- Thread starter
- #41
You really need help.Ocean currents effect temperatures. Ocean currents change all the time. Ocean currents do not explain ice age vs. no ice age. Only tectonic plate movement and latitude do...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You really need help.Ocean currents effect temperatures. Ocean currents change all the time. Ocean currents do not explain ice age vs. no ice age. Only tectonic plate movement and latitude do...
Sure they doOcean currents effect temperatures. Ocean currents change all the time. Ocean currents do not explain ice age vs. no ice age. Only tectonic plate movement and latitude do...
By "ice age glaciers" I presume you mean glaciers that have been present since the last glacial period. I don't think that's what EMH means by the term, but there's really no telling.We have ice age glaciers here in Oregon ... as far south as the Southern Sierras ...
The melting of ice age glaciers along the equator is disrupting tourism there ... {Cite} ...
[giggle] ...
you are a liar, where is your proof, this is a thread about proof, by your rules you have to provide proof when you make statementsthere is enough evidence supporting the AGW theory to have convinced very close to every climate scientist on the planet.
There’s no proof she saysyou are a liar, where is your proof, this is a thread about proof, by your rules you have to provide proof when you make statements
and you prove that as well, go ahead and provide proofThere’s no proof she says
Crock claims there’s no proof in scienceand you prove that as well, go ahead and provide proof
the solution increases pollution by increasing the size and use of Heavy IndustryCrock claims there’s no proof in science
Good lord, you are a moron.Not quite. The Pacific Ocean currents are like the wind. They do not control ice ages.
This is what you and crock are equating....
Alaska has ice just on top of mountains.... and has trees and grass north of Arctic Circle...
![]()
Greenland is in continent specific ice age and has mile thick ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle, as well as 7% of Earth ice (AA has 90%)
![]()
Maybe when land gets to 600 miles of an Earth pole, the annual snowfall ceases to fully melt in the summer, and it starts to stack, and that is the start of a continent specific ice age....
but it requires an IQ over 5 to think that through....
Crick claims there are no proofs in the natural sciences.Crock claims there’s no proof in science
Hahaha there you goCrick claims there are no proofs in the natural sciences.
Except….Crick claims there are no proofs in the natural sciences.
the solution increases pollution by increasing the size and use of Heavy Industry
You have been shown over and over and over again that the CO2 produced during construction is rapidly offset by producing power without emissions. It's a simple and obvious point, yet you keep ignoring it or blatantly denying it as you did here with the statement I've highlighted. You're actually well beyond the point at which an objective observer would conclude that poster Reiny Days is a liar.Hydro is only carbon-neutral in its production of electricity ... building the dam is extremely carbon-intensive ... anything with cement ... including nuclear plants ...
The solutions are more damaging than the problems of carbon dioxide ... curtailing Hamas is a good enough reason to conserve oil ... don't you think? ... only morons put solar panels on coal seams ...
Says the guy who won't discuss the bizarre, unsupported, extreme magnification of the instantaneous GHG effect of CO2.You have been shown over and over and over again that the CO2 produced during construction is rapidly offset by producing power without emissions. It's a simple and obvious point, yet you keep ignoring it or blatantly denying it as you did here with the statement I've highlighted. You're actually well beyond the point at which an objective observer would conclude that poster Reiny Days is a liar.
hydro, all the good rivers have big dams, so there is no way to expand hydroHydro is only carbon-neutral in its production of electricity ... building the dam is extremely carbon-intensive ... anything with cement ... including nuclear plants ...
The solutions are more damaging than the problems of carbon dioxide ... curtailing Hamas is a good enough reason to conserve oil ... don't you think? ... only morons put solar panels on coal seams ...
What do you find hard to believe?AnOTHER Open Challenge for my AGW Friends
I find that hard to believe
read all the comments crick, it is obvious if you doWhat do you find hard to believe?