Ameriacn drone was shoot down by a Russian jet over Black Sea.

No they don't. They use the same fuel land-based reactors use.
All ship based nuclear reactors do is boil water. The contaminated steam is passed through heat exchangers to heat non-radioactive water that flashes into steam and turns the turbines that produce electricity that runs the motors that turn the prop and provide electricity for auxiliary systems on the sub. Enriched fuel isn’t necessary to boil water. Some Russian reactors use liquified sodium as a coolant, but they still boil water to produce steam.
 
Like I posted on the other(s) thread about this topic



s82nIFk.jpg
 
No. It was quite far from it.
View attachment 765749
FORTE10 is an RQ-4 Global Hawk. Not the MQ-9 Reaper that was downed. The MQ-9 was not tracked (which only means no ADS-B).

Last flight for PERSEO71 was January 3- that orbit in Romania. Type is not identified, but 41,000 feet and 466kts, I'd guess RC-135.
 
A reasonable scenario is that a couple of bored Russian pilots who probably watched "Top Gun", came on this monstrosity and decided to pull a Maverick and have a little fun. They could have shot the drone down but that would have been too easy and provocative. Instead they buzzed in real close and dumped some gas on it and pulled a tricky and dangerous maneuver by clipping a propeller. They probably had a pretty good laugh (and a couple of shots of vodka) back at the barracks.
 
I wish them luck, they're gonna need it. No one can take on the U.S. and its allies and win.

As one U.S. commander once said, if you want to fight us, someone else will raise your sons and daugh

No one wants to be in the US military anymore.
Recruits are at historic lows. Military morale is the lowest ever.
Democrats are far more interested in a diverse, LGBTQ friendly military than one that could actually fight a war.
Marines are now REQUIRED to allow beards, prayer blankets, afternoon prayer breaks for Muslims and taxpayer sex changes for confused recruits. Oh, the physical standards to be a Marine have been adapted so that recruits with a penis, breast implants and high heels are given equal opportunity to pass the requirements to become one of the few and proud (of their sex change)

That commander is delusional.
 
A reasonable scenario is that a couple of bored Russian pilots who probably watched "Top Gun", came on this monstrosity and decided to pull a Maverick and have a little fun. They could have shot the drone down but that would have been too easy and provocative. Instead they buzzed in real close and dumped some gas on it and pulled a tricky and dangerous maneuver by clipping a propeller. They probably had a pretty good laugh (and a couple of shots of vodka) back at the barracks.

Has the Biden administration offered to pay for any damage to the Russian jets yet?
 
No one wants to be in the US military anymore.
Recruits are at historic lows. Military morale is the lowest ever.
Democrats are far more interested in a diverse, LGBTQ friendly military than one that could actually fight a war.
Marines are now REQUIRED to allow beards, prayer blankets, afternoon prayer breaks for Muslims and taxpayer sex changes for confused recruits. Oh, the physical standards to be a Marine have been adapted so that recruits with a penis, breast implants and high heels are given equal opportunity to pass the requirements to become one of the few and proud (of their sex change)

That commander is delusional.



You pretend what you want to pretend. The U.S. military is still the strongest and scariest fighting force in the world.

And no, that commander is not delusional. If you want to attack us, we will slaughter you and **** your wives during our military occupation. Your children are going to have American step-daddies, and will learn to not be the inbred animals they were.
 
A reasonable scenario is that a couple of bored Russian pilots who probably watched "Top Gun", came on this monstrosity and decided to pull a Maverick and have a little fun. They could have shot the drone down but that would have been too easy and provocative. Instead they buzzed in real close and dumped some gas on it and pulled a tricky and dangerous maneuver by clipping a propeller. They probably had a pretty good laugh (and a couple of shots of vodka) back at the barracks.
Whatever - it cost the US taxpayer up to around US$ 35-240 million depending on it's configuration and type of drone. Even if the Su was supposedly damaged - it can be considered as being a good bargain for Russia.
 
Last edited:
No they don't. They use the same fuel land-based reactors use.
Are you banned in Wikipedia?
----------
As the core of a seagoing reactor is much smaller than a power reactor, the probability of a neutron intersecting with a fissionable nucleus before it escapes into the shielding is much lower. As such, the fuel is typically more highly enriched (i.e., contains a higher concentration of 235U vs. 238U) than that used in a land-based nuclear power plant, which increases the probability of fission to the level where a sustained reaction can occur. Some marine reactors run on relatively low-enriched uranium, which requires more frequent refueling. Others run on highly enriched uranium, varying from 20% 235U, to the over 96% 235U found in U.S. submarines,[4] in which the resulting smaller core is quieter in operation (a big advantage to a submarine).[5] Using more-highly enriched fuel also increases the reactor's power density and extends the usable life of the nuclear fuel load, but is more expensive and a greater risk to nuclear proliferation than less-highly enriched fuel.[6]
----------
 
You pretend what you want to pretend. The U.S. military is still the strongest and scariest fighting force in the world.

And no, that commander is not delusional. If you want to attack us, we will slaughter you and **** your wives during our military occupation. Your children are going to have American step-daddies, and will learn to not be the inbred animals they were.
There is a little problem. Modern war means active usage of nuclear weapons, and it doesn't leave too many widows and orphans.
The bigger problem is that Russia (say nothing about Russia and China combined) have larger nuclear arsenal then the USA with a way better delivery systems.
And the largest problem is that Biden don't do anything about changing the situation. All what he do is nothing but imitation. Sending weapons to another delusional Neo-Nazi régime somewhere in Europe instead of taking care about our own Forces is bad enough, but his "economical measures", profitable for China only - much more worse.
 
There is a little problem. Modern war means active usage of nuclear weapons, and it doesn't leave too many widows and orphans.

Every nation knows the ramifications of nuclear war. Every nation, no matter who it is (perhaps with the exception of North Korea) will avoid it at all costs.
The bigger problem is that Russia (say nothing about Russia and China combined) have larger nuclear arsenal then the USA with a way better delivery systems.

A Russo-Chin alliance is highly unlikely. And do you believe foreign government (especially communist) propaganda about delivery systems?
And the largest problem is that Biden don't do anything about changing the situation. All what he do is nothing but imitation.

Intimidation you mean.
Sending weapons to another delusional Neo-Nazi régime somewhere in Europe instead of taking care about our own Forces is bad enough, but his "economical measures", profitable for China only - much more worse.


I agree to a point. The right wing media loves to spin the Ukrainians as neo-nazis. I had this as a firm belief before the war. But now I know better. Ukraine has every right to defend itself from a land grabbing tyrant, and neo-nazi or not, they should be able to. Besides, it's only an estimated 1% that are neo nazis.

The part that I agree with is that Biden should be focused on beefing up our military, better than it is currently. Of course, we know he won't do that.
 
Every nation knows the ramifications of nuclear war. Every nation, no matter who it is (perhaps with the exception of North Korea) will avoid it at all costs.
It depends your definition of 'all costs'. Actually, the Russians believe that they can win a nuclear war against the USA and NATO by a relatively small cost of 10 millions in realistic scenario, lesser than 1 million in optimistic scenario and no more than 50 millions in pessimistic scenarios. So, if their choice is "to win a nuclear war or to lost a conventional war" - they will fight nuclear war.
In future they expect even lesser cost.


A Russo-Chin alliance is highly unlikely. And do you believe foreign government (especially communist) propaganda about delivery systems?
The Russians and Chinese say that they have something better than an alliance. They have "unlimited partnership", whatever it means, and they have common enemy.
I don't totally believe even US Intel Community, but that's what they say about Russian nuclear weapons:

IMG_20230315_083254.webp



I agree to a point. The right wing media loves to spin the Ukrainians as neo-nazis. I had this as a firm belief before the war. But now I know better. Ukraine has every right to defend itself from a land grabbing tyrant, and neo-nazi or not, they should be able to. Besides, it's only an estimated 1% that are neo nazis.
Sure they have right to defend whatever they want (even their right to discriminate 30% of their population). But should we support them? It's not about values, it's not about our security. It's about Biden's money only.

The part that I agree with is that Biden should be focused on beefing up our military, better than it is currently. Of course, we know he won't do that.
Thats why we should vote for somebody else. Someone who really cares about America, American values and American security.
 
It depends your definition of 'all costs'. Actually, the Russians believe that they can win a nuclear war against the USA and NATO by a relatively small cost of 10 millions in realistic scenario, lesser than 1 million in optimistic scenario and no more than 50 millions in pessimistic scenarios. So, if their choice is "to win a nuclear war or to lost a conventional war" - they will fight nuclear war.
In future they expect even lesser cost.



The Russians and Chinese say that they have something better than an alliance. They have "unlimited partnership", whatever it means, and they have common enemy.
I don't totally believe even US Intel Community, but that's what they say about Russian nuclear weapons:

View attachment 765946



Sure they have right to defend whatever they want (even their right to discriminate 30% of their population). But should we support them? It's not about values, it's not about our security. It's about Biden's money only.


Thats why we should vote for somebody else. Someone who really cares about America, American values and American security.



Trump would wipe the floor with the chinks and the Ivans. As stupid as Biden is, even he could do it, you know why? Because Americas wins, fucktard. We WIN!
 
Trump would wipe the floor with the chinks and the Ivans. As stupid as Biden is, even he could do it, you know why? Because Americas wins, fucktard. We WIN!
What is even more important Trump is clever enough to win peace, not war. On his duty, European Nazism was not encouraged enough to become really provocative and situation in Ukraine was not perfect, but quite balanced.
 
15th post
Trump would wipe the floor with the chinks and the Ivans. As stupid as Biden is, even he could do it, you know why? Because Americas wins, fucktard. We WIN!
Do you know Biden's strategy to win?
1. Fight conventionally against adversary who use tactical nukes.
IMG_20230315_091835.jpg

2. Do not put nukes on hair-trigger alert, do not rely on launch-under-attack, allow Russians to kill as much American nukes by their first strikestrike as they can.
IMG_20230315_091711.jpg


3. When deterrence finally fails and the Russians eliminated as much American nukes as they want - surrender on the best terms achievable (personally for Biden and his clique).
IMG_20230315_091921.jpg


Does it sound like a reliable plan for you?
 
Trump would wipe the floor with the chinks and the Ivans. As stupid as Biden is, even he could do it, you know why? Because Americas wins, fucktard. We WIN!
You see, America wins not because God Himself fights instead of us. America wins because we are free people. We don't blindly follow orders of the selfish dictators, we use our intellectual skills to find the best solution and our leaders used to achieve common good for the whole nation, not for a bunch of corruped criminals.
 
E
A U.S. MQ-9 Reaper drone had to be downed in the Black Sea on Tuesday after being harassed by two Russian fighter jets, one of which struck the drone’s propeller and nearly crashed.

U.S. European Command said U.S. forces had to “bring the MQ-9 down” in international waters after the propeller strike around 7:03 a.m. local time. Leading up to the collision, the Russian Su-27 jets had dumped fuel on the drone and flown in front of it “in a reckless, environmentally unsound and unprofessional manner.”
"Environmentally unsound" that's ******* hilarious right there.
 
The Black Sea is international waters and airspace. American ships and aircraft have just as much right to be there as Russian ships and aircraft do.
No, they can't. This is forbidden territory because of military operations. Besides, the drone was flying without any identification signals. Naturally, the russians were interested in what the hell was flying towards them.
So two planes flew out to check it out. They did not use any weapons.
 
Back
Top Bottom