Ancient message in Genesis to the world

[surada]

There was no calendar other than the cycle of the moon. When a woman came into heat, she was off limits 7 days before and 7 days after.

Women don't come into heat.

 

[surada]

Loras College Library: Religious and Theological Studies: Isaiah II

Research guide for the study of religion and theology.

library.loras.edu

 

[irosie91]

Zechariah and John say you are wrong. Should I take your word or that of the Prophets and Apostles?

John who?

 

[irosie91]

Women don't come into heat.

in fact---the body temperature of a woman rises
approx 1 degree F. with Ovulation

 

[surada]

in fact---the body temperature of a woman rises
approx 1 degree F. with Ovulation

Are you comparing that to when animals go into heat?

 

[irosie91]

Are you comparing that to when animals go into heat?

of course-----the "heat" phenomenon of a dog is
also related to ovulation-----be not offended

 

[BreezeWood]

of course-----the "heat" phenomenon of a dog is
also related to ovulation-----be not offended

... you're sure they are referring to temperature -

 

[Cougarbear]

Isaiah was writing about the return to Jerusalem after the Babylonian exile.

Loras College Library: Religious and Theological Studies: Isaiah II

Research guide for the study of religion and theology.

library.loras.edu

Ya? So where is this book that is to be a marvellous work and wonder? The one that would cause your scholars to be silenced in their stupidity? Can't find it? It's the same one Ezekiel told of in Chapter 37, the Stick or Book of Joseph through Ephraim. So, where are these writings?

 

[Cougarbear]

John who?

John the Revelator. John who...

 

[james bond]

Are you comparing that to when animals go into heat?

It's similar, but we don't call it heat with the human female or "the span of time during a human female's somewhat monthly reproductive cycle when she is most sexually aroused, the span of the cycle during which her vagina is most easily aroused and most naturally lubricated, then yes, and it is natural." Just think of the jokes if we did?

It's called "three day period before ovulation" so we don't go crazy over it. Guys won't/can't make jokes over that.

Do chickens go in to heat? - Answers

If you're referring to the span of time during a human female's somewhat monthly reproductive cycle when she is most sexually aroused, the span of the cycle during which her vagina is most easily aroused and most naturally lubricated, then yes, and it is natural, but it is not called "going into...

www.answers.com

 

[surada]

Ya? So where is this book that is to be a marvellous work and wonder? The one that would cause your scholars to be silenced in their stupidity? Can't find it? It's the same one Ezekiel told of in Chapter 37, the Stick or Book of Joseph through Ephraim. So, where are these writings?

@norwegen

I think you have to live with what Scripture says... The revelation letter to the 7 churches says it will happen soon within a generation.. In most of the Bible a generation is 40 years.

 

[surada]

It's similar, but we don't call it heat with the human female or "the span of time during a human female's somewhat monthly reproductive cycle when she is most sexually aroused, the span of the cycle during which her vagina is most easily aroused and most naturally lubricated, then yes, and it is natural." Just think of the jokes if we did?

It's called "three day period before ovulation" so we don't go crazy over it. Guys won't/can't make jokes over that.

Do chickens go in to heat? - Answers

If you're referring to the span of time during a human female's somewhat monthly reproductive cycle when she is most sexually aroused, the span of the cycle during which her vagina is most easily aroused and most naturally lubricated, then yes, and it is natural, but it is not called "going into...

www.answers.com

You don't seem to know much about women.

 

[surada]

John the Revelator. John who...

John said it would happen soon, within a generation.. By what authority do you dismiss that scripture?

 

[irosie91]

... you're sure they are referring to temperature -

BREEZIE------get your mind out of your neighborhood gutter !!!!!

 

[irosie91]

John the Revelator. John who...

OH!!! john of the book of revulsions

 

[Cougarbear]

So, where's the book? Isaiah never said no 40 year generation. He was referring to the last days, our days.

Also, the Apostles were hopeful about the time period of the "Falling Away" or Apostasy. But, that was wishful thinking. Even Jesus Christ himself said he did not know when he would come again.

 

[Cougarbear]

John said it would happen soon, within a generation.. By what authority do you dismiss that scripture?

Well, it didn't happen, did it. We are still here and so is Satan. Remember, not even Jesus knew that time when he'd come a 2nd time. And, he has not come again in His glory. He has appeared again to His Prophet Joseph Smith. But, that was just to open up this the last dispensation (or generation) before Armageddon. I think translators missed on this concept of generation versus dispensation. The Bible is correct as far as it is translated correctly. Historical fact shows there is a disconnect with the translation and what John actually meant. Translators mostly aren't with understanding about times of dispensations. John knew and most likely meant a time of dispensation.

 

[Cougarbear]

OH!!! john of the book of revulsions

I guess you think you are clever or something? NOT!

 

[BreezeWood]

So, where's the book? Isaiah never said no 40 year generation. He was referring to the last days, our days.

Also, the Apostles were hopeful about the time period of the "Falling Away" or Apostasy. But, that was wishful thinking. Even Jesus Christ himself said he did not know when he would come again.

that is not true, their prescribed religion of antiquity - when the last being of either good or evil perishes is when the heavens will return for final judgement.

did c-bear not understand the reiteration of the 1st century events.

 

[surada]

Well, it didn't happen, did it. We are still here and so is Satan. Remember, not even Jesus knew that time when he'd come a 2nd time. And, he has not come again in His glory. He has appeared again to His Prophet Joseph Smith. But, that was just to open up this the last dispensation (or generation) before Armageddon. I think translators missed on this concept of generation versus dispensation. The Bible is correct as far as it is translated correctly. Historical fact shows there is a disconnect with the translation and what John actually meant. Translators mostly aren't with understanding about times of dispensations. John knew and most likely meant a time of dispensation.

norwegen

You believe Joseph Smith over John of Patmos? John is relating the message from Jesus. Maybe it did happen and you didn't get it.