If one professional group of 62,000 pediatric specialists says there is no danger, and one pediatric group with between 60 and 200 members, with a self-professed religious bias, says it is harmful, which do you think is based more on pediatric research and experience?
That's easy. The one that supports common sense: a child having regular contact with a mother and father as role models.
I think children having regular contact with their mother and father is a great ideal.
How are you going to make that happen for the millions of children who have been abandoned by one or both of their biological parents?
