You made a point, ie that Trump called for his people to "fight" and your position is that it is reasonable to conclude that he meant it LITERALLY.Show an example of Democrat staffers who ever shut down a vote count with threat of violence like is documented in the Brooks Brothers event. Or feel free to list all the times a Democrat President refused to accept the States certified election results and organized a Jan 6th like violent event to stop the count and reverse the vote? The New Republicans have to pretend that Democrat politicians were somehow in charge of the riotous crowds and ignore their calls for non-violent protest.
But, then you admit that the last prior republcian riot was TWENTY years earlier.
When REPUBLCIAN VIOLENCE is that rare, your accusation that he meant it LITERALLY,
is clearly wrong.
I have addressed your point, seriously and honestly. Do you have a defense of your point, or would you like to conceed it and then move the discussion forward?
OR, do you want to do the normal libtard move, where you made a lot of noise, and move on to next attack, without admitting that I REFUTED your point?