danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #381
Because a Civil War was worse. Especially when he didn't ask his staff to come up with Reconstruction 1.0 in a general, top-down manner.Ya think Lincoln wanted to PAY for our slaves? (-:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because a Civil War was worse. Especially when he didn't ask his staff to come up with Reconstruction 1.0 in a general, top-down manner.Ya think Lincoln wanted to PAY for our slaves? (-:
Do you have any clue, and I mean that dismissively, as to the monetary value of slaves in America circa 1860?A better rational choice than a civil war.
I don't need to care because this applies regarding our franchise: Fiat justitia ruat caelumDo you have any clue, and I mean that dismissively, as to the monetary value of slaves in America circa 1860?
Slavery was a moral evil. But so is taking.I don't need to care because this applies regarding our franchise: Fiat justitia ruat caelum
That is you assuming that conclusion via fallacious reasoning.Slavery was a moral evil. But so is taking.
It was not the slave hunters or slave owners right to decide that for them against their willAre you sure those black blacksmiths and other skilled black workers would have been better off if they had remained captured slaves in Africa?