- Aug 10, 2009
- Reaction score
I told you what she tried to do and got beat up for it. So your facts GHook20 are yours but do not reflect reality. Nothing new.She actually made the opposite claim that a judge has to rule on the law and the case presented in front of them and leave their outside convictions to the side. But you can make up facts... you could be the next Chris Homo or Don the Lemon!In her last hearings, Barrett tried to make the case that a believing Catholic could be an impartial Justice on the Supreme Court, and got the shit beat out of her for that tactic.
The Senate hearings are going to be great theatre.
I do expect that Barrett has 4 out of 5 chances to be confirmed.