American Bar Association: Delay Kavanaugh until FBI investigates assault allegations

But the FBI conducts background searches. They just have to chase down a few more leads. Where's Mark Judge?
Judge gave a written response under oath and under penalty of felony perjury. You lose! Its a matter of congressional record.
Not good enough! Subpoena him and have him publically testify!

Not up to you to decide. And, you've shown yourself so partisan that it's obvious that no matter what happens, you'll be stamping your little foot saying "Not good enough!"
The win at any cost tactics of the Republicans might seem to be great for rabid partisans, but consider this: if you like the partisan politics and the results of it brought about in congress, what will be the result when a political operative is seated on the Supreme Court? Will there be justice, or will we slip into Authoritarian one party rule?
Project much? :lmao:


Exactly, and welcome.

.
 
The American Bar Association should know that the FBI doesn't get involved in local juvenile crimes. They have no jurisdiction. After all, they are supposedly lawyers, right?
But the FBI conducts background searches. They just have to chase down a few more leads. Where's Mark Judge?

Mark Judge has already sworn an affidavit. Did you miss that part? He says that Ford is lying.

What part aren't you people getting? There is not a single intelligent person on this earth that backs Ford's version of events because it has more holes that a one ton block of Swiss cheese! Her own friend whom she claimed was in the room basically said, "I have no idea what the fuck she is talking about!"
Her friend said that due to her health problems her lawyer wrote that statement without her approval. The Arizona,prosecutor reveled that bon mot! Judge has never testified under oath nor has he been interviewed by an FBI investigator.

Dr. Ford is credible. Kavanaugh threw a fit in the afternoon. Partisan, bitter and obfuscurial. He has neither the temperamentnor the credibility to have a seat on the bench. Are there no other jurists Conservative enough to serve as associate justice? Why this particular guy?
What makes her “credible”?
Her detailed memories, the fact she had talked about the incident in regard to Kavanaugh years before his nomination, Kavanaugh's reputation as a frat boy, a brat boy in his youth, Kavanaugh' reaction and hissy fit thrown yesterday afternoon.


Too bad she has zero evidence.
 
But the FBI conducts background searches. They just have to chase down a few more leads. Where's Mark Judge?

Mark Judge has already sworn an affidavit. Did you miss that part? He says that Ford is lying.

What part aren't you people getting? There is not a single intelligent person on this earth that backs Ford's version of events because it has more holes that a one ton block of Swiss cheese! Her own friend whom she claimed was in the room basically said, "I have no idea what the fuck she is talking about!"
Her friend said that due to her health problems her lawyer wrote that statement without her approval. The Arizona,prosecutor reveled that bon mot! Judge has never testified under oath nor has he been interviewed by an FBI investigator.

Dr. Ford is credible. Kavanaugh threw a fit in the afternoon. Partisan, bitter and obfuscurial. He has neither the temperamentnor the credibility to have a seat on the bench. Are there no other jurists Conservative enough to serve as associate justice? Why this particular guy?
What makes her “credible”?
Her detailed memories, the fact she had talked about the incident in regard to Kavanaugh years before his nomination, Kavanaugh's reputation as a frat boy, a brat boy in his youth, Kavanaugh' reaction and hissy fit thrown yesterday afternoon.


Too bad she has zero evidence.
No evidence pending an investigation. Denied the capacity to have other witnesses callled to testify. Denied an investigation at the outset.

It's easy to frame someone when due process and even due diligence is withdrawn. The fix is in at the Republican controlled Senate Judiciary committee.
 
Mark Judge has already sworn an affidavit. Did you miss that part? He says that Ford is lying.

What part aren't you people getting? There is not a single intelligent person on this earth that backs Ford's version of events because it has more holes that a one ton block of Swiss cheese! Her own friend whom she claimed was in the room basically said, "I have no idea what the fuck she is talking about!"
Her friend said that due to her health problems her lawyer wrote that statement without her approval. The Arizona,prosecutor reveled that bon mot! Judge has never testified under oath nor has he been interviewed by an FBI investigator.

Dr. Ford is credible. Kavanaugh threw a fit in the afternoon. Partisan, bitter and obfuscurial. He has neither the temperamentnor the credibility to have a seat on the bench. Are there no other jurists Conservative enough to serve as associate justice? Why this particular guy?
What makes her “credible”?
Her detailed memories, the fact she had talked about the incident in regard to Kavanaugh years before his nomination, Kavanaugh's reputation as a frat boy, a brat boy in his youth, Kavanaugh' reaction and hissy fit thrown yesterday afternoon.


Too bad she has zero evidence.
No evidence pending an investigation. Denied the capacity to have other witnesses callled to testify. Denied an investigation at the outset.

It's easy to frame someone when due process and even due diligence is withdrawn. The fix is in at the Republican controlled Senate Judiciary committee.

There are no other witnesses and that is why you are an incredible dumbass!

Who exactly do you think the FBI is going to interview? The so-called witnesses named in these allegations have already stated that Ford, Ramirez and Swetnick are all off their rockers! Do you think they will suddenly come clean because an FBI agent asks them as opposed to anyone else?
 
Her friend said that due to her health problems her lawyer wrote that statement without her approval. The Arizona,prosecutor reveled that bon mot! Judge has never testified under oath nor has he been interviewed by an FBI investigator.

Dr. Ford is credible. Kavanaugh threw a fit in the afternoon. Partisan, bitter and obfuscurial. He has neither the temperamentnor the credibility to have a seat on the bench. Are there no other jurists Conservative enough to serve as associate justice? Why this particular guy?
What makes her “credible”?
Her detailed memories, the fact she had talked about the incident in regard to Kavanaugh years before his nomination, Kavanaugh's reputation as a frat boy, a brat boy in his youth, Kavanaugh' reaction and hissy fit thrown yesterday afternoon.


Too bad she has zero evidence.
No evidence pending an investigation. Denied the capacity to have other witnesses callled to testify. Denied an investigation at the outset.

It's easy to frame someone when due process and even due diligence is withdrawn. The fix is in at the Republican controlled Senate Judiciary committee.

There are no other witnesses and that is why you are an incredible dumbass!

Who exactly do you think the FBI is going to interview? The so-called witnesses named in these allegations have already stated that Ford, Ramirez and Swetnick are all off their rockers! Do you think they will suddenly come clean because an FBI agent asks them as opposed to anyone else?
Yes
 
Mark Judge has already sworn an affidavit. Did you miss that part? He says that Ford is lying.

What part aren't you people getting? There is not a single intelligent person on this earth that backs Ford's version of events because it has more holes that a one ton block of Swiss cheese! Her own friend whom she claimed was in the room basically said, "I have no idea what the fuck she is talking about!"
Her friend said that due to her health problems her lawyer wrote that statement without her approval. The Arizona,prosecutor reveled that bon mot! Judge has never testified under oath nor has he been interviewed by an FBI investigator.

Dr. Ford is credible. Kavanaugh threw a fit in the afternoon. Partisan, bitter and obfuscurial. He has neither the temperamentnor the credibility to have a seat on the bench. Are there no other jurists Conservative enough to serve as associate justice? Why this particular guy?
What makes her “credible”?
Her detailed memories, the fact she had talked about the incident in regard to Kavanaugh years before his nomination, Kavanaugh's reputation as a frat boy, a brat boy in his youth, Kavanaugh' reaction and hissy fit thrown yesterday afternoon.


Too bad she has zero evidence.
No evidence pending an investigation. Denied the capacity to have other witnesses callled to testify. Denied an investigation at the outset.

It's easy to frame someone when due process and even due diligence is withdrawn. The fix is in at the Republican controlled Senate Judiciary committee.

You are living on another planet where truth is a lie, the sun is made of cheese, and the sky is whatever color someone wants it to be.

The democrats are on record as having completely stonewalled every investigation that was offered. On Record. As in, you can't slither out from that fact. The SJC delayed the hearing no fewer than twice to accommodate Ford/Democrats. She lied when she said she didn't fly and that she'd have to drive.

As of right now, Trump even gave them the FBI investigation they claimed to want. Too bad none of the democrats are screaming for joy. They immediately turn it into a problem despite bitching about wanting that for weeks.

You people are dangerously delusional. I mean dangerously. It's clear from posts like this just how horrific the propaganda has become. You people are literally siding with whatever is the precise opposite of the truth. It's to that point.

Get help. Find new sources of information. Save yourself, and your sanity before it's too late. Nobody wants to be on the wrong side of history to the degree that you are. If only you'd look in the mirror long enough, you'd realize it too.

The hypocrisy on the left is beyond comical at this point. It's horrific. Whether it be the media, hollywood or congressional democrats, I cannot believe the depths to which they will sink to fool this country into electing its own destruction. It is the most disgusting thing I think this country has ever borne witness to politically speaking.
 
Last edited:
What makes her “credible”?
Her detailed memories, the fact she had talked about the incident in regard to Kavanaugh years before his nomination, Kavanaugh's reputation as a frat boy, a brat boy in his youth, Kavanaugh' reaction and hissy fit thrown yesterday afternoon.


Too bad she has zero evidence.
No evidence pending an investigation. Denied the capacity to have other witnesses callled to testify. Denied an investigation at the outset.

It's easy to frame someone when due process and even due diligence is withdrawn. The fix is in at the Republican controlled Senate Judiciary committee.

There are no other witnesses and that is why you are an incredible dumbass!

Who exactly do you think the FBI is going to interview? The so-called witnesses named in these allegations have already stated that Ford, Ramirez and Swetnick are all off their rockers! Do you think they will suddenly come clean because an FBI agent asks them as opposed to anyone else?
Yes

OMG, you are the dumbest libtard on this board!

BTW, did you see that Swetnick was sued for sexual harassment by two coworkers? That's some pot calling the kettle black!
 
Well, Mr. NoSmoKing, I've slept on this and only one thing has changed in my mind. I can accept a week extra to wait on the FBI investigation, whilst I have been told it already took place, my dear Republican Party does have a lot of power, which was earned on a blow-by-blow win. The balance of power is in our favor. If we use it properly, we deserve to remain in power so long as we keep our noses clean. I can concede one week to insure that the SECOND inquiry confirms the FIRST provided there be a cut off of more unconfirmed DNC demagogues coming forward with only one intention: to prolong this matter beyond a week, and that the DNC controls the number of lies that have already come out to destroy this candidacy of Brett Kavanaugh, whose sterling character has been smudged by professional game changers such as a psychologist female who AFTER Judge Kavanaugh had been a Federal Judge for 6 years, decided to tell someone else other than herself who damaged her 30-year-old memory of what took place and following her radicalized adherence to creating scenarios in her profession about how to persuade anybody of anything simply by controlling the environment with information from any kind of source to produce any kind of results the perpetrators of this persuasion decided would achieve the best results. That's basically my understanding of experimental psychology, and trust me, it differs from the old timey obtaining of facts that prove something to be true or false based on what is found rather than what may be created to achieve such an agenda as changing Constitutional provisions including amendments directed at keeping stuff fair..

So I concede, I can live with but don't like yielding one more week for the specific purpose that the spirit of party retaliation is contained and discarded in order to confirm a person who is qualified to settle the disputes of Americans. Provided there will be no more unsubstantiated claims against President Trump and his learned staff who provided this well-credentialed man of letters, not to mention laws, as the best candidate. The DNC must agree to no more dirty tricks for the same full week. Period.
 
I'll take "Shit that isn't going to happen" for $1,000, Alex.

Looks like you and the six or so others who applauded your effort(?), Desire(?), Fantasy(?) or childish magical thinking(!) has evaporated by reality.

Seriously very oddball, you should grow up and be fined for your unintentional smearing of commuter screens, and justice; coffee spit out when the reader laughs out loud blurs the vision and leading the biddable with your boorish propaganda isn't nice.
 
Her detailed memories, the fact she had talked about the incident in regard to Kavanaugh years before his nomination, Kavanaugh's reputation as a frat boy, a brat boy in his youth, Kavanaugh' reaction and hissy fit thrown yesterday afternoon.


Too bad she has zero evidence.
No evidence pending an investigation. Denied the capacity to have other witnesses callled to testify. Denied an investigation at the outset.

It's easy to frame someone when due process and even due diligence is withdrawn. The fix is in at the Republican controlled Senate Judiciary committee.

There are no other witnesses and that is why you are an incredible dumbass!

Who exactly do you think the FBI is going to interview? The so-called witnesses named in these allegations have already stated that Ford, Ramirez and Swetnick are all off their rockers! Do you think they will suddenly come clean because an FBI agent asks them as opposed to anyone else?
Yes

OMG, you are the dumbest libtard on this board!

BTW, did you see that Swetnick was sued for sexual harassment by two coworkers? That's some pot calling the kettle black!

Relevance? Someone psychologically traumatized might engage in bizarre behavior; consider that children molested by same sex perverts often end up with pathological hate for homosexuals.
 
Her detailed memories, the fact she had talked about the incident in regard to Kavanaugh years before his nomination, Kavanaugh's reputation as a frat boy, a brat boy in his youth, Kavanaugh' reaction and hissy fit thrown yesterday afternoon.


Too bad she has zero evidence.
No evidence pending an investigation. Denied the capacity to have other witnesses callled to testify. Denied an investigation at the outset.

It's easy to frame someone when due process and even due diligence is withdrawn. The fix is in at the Republican controlled Senate Judiciary committee.

There are no other witnesses and that is why you are an incredible dumbass!

Who exactly do you think the FBI is going to interview? The so-called witnesses named in these allegations have already stated that Ford, Ramirez and Swetnick are all off their rockers! Do you think they will suddenly come clean because an FBI agent asks them as opposed to anyone else?
Yes

OMG, you are the dumbest libtard on this board!

BTW, did you see that Swetnick was sued for sexual harassment by two coworkers? That's some pot calling the kettle black!
Swetnick has also been sued for baseless sex assault claims... She has a significant history of lying and its a matter of court record. Creepy Porn Lawyer and this liar... Two peas in a pod..
 
Last edited:
Well, Mr. NoSmoKing, I've slept on this and only one thing has changed in my mind. I can accept a week extra to wait on the FBI investigation, whilst I have been told it already took place, my dear Republican Party does have a lot of power, which was earned on a blow-by-blow win. The balance of power is in our favor. If we use it properly, we deserve to remain in power so long as we keep our noses clean. I can concede one week to insure that the SECOND inquiry confirms the FIRST provided there be a cut off of more unconfirmed DNC demagogues coming forward with only one intention: to prolong this matter beyond a week, and that the DNC controls the number of lies that have already come out to destroy this candidacy of Brett Kavanaugh, whose sterling character has been smudged by professional game changers such as a psychologist female who AFTER Judge Kavanaugh had been a Federal Judge for 6 years, decided to tell someone else other than herself who damaged her 30-year-old memory of what took place and following her radicalized adherence to creating scenarios in her profession about how to persuade anybody of anything simply by controlling the environment with information from any kind of source to produce any kind of results the perpetrators of this persuasion decided would achieve the best results. That's basically my understanding of experimental psychology, and trust me, it differs from the old timey obtaining of facts that prove something to be true or false based on what is found rather than what may be created to achieve such an agenda as changing Constitutional provisions including amendments directed at keeping stuff fair..

So I concede, I can live with but don't like yielding one more week for the specific purpose that the spirit of party retaliation is contained and discarded in order to confirm a person who is qualified to settle the disputes of Americans. Provided there will be no more unsubstantiated claims against President Trump and his learned staff who provided this well-credentialed man of letters, not to mention laws, as the best candidate. The DNC must agree to no more dirty tricks for the same full week. Period.
There is a silver lining to the FBI investigation. Trump, in his order, instructed the FBI to refer all crimes they find to proper local authorities. So they have been tasked with not only evidence collection for the senate but they have been tasked with looking into the veracity of claims and referring them to proper authorities. While congress will not get any recommendations, only the interview information, the FBI will be giving that information to local authorities for prosecutions if they feel they are warranted..

So if they find that the accusations are frivolous and defamatory the left is going to get serious blow back by being charged... Now that is damn funny to me... The Sword of Justice has cutting edges on both sides of the blade and it cuts both ways..

I think the left got a whole lot more than they wanted...
 
Too bad she has zero evidence.
No evidence pending an investigation. Denied the capacity to have other witnesses callled to testify. Denied an investigation at the outset.

It's easy to frame someone when due process and even due diligence is withdrawn. The fix is in at the Republican controlled Senate Judiciary committee.

There are no other witnesses and that is why you are an incredible dumbass!

Who exactly do you think the FBI is going to interview? The so-called witnesses named in these allegations have already stated that Ford, Ramirez and Swetnick are all off their rockers! Do you think they will suddenly come clean because an FBI agent asks them as opposed to anyone else?
Yes

OMG, you are the dumbest libtard on this board!

BTW, did you see that Swetnick was sued for sexual harassment by two coworkers? That's some pot calling the kettle black!

Relevance? Someone psychologically traumatized might engage in bizarre behavior; consider that children molested by same sex perverts often end up with pathological hate for homosexuals.

Homosexuality is bizarre behavior. Often victims of such trauma at an early age become homosexual because of it. There is a much higher rate of homosexuality in populations which have been abused because of that fact.

Not that I think your assessment is wrong. I'm sure it can go both ways(no pun intended). Someone molested by a homosexual might end up hating them just as much. I'm merely pointing out another likelihood. Originally, I misread your comment so I added this in as an edit.
 
Last edited:

As I posted before, THIS IS A LIE. A FAKE STORY

ABA Asking for Kavanaugh Delay a Fake

Senate Judiciary on Twitter

In other words, the guy who wrote the letter didn’t have the authority to do so. But, that didn’t mean a thing to the NYT.

The article show the letters that state the ABA still considers him to be well-qualified for the Supreme Court.

More @ Wow. It turns out the American Bar Association story on Brett Kavanaugh was FAKE NEWS
 

As I posted before, THIS IS A LIE. A FAKE STORY

ABA Asking for Kavanaugh Delay a Fake

Senate Judiciary on Twitter

In other words, the guy who wrote the letter didn’t have the authority to do so. But, that didn’t mean a thing to the NYT.

The article show the letters that state the ABA still considers him to be well-qualified for the Supreme Court.

More @ Wow. It turns out the American Bar Association story on Brett Kavanaugh was FAKE NEWS

You mean the OP LIED to advance his agenda...shocking!
 

As I posted before, THIS IS A LIE. A FAKE STORY

ABA Asking for Kavanaugh Delay a Fake

Senate Judiciary on Twitter

In other words, the guy who wrote the letter didn’t have the authority to do so. But, that didn’t mean a thing to the NYT.

The article show the letters that state the ABA still considers him to be well-qualified for the Supreme Court.

More @ Wow. It turns out the American Bar Association story on Brett Kavanaugh was FAKE NEWS


You mean to say that the left/democrats lied to further their agenda? I'm shocked! shocked I say!
 
Report: Christine Blasey Ford's ex-boyfriend says she coached a friend on taking a polygraph, more

What do you know!

Where'd all the Ford defenders go?

Sure, he isn't under oath and has no evidence , but that hasn't stopped anybody from defending Ford so maybe the democrats can play fair for once and take this one at face value the same way they took Ford at face value.

Let's see if her ex BF will also file a sworn statement.

It's sort of a good thing Ford was lying about the Claustrophobia/one door thing, because I hear prison cells are very small and also have only one door.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top