Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you understand the term veto proof majority?
Do you understand the term veto proof majority?
Your boy signed it into law. The congress didn't pass a law restricting the president as you and many others have charged. They can't. You lied. You're busted.
"But he had to". "He had no other choice". Isn't the same as the congress passed a law restricting the plans to close GITMO.
Obama owns it. Deal with it.
Of course they can and did. Starting in 2009. They passed a law denying him the funds to do it. He signed the law because it passed with a supermajority and they would have been able to override a veto.
Remember this woman?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bg98BvqUvCc
Well.. she's now a "racist" because she no longer supports Obama and is calling him a "Fraud".
Hey, Obama! Where?s my mortgage payment?
Surprisingly, some six years into the Obama presidency, Joseph has turned against the president, disappointed that he did not deliver on his hope and change campaign promises.
:::::::::::
Truth and honesty are important, Joseph explained to Gilbert in the film. He lied about everything.
Joseph explained that after doing some research and listening more carefully to Obama, she realized he was a fraud, and just like the Wizard of Oz, Obama has turned out to be nothing more than a man behind a curtain.
Do you understand the term veto proof majority?
Your boy signed it into law. The congress didn't pass a law restricting the president as you and many others have charged. They can't. You lied. You're busted.
"But he had to". "He had no other choice". Isn't the same as the congress passed a law restricting the plans to close GITMO.
Obama owns it. Deal with it.
Of course they can and did. Starting in 2009. They passed a law denying him the funds to do it. He signed the law because it passed with a supermajority and they would have been able to override a veto.
Funds to Close Guantánamo Denied
Published: May 20, 2009
WASHINGTON The Senate voted overwhelmingly on Wednesday to cut from a war spending bill the $80 million requested by President Obama to close the detention center at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, and to bar the transfer of detainees to the United States and its territories.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/21/us/politics/21detain.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
His EO still stands and Congress is still able to block it.
Of course they can and did. Starting in 2009. They passed a law denying him the funds to do it. He signed the law because it passed with a supermajority and they would have been able to override a veto.
We're talking about the Ike Skelton National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2011 signed into law by Obama in Jan 2011.
Congress cannot pass a law with out it being passed by the senate and signed into law by the POTUS.
He signed it for cover. If he believed in his position he would have vetoed it and let the chips fall where they may.
Your boy signed the bill into law.
Whose "we" cowboy, you got a frog in your pocket?.
Your boy signed it into law. The congress didn't pass a law restricting the president as you and many others have charged. They can't. You lied. You're busted.
"But he had to". "He had no other choice". Isn't the same as the congress passed a law restricting the plans to close GITMO.
Obama owns it. Deal with it.
Of course they can and did. Starting in 2009. They passed a law denying him the funds to do it. He signed the law because it passed with a supermajority and they would have been able to override a veto.
Funds to Close Guantánamo Denied
Published: May 20, 2009
WASHINGTON The Senate voted overwhelmingly on Wednesday to cut from a war spending bill the $80 million requested by President Obama to close the detention center at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, and to bar the transfer of detainees to the United States and its territories.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/21/us/politics/21detain.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
His EO still stands and Congress is still able to block it.
So you just proved that the far left denied their messiah the ability to close something that is not a apart of his charter..
horseshit statement : "He signed it for cover. If he believed in his position he would have vetoed it and let the chips fall where they may." Only an assumption without evidence.
Whose "we" cowboy, you got a frog in your pocket?.
All of us watching you squirm for getting caught in a lie.
We understand you're embarrassed.
Obama signed the bill into law. Embrace the suck.
Congress blocked and continues to block his EO closing Gitmo.
Congress blocked and continues to block his EO closing Gitmo.
...and on your planet Obama is not responsible or accountable for anything. Even a bill he signed into law preventing funds to move prisoners out of GITMO.
He and his party control two thirds of the government but it is only congress to blame for anything. Got it.
horseshit statement : "He signed it for cover. If he believed in his position he would have vetoed it and let the chips fall where they may." Only an assumption without evidence.
Valid point. It is an assumption on my part. I can't prove it.
If he had stuck to his convictions and vetoed it there is also not proof a supermajority would have overridden his veto. It probably would have since nobody, congressmen, senators and governors wanted those prisoners in their states. But no one at the time could have foreseen the future. I think (and cannot prove) he was asked by his party to sign it so it wouldn't go to a veto showdown. Cover. My assumption. Guilty.
Bottom line was Obama didn't have the conviction or balls to veto the bill.
