Natural Citizen
American Made
- Aug 8, 2016
- 30,514
- 31,358
- 2,945
American people elected Trump to Rule over us
- Thread starter Sunni Man
- Start date
No! No! No!
The president is elected to execute the laws of the land by Congress and our constitution ( thus executive branch), and distribute finances allotted and created by Congress, our representatives. And to be commander in chief when congress has declared a war. And to negotiate foreign treaties and agreements, with the Senate's approval, and to appoint federal judges and justices with the Senate's approval.
The President is not elected to represent us, our congress critters and senators do that.... The president is elected to run the mechanics of our Nation created by Congress, and the constitution...
Doc7505
Diamond Member
- Feb 16, 2016
- 23,544
- 41,904
- 2,430
~~~~~~>No! No! No!
The president is elected to execute the laws of the land by Congress and our constitution ( thus executive branch), and distribute finances allotted and created by Congress, our representatives. And to be commander in chief when congress has declared a war. And to negotiate foreign treaties and agreements, with the Senate's approval, and to appoint federal judges and justices with the Senate's approval.
The President is not elected to represent us, our congress critters and senators do that.... The president is elected to run the mechanics of our Nation created by Congress, and the constitution...
Under the Biden administration, individuals without legal status (Illegal aliens) were issued Social Security numbers, received Medicaid benefits, and obtained tax refunds. This has raised concerns about the eligibility and benefits provided to noncitizens in the U.S.
Read more:
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/RL32004
Additionally, Article II, defines the duties of the President far more and better than you've written.
Something that Joey Biden and his DSA handlers failed to do.
Furthermore, Critics argue that President Biden has not effectively enforced immigration laws, leading to an increase in illegal border crossings and a failure to uphold his constitutional duties. This has resulted in calls for impeachment based on claims of dereliction of duty and abuse of power regarding immigration policies.
Read more:
xxxxxxxxxx
Consequences of Failure: How Biden’s Policies Fueled the Border Crisis
Testimony Before Committee on Homeland Security / Subcommittee on Border Security and Enforcement United States House of Representatives March 25, 2025 Lora Ries Border Security and Immigration Center The Heritage Foundation
www.heritage.org
Last edited:
AntonToo
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2016
- 38,851
- 12,155
- 1,560
Did you even read your own link?
There is nothing there about any Social Security benefit eligibility changes under Obama, Biden or Trump administration. It's been the same since 2004.
Individuals Assigned an SSN in 2004 or Later
- With respect to benefit applications based on an SSN assigned on or after January 1, 2004, an individual must have work authorization when an SSN is assigned, or at any later time, to gain insured status under the Social Security program.
Last edited:
AntonToo
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2016
- 38,851
- 12,155
- 1,560
It is not, this degenrate has talked like this for as long as I've been on this site.
You've shown me a link that defines the US Laws covering it, created or modified in 2004? It's statistics on illegal entrants issued temporary SSN if given authorization to work while awaiting their court date, and the $13 billion illegal entrants contributed to social security is a 2014 statistic also, are prior to Biden's presidency?
The President can't break the law according to this stupid supreme court...you can impeach him only....which is nearly impossible to remove with a near even party split.
Edit:
That being said, our immigration law gives each president leeway to handle immigration how they think is best under their own circumstances.... i.e. Reagan chose amnesty as a means to handle all of the illegal entrants...while he was in office...
Last edited:
AntonToo
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2016
- 38,851
- 12,155
- 1,560
…Dummy, because he is an authoritarian wannabe, not a realized dictator.
He is a power drunk degenerate and doesn’t give two shits about violating any and all democratic principles to get his way, that’s what people are protesting.
Last edited:
We've been hearing that for a long time now. When's it gonna happen, Ma?
AntonToo
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2016
- 38,851
- 12,155
- 1,560
It’s not a binary state. It takes continuous destruction of the system to arrive from word’s foremost developed democracy to full on dictatorship.
Trump’s corrupt abuse of office and subversion of democratic norms and institutions has set a highly corrosive precedent.
He is fracturing the very foundation of what has made America great.
You Trumptards talking about how nice it is of Trump to let me post this, while ignoring all the crazy shit he does with his position is ******* nuts
We saw the previous administration colluding with social media outlets to direct what content they should promote and what they should downplay or outright eliminate. That didn't bother you, but now you're worried that TRUMP! is being a dictator? If you're concerned about the precedent he's setting, you should make sure the next democrat president (I know it has to happen eventually) won't do the same things. Will you be equally vociferous about that one?
AntonToo
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2016
- 38,851
- 12,155
- 1,560
Your choice word of "colluding" infers some sort of nefarious scheme.
There was nothing neferious about government seeking co-operation on healthcare emergency matters from a media company who's content (mis) informed so many millions of Americans.
Trump's admin doesn't act from such public welfare concerns, they act to punish anyone, or any institution of significant profile and influence who dares to cross dear leader Trump and on the flip side provide crony support for the ring-kissing loyalists.
When government colludes with private media to impede or prevent speech, it is nefarious.
You word choice of "act to punish" infers some sort of nefarious scheme being afoot. It is clear that you are willing to excuse the previous admin's attempts to control speech.
AntonToo
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2016
- 38,851
- 12,155
- 1,560
Government CONSTANTLY works with private media on all kinds of matters - from accuracy of reporting to disclosure of classified information.
You have no clue what you are talking about.
E. Pluribus
Gold Member
- Nov 29, 2023
- 258
- 315
- 203
It's a shock to the Dems' to see the executive branch actually do something after four years of sleepy Joe.
AntonToo
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2016
- 38,851
- 12,155
- 1,560
Because THERE IS.
Trump administration tried to ban "unfreindly" media from the White House press pool. And when it was ruled to be illegal they instead demoted their access:
Just recently Trump's DoD banned media outlets from access because they refused giving DoD what ammounted to editorial control:
US news outlets refuse to sign new Pentagon rules to report only official information
Defense department policy requires outlets to vow not to obtain unauthorized files and restricts access to some areas
www.theguardian.com
These are very specific and yes, nefarious actions against the democratic norms.
Last edited:
AntonToo
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2016
- 38,851
- 12,155
- 1,560
You mean do something so corrupt and un-democratic?
Damn straight it should be shocking to anyone who knows wtf is going on.
Link to another example of the colluding we saw from Quid Pro Joe?
Amazing. "Millions"??? of people, instead of doing something constructive and useful. spent their day protesting somebody who is a 'wannabe' not realized dictator? Even though you (or they) can't name any verifiable 'democratic principle' he has violated?
On 'man on the street' interviews on the news last night, many out there protesting had no clue what they were protesting. Actually nobody did.
Had Trump been acting in violation of democratic principles, he would have banned the protests. He didn't even suggest that as any kind of option.
Reagan's choice to offer amnesty to about 3 million illegals was one of his worst decisions. But it was well intended as it was on absolute condition that no more would be admitted or allowed to be here which the Democrats agreed to.
Of some interest, the population of the USA was roughly 100 million fewer when Reagan left office than it is now.
Well all it did was enlarge the huge flashing neon sign over America "Ya'll come and if you lay low for awhile, you'll get to stay."
Well now those millions are tens of millions, far too many of which are really bad actors and should never have been allowed to be here.
Elections have consequences. Biden said the border couldn't be closed--that was after he lied and said it WAS closed. Well Trump was elected, among other things, to remedy that and he did. And he was elected to remove the illegals, especially the criminal ones, from America. He is doing that. Biden was negligent and dangerously reckless to allow so many of those in.
The OP tongue in cheek satires the mantra that Trump is a 'king' illegally ruling over us. In fact, he is doing exactly what he promised the would do FOR, not TO the people.
New Topics
-
-
-
-
Canada’s wealth is quietly leaving — and everyday Canadians will pay the price- Started by shockedcanadian
- Replies: 2
