Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
WE'RE #16 NOW! WoooHooo!
(I feel like Slim Pickens riding the nuke down in the movie 'Doctor Strange Love' lol)
We're Number 16! U.S. Drops Again in Economic Freedom - Breitbart
WE'RE #16 NOW! WoooHooo!
(I feel like Slim Pickens riding the nuke down in the movie 'Doctor Strange Love' lol)
We're Number 16! U.S. Drops Again in Economic Freedom - Breitbart
Imagine that, were on the right track then, its a conservative and libertarian think tank in Canada. and Canada has had universal health care and SSM for longer than us. Look what the elites have done to us, smothered us to death , now they want to take SS and Medicare, that will make lots of more wealthy free people. Hong Kong is not a Christian nation last I checked.
As recently as 2000, the United States was the second-freest economy in the world.
Were still recovering from Bush.
WE'RE #16 NOW! WoooHooo!
(I feel like Slim Pickens riding the nuke down in the movie 'Doctor Strange Love' lol)
We're Number 16! U.S. Drops Again in Economic Freedom - Breitbart
Imagine that, were on the right track then, its a conservative and libertarian think tank in Canada. and Canada has had universal health care and SSM for longer than us. Look what the elites have done to us, smothered us to death , now they want to take SS and Medicare, that will make lots of more wealthy free people. Hong Kong is not a Christian nation last I checked.
Were still recovering from Bush.
Ummm...'recovering' would mean there is and has been progress since the man who promised to cut our debt in half by the end of his 1st term was over took office (but ended up adding over $6 trillion in only 4 years). Not long ago we were #12...now we're #16. That's a decline, not a recovery...under Obama!
WE'RE #16 NOW! WoooHooo!
(I feel like Slim Pickens riding the nuke down in the movie 'Doctor Strange Love' lol)
We're Number 16! U.S. Drops Again in Economic Freedom - Breitbart
Imagine that, were on the right track then, its a conservative and libertarian think tank in Canada. and Canada has had universal health care and SSM for longer than us. Look what the elites have done to us, smothered us to death , now they want to take SS and Medicare, that will make lots of more wealthy free people. Hong Kong is not a Christian nation last I checked.
The punctuation abuse makes babies Strunk and White cry.
And two terms to hit rock bottom???Were still recovering from Bush.
Ummm...'recovering' would mean there is and has been progress since the man who promised to cut our debt in half by the end of his 1st term was over took office (but ended up adding over $6 trillion in only 4 years). Not long ago we were #12...now we're #16. That's a decline, not a recovery...under Obama!
Cleaning up Bush's mess takes money.
Were still recovering from Bush.
Ummm...'recovering' would mean there is and has been progress since the man who promised to cut our debt in half by the end of his 1st term was over took office (but ended up adding over $6 trillion in only 4 years). Not long ago we were #12...now we're #16. That's a decline, not a recovery...under Obama!
Cleaning up Bush's mess takes money.
Were still recovering from Bush.
Ummm...'recovering' would mean there is and has been progress since the man who promised to cut our debt in half by the end of his 1st term was over took office (but ended up adding over $6 trillion in only 4 years). Not long ago we were #12...now we're #16. That's a decline, not a recovery...under Obama!
Cleaning up Bush's mess takes money.
The problem with your premise is that Liberals all agree that the decline in the economy began in the last 2 years of Bush's last 2 years in office. Up until then, despite 9/11/01 / the economic collapse as a result of 9/11/01 / 2 wars Bush had only added 2 1/2 Trillion in debt over 6 years....in the last 2 years 1 1/2 Trillion in debt was added. So what was the change, why the explosion in added debt? Whoever control the Congress controls the purse strings is the old saying even Democrats agree with...except when they are the ones holding the purse strings!
In the last 2 years of the Bush administration the purse strings were held by the Democrats, who were 1 seat away from TRULY having a 'super-majority' control of Congress. They held this level of control until the end of Obama's 2nd year in office.
SO, if the decline in the economy began in the last 2 years of the Bush administration, picking up speed downhill like a sled on a greased track, it was the DEMOCRATS who began making the mess. At the very LEAST the Democrats can say that the added 1.5 Trillion added at the end of the Bush administration (last 2 years) was 'SHARED debt addition', but the OVER $6 Trillion in new debt added under Obama is all Obama's and his fellow democrats'!
And as I said, Obama promised he would cut our debt in half by the end of his 1st term. By the end of his 1st term he had added more debt than EVERY other US President COMBINED!
We are paying a lot for Syria, and Libya cost a lot as well (which is still a mess), not to mention Iraq. . All this was planned before 911, the pentagon had lost trillions, according to Rumsfeld. All the disabled vets cost money, Bush made a mess out of it with his buddies , and they came out of it stinking rich.
WE'RE #16 NOW! WoooHooo!
(I feel like Slim Pickens riding the nuke down in the movie 'Doctor Strange Love' lol)
We're Number 16! U.S. Drops Again in Economic Freedom - Breitbart
Were still recovering from Bush.
Ummm...'recovering' would mean there is and has been progress since the man who promised to cut our debt in half by the end of his 1st term was over took office (but ended up adding over $6 trillion in only 4 years). Not long ago we were #12...now we're #16. That's a decline, not a recovery...under Obama!
Cleaning up Bush's mess takes money.
The problem with your premise is that Liberals all agree that the decline in the economy began in the last 2 years of Bush's last 2 years in office. Up until then, despite 9/11/01 / the economic collapse as a result of 9/11/01 / 2 wars Bush had only added 2 1/2 Trillion in debt over 6 years....in the last 2 years 1 1/2 Trillion in debt was added. So what was the change, why the explosion in added debt? Whoever control the Congress controls the purse strings is the old saying even Democrats agree with...except when they are the ones holding the purse strings!
In the last 2 years of the Bush administration the purse strings were held by the Democrats, who were 1 seat away from TRULY having a 'super-majority' control of Congress. They held this level of control until the end of Obama's 2nd year in office.
SO, if the decline in the economy began in the last 2 years of the Bush administration, picking up speed downhill like a sled on a greased track, it was the DEMOCRATS who began making the mess. At the very LEAST the Democrats can say that the added 1.5 Trillion added at the end of the Bush administration (last 2 years) was 'SHARED debt addition', but the OVER $6 Trillion in new debt added under Obama is all Obama's and his fellow democrats'!
And as I said, Obama promised he would cut our debt in half by the end of his 1st term. By the end of his 1st term he had added more debt than EVERY other US President COMBINED!
We are paying a lot for Syria, and Libya cost a lot as well (which is still a mess), not to mention Iraq. . All this was planned before 911, the pentagon had lost trillions, according to Rumsfeld. All the disabled vets cost money, Bush made a mess out of it with his buddies , and they came out of it stinking rich.
too bad like all psychic's she a day late and a few bricks short of a full load.Were still recovering from Bush.
Ummm...'recovering' would mean there is and has been progress since the man who promised to cut our debt in half by the end of his 1st term was over took office (but ended up adding over $6 trillion in only 4 years). Not long ago we were #12...now we're #16. That's a decline, not a recovery...under Obama!
Cleaning up Bush's mess takes money.
The problem with your premise is that Liberals all agree that the decline in the economy began in the last 2 years of Bush's last 2 years in office. Up until then, despite 9/11/01 / the economic collapse as a result of 9/11/01 / 2 wars Bush had only added 2 1/2 Trillion in debt over 6 years....in the last 2 years 1 1/2 Trillion in debt was added. So what was the change, why the explosion in added debt? Whoever control the Congress controls the purse strings is the old saying even Democrats agree with...except when they are the ones holding the purse strings!
In the last 2 years of the Bush administration the purse strings were held by the Democrats, who were 1 seat away from TRULY having a 'super-majority' control of Congress. They held this level of control until the end of Obama's 2nd year in office.
SO, if the decline in the economy began in the last 2 years of the Bush administration, picking up speed downhill like a sled on a greased track, it was the DEMOCRATS who began making the mess. At the very LEAST the Democrats can say that the added 1.5 Trillion added at the end of the Bush administration (last 2 years) was 'SHARED debt addition', but the OVER $6 Trillion in new debt added under Obama is all Obama's and his fellow democrats'!
And as I said, Obama promised he would cut our debt in half by the end of his 1st term. By the end of his 1st term he had added more debt than EVERY other US President COMBINED!
We are paying a lot for Syria, and Libya cost a lot as well (which is still a mess), not to mention Iraq. . All this was planned before 911, the pentagon had lost trillions, according to Rumsfeld. All the disabled vets cost money, Bush made a mess out of it with his buddies , and they came out of it stinking rich.
We are extremely lucky to have Penelope here----she is IN on all that is
PLANNED and can tell us what is going to HAPPEN next . Over to you,
Penelope-----the lady who KNOWS THE PLANS
too bad like all psychic's she a day late and a few bricks short of a full load.Ummm...'recovering' would mean there is and has been progress since the man who promised to cut our debt in half by the end of his 1st term was over took office (but ended up adding over $6 trillion in only 4 years). Not long ago we were #12...now we're #16. That's a decline, not a recovery...under Obama!
Cleaning up Bush's mess takes money.
The problem with your premise is that Liberals all agree that the decline in the economy began in the last 2 years of Bush's last 2 years in office. Up until then, despite 9/11/01 / the economic collapse as a result of 9/11/01 / 2 wars Bush had only added 2 1/2 Trillion in debt over 6 years....in the last 2 years 1 1/2 Trillion in debt was added. So what was the change, why the explosion in added debt? Whoever control the Congress controls the purse strings is the old saying even Democrats agree with...except when they are the ones holding the purse strings!
In the last 2 years of the Bush administration the purse strings were held by the Democrats, who were 1 seat away from TRULY having a 'super-majority' control of Congress. They held this level of control until the end of Obama's 2nd year in office.
SO, if the decline in the economy began in the last 2 years of the Bush administration, picking up speed downhill like a sled on a greased track, it was the DEMOCRATS who began making the mess. At the very LEAST the Democrats can say that the added 1.5 Trillion added at the end of the Bush administration (last 2 years) was 'SHARED debt addition', but the OVER $6 Trillion in new debt added under Obama is all Obama's and his fellow democrats'!
And as I said, Obama promised he would cut our debt in half by the end of his 1st term. By the end of his 1st term he had added more debt than EVERY other US President COMBINED!
We are paying a lot for Syria, and Libya cost a lot as well (which is still a mess), not to mention Iraq. . All this was planned before 911, the pentagon had lost trillions, according to Rumsfeld. All the disabled vets cost money, Bush made a mess out of it with his buddies , and they came out of it stinking rich.
We are extremely lucky to have Penelope here----she is IN on all that is
PLANNED and can tell us what is going to HAPPEN next . Over to you,
Penelope-----the lady who KNOWS THE PLANS
Were still recovering from Bush.
Ummm...'recovering' would mean there is and has been progress since the man who promised to cut our debt in half by the end of his 1st term was over took office (but ended up adding over $6 trillion in only 4 years). Not long ago we were #12...now we're #16. That's a decline, not a recovery...under Obama!
Cleaning up Bush's mess takes money.
The problem with your premise is that Liberals all agree that the decline in the economy began in the last 2 years of Bush's last 2 years in office. Up until then, despite 9/11/01 / the economic collapse as a result of 9/11/01 / 2 wars Bush had only added 2 1/2 Trillion in debt over 6 years....in the last 2 years 1 1/2 Trillion in debt was added. So what was the change, why the explosion in added debt? Whoever control the Congress controls the purse strings is the old saying even Democrats agree with...except when they are the ones holding the purse strings!
In the last 2 years of the Bush administration the purse strings were held by the Democrats, who were 1 seat away from TRULY having a 'super-majority' control of Congress. They held this level of control until the end of Obama's 2nd year in office.
SO, if the decline in the economy began in the last 2 years of the Bush administration, picking up speed downhill like a sled on a greased track, it was the DEMOCRATS who began making the mess. At the very LEAST the Democrats can say that the added 1.5 Trillion added at the end of the Bush administration (last 2 years) was 'SHARED debt addition', but the OVER $6 Trillion in new debt added under Obama is all Obama's and his fellow democrats'!
And as I said, Obama promised he would cut our debt in half by the end of his 1st term. By the end of his 1st term he had added more debt than EVERY other US President COMBINED!
We are paying a lot for Syria, and Libya cost a lot as well (which is still a mess), not to mention Iraq. . All this was planned before 911, the pentagon had lost trillions, according to Rumsfeld. All the disabled vets cost money, Bush made a mess out of it with his buddies , and they came out of it stinking rich.
