bendog
Diamond Member
Ya think Lincoln wanted to PAY for our slaves? (-:Why was eminent domain not used to abolish slavery in a more market friendly manner?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ya think Lincoln wanted to PAY for our slaves? (-:Why was eminent domain not used to abolish slavery in a more market friendly manner?
A better rational choice than a civil war.Ya think Lincoln wanted to PAY for our slaves? (-:
But so long as the southern blacks were slaves, they were not an econ threat to poor white southerners who were mainly subsistence farmers, who if they owned any slaves, didn't live that much better.Jefferson owned over 2,000 slaves. His plantation was a town, with black barbers, blacksmiths, wheelwrights, barrel makers, candle makers, potters, you name it. All of them working for no wages.
Slavery hurt the working class white man just as much as it hurt the slave. How do you compete with zero wages? You don't.
Them Yankees were nothing but cheap theivers. (-:A better rational choice than a civil war.
I suspect Jefferson, at the time, would have never thought even dumber people would do even dumber things, 200 years later.I suspect Jefferson would support people's rights to do stupid things.
Some in the north were simply emancipating their slaves after 1808.Them Yankees were nothing but cheap theivers. (-:
Seriously, Lincoln's offer was just keep your slaves, but don't try to secede, and no new slave states.
Except we are dominating you cuck boys. Lol. I love hearing you guys talk about racist things you're proud of from over a hundred years ago. Certainly can't point to any recent victories all you've been doing since the end of the last century is taking L's. Let's forget about your forefathers for a second, how does it feel to be the generation of cucks who lost everything they worked for? Lol.Preppies' Pet Pit Bulls
Slavery was punishment. Humanoids who act like wild animals need to be tamed. They should have never been turned loose on us. And it wasn't idealism that motivated the race traitors; they knew it would wreck society. They wanted to destroy The America That Was because they knew they couldn't dominate a proud and prosperous White race much longer.
Yes, but the emancipation proclamation didn't help slaves still owned in the North. It took the civil war amendments to the BoR to do that.Some in the north were simply emancipating their slaves after 1808.
The Monkey Cannot Grind the OrganExcept we are dominating you cuck boys. Lol. I love hearing you guys talk about racist things you're proud of from over a hundred years ago. Certainly can't point to any recent victories all you've been doing since the end of the last century is taking L's. Let's forget about your forefathers for a second, how does it feel to be the generation of cucks who lost everything they worked for? Lol.
The South Had Slavery; the North Had Sweatshops. The North Had No Moral Superiority, Only Financial Superiority Taken From the Sweat of the White People the Plutocracy Hated.The economic costs may have been enormous but would have paid for themselves eventually, and any savings from not having a civil war would have also been considerable.
With so much to lose on both sides of the Mason-Dixon Line, economic logic suggests that a peaceful solution to the slave issue would have made far more sense than a bloody war. Yet no solution emerged. One “economic” solution to the slave problem would be for those who objected to slavery to “buy out” the economic interest of Southern slaveholders. Under such a scheme, the federal government would purchase slaves. A major problem here was that the costs of such a scheme would have been enormous. Claudia Goldin estimates that the cost of having the government buy all the slaves in the United States in 1860, would be about $2.7 billion (1973: 85, Table 1). Obviously, such a large sum could not be paid all at once. Yet even if the payments were spread over 25 years, the annual costs of such a scheme would involve a tripling of federal government outlays (Ransom and Sutch 1990: 39-42)! The costs could be reduced substantially if instead of freeing all the slaves at once, children were left in bondage until the age of 18 or 21 (Goldin 1973:85). Yet there would remain the problem of how even those reduced costs could be distributed among various groups in the population. The cost of any “compensated” emancipation scheme was so high that even those who wished to eliminate slavery were unwilling to pay for a “buyout” of those who owned slaves.
The Economics of the Civil War
Eminent domain was more ethical than a civil war.
Lol. Yes cuck boy preach it! I'll tell you what. I'll stop calling you a cuck and thinking of you as a cuck when any of that hilarious bit of cosplaying dungeons and dragons for insurrectionists bullshit becomes reality.The Monkey Cannot Grind the Organ
It's unnatural for inferior races to be supreme; this inversion of a stable and productive order can't last much longer. The First Reconstruction quickly went chaotic, so this one will at least collapse from within. But it is better to pro-actively extirpate the Loots Roots until it is all dead insect-saturated wood never to sprout again. Afram savages have been a malignant growth on American progress. All you will have in your Blue State union will be the leftovers tossed in the dumpster.
A Stiff Wind Makes Snowflakes Whistle in the DarkLol. Yes cuck boy preach it! I'll tell you what. I'll stop calling you a cuck and thinking of you as a cuck when any of that hilarious bit of cosplaying dungeons and dragons for insurrectionists bullshit becomes reality.
Lol. Sure you are. But again you've set the bar. Every day I'm still here, you're still a cuck. Lol.A Stiff Wind Makes Snowflakes Whistle in the Dark
Calling names won't make the people who threaten your Kumbaya utopia go away. We're coming at you, and we're coming fast.
Do you want to pay your Mexican cleaning ladies?Ya think Lincoln wanted to PAY for our slaves? (-: