so only their mass murders are armed wherever they go.

They are so transparent to anyone with any mental capacity

 

[sealybobo]

The evil POS want everything a gun free zone so only their mass murders are armed wherever they go.

They are so transparent to anyone with any mental capacity

But such outcomes are unusual. Only two out of 61 such attacks last year ended when armed bystanders engaged the active shooter, according to an FBI report in May.

 

[there4eyeM]

Was the arm illegally possessed? From what we see in stories, it was the policy of the mall that firearms were prohibited, but not that it was against a specific law. The business might engage in some sort of proceedings, but otherwise there doesn't seem to be much to talk about.
That said, firing rounds in a crowded area is fraught with danger.

 

[Vastator]

But such outcomes are unusual. Only two out of 61 such attacks last year ended when armed bystanders engaged the active shooter, according to an FBI report in May.

View attachment 671831

Answer..? More armed, civilians. And ignore gun free zones when not on government property.

 

[Blues Man]

Answer..? More armed, civilians. And ignore gun free zones when not on government property.

Exactly

I have walked into places with no guns allowed signs with my carry pistol. The thing about concealed carry is that if you do it right no one will ever know you are armed

 

[Circe]

Was the arm illegally possessed? From what we see in stories, it was the policy of the mall that firearms were prohibited, but not that it was against a specific law. The business might engage in some sort of proceedings, but otherwise there doesn't seem to be much to talk about.
That said, firing rounds in a crowded area is fraught with danger.

Stores have lots of "policies" but they aren't laws. Like customers having to give birthdates --- we've been asked for birthdate on tractor hydraulic fluid, a fish knife, and Nyquil. I never cooperate. I still get to buy the stuff. Nobody arrests me. Just say no!

Or like the young hero, carry the gun anyway.

 

[DukeU]

But such outcomes are unusual. Only two out of 61 such attacks last year ended when armed bystanders engaged the active shooter, according to an FBI report in May.

Gee, I wonder why that is?

 

[pknopp]

I stomached through the article and nowhere did I see anywhere anyone was going after the guy. I saw where some had an issue with how some described him. but that isn't going after him.

 

[1srelluc]

Was the arm illegally possessed? From what we see in stories, it was the policy of the mall that firearms were prohibited, but not that it was against a specific law. The business might engage in some sort of proceedings, but otherwise there doesn't seem to be much to talk about.
That said, firing rounds in a crowded area is fraught with danger.

All they could do would be ask him to leave had they saw him carrying. If he refused then they could have him charged with trespassing.

That said as of 7/1/22 when Constitutional Carry went into effect there it's unclear if they could even had done that as malls are not considered prohibited places.....It really is just a property rights issue.

LOL....I guess they could ban him from the mall for life but since the mall operators lauded him that's not likely either.

 

[1srelluc]

Exactly

I have walked into places with no guns allowed signs with my carry pistol. The thing about concealed carry is that if you do it right no one will ever know you are armed

I do every day and will continue to do so. My personal security trumps a "30-06" sign.

 

[martybegan]

Was the arm illegally possessed? From what we see in stories, it was the policy of the mall that firearms were prohibited, but not that it was against a specific law. The business might engage in some sort of proceedings, but otherwise there doesn't seem to be much to talk about.
That said, firing rounds in a crowded area is fraught with danger.

Less fraught when the guy in question's target is an active shooter, as opposed to the active shooter's target of "whatever is making me mad enough to shoot"

 

[martybegan]

I do every day and will continue to do so. My personal security trumps a "30-06" sign.

Any business posting said sign should be held liable if anyone is hurt during a robbery at their establishment.

 

[Woodznutz]

I do every day and will continue to do so. My personal security trumps a "30-06" sign.

These are just the places where one should be carrying.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Every time that a Criminal is killed the Dirty Democrat Party loses another Voter.

 

[Circe]

Less fraught when the guy in question's target is an active shooter, as opposed to the active shooter's target of "whatever is making me mad enough to shoot"

Like people in general.

Especially women. More women than men are almost always killed in these events. Easier to target, somehow, I suppose.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

MSN

www.msn.com

so much for reasoned debate.

 

[Circe]

Any business posting said sign should be held liable if anyone is hurt during a robbery at their establishment.

No one knew the hero had a gun.

But the shooter spent a full hour in the men's room getting his rifle and all his many magazines ready, I read! Didn't it occur to anyone to report or notice any of that?? Darn. Maybe he was in a stall.

Seems to me the mall is fine with mass shooters coming there and tuning up to get ready to shoot everybody, but don't want anyone around who can stop the shooting.

 

[sealybobo]

MSN

www.msn.com

so much for reasoned debate.

He made a good point

If more guns made us safer, America would be the safest country in the WORLD. We need sensible gun laws, not vigilante safety nets.”

It's like applauding when you hear teachers have to dip into their own pockets to pay for student's supplies.

Why are these shooters shooting? It's like they want to play Grand Theft Auto with only one life.

But I do not mind good guys with ccw permits carrying guns.

 

[sealybobo]

Gee, I wonder why that is?

Lots of reasons. If I had a gun, I'd still run away. LOL

Or because the guy kills the good guy with a gun first? We don't know how many good guys with guns the mass shooters have taken out.

Or because the guy kills himself before the good guy with a gun can.

Or because the cops sit and wait will the shooter is picking off kids one at a time for 45 minutes. Afraid to go in. Waiting for orders. Cowards.