Actually, you're as clueless as usual. The eye-ranians had every intention of ignoring the JCPOA
America Doesn't Have The Moral Justification To Enter Into the Israel/Iran War!
- Thread starter JimofPennsylvan
- Start date
Actually, you're as clueless as usual. The eye-ranians had every intention of ignoring the JCPOA
RE:
Meanwhile:
"Iran protests: Protesters among prisoners pardoned by leader"
Iran protests: Protesters among prisoners pardoned by leader
Iranians involved in anti-government demos are among those set to be released.
www.bbc.com
EXCERPT "Iran's supreme leader has pardoned "tens of thousands" of prisoners, including many linked to anti-government protests." CONTINUED
Do you realize the degree to which you have been so clearly brainwashed by pro Israel Western MSM into hating people you've never met and know nothing about?
No! I do not like the Mullahs of Iran and regret that the Western meddling was instrumental in their coming into power and staying in power.
The first realty about the Middle East anyone learns who has been there is that neither side is either absolutely good or evil.
Netanyahu has murdered far more innocent human beings and you probably send him Valentine's Day Cards.
Please get a grip on your hate.
I have my information about Iran and "the mullahs" from Iranians who fled Iran---some as far backRE:
Meanwhile:
"Iran protests: Protesters among prisoners pardoned by leader"
Iran protests: Protesters among prisoners pardoned by leader
Iranians involved in anti-government demos are among those set to be released.
EXCERPT "Iran's supreme leader has pardoned "tens of thousands" of prisoners, including many linked to anti-government protests." CONTINUED
Do you realize the degree to which you have been so clearly brainwashed by pro Israel Western MSM into hating people you've never met and know nothing about?
No! I do not like the Mullahs of Iran and regret that the Western meddling was instrumental in their coming into power and staying in power.
The first realty about the Middle East anyone learns who has been there is that neither side is either absolutely good or evil.
Netanyahu has murdered far more innocent human beings and you probably send him Valentine's Day Cards.
Please get a grip on your hate.
as the 1960s as the stench of islamism infected the land. Most of the Iranians I knew well at that
time were muslims----a few were jews who were being sent out by their parents in a program some-
thing like the "kindertransport" from Nazi Germany-----way back in the 1960s. Netanyahu has
murdered no one. You have no idea what INNOCENT is. Sadly, most of the Iranians did not have
the means to RUN-----
tahuyaman
Platinum Member
- Aug 21, 2012
- 9,784
- 5,716
- 928
Which was vacated and never re-done. It was unenforceable anyway.
tahuyaman
Platinum Member
- Aug 21, 2012
- 9,784
- 5,716
- 928
What the **** is wrong with you?
You liberal types are the ones who love the Mullahs.
Dragonlady
Designing Woman
1. Yes.
2. They've been doing that effectively for the past 20 years.
3. Iran is not building a nuclear weapon.
4. See #3 above.
Dragonlady
Designing Woman
Since when? MAGA's need to stop pretending that they know what liberals want. FOX News is lying to you about what liberals want. You don't clue.
Brainwashed, mindless and MAGA is no way to go through life.
tahuyaman
Platinum Member
- Aug 21, 2012
- 9,784
- 5,716
- 928
The Ayatollah said he had no intention of abiding by it. When you think about it, why would they. Iran is a sovereign nation.
JoeB131
Diamond Member
Guy in a bass boat can lay a mine, guy.
They don't even need to lay mines, they can just take out a tanker with some of those missiles they have.
They could use one of their 25 submarines as well.
tahuyaman
Platinum Member
- Aug 21, 2012
- 9,784
- 5,716
- 928
Where are you getting the Fox News shit? Is that because you have nothing of value to add, so you go Fox News? Idiot.
BluesLegend
Diamond Member
That's because you are a blithering idiot who can't read.
- Moderator
- #172
Still enough to have their entire navy destroyed.
Submarine warfare? They wouldn't be a match.
John Edgar Slow Horses
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2023
- 53,995
- 25,135
- 2,488
- Banned
- #173
We are all better ignoring Templar Kormac and tahuyaman.
Clear the Hormuz straits, annihilate the Houthis, and bomb Arak and Fodor out of existence.
Then go home in time for dinner.
Clear the Hormuz straits, annihilate the Houthis, and bomb Arak and Fodor out of existence.
Then go home in time for dinner.
John Edgar Slow Horses
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2023
- 53,995
- 25,135
- 2,488
- Banned
- #174
It will be for both.
John Edgar Slow Horses
Diamond Member
- Apr 11, 2023
- 53,995
- 25,135
- 2,488
- Banned
- #175
That is a small minority unlike the large majority of MAGA that hate the Jews.
Take it to Iran right now. Obliterate Fordow and Arak. Send any who support Iran and hate Israel to Iran tomorrow.
AZrailwhale
Diamond Member
Iran gave up NO refined fuel. They merely slowed the pace if their enrichment. Iran agreed to give up fuel but never did.
JoeB131
Diamond Member
They don't have to be a "match", Twinkie.
All they have to do is sink a tanker or two, or even damage one, and the price of oil will shoot through the roof.
AZrailwhale
Diamond Member
That isn't what happened during the tanker wars of the eighties. It failed then and will fail now, all it will accomplish is cost Iran the remains of its navy.
Nobody911
Platinum Member
- Nov 26, 2022
- 1,062
- 525
- 938
It may be too late for many Americans to prepare for the consequences of their choices. If you voted for Trump, you must face the repercussions of that decision. It's a difficult reality, but accountability is essential. Just focus on energy and defense sectors, and gold if you want to make money! 
Based on the current situation and analysis of Donald Trump's character and behavior, here is an assessment of whether Trump is likely to support Israel by attacking Iranian nuclear facilities within the next two weeks:
Current Context
Israel has already struck numerous targets in Iran, including nuclear sites, escalating the conflict significantly.
Trump has stated he will decide within two weeks whether the U.S. will join Israel's air campaign against Iran's nuclear facilities, indicating that the decision is pending and subject to diplomatic developments1234.
Diplomatic efforts are ongoing, with Trump’s envoy engaging Iranian officials, and Trump himself has expressed some openness to diplomacy, though he also acknowledges the possibility of military action368.
Iran has warned that U.S. involvement would cause irreversible damage and has dismissed calls to surrender27.
Trump's Character and Behavior Analysis
Trump has historically projected himself as a dealmaker and peacemaker, often preferring negotiation but also showing readiness to use force if it bolsters his image of strength689.
He tends to weigh decisions based on political and personal image considerations, such as appearing strong and successful rather than weak or manipulated9.
Trump has vacillated publicly on the issue, reflecting his tendency to keep opponents and allies guessing and to leverage uncertainty for negotiation advantage237.
He has shown respect for Israel's military effectiveness and has provided political backing, though he is cautious about dragging the U.S. into a large-scale conflict9.
His administration appears constrained by the reality that Israel is determined to act, limiting his ability to prevent Israeli strikes and pushing him toward at least tacit support9.
Trump is aware that direct U.S. military involvement, such as bombing Iran’s fortified nuclear site at Fordow, would escalate the conflict and risk broader regional instability, but he may see it as necessary if diplomacy fails56.
Likelihood of Support Within Two Weeks
Trump is currently delaying a decision to allow for diplomacy, suggesting he prefers a negotiated solution if possible36.
However, if diplomacy fails or Iran does not meet U.S. demands regarding nuclear disarmament, Trump may authorize military support to Israel, including strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, to demonstrate strength and uphold U.S. and Israeli security interests569.
His decision will likely balance the risks of escalation against the political and strategic benefits of preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.
Given Trump's pattern of shifting between diplomacy and force and his desire not to appear weak, it is plausible he could support an attack within two weeks if diplomatic efforts falter or if he perceives a strategic advantage2379.
Summary
Donald Trump is weighing a complex decision with significant regional and global risks. While he currently favors waiting for diplomatic outcomes, his character traits—such as valuing strength, unpredictability, and political image—combined with the pressure of Israeli actions and Iran’s nuclear ambitions, make it likely he would support military action against Iranian nuclear facilities within two weeks if diplomacy fails or if he judges it necessary to maintain U.S. influence and security commitments in the Middle East123569.
sources:
1. https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/iran-israel-conflict-news
2. https://www.reuters.com/world/middl...tacks-trump-weighs-us-involvement-2025-06-19/
3. Trump to decide ‘within next two weeks’ whether to join Iran strikes — White House
4. Trump to decide on US action in Israel-Iran conflict within two weeks
5. If diplomacy and Israel’s efforts fall short, Trump should bomb Fordow to end the war
6. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/16/us/politics/trump-iran-diplomacy-conflict.html
7. Trump on Iran: From ‘very close’ to a deal to ‘very close’ to a bomb
8. https://www.reuters.com/world/middl...ced-israels-campaign-against-iran-2025-06-19/
9. Donald Trump’s No-Strategy Strategy on Iran
Based on the current situation and analysis of Donald Trump's character and behavior, here is an assessment of whether Trump is likely to support Israel by attacking Iranian nuclear facilities within the next two weeks:Current Context
Israel has already struck numerous targets in Iran, including nuclear sites, escalating the conflict significantly.
Trump has stated he will decide within two weeks whether the U.S. will join Israel's air campaign against Iran's nuclear facilities, indicating that the decision is pending and subject to diplomatic developments1234.
Diplomatic efforts are ongoing, with Trump’s envoy engaging Iranian officials, and Trump himself has expressed some openness to diplomacy, though he also acknowledges the possibility of military action368.
Iran has warned that U.S. involvement would cause irreversible damage and has dismissed calls to surrender27.
Trump's Character and Behavior Analysis
Trump has historically projected himself as a dealmaker and peacemaker, often preferring negotiation but also showing readiness to use force if it bolsters his image of strength689.
He tends to weigh decisions based on political and personal image considerations, such as appearing strong and successful rather than weak or manipulated9.
Trump has vacillated publicly on the issue, reflecting his tendency to keep opponents and allies guessing and to leverage uncertainty for negotiation advantage237.
He has shown respect for Israel's military effectiveness and has provided political backing, though he is cautious about dragging the U.S. into a large-scale conflict9.
His administration appears constrained by the reality that Israel is determined to act, limiting his ability to prevent Israeli strikes and pushing him toward at least tacit support9.
Trump is aware that direct U.S. military involvement, such as bombing Iran’s fortified nuclear site at Fordow, would escalate the conflict and risk broader regional instability, but he may see it as necessary if diplomacy fails56.
Likelihood of Support Within Two Weeks
Trump is currently delaying a decision to allow for diplomacy, suggesting he prefers a negotiated solution if possible36.
However, if diplomacy fails or Iran does not meet U.S. demands regarding nuclear disarmament, Trump may authorize military support to Israel, including strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, to demonstrate strength and uphold U.S. and Israeli security interests569.
His decision will likely balance the risks of escalation against the political and strategic benefits of preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.
Given Trump's pattern of shifting between diplomacy and force and his desire not to appear weak, it is plausible he could support an attack within two weeks if diplomatic efforts falter or if he perceives a strategic advantage2379.
Summary
Donald Trump is weighing a complex decision with significant regional and global risks. While he currently favors waiting for diplomatic outcomes, his character traits—such as valuing strength, unpredictability, and political image—combined with the pressure of Israeli actions and Iran’s nuclear ambitions, make it likely he would support military action against Iranian nuclear facilities within two weeks if diplomacy fails or if he judges it necessary to maintain U.S. influence and security commitments in the Middle East123569.
sources:
1. https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/iran-israel-conflict-news
2. https://www.reuters.com/world/middl...tacks-trump-weighs-us-involvement-2025-06-19/
3. Trump to decide ‘within next two weeks’ whether to join Iran strikes — White House
4. Trump to decide on US action in Israel-Iran conflict within two weeks
5. If diplomacy and Israel’s efforts fall short, Trump should bomb Fordow to end the war
6. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/16/us/politics/trump-iran-diplomacy-conflict.html
7. Trump on Iran: From ‘very close’ to a deal to ‘very close’ to a bomb
8. https://www.reuters.com/world/middl...ced-israels-campaign-against-iran-2025-06-19/
9. Donald Trump’s No-Strategy Strategy on Iran
Soupnazi630
Gold Member
- Dec 9, 2013
- 21,100
- 6,488
- 335
Hey gay boy I never said who it was so that proves YOU are the lair here
I posted facts you confirmed them
but being a ***** and a dishonest one you are too stupid to see it
I did not state one lie you little dick licker and nothing you posted even contradicts what I said
learn to read BOY you wont own yourself so easily
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
Mamdani's wife Rama Duwaji Used N Word, Celebrated palestine Terrorists, Claimed White People "created" Al Qaeda
- Started by Thethingsz
- Replies: 3
-
