Antarctica has grown ice for more than 2.7 million years, disproving "interglacials" completely

[EMH]

"I don't understand your long answers and big words, so it's all fake."

Did you think real scientific explanations would fit on a bumper sticker?

You haven't fooled ANYONE here.

You are paid by CO2 FRAUD to come here and lie, obstruct, make false claims, and insist fudged data is real and actual data is not real.

 

[Anomalism]

You haven't fooled ANYONE here.

You are paid by CO2 FRAUD to come here and lie, obstruct, make false claims, and insist fudged data is real and actual data is not real.

Flattery will get you nowhere.

So that's your new escape hatch, huh?

"You're being paid."

Lol

 

[EMH]

Flattery will get you nowhere.

So that's your new escape hatch, huh?

"You're being paid."

Lol

Then why are you here polluting every thread in Enviro section with CO2 FRAUD bullshit that has been outed as BS here for years?

 

[Anomalism]

Then why are you here polluting every thread in Enviro section

Because your incoherence deserves to be met by reality.

 

[EMH]

Because your incoherence deserves to be met by reality.

LOL!!!

You've lost every single time. You are delusional if you haven't figured that out...


Your last argument was

it doesn't matter that Jamaica suffered Cat 1 damage, a Cat 5 went ashore as a Cat 5, it just left Cat 1 damage....


CLASSIC CO2 FRAUD

 

[Anomalism]

LOL!!!

You've lost every single time. You are delusional if you haven't figured that out...


Your last argument was

it doesn't matter that Jamaica suffered Cat 1 damage, a Cat 5 went ashore as a Cat 5, it just left Cat 1 damage....


CLASSIC CO2 FRAUD

My argument was that hurricanes aren't measured by your intuition about how much damage should have been done.

 

[EMH]

My argument was that hurricanes aren't measured by your intuition about how much damage should have been done.

When a hurricane makes landfall in a certain category, it does specific and documented damage.

There was no place on Jamaica that had anything more than Cat 1 damage.

Had a storm come ashore as a Cat 5, it would have leveled every tree and wooden building.


The damage to Jamaica proves Melissa was not a Cat 5 when it came ashore.

NWS lied and gave us a faux image of a Cat 5 that was not the actual storm Melissa that hit Jamaica as a Cat 1.

 

[Anomalism]

When a hurricane makes landfall in a certain category, it does specific and documented damage.

There was no place on Jamaica that had anything more than Cat 1 damage.

Had a storm come ashore as a Cat 5, it would have leveled every tree and wooden building.


The damage to Jamaica proves Melissa was not a Cat 5 when it came ashore.

NWS lied and gave us a faux image of a Cat 5 that was not the actual storm Melissa that hit Jamaica as a Cat 1.

You are so ignorant that it's difficult to carry on a conversation.

Anyway, you're going in circles now. I've already explained why your position is asinine.

 

[EMH]

asinine = noticing the Cat 1 damage on Jamaica is proof Melissa did not come ashore as a Cat 5, or noticing CO2 FRAUD lying about anything and everything else

 

[Anomalism]

asinine = noticing the Cat 1 damage on Jamaica is proof Melissa did not come ashore as a Cat 5, or noticing CO2 FRAUD lying about anything and everything else

We don't measure hurricanes by the damage they do.

 

[EMH]

^^^^^^^

LOL!!!

Hurricane damage by category is classified according to the Saffir-Simpson scale, which includes:

• Category 1 (74-95 mph): Minimal damage, such as roof shingles and tree branches affected.
  
  1
• Category 2 (96-110 mph): Moderate damage, including significant roof and siding damage, uprooted trees, and extended power outages.
  
  2
• Category 3 (111-129 mph): Extensive damage, with the potential for major structural damage and flooding.
  
  2
• Category 4 (130-156 mph): Severe damage, with catastrophic effects on homes and infrastructure.
  
  2
• Category 5 (157 mph or higher): Total destruction of buildings, with a high percentage of homes being uninhabitable.
  
  1
  These categories help estimate the potential damage and inform preparedness efforts.

 

[Anomalism]

^^^^^^^

LOL!!!

Hurricane damage by category is classified according to the Saffir-Simpson scale, which includes:

• Category 1 (74-95 mph): Minimal damage, such as roof shingles and tree branches affected.
  
  1
• Category 2 (96-110 mph): Moderate damage, including significant roof and siding damage, uprooted trees, and extended power outages.
  
  2
• Category 3 (111-129 mph): Extensive damage, with the potential for major structural damage and flooding.
  
  2
• Category 4 (130-156 mph): Severe damage, with catastrophic effects on homes and infrastructure.
  
  2
• Category 5 (157 mph or higher): Total destruction of buildings, with a high percentage of homes being uninhabitable.
  
  1
  These categories help estimate the potential damage and inform preparedness efforts.

Your ignorance is obnoxious.

 

[ding]

You’re conflating trigger and driver, again. Yes, AMOC responds to density changes and yes, glacial interglacial cycles set the long term rhythm, but that’s the slow background, not the current spike. Modern warming isn’t paced by orbital cycles or post glacial residuals; it’s orders of magnitude faster and globally uniform in ways natural recovery cannot produce. Detection and attribution studies explicitly remove glacial and oceanic signals. Without anthropogenic CO2 forcing, the observed 20th–21st century trend disappears. Denying this is hand waving, not science.

No, I'm not conflating trigger and driver. You are refusing to accept the ocean is responsible for abrupt climate changes. You believe orbital forcing is... which I believe is dumb.

Climate variability isn't well understood. Clearly the system is capable of warming another 2C all on it's own. Just because they can't understand it doesn't mean they should ignore the empirical climate evidence of the geologic record. Rather they should be seeking to understand it so that they can then model anthropogenic changes more accurately.

 

[EMH]

You are refusing to accept the ocean is responsible for abrupt climate changes.

Two taxpayer funded liars continue to pollute the Enviro section.


You have absolutely zero evidence of abrupt climate change, ZERO.

 

[ding]

Two taxpayer funded liars continue to pollute the Enviro section.


You have absolutely zero evidence of abrupt climate change, ZERO.

Go away. You are a moron. I'm not going to waste my time with a moron.

 

[EMH]

^^^^

because there is NO EVIDENCE of "abrupt climate change"

 

[ding]

^^^^

because there is NO EVIDENCE of "abrupt climate change"

The geologic record is littered with them.

 

[EMH]

The geologic record is littered with them.

Show us...

What happened and when....

 

[ding]

Show us...

What happened and when....

I have. Many times. Go eat a bullet.

 

[EMH]

I have. Many times. Go eat a bullet.

You show a chart of oxygen isotopes from one ice core in AA that doesn't show ANY "abrupt climate change."