Another lie debunked-Africans did nothing before the white man

[Tommy Tainant]

Yes you do. Because when you saltines determine that South Africa was not sub Saharan until blacks took over, it means the term is made up.

Their reason for coining the term is irrelevant. Its still the term.

There is no such term.

If that was true, we wouldnt even be discussing this subject. Wrong again, Dumbo!

Since it is true, recognize that whites like you have made up a lot of things that didn't exist.

Words like "Sub Saharan" absolutely do exist. White people made up ALL the words you know. Youre welcome!

Well they didnt did they ? The English language is a collection of words from many different countries and cultures. It is consistent with your idiocy that you assert otherwise. Thick as shit.

 

[francoHFW]

For some reason, European countries decided they had the right to go into Africa and control the nations on that continent. Suddenly after centuries of free trade, the Europeans decided to possess the lands in Africa. This led to the Berlin Conference of 1884-1885 that divided Africa.

Fourteen countries held a conference in Berlin on November 15, 1884. The countries represented at the time included Austria-Hungary, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Sweden and Norway, who were unified at the time, Turkey, plus the United States of America. No African nation was included in the decision-making process.

Whites went on to colonize the continent of Africa. They raped pillaged, stole and plundered taking the money back to Europe, getting rich while draining African economies everywhere they went. The “Scramble for Africa” as it is called, ruined the continent and it’s still rebuilding. Today in South Africa the whites still control the economy of that nation years after apartheid. They stole the lands through murder and plunder, enacted laws making it illegal for black South Africans to own land, ruled by authortarian force, while killing countless blacks for fighting the oppression. And now that blacks want their land back, a certain segment of the American white community want us to all forget about the atrocities visited on black South Africans and are whining about how wrong it is for the blacks to want land stolen from them back. Whites here and in South Africa are whining to the world about how they are victims of cruel racism. South African Boers are whining about racism. If that wasn’t so pathetic it would be funny.

There is no sub Saharan Africa. And the so-called shitholes are the result of what whites have done and how whites continue stealing billions from the continent annually.

World is plundering Africa's wealth of 'billions of dollars a year'

More wealth leaves Africa every year than enters it – by more than $40bn (£31bn) – according to research that challenges “misleading” perceptions of foreign aid.

Analysis by a coalition of UK and African equality and development campaigners including Global Justice Now, published on Wednesday, claims the rest of the world is profiting more than most African citizens from the continent’s wealth.

It said African countries received $162bn in 2015, mainly in loans, aid and personal remittances. But in the same year, $203bn was taken from the continent, either directly through multinationals repatriating profits and illegally moving money into tax havens, or by costs imposed by the rest of the world through climate change adaptation and mitigation.

This led to an annual financial deficit of $41.3bn from the 47 African countries where many people remain trapped in poverty, according to the report, Honest Accounts 2017.

The campaigners said illicit financial flows, defined as the illegal movement of cash between countries, account for $68bn a year, three times as much as the $19bn Africa receives in aid.

World is plundering Africa's wealth of 'billions of dollars a year'

blacks did the same thing--murder/genocide/war/etc

In no way the to the same extent. Check out the Belgian Congo sometime ding dong. That was the absolute worst and that is why it is so screwed up today along with continued rape by outside countries....

.....the blacks did the same thing..the NAs might not have murdered as many because they didn't have the technology to do so [ might not ] but they did the same thing--you can't measure evil.....hahahahha
...the Hutus murdered more faster per capita than the Germans at the Holocaust ..since they used Medieval weapons/etc, more Hutus had to participate per capita
..freakin bullshit
--MURDERING 200,000 is the SAME evil as murdering 500,000/etc etc

Another great job of mapping borders by Europeans LOL...

 

[francoHFW]

For some reason, European countries decided they had the right to go into Africa and control the nations on that continent. Suddenly after centuries of free trade, the Europeans decided to possess the lands in Africa. This led to the Berlin Conference of 1884-1885 that divided Africa.

Fourteen countries held a conference in Berlin on November 15, 1884. The countries represented at the time included Austria-Hungary, Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, Russia, Spain, Sweden and Norway, who were unified at the time, Turkey, plus the United States of America. No African nation was included in the decision-making process.

Whites went on to colonize the continent of Africa. They raped pillaged, stole and plundered taking the money back to Europe, getting rich while draining African economies everywhere they went. The “Scramble for Africa” as it is called, ruined the continent and it’s still rebuilding. Today in South Africa the whites still control the economy of that nation years after apartheid. They stole the lands through murder and plunder, enacted laws making it illegal for black South Africans to own land, ruled by authortarian force, while killing countless blacks for fighting the oppression. And now that blacks want their land back, a certain segment of the American white community want us to all forget about the atrocities visited on black South Africans and are whining about how wrong it is for the blacks to want land stolen from them back. Whites here and in South Africa are whining to the world about how they are victims of cruel racism. South African Boers are whining about racism. If that wasn’t so pathetic it would be funny.

There is no sub Saharan Africa. And the so-called shitholes are the result of what whites have done and how whites continue stealing billions from the continent annually.

World is plundering Africa's wealth of 'billions of dollars a year'

More wealth leaves Africa every year than enters it – by more than $40bn (£31bn) – according to research that challenges “misleading” perceptions of foreign aid.

Analysis by a coalition of UK and African equality and development campaigners including Global Justice Now, published on Wednesday, claims the rest of the world is profiting more than most African citizens from the continent’s wealth.

It said African countries received $162bn in 2015, mainly in loans, aid and personal remittances. But in the same year, $203bn was taken from the continent, either directly through multinationals repatriating profits and illegally moving money into tax havens, or by costs imposed by the rest of the world through climate change adaptation and mitigation.

This led to an annual financial deficit of $41.3bn from the 47 African countries where many people remain trapped in poverty, according to the report, Honest Accounts 2017.

The campaigners said illicit financial flows, defined as the illegal movement of cash between countries, account for $68bn a year, three times as much as the $19bn Africa receives in aid.

World is plundering Africa's wealth of 'billions of dollars a year'

blacks did the same thing--murder/genocide/war/etc

In no way the to the same extent. Check out the Belgian Congo sometime ding dong. That was the absolute worst and that is why it is so screwed up today along with continued rape by outside countries....

.....the blacks did the same thing..the NAs might not have murdered as many because they didn't have the technology to do so [ might not ] but they did the same thing--you can't measure evil.....hahahahha
...the Hutus murdered more faster per capita than the Germans at the Holocaust ..since they used Medieval weapons/etc, more Hutus had to participate per capita
..freakin bullshit
--MURDERING 200,000 is the SAME evil as murdering 500,000/etc etc

Ain't poverty great? Way to keep Africa poor for 8 hundred years now....

 

[IM2]

I think some of the shit posted on this thread is the result of out and out racism.
But I also think that ignorance plays a huge part.

For most of these shit kickers the only view they have of Africa, which is many different places, is a short clip on the famine or war going on somewhere. No other stories are covered in the mainstream media. This narrow view is reinforced by the Hollywood view of Africa where a white actor is the subject and the black actors are just for crowd scenes and carrying stuff for bwana.
They form their opinions from King Solomons Mines and Tarzan movies . It suits their World view and reinforces their misplaced sense of superiority. It also means that they lack any curiosity to seek out information.

This is not a primitive village.

This is not a mud hut.

This isnt Alabama.

Neither is this

This isnt a jungle drum.

This is a typical small African chapel.

What are you having ?

57 channels and nothing on ?

Stop spouting shit and educate yourself.

Damned by faint praise and of course flights of fantasy of places that never existed.

IDIOT!!!

Except they do exist.

Thank you European Colonisation

Wrong.

 

[harmonica]

Yes you do. Because when you saltines determine that South Africa was not sub Saharan until blacks took over, it means the term is made up.

Their reason for coining the term is irrelevant. Its still the term.

Its a term I have only seen used by racists like yourself. I first saw it on this forum. I think you use it in the same way you use the phrase " dem controlled cities". It allows you to hide behind a phrase but exercise your racist character.
Its telling that you feel the need to hide behind these euphamisms. Maybe there is a human in there somewhere ?

The internet has given these cowards a safe space.

..internet brings out your racism

You accusing some1 of racism? That's funny.

hahahhahahah--I know---you give many laughs ..thank you

 

[Godboy]

Yes you do. Because when you saltines determine that South Africa was not sub Saharan until blacks took over, it means the term is made up.

Their reason for coining the term is irrelevant. Its still the term.

Its a term I have only seen used by racists like yourself. I first saw it on this forum. I think you use it in the same way you use the phrase " dem controlled cities". It allows you to hide behind a phrase but exercise your racist character.
Its telling that you feel the need to hide behind these euphamisms. Maybe there is a human in there somewhere ?

The internet has given these cowards a safe space.

Aww, does the internet interfere with your need for violence?

Not my need. Seems that violence has been a white male problem.

Doesnt seem like that in the age i live in. In fact, the statistics are quite clear that black people are by far the most violent people in the US.

 

[IM2]

Their reason for coining the term is irrelevant. Its still the term.

Its a term I have only seen used by racists like yourself. I first saw it on this forum. I think you use it in the same way you use the phrase " dem controlled cities". It allows you to hide behind a phrase but exercise your racist character.
Its telling that you feel the need to hide behind these euphamisms. Maybe there is a human in there somewhere ?

The internet has given these cowards a safe space.

Aww, does the internet interfere with your need for violence?

Not my need. Seems that violence has been a white male problem.

Doesnt seem like that in the age i live in. In fact, the statistics are quite clear that black people are by far the most violent people in the US.

No, the statistics show whites to be. Every year.

 

[Godboy]

Their reason for coining the term is irrelevant. Its still the term.

There is no such term.

If that was true, we wouldnt even be discussing this subject. Wrong again, Dumbo!

Since it is true, recognize that whites like you have made up a lot of things that didn't exist.

Words like "Sub Saharan" absolutely do exist. White people made up ALL the words you know. Youre welcome!

Actually since Africans created language, all the words you know come from African beginnings.

You're welcome.

Clicks and grunts are far less impressive than the English language, which was invented by white people.

 

[fncceo]

This thread has gone off the rails, predictably.

It started out with a discussion of pre-colonial African civilization.

There are several examples of technical empires prior to the colonial era.

What about those?

 

[Godboy]

Its a term I have only seen used by racists like yourself. I first saw it on this forum. I think you use it in the same way you use the phrase " dem controlled cities". It allows you to hide behind a phrase but exercise your racist character.
Its telling that you feel the need to hide behind these euphamisms. Maybe there is a human in there somewhere ?

The internet has given these cowards a safe space.

Aww, does the internet interfere with your need for violence?

Not my need. Seems that violence has been a white male problem.

Doesnt seem like that in the age i live in. In fact, the statistics are quite clear that black people are by far the most violent people in the US.

No, the statistics show whites to be. Every year.

Ignoring facts that everyone knows, isnt an effective counter debate. It just makes you look sad.

 

[harmonica]

Its a term I have only seen used by racists like yourself. I first saw it on this forum. I think you use it in the same way you use the phrase " dem controlled cities". It allows you to hide behind a phrase but exercise your racist character.
Its telling that you feel the need to hide behind these euphamisms. Maybe there is a human in there somewhere ?

The internet has given these cowards a safe space.

Aww, does the internet interfere with your need for violence?

Not my need. Seems that violence has been a white male problem.

Doesnt seem like that in the age i live in. In fact, the statistics are quite clear that black people are by far the most violent people in the US.

No, the statistics show whites to be. Every year.

wrong

 

[Godboy]

This thread has gone off the rails, predictably.

It started out with a discussion of pre-colonial African civilization.

There are several examples of technical empires prior to the colonial era.

What about those?

They were far less advanced than the rest of the world.

 

[IM2]

There is no such term.

If that was true, we wouldnt even be discussing this subject. Wrong again, Dumbo!

Since it is true, recognize that whites like you have made up a lot of things that didn't exist.

Words like "Sub Saharan" absolutely do exist. White people made up ALL the words you know. Youre welcome!

Actually since Africans created language, all the words you know come from African beginnings.

You're welcome.

Clicks and grunts are far less impressive than the English language, which was invented by white people.

Clicks and grunts came from the caves of Europe while blacks were talking to each other.

 

[IM2]

This thread has gone off the rails, predictably.

It started out with a discussion of pre-colonial African civilization.

There are several examples of technical empires prior to the colonial era.

What about those?

They were far less advanced than the rest of the world.

Except they weren't.

 

[fncceo]

Words like “sub-Saharan Africa” are GOOD words to use if you are talking about white power and the world it has created (colonialism, racism, racialized identities, etc)

But they are TERRIBLE terms to use, as tools of thought.

It draws a big fat line across Africa based on race. It makes the most diverse part of the world into undifferentiated blob.

• Are Italy and Greece “sub-Nordic” ?
• Are the U.S. and Mexico “sub-Canadian”?
• Is Latin America sub-Anglo-America?

Who the hell thinks up this shit?

Black folks are on both sides of the Sahara as well. There are millions of blacks who live all across the Sahara, as their ancestors have lived for thousands of years.

When whites use the terms “Sub Saharan” Africa they are mostly referring to stereotypical phenotypes associated with Black people. The fault with this reasoning is that there is no single Black phenotype in Africa.

Even within certain African ethnic groups there is genetic diversity which dictates hair textures and types, eye color, nose shape, skin tone, yet it's still Blackness.

Blacks live on both sides of the Sahara? On what planet?

North of the Sahara are Arabs, dumbass!

Actually that is untrue. Plus black Arabs do exist.

Black MUSLIMS exist. There can be no such thing as a black "Arab."

There can and there is.

No, because Islam is a religion they can adopt. "Arab" is a RACE. Africans are not Arab

Actually, quite a few Africans are Arabs. Arab migration into Northern Africa dates back thousands of years.

 

[harmonica]

If that was true, we wouldnt even be discussing this subject. Wrong again, Dumbo!

Since it is true, recognize that whites like you have made up a lot of things that didn't exist.

Words like "Sub Saharan" absolutely do exist. White people made up ALL the words you know. Youre welcome!

Actually since Africans created language, all the words you know come from African beginnings.

You're welcome.

Clicks and grunts are far less impressive than the English language, which was invented by white people.

Clicks and grunts came from the caves of Europe while blacks were talking to each other.

hahhahaha--they didn't even have a written language like the whites did

 

[harmonica]

.....plain and simple--sub-Saharan Africa was and still is far behind the white countries --this is undeniable
not hate--but fact

 

[fncceo]

This thread has gone off the rails, predictably.

It started out with a discussion of pre-colonial African civilization.

There are several examples of technical empires prior to the colonial era.

What about those?

They were far less advanced than the rest of the world.

Actually, I can think of six off the top of my head.

 

[Godboy]

Since it is true, recognize that whites like you have made up a lot of things that didn't exist.

Words like "Sub Saharan" absolutely do exist. White people made up ALL the words you know. Youre welcome!

Actually since Africans created language, all the words you know come from African beginnings.

You're welcome.

Clicks and grunts are far less impressive than the English language, which was invented by white people.

Clicks and grunts came from the caves of Europe while blacks were talking to each other.

hahhahaha--they didn't even have a written language like the whites did

Yeah, this guy doesnt look European to me!

 

[fncceo]

.....plain and simple--sub-Saharan Africa was and still is far behind the white countries --this is undeniable
not hate--but fact

The original civilizations that gave birth to 'white culture' were African and Middle Eastern.