Were Romney to run again he'd lose again. Americans would, once more, vote for the LESSER of liberals and go for Hillary or Fauxahontas to slow the leftward train wreck.
Hmmm. Of course I understand the strategy, but in our "If one is good, two must be better" societal mindset there is a tendency to go overboard the other way when we are merely trying to find the right way.
And so, like tuning a radio, we go too far to the left and then we tune too far to the Right until we finally zero in on the exact right one tha we all want.
Well, that is what we COULD have had in 2012.
Not the over reaction to the excesses of the left but the right one.
Not too hot.
Not too cold.
Just Right.
Mitt is who we need.
Who we should have hired to do the job of POTUS-ing this huge organization called the federal government.
And when you look at the resumes of all the contenders, who actually has a history of success in turning around huge organizations and making them run properly?
If we were hiring someone to do the job and needed to create a job description, much of it could be describing what Mitt has already DONE and achieved outstanding results.
If you hire a company to build your house and you could get the company with the most professional and courteous crews and the most experience and the best references and the most accolades in the industry or would you hire the company that was LESS?
And they would both be willing to work for the exact same salary and compensation.
What in the **** has Romney done to piss so many people off that they would be opposed to his fixing the country they say they love???
I don't get it.