Another slam dunk if Trump plays it right during debate, tell Americans "if I win, I will demand reparations from China for the Wuhan Virus".

[Coyote]

Is this another gimmick like he'll make Mexico pay for the wall?

(are voters really so stupid to go for it twice?)

they keep falling for RUSSIA
they believe RAPE for kavanaugh
they believe trump said to drink bleach
they believe random phone calls heard by anon people are grounds for impeachment
they believe destroying a hard drive is ok UNLESS they don't like you

if you really want to get into stupid voters debate, i'm certainly in. but let's look at all; not just those you don't like.

but you won't do that.

So...you seen the check from Mexico yet?

oh look who finally replies to pull a "whataboutism" since this isn't about mexico. i'll be glad to discuss a SINGLE topic with you but you won't do that. you ignore all what i said above to get a trump shot in that can ONLY be met according to your OWN standards.

like i said - you use your own rules that change from topic to topic and then get mad when i try to establish position on a single topic and call me a troll.

and tell me where trump ever said he would get a check from mexico vs. alter trade deals to where we come out ahead, paying for the wall.

when YOUR SIDE hears him say "drink bleach" when he never said it, it's a given you hear what you want and pretend it's true. stop doing that shit and a vast majority of our "problems" will poof.

Ok. You could have just said it in one sentence instead of 4 paragraphs going off on "your side" this and "your side" that.

Trump hasn't made Mexico pay for the wall. And, by implication, voters would fall for the same rhetorical wet dream if he promised to make China pay "reparations" for the virus.

Get real.

You asked for a check.

Where did Trump define how it would be paid for?

I am happy rephrase it: 4 years in and Mexico has yet to pay for it.

 

[iceberg]

Is this another gimmick like he'll make Mexico pay for the wall?

(are voters really so stupid to go for it twice?)

they keep falling for RUSSIA
they believe RAPE for kavanaugh
they believe trump said to drink bleach
they believe random phone calls heard by anon people are grounds for impeachment
they believe destroying a hard drive is ok UNLESS they don't like you

if you really want to get into stupid voters debate, i'm certainly in. but let's look at all; not just those you don't like.

but you won't do that.

So...you seen the check from Mexico yet?

oh look who finally replies to pull a "whataboutism" since this isn't about mexico. i'll be glad to discuss a SINGLE topic with you but you won't do that. you ignore all what i said above to get a trump shot in that can ONLY be met according to your OWN standards.

like i said - you use your own rules that change from topic to topic and then get mad when i try to establish position on a single topic and call me a troll.

and tell me where trump ever said he would get a check from mexico vs. alter trade deals to where we come out ahead, paying for the wall.

when YOUR SIDE hears him say "drink bleach" when he never said it, it's a given you hear what you want and pretend it's true. stop doing that shit and a vast majority of our "problems" will poof.

Ok. You could have just said it in one sentence instead of 4 paragraphs going off on "your side" this and "your side" that.

Trump hasn't made Mexico pay for the wall. And, by implication, voters would fall for the same rhetorical wet dream if he promised to make China pay "reparations" for the virus.

Get real.

You asked for a check.

Where did Trump define how it would be paid for?

I am happy rephrase it: 4 years in and Mexico has yet to pay for it.

Again, where did Trump specify HOW they would pay for it? We need the criteria you are using to judge this. If he never said they'd write a check, it's a bit of a stretch to use that as your barameter.

You love to say I deflect but you never directly answer a question.

 

[Coyote]

Again, where did Trump specify HOW they would pay for it? We need the criteria you are using to judge this. If he never said they'd write a check, it's a bit of a stretch to use that as your barameter.

You love to say I deflect but you never directly answer a question.

Actually, you are being again...a silly waste of time splitting hairs here. Not playing your game.

Four years in, has Mexico paid for the Wall? No. Now stop schilling for Trump on this particular issue.

 

[iceberg]

Again, where did Trump specify HOW they would pay for it? We need the criteria you are using to judge this. If he never said they'd write a check, it's a bit of a stretch to use that as your barameter.

You love to say I deflect but you never directly answer a question.

Actually, you are being again...a silly waste of time splitting hairs here. Not playing your game.

Four years in, has Mexico paid for the Wall? No. Now stop schilling for Trump on this particular issue.

I'm defining the success criteria.

you never allow that you must have your "victory" vs find that common ground. if we define it then you may have to give credit. OH NO.

stop showing off your emotional imbalances.

 

[BULLDOG]

Again, where did Trump specify HOW they would pay for it? We need the criteria you are using to judge this. If he never said they'd write a check, it's a bit of a stretch to use that as your barameter.

You love to say I deflect but you never directly answer a question.

Actually, you are being again...a silly waste of time splitting hairs here. Not playing your game.

Four years in, has Mexico paid for the Wall? No. Now stop schilling for Trump on this particular issue.

I'm defining the success criteria.

you never allow that you must have your "victory" vs find that common ground. if we define it then you may have to give credit. OH NO.

stop showing off your emotional imbalances.

That's just nuts. Trump defined the terms when he said Mexico would pay. Your trying to redefine his promise is moving the goal post.

 

[Coyote]

Again, where did Trump specify HOW they would pay for it? We need the criteria you are using to judge this. If he never said they'd write a check, it's a bit of a stretch to use that as your barameter.

You love to say I deflect but you never directly answer a question.

Actually, you are being again...a silly waste of time splitting hairs here. Not playing your game.

Four years in, has Mexico paid for the Wall? No. Now stop schilling for Trump on this particular issue.

I'm defining the success criteria.

you never allow that you must have your "victory" vs find that common ground. if we define it then you may have to give credit. OH NO.

stop showing off your emotional imbalances.

Good grief. So this is all about me and my “emotional imbalances” because I won’t play your game? Have to give credit? To who or what?

You are parsing words because you have no alternative. Because, 4 years in, it’s pretty blatantly obvious that no...Mexico didn’t pay for the wall nor is it likely to.

Now most, normal, people will write it off as campaign rhetoric. But not you, you fixated on my figure of speech, writing a check, because that is easy...low hanging fruit. Then you throw in “emotional imbalances”...why? Not sure of your motive there, but it is noteworthy that the more I ignore you, the more desperate you are to invoke some sort of reaction.

I think I already said this...but it bears repeating. I am not interested in your games.

 

[WTF19]

Again, where did Trump specify HOW they would pay for it? We need the criteria you are using to judge this. If he never said they'd write a check, it's a bit of a stretch to use that as your barameter.

You love to say I deflect but you never directly answer a question.

Actually, you are being again...a silly waste of time splitting hairs here. Not playing your game.

Four years in, has Mexico paid for the Wall? No. Now stop schilling for Trump on this particular issue.

its not a game, you deflect. is there a reason you dont answer the question?

 

[iceberg]

Again, where did Trump specify HOW they would pay for it? We need the criteria you are using to judge this. If he never said they'd write a check, it's a bit of a stretch to use that as your barameter.

You love to say I deflect but you never directly answer a question.

Actually, you are being again...a silly waste of time splitting hairs here. Not playing your game.

Four years in, has Mexico paid for the Wall? No. Now stop schilling for Trump on this particular issue.

I'm defining the success criteria.

you never allow that you must have your "victory" vs find that common ground. if we define it then you may have to give credit. OH NO.

stop showing off your emotional imbalances.

Good grief. So this is all about me and my “emotional imbalances” because I won’t play your game? Have to give credit? To who or what?

You are parsing words because you have no alternative. Because, 4 years in, it’s pretty blatantly obvious that no...Mexico didn’t pay for the wall nor is it likely to.

Now most, normal, people will write it off as campaign rhetoric. But not you, you fixated on my figure of speech, writing a check, because that is easy...low hanging fruit. Then you throw in “emotional imbalances”...why? Not sure of your motive there, but it is noteworthy that the more I ignore you, the more desperate you are to invoke some sort of reaction.

I think I already said this...but it bears repeating. I am not interested in your games.

Simply showing you that you refuse to define success criteria.

You said Mexico never sent a check. I asked if that's, what Trump said? You never showed he did.

If he did then I'd say you are right, he failed.

You simply refuse to define anything. Just get emo and tell me I'm the problem for wanting to nail down success criteria so we at least are on the same page.

 

[Coyote]

Again, where did Trump specify HOW they would pay for it? We need the criteria you are using to judge this. If he never said they'd write a check, it's a bit of a stretch to use that as your barameter.

You love to say I deflect but you never directly answer a question.

Actually, you are being again...a silly waste of time splitting hairs here. Not playing your game.

Four years in, has Mexico paid for the Wall? No. Now stop schilling for Trump on this particular issue.

I'm defining the success criteria.

you never allow that you must have your "victory" vs find that common ground. if we define it then you may have to give credit. OH NO.

stop showing off your emotional imbalances.

Good grief. So this is all about me and my “emotional imbalances” because I won’t play your game? Have to give credit? To who or what?

You are parsing words because you have no alternative. Because, 4 years in, it’s pretty blatantly obvious that no...Mexico didn’t pay for the wall nor is it likely to.

Now most, normal, people will write it off as campaign rhetoric. But not you, you fixated on my figure of speech, writing a check, because that is easy...low hanging fruit. Then you throw in “emotional imbalances”...why? Not sure of your motive there, but it is noteworthy that the more I ignore you, the more desperate you are to invoke some sort of reaction.

I think I already said this...but it bears repeating. I am not interested in your games.

Simply showing you that you refuse to define success criteria.

You said Mexico never sent a check. I asked if that's, what Trump said? You never showed he did.

If he did then I'd say you are right, he failed.

You simply refuse to define anything. Just get emo and tell me I'm the problem for wanting to nail down success criteria so we at least are on the same page.

Then perhaps we should go back to the original question, the one where you deflected (with your emo laden screed of antI-Trump grievances)...and never answered. Or, you can go back to parsing words and pretending you are nailing down criteria.

 

[iceberg]

Again, where did Trump specify HOW they would pay for it? We need the criteria you are using to judge this. If he never said they'd write a check, it's a bit of a stretch to use that as your barameter.

You love to say I deflect but you never directly answer a question.

Actually, you are being again...a silly waste of time splitting hairs here. Not playing your game.

Four years in, has Mexico paid for the Wall? No. Now stop schilling for Trump on this particular issue.

I'm defining the success criteria.

you never allow that you must have your "victory" vs find that common ground. if we define it then you may have to give credit. OH NO.

stop showing off your emotional imbalances.

Good grief. So this is all about me and my “emotional imbalances” because I won’t play your game? Have to give credit? To who or what?

You are parsing words because you have no alternative. Because, 4 years in, it’s pretty blatantly obvious that no...Mexico didn’t pay for the wall nor is it likely to.

Now most, normal, people will write it off as campaign rhetoric. But not you, you fixated on my figure of speech, writing a check, because that is easy...low hanging fruit. Then you throw in “emotional imbalances”...why? Not sure of your motive there, but it is noteworthy that the more I ignore you, the more desperate you are to invoke some sort of reaction.

I think I already said this...but it bears repeating. I am not interested in your games.

Simply showing you that you refuse to define success criteria.

You said Mexico never sent a check. I asked if that's, what Trump said? You never showed he did.

If he did then I'd say you are right, he failed.

You simply refuse to define anything. Just get emo and tell me I'm the problem for wanting to nail down success criteria so we at least are on the same page.

Then perhaps we should go back to the original question, the one where you deflected (with your emo laden screed of antI-Trump grievances)...and never answered. Or, you can go back to parsing words and pretending you are nailing down criteria.

I can't answer a question where we've not defined what Trump himself said he would do.

You refuse to tell me what Trump said would be the payment.

So how, can I say if he made them or not if we've not agreed on what that would be.

Either way.

You make 2+2 complex if you don't like 4.

 

[Indeependent]

Is this another gimmick like he'll make Mexico pay for the wall?

(are voters really so stupid to go for it twice?)

Biden will build a Green Clean Wall.

 

[Claudette]

Definitely but it has to be a coalition of nations led by Trump IMO.

Nobody will join Trump in anything. I believe we still have some allies who would help America if we needed it despite Trump's crap, but nobody would lift a finger to help that fat orange idiot.

You give a bad name to fat orange idiots

and you support pedophiles? i see

50% of Trump voters believe in Q-anon. 30% of Trump voters believe in birtherism. Trump voters are clearly lacking in critical thinking skills and will believe anything.

Biden voters are just plain stupid. Who would vote for someone who will raise taxes and implement green shit that would bankrupt the country??

Oh wait. I forgot. You're a stupid Biden supporter. Never mind.

Yes, a President with policies, plans and good ideas, who needs that?

Trump cut taxes and tried to bring back coal, and refuses to address climate change. Trump really has bankrupted and destroyed the economy? If not for the tax cuts to billionaires, your deficit would be less than half of what is now is. How has that all worked out for you so far?

Biden is raising taxes on billionaires, and the top 10% of taxpayers. You must be really, really rich if you don't support raising taxes on billionaires. If not, you're a complete fool who continues to believe Republican bullshit and lies.

Well obviously we need taxes raised and green shit that will bankrupt everyone.

Sure he is. He's raising taxes on corps and people who make 400,000 or more. Of course he's to dumb to know that cutting taxes puts more money into the economy and the Fed coffers than raising them ever did. Kennedy, Reagan and Trump knew this but Biden sure as hell doesn't.

He will also raise Capital Gains from 21 to 28% and that will affect the stock market and everyone else. Not very smart.

Oh and his green shit will tank everything.

Seems you forgot. Before the Chinese virus UE was the lowest it had been in 50 years and we had jobs all across this country. We also had a great economy and all that with good plans and good ideas. All that with Trump at the helm.

Climate change is a hoax. The climate has been changing for billions of years and will continue to change when you are dust.

You're the complete fool and just love Biden's lies. I'm not a republican. Just someone who's way smarter than your stupid ass will ever be.

Unemployment was at it's lowest levels in years and years when Trump took office. The economy was doing just fine when Trump took office. Trump did nothing to improve the economy, all he did was take credit for Obama's economy, and then crash it into a tree.

The economy slowed down after Trump's election. His job creation, unemployment numbers, GDP and stock market growth for the first three years of his Presidency are all lower than than last 3 years of Obama's second term.

No one cares what will happen with the stock market going forward. 80% of Americans own no stocks or 401K's at all. Furthermore, for those who do, Obama DOUBLED the DOW in his first four term in office. The DOW is barely up 30% in Trump's first term.

If I owned stocks, I'd take Obama's record with the market over Trump or W's record any day of the week - regardless of higher capitals gains taxes. If I get a 200% percent return on my investment, I don't mind paying an extra in capital gains tax 7% tax at all on that capital gain. I'm WAY further ahead with a Biden in the White House.

Cutting taxes for billionaires isn't putting money into anyone's pockets but those already in the Top 1%. Worse, it's taking the money out of the pockets of the working and middle classes. Wealth inequity accelerates with every tax cut, as does poverty. Neither of these things were a problem before 1980, and neither are a problem in the rest of the first world where 80% of the wealth isn't flowing to the top 20%.

Only an idiot thinks manmade climate change is a "hoax".

Well for the lousy job you say he did. Trump did well. UE the lowest its been in 50 years, Jobs all across the country and a great economy. Oh Barry left him a fair hand but Trump improved on it by getting rid of Barry's business stopping EO's and putting in his own which helped business. Companies hire and that's great for the economy.

I'm no billionaire and I've done quite well in the four years Trump has been POTUS.

Oh brother. You and climate change. Al Gore laughed his way to the bank with his Climate Change gig.

Hell in 1815 or thereabouts there was no summer. It snowed in July and August and there was no carbon foot print back then. People starved because they couldn't grow crops. Again. No carbon footprint in 1815.

The Climate changed just as it has been doing for billions of years. Its doesn't take a carbon footprint for that to happen.

But you go ahead and embrace the climate change bullshit. I'll just stand over here and LMAO at you.

How are you doing right now? What was happening while Trump was coasting on the Obama economy's coattails is gone and it's not coming back under this president. Harking back to what happened before Trump crashed the economy when he has no plan on how to re-open the economy is idiocy on the hoof, albeit typical of you.

Biden restarted the economy for Obama, and Joe has a plan based on his prior experience. Trump is relying on the same magical thinking, that put you in this mess in the first place.

Everything you believe is "crackpot" has been very successful everywhere else in the world, and we're all doing a whole lot better than you are. You're really close to a banana republic economy right now and Trump has no plan to do anything different than right now. Shovel money to billionaires and continue to line his own pockets.

Trump didn't crash the economy the Chinese virus did that. You know the virus the Dems called a hoax.

Biden's plan will be a train wreck especially if he get the green shit he wants.

I'm doing just fine. Oh and the economy will be back once the Chinese virus is licked. Trump will bring it back. If Biden gets elected it will be a train wreck.

Seems you forgot Trump donates his salary where he thinks it will help. He certainly isn't lining his pockets but you might want to check Biden's pockets. Hunter has funneled quite bit his way if the stories are true.

The Chinese virus cut taxes and ran up the deficit The Chinese virus funnelled the stimulous to large corporations and not working people? The Chinese virus gave tax breaks to millionaires in the stimulus? The Chinese virus refused to shut down and stay shut down until the virus was quashed.

Trump's response to the Chinese virus crashed the economy. Of all of the first world countries in the world, only the USA lost -32% GDP in the second quarter. Canada -11.2%, EU -11.5%
.
Do you have any financial analysts or statisticians to back up this bullshit or did Trump just pull that straight out of his ass, and you swallowed it whole? Unfortunately we can't do a financial analysis of Trump's economic plans and policies because HE DOESN'T HAVE ONE.

Trump donates his salary to impress gullible fools like you, while he stuffs his pockets full of cash through shady means:

Trump Campaign’s $63 Million Dwarfed by Biden’s $177 Million (Published 2020)

New financial filings showed the extent of the president’s cash troubles, as he is now badly outmatched by Joe Biden.

www.nytimes.com

Opinion | Trump’s Corruption: The Definitive List (Published 2018)

The many ways that the president, his family and his aides are lining their own pockets.

www.nytimes.com

Trump Is Running His Campaign Like He Ran His Businesses

The president is again profiting handsomely at the expense of those trusting enough to give him money.

www.theatlantic.com

Laughing at people who are doing a whole lot better than you are. Every day, in every way, you prove how gullible you are.

I never laugh at people who are successful and I don't really care. I have a good life and live it.

In every way, every day, you prove what an biased idiot you are.

 

[L.K.Eder]

Is this another gimmick like he'll make Mexico pay for the wall?

(are voters really so stupid to go for it twice?)

well, the reelection strategy seems to hinge on a repeat of "but her emails", but this time without 30 years of smearing prior to that. and some other differences...

 

[JoeB131]

He is achieving it with Sudan and their support of terror in the past, why should China not face a class action lawsuit from the world for spreading this virus around the globe without any provocation?

Sudan will be getting more in aid than they will be paying out...

Has Mexico paid for the wall yet?

 

[pknopp]

Is this another gimmick like he'll make Mexico pay for the wall?

(are voters really so stupid to go for it twice?)

they keep falling for RUSSIA
they believe RAPE for kavanaugh
they believe trump said to drink bleach
they believe random phone calls heard by anon people are grounds for impeachment
they believe destroying a hard drive is ok UNLESS they don't like you

if you really want to get into stupid voters debate, i'm certainly in. but let's look at all; not just those you don't like.

but you won't do that.

So...you seen the check from Mexico yet?

oh look who finally replies to pull a "whataboutism" since this isn't about mexico. i'll be glad to discuss a SINGLE topic with you but you won't do that. you ignore all what i said above to get a trump shot in that can ONLY be met according to your OWN standards.

like i said - you use your own rules that change from topic to topic and then get mad when i try to establish position on a single topic and call me a troll.

and tell me where trump ever said he would get a check from mexico vs. alter trade deals to where we come out ahead, paying for the wall.

when YOUR SIDE hears him say "drink bleach" when he never said it, it's a given you hear what you want and pretend it's true. stop doing that shit and a vast majority of our "problems" will poof.

Ok. You could have just said it in one sentence instead of 4 paragraphs going off on "your side" this and "your side" that.

Trump hasn't made Mexico pay for the wall. And, by implication, voters would fall for the same rhetorical wet dream if he promised to make China pay "reparations" for the virus.

Get real.

You asked for a check.

Where did Trump define how it would be paid for?

I am happy rephrase it: 4 years in and Mexico has yet to pay for it.

Again, where did Trump specify HOW they would pay for it? We need the criteria you are using to judge this. If he never said they'd write a check, it's a bit of a stretch to use that as your barameter.

You love to say I deflect but you never directly answer a question.

He did say that they perhaps would write a check. You know this. All the same it's not being done in any manner or form.

 

[IM2]

There will be no reparations from China.. You racists are ******* ignorant. There are conditions that must be met for reparations and American business people catching a virus from traveling to a foreign country ain't one of them.

No but letting your citizens travel to a foreign country carrying the virus is one of them.

No it isn't. People made that choice. This was not an act of war, You racists don't understand what reparations are because you've been race pimped. There will be no reparations from China. It is not the fault of the chinese government that our president removed the CDC from China, ignored warning given to him in daily briefings and refused to take action when the first infections hit.

 

[Claudette]

There will be no reparations from China.. You racists are ******* ignorant. There are conditions that must be met for reparations and American business people catching a virus from traveling to a foreign country ain't one of them.

No but letting your citizens travel to a foreign country carrying the virus is one of them.

No it isn't. People made that choice. This was not an act of war, You racists don't understand what reparations are because you've been race pimped. There will be no reparations from China. It is not the fault of the chinese government that our president removed the CDC from China, ignored warning given to him in daily briefings and refused to take action when the first infections hit.

Its not Trumps fault that the Chinese didn't lock down their country to keep the virus in China.

Its certainly not his fault that it made its way to the US. Its a pandemic shit for brains and the CDC in China wasn't going to stop it.

And just what actions did you have in mind since the CDC told everyone to wear a mask and practice social distancing. That's about all anyone could do.

You really are a biased ass.

 

[Dragonlady]

He is achieving it with Sudan and their support of terror in the past, why should China not face a class action lawsuit from the world for spreading this virus around the globe without any provocation?

I seen to have heard this line before. "I'm going to build a wall and Mexico is going to pay for it". Where is that cheque from Mexico? Shouldn't they have paid for that wall by now? Trump needs new material. Recycling the lies that worked in 2016 is failing miserably today, because Americans have learned from their mistakes, and that Trump lies.

The idiocy of Trump wasting government money suing the Sudan is ridiculous. Even if the USA wins the lawsuit, how are you going to collect from a one of the poorest nations on earth with one of the lowest GDP in the world? The answer is, you can't. Only an idiot enters into a lawsuit when the other party is broke and you have no hope of collecting, even if you win. Donald Trump is that idiot, who has used law suits to courts and bully intimidate others all of his life.

Suing China is a fools errand meant to deflect from the failure of his response to the pandemic. All that China would have to do, is to point out that other first world countries have not suffered the levels of disease, death or economic devastation as the USA, and the court would find for the Defendant. The Chinese would point out that most of the problems in the USA were caused by the inaction and lack of preparation by the Trump administration, during the period of January 2nd, when China warned the world, and March 13th when Trump announced his task force.

Incidentally, many of the states are planning "manslaughter" or "negligent homicide" charges against Donald Trump for promoting false information on the pandemic which has cost tens of thousands of American lives.

Blaming your own like you do making China a victim instead of an instigator to war is part of the Prog extreme feminist guilt trip. When you end up with far less or even nothing you will then blame someone else and it will be to late.

Where have I made China a victim? You're the ones who claim that Trump's re-election campaign is a victim of the pandemic. Poor Trump. He was coasting to re-election and he was doing such a great job - none of which was true. Put when Trump loses, it will not be his fault. This is the very definition of playing the victim card.

In reality, the Trump re-election chances were slim at best. Telling the public what a great job you're doing on the economy is not the same thing as actually doing a great job on the economy.

Trump has run the WORST campaign in history. The American people are sick of the crazy uncle they elected President. The incompetence, the corruption, and the chaos. They elected Trump to work for THEM, not himself.

 

[shockedcanadian]

He is achieving it with Sudan and their support of terror in the past, why should China not face a class action lawsuit from the world for spreading this virus around the globe without any provocation?

I seen to have heard this line before. "I'm going to build a wall and Mexico is going to pay for it". Where is that cheque from Mexico? Shouldn't they have paid for that wall by now? Trump needs new material. Recycling the lies that worked in 2016 is failing miserably today, because Americans have learned from their mistakes, and that Trump lies.

The idiocy of Trump wasting government money suing the Sudan is ridiculous. Even if the USA wins the lawsuit, how are you going to collect from a one of the poorest nations on earth with one of the lowest GDP in the world? The answer is, you can't. Only an idiot enters into a lawsuit when the other party is broke and you have no hope of collecting, even if you win. Donald Trump is that idiot, who has used law suits to courts and bully intimidate others all of his life.

Suing China is a fools errand meant to deflect from the failure of his response to the pandemic. All that China would have to do, is to point out that other first world countries have not suffered the levels of disease, death or economic devastation as the USA, and the court would find for the Defendant. The Chinese would point out that most of the problems in the USA were caused by the inaction and lack of preparation by the Trump administration, during the period of January 2nd, when China warned the world, and March 13th when Trump announced his task force.

Incidentally, many of the states are planning "manslaughter" or "negligent homicide" charges against Donald Trump for promoting false information on the pandemic which has cost tens of thousands of American lives.

Blaming your own like you do making China a victim instead of an instigator to war is part of the Prog extreme feminist guilt trip. When you end up with far less or even nothing you will then blame someone else and it will be to late.

Where have I made China a victim? You're the ones who claim that Trump's re-election campaign is a victim of the pandemic. Poor Trump. He was coasting to re-election and he was doing such a great job - none of which was true. Put when Trump loses, it will not be his fault. This is the very definition of playing the victim card.

In reality, the Trump re-election chances were slim at best. Telling the public what a great job you're doing on the economy is not the same thing as actually doing a great job on the economy.

Trump has run the WORST campaign in history. The American people are sick of the crazy uncle they elected President. The incompetence, the corruption, and the chaos. They elected Trump to work for THEM, not himself.

Ontarios economy has been getting crushed for decades, we are now basically insolvent. A function of a covert kakistocracy that has milked Canada dry.

We had better hope Trump wins, or it's about to get a WHOLE lot worse...

 

[IM2]

There will be no reparations from China.. You racists are ******* ignorant. There are conditions that must be met for reparations and American business people catching a virus from traveling to a foreign country ain't one of them.

No but letting your citizens travel to a foreign country carrying the virus is one of them.

No it isn't. People made that choice. This was not an act of war, You racists don't understand what reparations are because you've been race pimped. There will be no reparations from China. It is not the fault of the chinese government that our president removed the CDC from China, ignored warning given to him in daily briefings and refused to take action when the first infections hit.

Its not Trumps fault that the Chinese didn't lock down their country to keep the virus in China.

Its certainly not his fault that it made its way to the US. Its a pandemic shit for brains and the CDC in China wasn't going to stop it.

And just what actions did you have in mind since the CDC told everyone to wear a mask and practice social distancing. That's about all anyone could do.

You really are a biased ass.

No Claudette, I'm not biased. I just don't fall for racist assholes. There will be no reparations from china. trump was warned and did nothing. The results we see are his fault.