- Banned
- #1
To expand your knowledge base enabling your knowledge to evolve.
The first link I found while reading another link- yes, I read - a lot of what I read validates my opinions a lot contradicts it- both these are the former. Another invitation is to offer counter opinions based on evidence- not feelings. That would mean specifics in quotes (for validation) from the articles posted. What you feel about me, personally, is immaterial.
exiledjargon.blogspot.com
excerpt:
Note: This essay assumes some familiarity on the reader's part with the political leadership of the Jewish nation and its historical role in bringing about the political forms of Rationalism: Liberalism, Democracy, and Communism.
The Cold Warriors and the Transformation of American Dissent
Introduction
If there is one thing today that Americans need desperately to know, it is this: that there once existed a bloc of men who could accurately recognize their own interests, who organized around those interests and sought to obtain them at the national level, on equal footing with the forces of the establishment. Since the Second World War this has not been true. American dissent, from the postbellum period up until the war, consisted of both leaders and followers who understood at an abstract and systematic level what their interests were and also who was standing in the way, blocking off their path. Just for an example, Americans of every level of education once wrote pamphlets on the shortcomings of bimetallism, which is the idea of a government supporting both silver and gold as the monetary base. Compare this to the postwar period, in which, while it would be a lie to say that no one ever stood up for the American peoples' interests, things are clearly not the same. The prevailing pastimes in America have passed from writing critiques of bimetallism to watching streaming services on infinite play. More often than not, these American political leaders, like Pat Buchanan for example, have had to worm and dissimulate their way into convincing the people to support their own interests. I use these words not to express any contempt for him but merely to point out that the shift in American political consciousness has reached such a low level that the peoples' would-be champions must jump through hoops and disguise themselves as con-men in order to have a chance at reaching their hidden altruistic aims.
I found the above while reading this
The Jew Thing
excerpt:
The first link I found while reading another link- yes, I read - a lot of what I read validates my opinions a lot contradicts it- both these are the former. Another invitation is to offer counter opinions based on evidence- not feelings. That would mean specifics in quotes (for validation) from the articles posted. What you feel about me, personally, is immaterial.
The Cold Warriors and the Transformation of American Dissent
The Cold Warriors and the Transformation of American Dissent @Jargon_0 on twitter Reading Time: Long Note: This essay ass...
exiledjargon.blogspot.com
excerpt:
Note: This essay assumes some familiarity on the reader's part with the political leadership of the Jewish nation and its historical role in bringing about the political forms of Rationalism: Liberalism, Democracy, and Communism.
The Cold Warriors and the Transformation of American Dissent
Introduction
If there is one thing today that Americans need desperately to know, it is this: that there once existed a bloc of men who could accurately recognize their own interests, who organized around those interests and sought to obtain them at the national level, on equal footing with the forces of the establishment. Since the Second World War this has not been true. American dissent, from the postbellum period up until the war, consisted of both leaders and followers who understood at an abstract and systematic level what their interests were and also who was standing in the way, blocking off their path. Just for an example, Americans of every level of education once wrote pamphlets on the shortcomings of bimetallism, which is the idea of a government supporting both silver and gold as the monetary base. Compare this to the postwar period, in which, while it would be a lie to say that no one ever stood up for the American peoples' interests, things are clearly not the same. The prevailing pastimes in America have passed from writing critiques of bimetallism to watching streaming services on infinite play. More often than not, these American political leaders, like Pat Buchanan for example, have had to worm and dissimulate their way into convincing the people to support their own interests. I use these words not to express any contempt for him but merely to point out that the shift in American political consciousness has reached such a low level that the peoples' would-be champions must jump through hoops and disguise themselves as con-men in order to have a chance at reaching their hidden altruistic aims.
I found the above while reading this
The Jew Thing
excerpt:
