Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The win at any cost tactics of the Republicans might seem to be great for rabid partisans, but consider this: if you like the partisan politics and the results of it brought about in congress, what will be the result when a political operative is seated on the Supreme Court? Will there be justice, or will we slip into Authoritarian one party rule?Not good enough! Subpoena him and have him publically testify!Judge gave a written response under oath and under penalty of felony perjury. You lose! Its a matter of congressional record.But the FBI conducts background searches. They just have to chase down a few more leads. Where's Mark Judge?`
What does that have to do with the American Bar Associations request????
The American Bar Association should know that the FBI doesn't get involved in local juvenile crimes. They have no jurisdiction. After all, they are supposedly lawyers, right?
Not up to you to decide. And, you've shown yourself so partisan that it's obvious that no matter what happens, you'll be stamping your little foot saying "Not good enough!"
`They're not going to investigate an alleged 36 year-old non federal crime. If they want to re-vet him, fine, I don't care. But they're not going to come up with anything they din't uncover the first six times; they're quite thorough.
You don't read much, do you? It has already been thoroughly explained how this system works, yet you insist on falling back to your false, partisan beliefs. The introduction of Julie Swetnick, Christine Blasey Ford and Deborah Ramirez represent new information that was not vetted or investigated by the FBI, information that the nations top attorneys, legal experts, senators, representatives, et al, consider absolutely pertinent in selecting a supreme court just justice.
You just don't know what you are talking about. There is just no other way to state this. While I understand your hyper partisan political beliefs has hampered your ability to discern facts from fiction, despite the reams of evidence presented, you just continue to rehash the same thing, over and over.
A far left wing group parroting a baseless claim.... how unoriginal...
The win at any cost tactics of the Republicans might seem to be great for rabid partisans, but consider this: if you like the partisan politics and the results of it brought about in congress, what will be the result when a political operative is seated on the Supreme Court? Will there be justice, or will we slip into Authoritarian one party rule?Not good enough! Subpoena him and have him publically testify!Judge gave a written response under oath and under penalty of felony perjury. You lose! Its a matter of congressional record.But the FBI conducts background searches. They just have to chase down a few more leads. Where's Mark Judge?The American Bar Association should know that the FBI doesn't get involved in local juvenile crimes. They have no jurisdiction. After all, they are supposedly lawyers, right?
Not up to you to decide. And, you've shown yourself so partisan that it's obvious that no matter what happens, you'll be stamping your little foot saying "Not good enough!"
A far left wing group parroting a baseless claim.... how unoriginal...
The American Bar Association is a 'far left wing group'? That's about the most ridiculous thing I have read on here in a while.
'One function of the ABA is its creation and maintenance of a code of ethical standards for lawyers. The Model Code of Professional Responsibility (1969) and/or the newer Model Rules of Professional Conduct (1983) have been adopted in 49 states, the District of Columbia and the United States Virgin Islands. The exception is the State Bar of California; however, a few sections of the California Rules of Professional Conduct were drawn from the ABA models.'
American Bar Association - Wikipedia
Where is your link to unbiased factual proof that the AMA is a 'far left wing group'?
I GUARANTEE that you can provide no such link.
A far left wing group parroting a baseless claim.... how unoriginal...
The American Bar Association is a 'far left wing group'? That's about the most ridiculous thing I have read on here in a while.
'One function of the ABA is its creation and maintenance of a code of ethical standards for lawyers. The Model Code of Professional Responsibility (1969) and/or the newer Model Rules of Professional Conduct (1983) have been adopted in 49 states, the District of Columbia and the United States Virgin Islands. The exception is the State Bar of California; however, a few sections of the California Rules of Professional Conduct were drawn from the ABA models.'
American Bar Association - Wikipedia
Where is your link to unbiased factual proof that the AMA is a 'far left wing group'?
I GUARANTEE that you can provide no such link.
The American Bar Association's History of Liberal Advocacy
`Well little girl, the FBI has completed it's background check on Kavanaugh including the Ford information. What comes next is the committee vote tomorrow. A floor vote to begin debate on Sunday and a floor vote to confirm mid week. He'll be seated by Thursday or Friday, with a bipartisan vote of 56-44. I'd bet $10. on it.
You are welcome to your opinions. There is no law preventing the FBI from doing another background check based on the claims of these three women but as I said before, trump will not allow it. What happens after that, remains to be seen.
Why should the FBI do another background check? Is he being nominated to be God? There is absolutely no reason for the FBI to investigate a crime that she cannot prove, was allegedly committed by a juvenile in Maryland, and occurred 36 years ago, give or take Ford's inaccurate memory.
A far left wing group parroting a baseless claim.... how unoriginal...
The American Bar Association is a 'far left wing group'? That's about the most ridiculous thing I have read on here in a while.
'One function of the ABA is its creation and maintenance of a code of ethical standards for lawyers. The Model Code of Professional Responsibility (1969) and/or the newer Model Rules of Professional Conduct (1983) have been adopted in 49 states, the District of Columbia and the United States Virgin Islands. The exception is the State Bar of California; however, a few sections of the California Rules of Professional Conduct were drawn from the ABA models.'
American Bar Association - Wikipedia
Where is your link to unbiased factual proof that the AMA is a 'far left wing group'?
I GUARANTEE that you can provide no such link.
The American Bar Association's History of Liberal Advocacy
A) the author of your link is HARDLY 'unbiased' on this. He is a very conservative guy.
B) Besides which - he said (that I saw) NOTHING about the ABA being a 'FAR left wing group'. He just said they were left of center...which I might tend to agree with.
But calling them 'FAR left wing' is flat out ridiculous.
'Far Left
Also known as the extreme left, ultra left or radical left. The Far Left most often includes anarchists and communists. The Far Left refers to the highest degree of leftism in politics, and seeks perfect or near perfect equality.'
Urban Dictionary: Far Left
A far left wing group parroting a baseless claim.... how unoriginal...
The American Bar Association is a 'far left wing group'? That's about the most ridiculous thing I have read on here in a while.
'One function of the ABA is its creation and maintenance of a code of ethical standards for lawyers. The Model Code of Professional Responsibility (1969) and/or the newer Model Rules of Professional Conduct (1983) have been adopted in 49 states, the District of Columbia and the United States Virgin Islands. The exception is the State Bar of California; however, a few sections of the California Rules of Professional Conduct were drawn from the ABA models.'
American Bar Association - Wikipedia
Where is your link to unbiased factual proof that the AMA is a 'far left wing group'?
I GUARANTEE that you can provide no such link.
The American Bar Association's History of Liberal Advocacy
A) the author of your link is HARDLY 'unbiased' on this. He is a very conservative guy.
B) Besides which - he said (that I saw) NOTHING about the ABA being a 'FAR left wing group'. He just said they were left of center...which I might tend to agree with.
But calling them 'FAR left wing' is flat out ridiculous.
'Far Left
Also known as the extreme left, ultra left or radical left. The Far Left most often includes anarchists and communists. The Far Left refers to the highest degree of leftism in politics, and seeks perfect or near perfect equality.'
Urban Dictionary: Far Left
I didn't realize that y'all had rules about bias.. I was just trying to help.
A far left wing group parroting a baseless claim.... how unoriginal...
The American Bar Association is a 'far left wing group'? That's about the most ridiculous thing I have read on here in a while.
'One function of the ABA is its creation and maintenance of a code of ethical standards for lawyers. The Model Code of Professional Responsibility (1969) and/or the newer Model Rules of Professional Conduct (1983) have been adopted in 49 states, the District of Columbia and the United States Virgin Islands. The exception is the State Bar of California; however, a few sections of the California Rules of Professional Conduct were drawn from the ABA models.'
American Bar Association - Wikipedia
Where is your link to unbiased factual proof that the AMA is a 'far left wing group'?
I GUARANTEE that you can provide no such link.
The American Bar Association's History of Liberal Advocacy
A) the author of your link is HARDLY 'unbiased' on this. He is a very conservative guy.
B) Besides which - he said (that I saw) NOTHING about the ABA being a 'FAR left wing group'. He just said they were left of center...which I might tend to agree with.
But calling them 'FAR left wing' is flat out ridiculous.
'Far Left
Also known as the extreme left, ultra left or radical left. The Far Left most often includes anarchists and communists. The Far Left refers to the highest degree of leftism in politics, and seeks perfect or near perfect equality.'
Urban Dictionary: Far Left
I didn't realize that y'all had rules about bias.. I was just trying to help.
Well, thanks for trying. But I did put right in my request 'unbiased' in bold letters.
The ABA can go to hell, committee vote will be tomorrow, with a floor vote early next week, the commies have lost again. Justice Kavanaugh will take his seat on the court by Friday the 5th. LMAO
.
"is able to request assistance"`
Very smart move. There are way too many unanswered questions here.
Sadly they are all in Fords lack of facts and corroborating evidence... How about you file these allegations with the proper authorities and see where they go... The FBI isn't it..
So you say. A crime has been alleged, a crime against a child. Local LE has a duty to investigate the allegation, and is able to request assistance from the State AG's Office or the FBI.
Which means the STATE AUTHORITIES MUST REQUEST IT. Which means the STATE must have an open investigation it believes is credible.... Again the STATE has no such investigation ongoing..
No credible story, no credible witnesses, you got nothing! the state will not investigate this..
`
What does that have to do with the American Bar Associations request????
The American Bar Association should know that the FBI doesn't get involved in local juvenile crimes. They have no jurisdiction. After all, they are supposedly lawyers, right?
Project much?The win at any cost tactics of the Republicans might seem to be great for rabid partisans, but consider this: if you like the partisan politics and the results of it brought about in congress, what will be the result when a political operative is seated on the Supreme Court? Will there be justice, or will we slip into Authoritarian one party rule?Not good enough! Subpoena him and have him publically testify!Judge gave a written response under oath and under penalty of felony perjury. You lose! Its a matter of congressional record.But the FBI conducts background searches. They just have to chase down a few more leads. Where's Mark Judge?The American Bar Association should know that the FBI doesn't get involved in local juvenile crimes. They have no jurisdiction. After all, they are supposedly lawyers, right?
Not up to you to decide. And, you've shown yourself so partisan that it's obvious that no matter what happens, you'll be stamping your little foot saying "Not good enough!"
The American Bar Association is a 'far left wing group'? That's about the most ridiculous thing I have read on here in a while.
'One function of the ABA is its creation and maintenance of a code of ethical standards for lawyers. The Model Code of Professional Responsibility (1969) and/or the newer Model Rules of Professional Conduct (1983) have been adopted in 49 states, the District of Columbia and the United States Virgin Islands. The exception is the State Bar of California; however, a few sections of the California Rules of Professional Conduct were drawn from the ABA models.'
American Bar Association - Wikipedia
Where is your link to unbiased factual proof that the AMA is a 'far left wing group'?
I GUARANTEE that you can provide no such link.
The American Bar Association's History of Liberal Advocacy
A) the author of your link is HARDLY 'unbiased' on this. He is a very conservative guy.
B) Besides which - he said (that I saw) NOTHING about the ABA being a 'FAR left wing group'. He just said they were left of center...which I might tend to agree with.
But calling them 'FAR left wing' is flat out ridiculous.
'Far Left
Also known as the extreme left, ultra left or radical left. The Far Left most often includes anarchists and communists. The Far Left refers to the highest degree of leftism in politics, and seeks perfect or near perfect equality.'
Urban Dictionary: Far Left
I didn't realize that y'all had rules about bias.. I was just trying to help.
Well, thanks for trying. But I did put right in my request 'unbiased' in bold letters.
Ah, I just read the last line, not the giant bold line. LOL!
`
What does that have to do with the American Bar Associations request????
The American Bar Association should know that the FBI doesn't get involved in local juvenile crimes. They have no jurisdiction. After all, they are supposedly lawyers, right?
And you do know this to be a fact? Prove it, for I know differently. The DOJ has a wide range of resources, show us the policy which denies them the authority to aid local authority.
It's tough to slip into Authoritarian one party rule when your opposition controls both houses of congress, the White House and, it appears, the Supreme Court.Project much?The win at any cost tactics of the Republicans might seem to be great for rabid partisans, but consider this: if you like the partisan politics and the results of it brought about in congress, what will be the result when a political operative is seated on the Supreme Court? Will there be justice, or will we slip into Authoritarian one party rule?Not good enough! Subpoena him and have him publically testify!Judge gave a written response under oath and under penalty of felony perjury. You lose! Its a matter of congressional record.But the FBI conducts background searches. They just have to chase down a few more leads. Where's Mark Judge?
Not up to you to decide. And, you've shown yourself so partisan that it's obvious that no matter what happens, you'll be stamping your little foot saying "Not good enough!"
With all due respect to your heartfelt loyalty to a party that some of us feel has been dealing from the bottom of the deck when nobody is watching, I cannot respect the flagrant unsubstantiated testimony and myriad acts of obfuscation therein that was brought to the public attention at the Kavanaugh roast, disguised as a hearing for fitness to serve on the Supreme Court. Dr. Ford needs some serious care for an extended time from now on. How could the Democrats do such a heinous thing to a person who was hurt, but can't remember any details except for one: her perpetrator was the most important Republican nominee, and her extremism puts her in the unique position of actually hating any and all Republicans, especially if they are just in her road to which a victim entitles only themselves while everybody else is just in the rear view mirror. That's why they should have hospitalized her, not pushed her into the national political arena where demands on her memory must be quite clear enough to convince skeptics like me who thinks the event may not have taken place until she decided on someone she hated as much as the real perpetrator, and it just happens to be somebody she assumes is evil as her perpetrator was because of her own brainwashing by party controllers who reward her for doing certain deeds she does well.It's tough to slip into Authoritarian one party rule when your opposition controls both houses of congress, the White House and, it appears, the Supreme Court.Project much?The win at any cost tactics of the Republicans might seem to be great for rabid partisans, but consider this: if you like the partisan politics and the results of it brought about in congress, what will be the result when a political operative is seated on the Supreme Court? Will there be justice, or will we slip into Authoritarian one party rule?Not good enough! Subpoena him and have him publically testify!Judge gave a written response under oath and under penalty of felony perjury. You lose! Its a matter of congressional record.
Not up to you to decide. And, you've shown yourself so partisan that it's obvious that no matter what happens, you'll be stamping your little foot saying "Not good enough!"
`They're not going to investigate an alleged 36 year-old non federal crime. If they want to re-vet him, fine, I don't care. But they're not going to come up with anything they din't uncover the first six times; they're quite thorough.
You don't read much, do you? It has already been thoroughly explained how this system works, yet you insist on falling back to your false, partisan beliefs. The introduction of Julie Swetnick, Christine Blasey Ford and Deborah Ramirez represent new information that was not vetted or investigated by the FBI, information that the nations top attorneys, legal experts, senators, representatives, et al, consider absolutely pertinent in selecting a supreme court just justice.
You just don't know what you are talking about. There is just no other way to state this. While I understand your hyper partisan political beliefs has hampered your ability to discern facts from fiction, despite the reams of evidence presented, you just continue to rehash the same thing, over and over.
