Amazing what politics does to people.

If she was trying to "kill" him, why did she try to avoid him by turning her wheels? He shot her after he was out of her path of travel. Draw a line between the first bullet hole in the windshield and her head. This would place him at the side of her vehicle when he fired, not in front of it. He was already out of any danger when he murdered her.
Holy ****-nuutz, you've got to be trolling.
🙄
 
Holy ****-nuutz, you've got to be trolling.
🙄

Yeah, I don't get it, but I'm done. If you're too dense to watch a video and see what is right in front of your face, then there's no point in even discussing it further. They've released his bodycam showing him being hit, and they refuse to believe it. Apparently some people just believe that LEO's should be willing to try to guess intentions in the tenths of seconds they have before they take any self-defensive actions to preserve their own lives. Let them go out and try to do the job, then we'll see if they're willing to put their money where their mouths are.
 

Videos Contradict Trump Administration Account of ICE Shooting in Minneapolis​

An analysis of footage from three camera angles show that the vehicle appears to be turning away from a federal officer as he opened fire.


Given the ICE agent's experience of having been dragged by a car during a prior incident I can understand him not wanting it to happen again. But she had turned her car sharply to the right, not at him, when he shot her.

She hit him with her car

All the videos show that

the obssession with wheels is a mental trick to get people to ignore the truth
 
If she was trying to "kill" him, why did she try to avoid him by turning her wheels? He shot her after he was out of her path of travel. Draw a line between the first bullet hole in the windshield and her head. This would place him at the side of her vehicle when he fired, not in front of it. He was already out of any danger when he murdered her.


What's funny is that you're supposedly a 'conservative', yet you have the biggest empty-headed, anti-police shill on the board, CareforNone, thanking your posts. You must be so proud. :rolleyes:
 
There are a dozen others that clearly show she didn't.

The one video that "proves" she did shows up 2 days later?

In this day of AI generation?

No.

*******.

Way.
No there are not moron

So far there are not a dozen videos of the incident at all

So far there are no more than 6 seen by the public and they ALL show her hitting him


Yes ******* way you dishonest troll

You have no ******* evidence and you are a proven ignorant liar
 
Go to near the end of the video, around the 38-39 second mark.


You can clearly see Good turning the wheel of her car to the right, steering away from, not at the officer, as she begins to leave the scene.
Just look at the videos without obssessing over ******* wheels

She hit the officer
 
The video footage has become a modern day Zapruder film. Being analyzed frame by frame. When done so a few things become clear. 1. The ICE officer panicked. 2. Good was steering sharply to the right, not at him. 3. Her intent was to leave the seen, not run the officer over.
Her wheels do not establish intent

She DID hit the officer with her car

That is settled fact and speaks more to intent
 
Does it show her trying to murder the officer? No, it doesnt. So what is your point? What justifies him killing her on the spot? Point blank range? Nothing.

Facts, are facts. Stop pushing the lies!
the law, in fact the Democratic Governor of that state signed into law that police don't have to wait to be hit by a car to fire on the car. She drove at him with a deadly weapon and actually hit him.
 
he was hit

That is fact

Impossible.

1768231086690.webp
 
What I bolded is simply not true. I think she didn't even see him and was trying to get away from the other officer and intended to go down the street because ICE was the other direction. Her wheels slipped for a second on the ice whenever she gunned the engine or I think the officer in the front would have been much more badly injured if not killed. He had a split second to make a decision that could either leave him dead or save his life, and he did what he thought he needed to do. It was a tragedy that was completely avoidable, and her own actions led to her own death, period.

You keep wanting to focus on what her intentions were, when her intentions are irrelevant to the discussion, so I don't know what else to tell you.
How would killing her save him from injury? At the moment he shot her he was clear of the vehicle.
 
What's funny is that you're supposedly a 'conservative', yet you have the biggest empty-headed, anti-police shill on the board, CareforNone, thanking your posts. You must be so proud. :rolleyes:
The police simply kill too many people unnecessarily. My biggest problem is with the state legislators that don't use the death penalty. The police needlessly kill more people on the street in a year than would be executed wrongly in ten years. How does that make any sense.
 
15th post
he was hit

That is fact
He was hit, technically. He shot her out of anger, not self defense. At the point that she knew she had taken her protest to the limit, when the agents closed on her vehicle, she decided to flee. The agent who stood in front of her simply stood too close for her make a clean getaway. A human body makes a poor roadblock. If they wanted to detain her, they should have disabled her vehicle with road spikes. ICE was simply unprepared for the incident.
 
Back
Top Bottom