Antarctica hits warmest temperature ever recorded

[CrusaderFrank]

"But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy..." -IPCC

 

[Yarddog]

Antarctic ‘supervolcano’ makes ice sheet vulnerable: NASA study

 

[Persistence Of Memory]

Politically Bernie would better serve in Antarctica leading the penguins out to sea for feeding.

 

[westwall]

View attachment 305395 There's no denying it now.

The Antarctic Peninsula recorded a high of 65 degrees this week, the hottest temperature ever recorded there.

The reading was taken Thursday at Esperanza Base along Antarctica's Trinity Peninsula.

Antarctica hits warmest temperature ever recorded

Antarctica logs hottest temperature on record of 18.3C

And. In the 1850's when they were trying to find the South Pole, ships were able to sail almost 300 miles further south than they can today.

How was that possible you might ask, had you a scientific mind, why there was far less ocean ice back then. FAR less.

Why?

Ummmmm, because it was a lot warmer. No thermometers at the time, but 300 miles less ice shelf is pretty significant.

But only if you care about facts.

 

[MisterBeale]

And if humans had never evolved or put CO2 into the atmosphere, we have no proof this would not have happened anyway.

100% wrong. It is established that mankind's actions have caused the rapid warming we are observing. Again, that is literally the fundamental basis of this topic.

Nope. That hasn't been established.

It is just a theory.


It is pushed by political organizations.

Most of the warming is done. . . BY THE SUN.


Global Warming, Carbon Dioxide and the Solar Minimum
Global Warming, Carbon Dioxide and the Solar Minimum

". . . Before the IPCC formed, NOAA’s Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii registered co2 levelsat under 350 ppm (parts per million) with the explicit warning that if co2 exceeded that number, Mother Earth was in Big Trouble – and there would be no turning back for humanity. Those alarm bells continue today as co2 levels have risen to 414 ppm as temperatures peaked in 1998.

From the outset, the IPCC controlled the debate by limiting its charter…

"to understanding the scientific basis of risk of human-induced climate change, its potential impacts and options for adaptation and mitigation.”

In other words, before any of the science had been done, the IPCC’s assumption was that man-made activity was responsible and that Nature was not an active participant in a process within its own sphere of interest. As an interdisciplinary topic of multiple diversity, the IPCC is not an authority on all the disciplines of science within the CC domain.

While there is no dispute among scientists that the Sun and its cyclical output is the true external force driving Earth’s energy and climate system as part of a Sun-centered Universe, the IPCC’s exclusion of the Sun from its consideration can only be seen as a deliberate thwarting of a basic fundamental law of science, a process which assures a free inquiry based on reason and evidence.

It is the Sun which all planets of the solar system orbit around, that has the strongest gravitational pull in the solar system, is the heaviest of all celestial bodies and its sunspots in relation to Earth’s temperatures has been known since Galileo began drawing sunspots in 1613.

Yet the IPCC which touts a ‘scientific view of climate change’ would have us believe the Sun is irrelevant and immaterial to the IPCC’s world view and Earth’s climate; hardly a blip on their radar.. . "


The IPCC’s fatal founding flaw
The IPCC’s fatal founding flaw – Quadrant Online

"The media at large and the public that the media influences seem to believe that the IPCC is an international authority on all aspects of climate. This is a popular but false notion. The IPCC is, in fact, no more than a craftily assembled government-supported lobby group, doing what lobby groups usually do.

Its charter gives the game away:

"The role of the IPCC is to assess on a comprehensive, objective, open and transparent basis the scientific, technical and socio-economic information relevant to understanding the scientific basis of risk of human-induced climate change, its potential impacts and options for adaptation and mitigation."

Or, put more simply, the IPCC is to report on the magnitude of man-made climate change and what can be done to reduce its impact, the existence of man-made climate change being assumed from the outset.

The IPCC was established through the urgings of the International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU) and the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). The former is a shadowy organisation that conducted scientific projects for UNEP and wrote in-house reports. Given the amount of work it undertook, those reports probably aligned closely with UNEP thinking.

The latter is well known for blaming human activity for every change to the environment — a stance seemingly based on the assumption that the environment never changes naturally and/or that we fully understand every natural force which might make it change. By this logic any and every deviation must be man-made.. . ."


A sensitive matter
The climate may be heating up less in response to greenhouse-gas emissions than was once thought. But that does not mean the problem is going away
A sensitive matter

"OVER the past 15 years air temperatures at the Earth’s surface have been flat while greenhouse-gas emissions have continued to soar. The world added roughly 100 billion tonnes of carbon to the atmosphere between 2000 and 2010. That is about a quarter of all the CO₂ put there by humanity since 1750. And yet, as James Hansen, the head of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, observes, “the five-year mean global temperature has been flat for a decade.”

Temperatures fluctuate over short periods, but this lack of new warming is a surprise. Ed Hawkins, of the University of Reading, in Britain, points out that surface temperatures since 2005 are already at the low end of the range of projections derived from 20 climate models (see chart 1). If they remain flat, they will fall outside the models’ range within a few years.. . .

That's one nice conspiracy theory cut and paste, but it doesn't mean anything.

The sun being responsible for climate is a conspiracy theory?

 

[MisterBeale]

"But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy..." -IPCC

ayup. That there, is what it is all about.

Of course, the bureaucrats that do no real work, will first take their percentage cut off of the top before any "redistribution" takes place. Making NY and Brussels infinitely more wealthy than all the other cities.

 

[Crepitus]

And if humans had never evolved or put CO2 into the atmosphere, we have no proof this would not have happened anyway.

100% wrong. It is established that mankind's actions have caused the rapid warming we are observing. Again, that is literally the fundamental basis of this topic.

Nope. That hasn't been established.

It is just a theory.


It is pushed by political organizations.

Most of the warming is done. . . BY THE SUN.


Global Warming, Carbon Dioxide and the Solar Minimum
Global Warming, Carbon Dioxide and the Solar Minimum

". . . Before the IPCC formed, NOAA’s Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii registered co2 levelsat under 350 ppm (parts per million) with the explicit warning that if co2 exceeded that number, Mother Earth was in Big Trouble – and there would be no turning back for humanity. Those alarm bells continue today as co2 levels have risen to 414 ppm as temperatures peaked in 1998.

From the outset, the IPCC controlled the debate by limiting its charter…

"to understanding the scientific basis of risk of human-induced climate change, its potential impacts and options for adaptation and mitigation.”

In other words, before any of the science had been done, the IPCC’s assumption was that man-made activity was responsible and that Nature was not an active participant in a process within its own sphere of interest. As an interdisciplinary topic of multiple diversity, the IPCC is not an authority on all the disciplines of science within the CC domain.

While there is no dispute among scientists that the Sun and its cyclical output is the true external force driving Earth’s energy and climate system as part of a Sun-centered Universe, the IPCC’s exclusion of the Sun from its consideration can only be seen as a deliberate thwarting of a basic fundamental law of science, a process which assures a free inquiry based on reason and evidence.

It is the Sun which all planets of the solar system orbit around, that has the strongest gravitational pull in the solar system, is the heaviest of all celestial bodies and its sunspots in relation to Earth’s temperatures has been known since Galileo began drawing sunspots in 1613.

Yet the IPCC which touts a ‘scientific view of climate change’ would have us believe the Sun is irrelevant and immaterial to the IPCC’s world view and Earth’s climate; hardly a blip on their radar.. . "


The IPCC’s fatal founding flaw
The IPCC’s fatal founding flaw – Quadrant Online

"The media at large and the public that the media influences seem to believe that the IPCC is an international authority on all aspects of climate. This is a popular but false notion. The IPCC is, in fact, no more than a craftily assembled government-supported lobby group, doing what lobby groups usually do.

Its charter gives the game away:

"The role of the IPCC is to assess on a comprehensive, objective, open and transparent basis the scientific, technical and socio-economic information relevant to understanding the scientific basis of risk of human-induced climate change, its potential impacts and options for adaptation and mitigation."

Or, put more simply, the IPCC is to report on the magnitude of man-made climate change and what can be done to reduce its impact, the existence of man-made climate change being assumed from the outset.

The IPCC was established through the urgings of the International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU) and the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). The former is a shadowy organisation that conducted scientific projects for UNEP and wrote in-house reports. Given the amount of work it undertook, those reports probably aligned closely with UNEP thinking.

The latter is well known for blaming human activity for every change to the environment — a stance seemingly based on the assumption that the environment never changes naturally and/or that we fully understand every natural force which might make it change. By this logic any and every deviation must be man-made.. . ."


A sensitive matter
The climate may be heating up less in response to greenhouse-gas emissions than was once thought. But that does not mean the problem is going away
A sensitive matter

"OVER the past 15 years air temperatures at the Earth’s surface have been flat while greenhouse-gas emissions have continued to soar. The world added roughly 100 billion tonnes of carbon to the atmosphere between 2000 and 2010. That is about a quarter of all the CO₂ put there by humanity since 1750. And yet, as James Hansen, the head of NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies, observes, “the five-year mean global temperature has been flat for a decade.”

Temperatures fluctuate over short periods, but this lack of new warming is a surprise. Ed Hawkins, of the University of Reading, in Britain, points out that surface temperatures since 2005 are already at the low end of the range of projections derived from 20 climate models (see chart 1). If they remain flat, they will fall outside the models’ range within a few years.. . .

That's one nice conspiracy theory cut and paste, but it doesn't mean anything.

The sun being responsible for climate is a conspiracy theory?

Don't be stupider than you have to be, Son.

 

[Persistence Of Memory]

View attachment 305395 There's no denying it now.

The Antarctic Peninsula recorded a high of 65 degrees this week, the hottest temperature ever recorded there.

The reading was taken Thursday at Esperanza Base along Antarctica's Trinity Peninsula.

Antarctica hits warmest temperature ever recorded

Antarctica logs hottest temperature on record of 18.3C

And. In the 1850's when they were trying to find the South Pole, ships were able to sail almost 300 miles further south than they can today.

How was that possible you might ask, had you a scientific mind, why there was far less ocean ice back then. FAR less.

Why?

Ummmmm, because it was a lot warmer. No thermometers at the time, but 300 miles less ice shelf is pretty significant.

But only if you care about facts.

I think Paris had a few 100 degree days relatively recently...........They said it was the hottest in like 150 F yrs. But the scientific Gender Studies majors screamed GL.

People don't realize the autistic little girl used for this nonsense is Schiffs secret child.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So how is eating less beef, going to stop the glaciers from melting when there's a hot water plume coming from the earths crust?

Why in the world are you asking me this dumb ass question?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Deniers and their friggin idiocy, I swear. 65 degrees in the Arctic in winter is somehow normal to these friggin idiots. Fuck you and your junk science. Putting us all at risk because of your absolute stupidity and greed.

I laugh at idiots like you who think that they know what normal is.
You literally a pimple on the ass of time.
Centuries come and go, yet an insignificant closed minded ass pimple like you knows what's normal.
STFU .

Screw you, you dumb ass denier. Fuck you and your greed.

There it is -

I got him to say the magic word - greed.

It's not science at all.
Its political.

It's a movement, socialist in nature to shut down Capitalism and other systems where life's losers fall short



Continue to fall short loser.

Unlike you I care for the world I leave my children. All this bull shit about socialism is just that. Bull shit to paralyze the public to take action all in order to preserve the vested interest of the fossil fuel industry. A fossil fuel industry that has spent hundreds of millions to convince people like you that climate change is not real when they have known better for the past 40 years.

That's crap. These energy companies are part of the push for the green new deal, they are ready for it. If you think a carbon tax will hurt them? You are nuts. It will just be passed right on TO YOU! I have some far left Canadian Socialist friends whining about, and blaming their conservative province governor about energy prices. . . Some of them are switching to wood burning stoves. lol duh. That sort of defeats the purpose. And yet? They were once like you. . . begging for "global warming solutions." duh.

All of these elite energy companies are completely on board with the UN program. THEY KNOW that if there is a carbon tax, folks will STILL be using oil, gas etc. Nothing compares to the energy output of their product, the planet cannot get by w/o them.

This is about global elites controlling EVERYTHING you do.

All of these elites, and the corporate boards have plans already drawn up. YOU just aren't paying attention.

Contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals - Energy Factor Exxon

UN Sustainable Development Goals | Sustainability | Home BP

UN sustainable development goals - Shell Sustainability Report 2018

Saudi Vision 2030

Zero relevance to the science. What a waste of time that post was.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Everyone knows you're talking out of your ass and know nothing.

Irrelevant crybabying from the board's biggest crybaby. If you want to know how atmospheric co2 warms up the ocean, because you are too stupid or ignorant to figure that out for yourself, then go look it up. Your mommy is not here, so I have to say it to you.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

"But one must say clearly that we redistribute de facto the world's wealth by climate policy..." -IPCC

Fake quote, regurgitated by a fool...

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

ayup. That there, is what it is all about.

Gullible denier, getting fooled by fake quote regurgitated by moron...

 

[2aguy]

View attachment 305395 There's no denying it now.

The Antarctic Peninsula recorded a high of 65 degrees this week, the hottest temperature ever recorded there.

The reading was taken Thursday at Esperanza Base along Antarctica's Trinity Peninsula.

Antarctica hits warmest temperature ever recorded

Antarctica logs hottest temperature on record of 18.3C

And they just discovered very warm water under a huge glacier there. This glacier holds back much of the ice shelf from flowing right into the sea. Not good.

Yes...volcanoes will do that.

 

[MisterBeale]

ayup. That there, is what it is all about.

Gullible denier, getting fooled by fake quote regurgitated by moron...

I read the interview from the original source before these draconian elitists took it down.

Now that interview is mirrored on a plethora of sites.

Deny it all you want, you are being an idiot at this point.

UN Admits Climate Change Purpose: Redistribute World’s Wealth

 

[MisterBeale]

I laugh at idiots like you who think that they know what normal is.
You literally a pimple on the ass of time.
Centuries come and go, yet an insignificant closed minded ass pimple like you knows what's normal.
STFU .

Screw you, you dumb ass denier. Fuck you and your greed.

There it is -

I got him to say the magic word - greed.

It's not science at all.
Its political.

It's a movement, socialist in nature to shut down Capitalism and other systems where life's losers fall short



Continue to fall short loser.

Unlike you I care for the world I leave my children. All this bull shit about socialism is just that. Bull shit to paralyze the public to take action all in order to preserve the vested interest of the fossil fuel industry. A fossil fuel industry that has spent hundreds of millions to convince people like you that climate change is not real when they have known better for the past 40 years.

That's crap. These energy companies are part of the push for the green new deal, they are ready for it. If you think a carbon tax will hurt them? You are nuts. It will just be passed right on TO YOU! I have some far left Canadian Socialist friends whining about, and blaming their conservative province governor about energy prices. . . Some of them are switching to wood burning stoves. lol duh. That sort of defeats the purpose. And yet? They were once like you. . . begging for "global warming solutions." duh.

All of these elite energy companies are completely on board with the UN program. THEY KNOW that if there is a carbon tax, folks will STILL be using oil, gas etc. Nothing compares to the energy output of their product, the planet cannot get by w/o them.

This is about global elites controlling EVERYTHING you do.

All of these elites, and the corporate boards have plans already drawn up. YOU just aren't paying attention.

Contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals - Energy Factor Exxon

UN Sustainable Development Goals | Sustainability | Home BP

UN sustainable development goals - Shell Sustainability Report 2018

Saudi Vision 2030

Zero relevance to the science. What a waste of time that post was.

You don't know shit about science.

Give it up man.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

read the interview from the original source before these draconian elitists took it down.

No liar, it's a fake quote.

 

[whitehall]

Ever recorded? Scientists have only been collecting atmospheric data in Antarctica for fifty years and during most of that time they were using something akin to a gas station thermometer mounted outside the window.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You don't know shit about science.

I didn't claim to, crybaby. I claimed to defer to science and scientists instead of uneducated right-wing American slobs. . Pay attention.

 

[the other mike]

Screw you, you dumb ass denier. Fuck you and your greed.

There it is -

I got him to say the magic word - greed.

It's not science at all.
Its political.

It's a movement, socialist in nature to shut down Capitalism and other systems where life's losers fall short



Continue to fall short loser.

Unlike you I care for the world I leave my children. All this bull shit about socialism is just that. Bull shit to paralyze the public to take action all in order to preserve the vested interest of the fossil fuel industry. A fossil fuel industry that has spent hundreds of millions to convince people like you that climate change is not real when they have known better for the past 40 years.

That's crap. These energy companies are part of the push for the green new deal, they are ready for it. If you think a carbon tax will hurt them? You are nuts. It will just be passed right on TO YOU! I have some far left Canadian Socialist friends whining about, and blaming their conservative province governor about energy prices. . . Some of them are switching to wood burning stoves. lol duh. That sort of defeats the purpose. And yet? They were once like you. . . begging for "global warming solutions." duh.

All of these elite energy companies are completely on board with the UN program. THEY KNOW that if there is a carbon tax, folks will STILL be using oil, gas etc. Nothing compares to the energy output of their product, the planet cannot get by w/o them.

This is about global elites controlling EVERYTHING you do.

All of these elites, and the corporate boards have plans already drawn up. YOU just aren't paying attention.

Contributing to the Sustainable Development Goals - Energy Factor Exxon

UN Sustainable Development Goals | Sustainability | Home BP

UN sustainable development goals - Shell Sustainability Report 2018

Saudi Vision 2030

Zero relevance to the science. What a waste of time that post was.

You don't know shit about science.

Give it up man.

Just because they tried to pull off a carbon tax scam doesn't mean all the scientific evidence of climate change isn't factual.