And this is why Blacks Don't Vote Republican

[struth]

Members of this forum make ludicrous accusations because most blacks vote Democrat. Never mind that the majority of Asians, Native Americans, Hispanics and Pacific Islanders vote Democrats, only blacks are too stupid to think for ourselves and must be told who to vote for by white liberals.

THIS, is why we don't vote Republican.

Federal Court Moves to Drastically Weaken Voting Rights Act​

The ruling, which is almost certain to be appealed to the Supreme Court, would effectively bar private citizens and civil rights groups from suing under a key provision of the landmark law.

A federal appeals court moved on Monday to drastically weaken the Voting Rights Act, issuing a ruling that would effectively bar private citizens and civil rights groups from filing lawsuits under a central provision of the landmark civil rights law.

The ruling, made by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, found that only the federal government could bring a legal challenge under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, a crucial part of the law that prohibits election or voting practices that discriminate against Americans based on race.

The opinion is almost certain to be appealed to the Supreme Court.

The current legal debate over who can bring Section 2 claims took a significant turn in February 2022, when Judge Lee P. Rudofsky, a district judge in eastern Arkansas appointed by former President Donald J. Trump, found that “only the attorney general of the United States may bring suit” to enforce Section 2.

Federal Court Moves to Drastically Weaken Voting Rights Act

The ruling, which is almost certain to be appealed to the Supreme Court, would effectively bar private citizens and civil rights groups from suing under a key provision of the landmark law.

www.nytimes.com

What does this ruling have to do with republicans?

 

[BackAgain]

CONSERVATIVE JUDGES KNIFE VOTING RIGHTS ACT​

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/24172336/arkansas-state-conference-naacp-2023-11-20-8th-circuit-opinion.pdf

​

No. They interpreted the act pursuant to established precedent and clear legislative intent.

It can be fixed. But the courts are not the ones to correct it. Not is seen as needing a new enforcement mechanism, then they tons the province of the legislature do that.

The law itself clearly says who can sue under the act. That is: the attorney general.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Members of this forum make ludicrous accusations because most blacks vote Democrat. Never mind that the majority of Asians, Native Americans, Hispanics and Pacific Islanders vote Democrats, only blacks are too stupid to think for ourselves and must be told who to vote for by white liberals.

THIS, is why we don't vote Republican.

Federal Court Moves to Drastically Weaken Voting Rights Act​

The ruling, which is almost certain to be appealed to the Supreme Court, would effectively bar private citizens and civil rights groups from suing under a key provision of the landmark law.

A federal appeals court moved on Monday to drastically weaken the Voting Rights Act, issuing a ruling that would effectively bar private citizens and civil rights groups from filing lawsuits under a central provision of the landmark civil rights law.

The ruling, made by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, found that only the federal government could bring a legal challenge under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, a crucial part of the law that prohibits election or voting practices that discriminate against Americans based on race.

The opinion is almost certain to be appealed to the Supreme Court.

The current legal debate over who can bring Section 2 claims took a significant turn in February 2022, when Judge Lee P. Rudofsky, a district judge in eastern Arkansas appointed by former President Donald J. Trump, found that “only the attorney general of the United States may bring suit” to enforce Section 2.

Federal Court Moves to Drastically Weaken Voting Rights Act

The ruling, which is almost certain to be appealed to the Supreme Court, would effectively bar private citizens and civil rights groups from suing under a key provision of the landmark law.

www.nytimes.com

So any "Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe" can at any whim make a lawsuit, if they "FEEL" that someones right has been taken away? Yet, there are how many people in Congressional Jail, who still have no due process for a crime of trespassing which the Federal Government wont let them have their day in court. Yet you side with the Demofascists who have just done that, many of whom are black. Man you are one sick black guy/girl/them.

 

[Auld Phart]

No, because the majority of other non white groups and Jews vot democcrrat.

Republican policies suck, that's why we vote Democrat. WITF would we vote for anyone in a partty trying to end our right to vote?

When you rob Peter to Pay Paul, you can always count on Pauls vote.

 

[Crepitus]

OK So why don't blacks vote Republican? Because of this eighth Circuit Court opinion?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Members of this forum make ludicrous accusations because most blacks vote Democrat. Never mind that the majority of Asians, Native Americans, Hispanics and Pacific Islanders vote Democrats, only blacks are too stupid to think for ourselves and must be told who to vote for by white liberals.

THIS, is why we don't vote Republican.

Federal Court Moves to Drastically Weaken Voting Rights Act​

The ruling, which is almost certain to be appealed to the Supreme Court, would effectively bar private citizens and civil rights groups from suing under a key provision of the landmark law.

A federal appeals court moved on Monday to drastically weaken the Voting Rights Act, issuing a ruling that would effectively bar private citizens and civil rights groups from filing lawsuits under a central provision of the landmark civil rights law.

The ruling, made by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, found that only the federal government could bring a legal challenge under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, a crucial part of the law that prohibits election or voting practices that discriminate against Americans based on race.

The opinion is almost certain to be appealed to the Supreme Court.

The current legal debate over who can bring Section 2 claims took a significant turn in February 2022, when Judge Lee P. Rudofsky, a district judge in eastern Arkansas appointed by former President Donald J. Trump, found that “only the attorney general of the United States may bring suit” to enforce Section 2.

Federal Court Moves to Drastically Weaken Voting Rights Act

The ruling, which is almost certain to be appealed to the Supreme Court, would effectively bar private citizens and civil rights groups from suing under a key provision of the landmark law.

www.nytimes.com

Can you cite the part of the Voting Rights Act that allows private groups to sue under that "central provision?"

 

[Crepitus]

Good......The feds made the law so it should be only the feds that can bring suit, no a bunch of perpetually butt-hurt anti-white .orgs clogging up the courts with frivolous anti-white lawsuits.

Anyway who blacks vote for is a moot point....It's the black ballot stuffers you have to worry about.

 

[IM2]

What does this ruling have to do with republicans?

Republican judges made the ruling..

 

[Crepitus]

The plantation is strong with this one.

 

[Crepitus]

Nobody who smokes menthols needs to be voting.

 

[IM2]

Can you cite the part of the Voting Rights Act that allows private groups to sue under that "central provision?"

Since private groups have been suing since 1965 cite the part that says it can't be done.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Since private groups have been suing since 1965 cite the part that says it can't be done.

You're making the case that the ruling is wrong and racist. You bring the receipts or don't act shocked that you get followed by LP in stores.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Jews. Jews also vote overwhelmingly Democratic.

Racist Republican whites don't speak about them in such terms.

As usual, you're right OP.

There’s a big difference between voting majority and voting 93% dem for decades. Those are close to North Korea numbers.
Time to wake up fool.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

No, because the majority of other non white groups and Jews vot democcrrat.

Republican policies suck, that's why we vote Democrat. WITF would we vote for anyone in a partty trying to end our right to vote?

“We’re going to put youall back in chains.”
It’s true! It really really is!

 

[Lastamender]

Members of this forum make ludicrous accusations because most blacks vote Democrat. Never mind that the majority of Asians, Native Americans, Hispanics and Pacific Islanders vote Democrats, only blacks are too stupid to think for ourselves and must be told who to vote for by white liberals.

THIS, is why we don't vote Republican.

Federal Court Moves to Drastically Weaken Voting Rights Act​

The ruling, which is almost certain to be appealed to the Supreme Court, would effectively bar private citizens and civil rights groups from suing under a key provision of the landmark law.

A federal appeals court moved on Monday to drastically weaken the Voting Rights Act, issuing a ruling that would effectively bar private citizens and civil rights groups from filing lawsuits under a central provision of the landmark civil rights law.

The ruling, made by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, found that only the federal government could bring a legal challenge under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, a crucial part of the law that prohibits election or voting practices that discriminate against Americans based on race.

The opinion is almost certain to be appealed to the Supreme Court.

The current legal debate over who can bring Section 2 claims took a significant turn in February 2022, when Judge Lee P. Rudofsky, a district judge in eastern Arkansas appointed by former President Donald J. Trump, found that “only the attorney general of the United States may bring suit” to enforce Section 2.

Federal Court Moves to Drastically Weaken Voting Rights Act

The ruling, which is almost certain to be appealed to the Supreme Court, would effectively bar private citizens and civil rights groups from suing under a key provision of the landmark law.

www.nytimes.com

You fall for anything.

 

[the other mike]

Yes, and...?

You know.
I hear a bunch of fast talking black slang and rap music y'all think is over my head ( being an old white conservative and all).

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Since private groups have been suing since 1965 cite the part that says it can't be done.

In America, you can sue just about anything, but winning that lawsuit is what is risky. Unless you're black, then you can have Jessie Love Child Jackson and his Rainbow Collalition come in and shake down the company without any trial.....

 

[1srelluc]

“We’re going to put youall back in chains.”
It’s true! It really really is!

They really funny part is it's the dems that are replacing the blacks with Hispanics.

Within a couple of generations blacks will have about as much political pull as Native Americans.

Of course with the blacks killing themselves off in wholesale lots though abortion and general thuggery it might be even sooner.

 

[IM2]

You're making the case that the ruling is wrong and racist. You bring the receipts or don't act shocked that you get followed by LP in stores.

Fuck you. Groups have been suing for 60 years, so you show where it doesn't since you want to defend taking this away.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Fuck you.

I thought this was Zone 1?

Groups have been suing for 60 years, so you show where it doesn't since you want to defend taking this away.

It's your thread, my dude. Since your premise is that the ruling must be wrong and therefore based on racism, it's up to you to stop hiding in the woodpile and show us the evidence.

Groups were using literacy tests to stop folks like you* from voting for well over sixty years, but that does not mean it was legal.

*Meaning illiterate people, not black people. I have no evidence you are black.