Another QUIZ for Liberals

[protectionist]

Listen, bub! I was fortunately not brought up in a fun loving household. The gun culture is repugnant to me, yet I TOLERATE those who own guns responsibly. I don't need to be called names by some wannabe Dirty Harry. Would you put a gun into every hand, or would you want guns to be used by those who feel competent and secure in their safe use? I pull out a gun in some cinematic flourish and the chances are I hurt someone or someone takes that gun and hurts me or others.

Of course guns should only be owned and carried by those who are competent and secure in their safe use. That includes those of sound mind - which would exclude those who engage in childish name calling like "wannabe Dirty Harry".

It would also exclude those whose insufficient education has resulted in them thinking the OP scenario is extreme.

PS - the "gun culture" is the Constitution.

I am educated. And the gun culture IS NOT the constitution. If it were, Americans would be required to own one. Call me dumb? Fuck off Dirty Harry!

You are about as educated as a moth. Of course what you call "gun culture" is the Constitution. That's where our gun laws come from.

You are a victim of a pitifully deficient MISeducation, that has left you dangerously clueless.

 

[OldLady]

Suppose you are threatened with violence, by an irrational stranger. You display your legally carried gun, and warn the guy to keep his hands visible.

Right then, he reaches into his pocket. What do you do ?

Please: Liberals only answer this.

Shoot him.

Ever see the movie "Crash"?

Nope. What did I miss?

A scene that would make you think twice about what you posted. Actually several.
Scenes about acting before thinking. Scenes about being led astray on the sole basis of one's suspicions.

I recommend it.

Best movie I've seen in a long time.

 

[my2¢]

I'm liberal enough not to own a gun.

 

[OldLady]

First of all there are a giant number of variables here. The only person who has threatened me with violence is a police man. Now as for an irrational stranger i would be trying to help the man with his derangement and have no need to show any gun or weapon. That sets off irrational people. Also I look in the eyes of everyone I talk to so I can tell if they are cons or not. If he is a con then there is no hope and I take him down and terminate his life. If he is not a republican then there is hope so I will keep trying to get him into a stable mental place.

Hopefully, in the near future you will find yourself a stable mental place ,( before you encounter an irrational, violent individual.)

My carry weapon is a PPQ 9mm with Federal 147 grn HST/ LE, always loaded with full magazine and chambered. 1. Don't get in arguments. If one starts, back off "if" you can. At least 3, no more than 10ft or less. If you have felt the need to draw your weapon because you are threatened, do not display it. Immediately aim center mass! Think about situations before you get into one and how to handle them. If it's his coat pocket, you can be shot without the threat pulling a weapon out. Put as many rounds as possible into threat until it ceases to be a threat. If it is a blue jeans pocket, it is very unlikely they could hit from the pocket and nobody can quick draw me from a blue jeans pocket if my aiming point is already center mass. You owe it to yourself "if" you can take the time to be reasonably sure. Some nut ball committing suicide by using you will f*ck you up unless you are as bad a piece of sh*t as they are. Do what you got to do, but if you haven't planned your actions on contact ahead of time, other that knee jerk/gun jerk reactions, perhaps you should evaluate whether you should carry. Anyone can pass the tests and learn to shoot a weapon and become licensed to carry as is their right. That doesn't mean everybody should, just because it is a right.

Far more people should carry than actually do (especially women). I would display my gun if threatened, and have done so on multiple occasions. Every time the rogue backed off and disappeared.

That doesn't mean they will every time. Point is to be ready to shoot when necessary. If the rogue doesn't back off and fails to keep his hands visible, you must shoot him.

If guns were controlled in this country the way I think they should be, there would be no reason to think the irrational person would have a gun in his pocket. Peace.

 

[protectionist]

I'm liberal enough not to own a gun.

And be in danger, needlessly. Another product of the pathetically deficient MISeducation system.

 

[protectionist]

First of all there are a giant number of variables here. The only person who has threatened me with violence is a police man. Now as for an irrational stranger i would be trying to help the man with his derangement and have no need to show any gun or weapon. That sets off irrational people. Also I look in the eyes of everyone I talk to so I can tell if they are cons or not. If he is a con then there is no hope and I take him down and terminate his life. If he is not a republican then there is hope so I will keep trying to get him into a stable mental place.

Hopefully, in the near future you will find yourself a stable mental place ,( before you encounter an irrational, violent individual.)

My carry weapon is a PPQ 9mm with Federal 147 grn HST/ LE, always loaded with full magazine and chambered. 1. Don't get in arguments. If one starts, back off "if" you can. At least 3, no more than 10ft or less. If you have felt the need to draw your weapon because you are threatened, do not display it. Immediately aim center mass! Think about situations before you get into one and how to handle them. If it's his coat pocket, you can be shot without the threat pulling a weapon out. Put as many rounds as possible into threat until it ceases to be a threat. If it is a blue jeans pocket, it is very unlikely they could hit from the pocket and nobody can quick draw me from a blue jeans pocket if my aiming point is already center mass. You owe it to yourself "if" you can take the time to be reasonably sure. Some nut ball committing suicide by using you will f*ck you up unless you are as bad a piece of sh*t as they are. Do what you got to do, but if you haven't planned your actions on contact ahead of time, other that knee jerk/gun jerk reactions, perhaps you should evaluate whether you should carry. Anyone can pass the tests and learn to shoot a weapon and become licensed to carry as is their right. That doesn't mean everybody should, just because it is a right.

Far more people should carry than actually do (especially women). I would display my gun if threatened, and have done so on multiple occasions. Every time the rogue backed off and disappeared.

That doesn't mean they will every time. Point is to be ready to shoot when necessary. If the rogue doesn't back off and fails to keep his hands visible, you must shoot him.

If guns were controlled in this country the way I think they should be, there would be no reason to think the irrational person would have a gun in his pocket. Peace.

100% FALSE! I was born and raised in the most gun controlled city in America, New York. I lived there for 30 years. I have since moved about the country, but have never lived anywhere where there were more guns in pockets than in New York.

Another city similar to this is Chicago. Lots of gun control law, lots of guns, and most of them in the hands of criminals, who pay no attention to the law.

All gun control does is take guns away from law abiding people, leaving them defenseless against well'armed criminals.

 

[protectionist]

First of all there are a giant number of variables here. The only person who has threatened me with violence is a police man. Now as for an irrational stranger i would be trying to help the man with his derangement and have no need to show any gun or weapon. That sets off irrational people. Also I look in the eyes of everyone I talk to so I can tell if they are cons or not. If he is a con then there is no hope and I take him down and terminate his life. If he is not a republican then there is hope so I will keep trying to get him into a stable mental place.

Hopefully, in the near future you will find yourself a stable mental place ,( before you encounter an irrational, violent individual.)

My carry weapon is a PPQ 9mm with Federal 147 grn HST/ LE, always loaded with full magazine and chambered. 1. Don't get in arguments. If one starts, back off "if" you can. At least 3, no more than 10ft or less. If you have felt the need to draw your weapon because you are threatened, do not display it. Immediately aim center mass! Think about situations before you get into one and how to handle them. If it's his coat pocket, you can be shot without the threat pulling a weapon out. Put as many rounds as possible into threat until it ceases to be a threat. If it is a blue jeans pocket, it is very unlikely they could hit from the pocket and nobody can quick draw me from a blue jeans pocket if my aiming point is already center mass. You owe it to yourself "if" you can take the time to be reasonably sure. Some nut ball committing suicide by using you will f*ck you up unless you are as bad a piece of sh*t as they are. Do what you got to do, but if you haven't planned your actions on contact ahead of time, other that knee jerk/gun jerk reactions, perhaps you should evaluate whether you should carry. Anyone can pass the tests and learn to shoot a weapon and become licensed to carry as is their right. That doesn't mean everybody should, just because it is a right.

Far more people should carry than actually do (especially women). I would display my gun if threatened, and have done so on multiple occasions. Every time the rogue backed off and disappeared.

That doesn't mean they will every time. Point is to be ready to shoot when necessary. If the rogue doesn't back off and fails to keep his hands visible, you must shoot him.

If guns were controlled in this country the way I think they should be, there would be no reason to think the irrational person would have a gun in his pocket. Peace.

One cannot have "Peace" while unarmed.

 

[Norman]

Suppose you are threatened with violence, by an irrational stranger. You display your legally carried gun, and warn the guy to keep his hands visible.

Right then, he reaches into his pocket. What do you do ?

Please: Liberals only answer this.

When it comes to liberal vs. Darwin, you can always bet on Darwin.

 

[Nosmo King]

I am educated. And the gun culture IS NOT the constitution. If it were, Americans would be required to own one. Call me dumb? Fuck off Dirty Harry!

Unfortunately for you, the 2nd amendment to the Constitution gives every American the RIGHT to own firearms. The Constitution was not created to form a 'gun culture' which does not exist and is a figment of your imagination. You are a great example of the mental illness which is modern liberalism.

You have limited rights to own guns, not an absolutes right. Gun ownership is a privledge.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Suppose you are threatened with violence, by an irrational stranger. You display your legally carried gun, and warn the guy to keep his hands visible.

Right then, he reaches into his pocket. What do you do ?

Please: Liberals only answer this.

I shoot his fucking ass in self defense

Oh my! Liberals HATE guns. Liberals are AFRAID of guns.

 

[my2¢]

I'm liberal enough not to own a gun.

And be in danger, needlessly. Another product of the pathetically deficient MISeducation system.

That's your way of looking at it. I find life better living without fear of somebody putting their hand in their pocket.

 

[Pogo]

Suppose you are threatened with violence, by an irrational stranger. You display your legally carried gun, and warn the guy to keep his hands visible.

Right then, he reaches into his pocket. What do you do ?

Please: Liberals only answer this.

First of all there are a giant number of variables here. The only person who has threatened me with violence is a police man. Now as for an irrational stranger i would be trying to help the man with his derangement and have no need to show any gun or weapon. That sets off irrational people. Also I look in the eyes of everyone I talk to so I can tell if they are cons or not. If he is a con then there is no hope and I take him down and terminate his life. If he is not a republican then there is hope so I will keep trying to get him into a stable mental place.

Yep, police aren't the only ones who've ever threatened me with violence, but they are the only ones who ever pulled guns on me. Had I been carrying per the OP fantasy, there would have been at least two dead, three if I was a good shot.

Another Tard threatened by the police. How would there be two dead there, Tard? You don't own a gun, you don't have a gun, you leading a double life? Is this another one of your errant bluffs, like your claim you "Aced" the last quiz for liberals? Don't show 'em any fear---- you'd be showing all the fear in the world pissing down your leg if your life were ever really in danger!

While you're visiting that shrink I advised for you pathetic little meltdown about etymology, ask around for a reading teacher as well. Because if you ever figure out how to read you'll go back and see that what I wrote was that ***IF*** I lived in the childish comic-book world of the OP and his gun fetish fellow travellers, ***THEN*** there would have been a shootout, because that's what that mentality wants and expects.

That's what we call a "conditional" scenario, which is probably way over your tiny little head.

Oh and as far as "showing fear", you'd be surprised; it works on wild animals too. I just applied it to the human animal. And again like the etymology thing, what I did worked and there ain't a god damn thing you can do about it. All of which merely means that one can be more creative than the knuckledragging mentality of "duh, shoot 'em all, duh".

You use that "no fear" method of yours the next time a panther is charging you. A real killer doesn't give a crap whether you are afraid or not. It wants your throat. I can see you've not yet ever met a REAL threat.

It appears to be working just fine on you right now, donut. But you are correct, you ain't no real threat.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Of course, but I want to hear from the Liberals.

There aren't any liberals in this forum.


There seems to be no end to the number of authoritarian leftists, though.

 

[Pogo]

Suppose you are threatened with violence, by an irrational stranger. You display your legally carried gun, and warn the guy to keep his hands visible.

Right then, he reaches into his pocket. What do you do ?

Please: Liberals only answer this.

Shoot him.

Ever see the movie "Crash"?

Nope. What did I miss?

A scene that would make you think twice about what you posted. Actually several.
Scenes about acting before thinking. Scenes about being led astray on the sole basis of one's suspicions.

I recommend it.

Best movie I've seen in a long time.

Imagine -- ME of all creatures, giving a movie recommendation.

True, it raises outstanding questions that are rarely raised. I guess I liked it because it's so anti-stereotype and that demonstrates the fallacy of generalizations.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Suppose you are threatened with violence, by an irrational stranger. You display your legally carried gun, and warn the guy to keep his hands visible.

Right then, he reaches into his pocket. What do you do ?

Please: Liberals only answer this.

First of all there are a giant number of variables here. The only person who has threatened me with violence is a police man. Now as for an irrational stranger i would be trying to help the man with his derangement and have no need to show any gun or weapon. That sets off irrational people. Also I look in the eyes of everyone I talk to so I can tell if they are cons or not. If he is a con then there is no hope and I take him down and terminate his life. If he is not a republican then there is hope so I will keep trying to get him into a stable mental place.

Yep, police aren't the only ones who've ever threatened me with violence, but they are the only ones who ever pulled guns on me. Had I been carrying per the OP fantasy, there would have been at least two dead, three if I was a good shot.

Another Tard threatened by the police. How would there be two dead there, Tard? You don't own a gun, you don't have a gun, you leading a double life? Is this another one of your errant bluffs, like your claim you "Aced" the last quiz for liberals? Don't show 'em any fear---- you'd be showing all the fear in the world pissing down your leg if your life were ever really in danger!

While you're visiting that shrink I advised for you pathetic little meltdown about etymology, ask around for a reading teacher as well. Because if you ever figure out how to read you'll go back and see that what I wrote was that ***IF*** I lived in the childish comic-book world of the OP and his gun fetish fellow travellers, ***THEN*** there would have been a shootout, because that's what that mentality wants and expects.

That's what we call a "conditional" scenario, which is probably way over your tiny little head.

Oh and as far as "showing fear", you'd be surprised; it works on wild animals too. I just applied it to the human animal. And again like the etymology thing, what I did worked and there ain't a god damn thing you can do about it. All of which merely means that one can be more creative than the knuckledragging mentality of "duh, shoot 'em all, duh".

Now stepping up to accept the award for poster most impressed with himself with the very least amount of reason for such, please give it up for Pogo!

 

[toobfreak]

Suppose you are threatened with violence, by an irrational stranger. You display your legally carried gun, and warn the guy to keep his hands visible.

Right then, he reaches into his pocket. What do you do ?

Please: Liberals only answer this.

First of all there are a giant number of variables here. The only person who has threatened me with violence is a police man. Now as for an irrational stranger i would be trying to help the man with his derangement and have no need to show any gun or weapon. That sets off irrational people. Also I look in the eyes of everyone I talk to so I can tell if they are cons or not. If he is a con then there is no hope and I take him down and terminate his life. If he is not a republican then there is hope so I will keep trying to get him into a stable mental place.

Yep, police aren't the only ones who've ever threatened me with violence, but they are the only ones who ever pulled guns on me. Had I been carrying per the OP fantasy, there would have been at least two dead, three if I was a good shot.

Another Tard threatened by the police. How would there be two dead there, Tard? You don't own a gun, you don't have a gun, you leading a double life? Is this another one of your errant bluffs, like your claim you "Aced" the last quiz for liberals? Don't show 'em any fear---- you'd be showing all the fear in the world pissing down your leg if your life were ever really in danger!

While you're visiting that shrink I advised for you pathetic little meltdown about etymology, ask around for a reading teacher as well. Because if you ever figure out how to read you'll go back and see that what I wrote was that ***IF*** I lived in the childish comic-book world of the OP and his gun fetish fellow travellers, ***THEN*** there would have been a shootout, because that's what that mentality wants and expects.

That's what we call a "conditional" scenario, which is probably way over your tiny little head.

Oh and as far as "showing fear", you'd be surprised; it works on wild animals too. I just applied it to the human animal. And again like the etymology thing, what I did worked and there ain't a god damn thing you can do about it. All of which merely means that one can be more creative than the knuckledragging mentality of "duh, shoot 'em all, duh".

You use that "no fear" method of yours the next time a panther is charging you. A real killer doesn't give a crap whether you are afraid or not. It wants your throat. I can see you've not yet ever met a REAL threat. BTW, pogodreamer, show us this last quiz for liberals you aced. I'd love to see it.

 

[Pogo]

Suppose you are threatened with violence, by an irrational stranger. You display your legally carried gun, and warn the guy to keep his hands visible.

Right then, he reaches into his pocket. What do you do ?

Please: Liberals only answer this.

First of all there are a giant number of variables here. The only person who has threatened me with violence is a police man. Now as for an irrational stranger i would be trying to help the man with his derangement and have no need to show any gun or weapon. That sets off irrational people. Also I look in the eyes of everyone I talk to so I can tell if they are cons or not. If he is a con then there is no hope and I take him down and terminate his life. If he is not a republican then there is hope so I will keep trying to get him into a stable mental place.

Yep, police aren't the only ones who've ever threatened me with violence, but they are the only ones who ever pulled guns on me. Had I been carrying per the OP fantasy, there would have been at least two dead, three if I was a good shot.

Another Tard threatened by the police. How would there be two dead there, Tard? You don't own a gun, you don't have a gun, you leading a double life? Is this another one of your errant bluffs, like your claim you "Aced" the last quiz for liberals? Don't show 'em any fear---- you'd be showing all the fear in the world pissing down your leg if your life were ever really in danger!

While you're visiting that shrink I advised for you pathetic little meltdown about etymology, ask around for a reading teacher as well. Because if you ever figure out how to read you'll go back and see that what I wrote was that ***IF*** I lived in the childish comic-book world of the OP and his gun fetish fellow travellers, ***THEN*** there would have been a shootout, because that's what that mentality wants and expects.

That's what we call a "conditional" scenario, which is probably way over your tiny little head.

Oh and as far as "showing fear", you'd be surprised; it works on wild animals too. I just applied it to the human animal. And again like the etymology thing, what I did worked and there ain't a god damn thing you can do about it. All of which merely means that one can be more creative than the knuckledragging mentality of "duh, shoot 'em all, duh".

Now stepping up to accept the award for poster most impressed with himself with the very least amount of reason for such, please give it up for Pogo!

Translation: Damn right I bite back. Hard.

 

[Pogo]

Suppose you are threatened with violence, by an irrational stranger. You display your legally carried gun, and warn the guy to keep his hands visible.

Right then, he reaches into his pocket. What do you do ?

Please: Liberals only answer this.

First of all there are a giant number of variables here. The only person who has threatened me with violence is a police man. Now as for an irrational stranger i would be trying to help the man with his derangement and have no need to show any gun or weapon. That sets off irrational people. Also I look in the eyes of everyone I talk to so I can tell if they are cons or not. If he is a con then there is no hope and I take him down and terminate his life. If he is not a republican then there is hope so I will keep trying to get him into a stable mental place.

Yep, police aren't the only ones who've ever threatened me with violence, but they are the only ones who ever pulled guns on me. Had I been carrying per the OP fantasy, there would have been at least two dead, three if I was a good shot.

Another Tard threatened by the police. How would there be two dead there, Tard? You don't own a gun, you don't have a gun, you leading a double life? Is this another one of your errant bluffs, like your claim you "Aced" the last quiz for liberals? Don't show 'em any fear---- you'd be showing all the fear in the world pissing down your leg if your life were ever really in danger!

While you're visiting that shrink I advised for you pathetic little meltdown about etymology, ask around for a reading teacher as well. Because if you ever figure out how to read you'll go back and see that what I wrote was that ***IF*** I lived in the childish comic-book world of the OP and his gun fetish fellow travellers, ***THEN*** there would have been a shootout, because that's what that mentality wants and expects.

That's what we call a "conditional" scenario, which is probably way over your tiny little head.

Oh and as far as "showing fear", you'd be surprised; it works on wild animals too. I just applied it to the human animal. And again like the etymology thing, what I did worked and there ain't a god damn thing you can do about it. All of which merely means that one can be more creative than the knuckledragging mentality of "duh, shoot 'em all, duh".

You use that "no fear" method of yours the next time a panther is charging you. A real killer doesn't give a crap whether you are afraid or not. It wants your throat. I can see you've not yet ever met a REAL threat. BTW, pogodreamer, show us this last quiz for liberals you aced. I'd love to see it.

Ah, so you waxed your carrot all prolific about the last quiz without even seeing it? We shouldn't be surprised.
I'd be glad to paste it in.

OP said:

Identify the following people >>

1. Crystal Mangum

2. Lemrick Nelson

3. C. Vernon Mason

4. Mike Nifong

5. Lawrence Katz

6. Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez

7. Edmund Perry

8. Eleanor Bumpurs

9. Stephen Sullivan

10. AND: What was the end result of the Democrat Party charge/claim that >> "in the 2000 election, more than 1 million African Americans were disenfranchised in one of the most tainted elections in history." (?)

So I sez:

Oboy! A quiz! Time to win me sum munneh.



1. Crystal Mangum

Crystal Gayle's sister, her motto: "You Mangum, I bang 'em"​

2. Lemrick Nelson

Irish movie actor and noted hothead​

3. C. Vernon Mason

Signed dollar bills back in the day. Treasury Sec or sump'm like that.
​

4. Mike Nifong

Understudy for Tommy Chong.​

5. Lawrence Katz

The Jewish version of Lawrence Welk​

6. Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez

Number six on the all-time list of "Names You Enjoy Saying", just behind Emiliana Torini.​

7. Edmund Perry

Went to the North Pole where he painted it with red and white diagonal stripes and put a motor on it.​

8. Eleanor Bumpurs

Invented the popular Bumpur Car rides found at many a county fair​

9. Stephen Sullivan

One-fourth of the famous 1970s group Cosby, Sullivan, Gilbert and Nash​

10. AND: What was the end result of the Democrat Party charge/claim that >> "in the 2000 election, more than 1 million African Americans were disenfranchised in one of the most tainted elections in history." (?)

Trick question --- there is no such thing as a "Democrat Party"

​

I frickin' aced this one. What do I win?

Commonly known as "silly answers to silly questions'.

 

[toobfreak]

First of all there are a giant number of variables here. The only person who has threatened me with violence is a police man. Now as for an irrational stranger i would be trying to help the man with his derangement and have no need to show any gun or weapon. That sets off irrational people. Also I look in the eyes of everyone I talk to so I can tell if they are cons or not. If he is a con then there is no hope and I take him down and terminate his life. If he is not a republican then there is hope so I will keep trying to get him into a stable mental place.

Yep, police aren't the only ones who've ever threatened me with violence, but they are the only ones who ever pulled guns on me. Had I been carrying per the OP fantasy, there would have been at least two dead, three if I was a good shot.

Another Tard threatened by the police. How would there be two dead there, Tard? You don't own a gun, you don't have a gun, you leading a double life? Is this another one of your errant bluffs, like your claim you "Aced" the last quiz for liberals? Don't show 'em any fear---- you'd be showing all the fear in the world pissing down your leg if your life were ever really in danger!

While you're visiting that shrink I advised for you pathetic little meltdown about etymology, ask around for a reading teacher as well. Because if you ever figure out how to read you'll go back and see that what I wrote was that ***IF*** I lived in the childish comic-book world of the OP and his gun fetish fellow travellers, ***THEN*** there would have been a shootout, because that's what that mentality wants and expects.

That's what we call a "conditional" scenario, which is probably way over your tiny little head.

Oh and as far as "showing fear", you'd be surprised; it works on wild animals too. I just applied it to the human animal. And again like the etymology thing, what I did worked and there ain't a god damn thing you can do about it. All of which merely means that one can be more creative than the knuckledragging mentality of "duh, shoot 'em all, duh".

Now stepping up to accept the award for poster most impressed with himself with the very least amount of reason for such, please give it up for Pogo!

Translation: Damn right I bite back. Hard.

Perception vs. Reality:

 

[toobfreak]

First of all there are a giant number of variables here. The only person who has threatened me with violence is a police man. Now as for an irrational stranger i would be trying to help the man with his derangement and have no need to show any gun or weapon. That sets off irrational people. Also I look in the eyes of everyone I talk to so I can tell if they are cons or not. If he is a con then there is no hope and I take him down and terminate his life. If he is not a republican then there is hope so I will keep trying to get him into a stable mental place.

Yep, police aren't the only ones who've ever threatened me with violence, but they are the only ones who ever pulled guns on me. Had I been carrying per the OP fantasy, there would have been at least two dead, three if I was a good shot.

Another Tard threatened by the police. How would there be two dead there, Tard? You don't own a gun, you don't have a gun, you leading a double life? Is this another one of your errant bluffs, like your claim you "Aced" the last quiz for liberals? Don't show 'em any fear---- you'd be showing all the fear in the world pissing down your leg if your life were ever really in danger!

While you're visiting that shrink I advised for you pathetic little meltdown about etymology, ask around for a reading teacher as well. Because if you ever figure out how to read you'll go back and see that what I wrote was that ***IF*** I lived in the childish comic-book world of the OP and his gun fetish fellow travellers, ***THEN*** there would have been a shootout, because that's what that mentality wants and expects.

That's what we call a "conditional" scenario, which is probably way over your tiny little head.

Oh and as far as "showing fear", you'd be surprised; it works on wild animals too. I just applied it to the human animal. And again like the etymology thing, what I did worked and there ain't a god damn thing you can do about it. All of which merely means that one can be more creative than the knuckledragging mentality of "duh, shoot 'em all, duh".

You use that "no fear" method of yours the next time a panther is charging you. A real killer doesn't give a crap whether you are afraid or not. It wants your throat. I can see you've not yet ever met a REAL threat. BTW, pogodreamer, show us this last quiz for liberals you aced. I'd love to see it.

Ah, so you waxed your carrot all prolific about the last quiz without even seeing it? We shouldn't be surprised.
I'd be glad to paste it in.

OP said:

Identify the following people >>

1. Crystal Mangum

2. Lemrick Nelson

3. C. Vernon Mason

4. Mike Nifong

5. Lawrence Katz

6. Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez

7. Edmund Perry

8. Eleanor Bumpurs

9. Stephen Sullivan

10. AND: What was the end result of the Democrat Party charge/claim that >> "in the 2000 election, more than 1 million African Americans were disenfranchised in one of the most tainted elections in history." (?)

So I sez:

Oboy! A quiz! Time to win me sum munneh.



1. Crystal Mangum

Crystal Gayle's sister, her motto: "You Mangum, I bang 'em"​

2. Lemrick Nelson

Irish movie actor and noted hothead​

3. C. Vernon Mason

Signed dollar bills back in the day. Treasury Sec or sump'm like that.
​

4. Mike Nifong

Understudy for Tommy Chong.​

5. Lawrence Katz

The Jewish version of Lawrence Welk​

6. Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez

Number six on the all-time list of "Names You Enjoy Saying", just behind Emiliana Torini.​

7. Edmund Perry

Went to the North Pole where he painted it with red and white diagonal stripes and put a motor on it.​

8. Eleanor Bumpurs

Invented the popular Bumpur Car rides found at many a county fair​

9. Stephen Sullivan

One-fourth of the famous 1970s group Cosby, Sullivan, Gilbert and Nash​

10. AND: What was the end result of the Democrat Party charge/claim that >> "in the 2000 election, more than 1 million African Americans were disenfranchised in one of the most tainted elections in history." (?)

Trick question --- there is no such thing as a "Democrat Party"

​

I frickin' aced this one. What do I win?

Commonly known as "silly answers to silly questions'.

Typical Pogo deflection. Leaves him feeling so good about himself. His ego needs it.