Amazing, Six Members of the Clown Car did WHAT?

[Seawytch]

What about those who live in remote rural areas? Places that are hundreds of miles from the nearest next town?

Areas that have only one store. That one store won't allow you inside to buy food just because you're gay.

Where are you going to get food or the necessities of life?

Or say the gas station? They won't let you get gas because you're gay. Where are you going to get gas?

Even though your tax dollars paid for the streets that the store owner uses for trucks to bring food and other life necessities to his store to sell. Even though your tax dollars is paying for the police and fire department that serve that store.

Or the private company that owns the electricity or natural gas that is used to electrify and heat homes? Is it fair that they deny you electricity or gas just because you're gay?

Do you think it's fair for someone to deny you food or gas or anything just because you're gay and you have no other place to get those things?

I already gave answers to these concerns.

So you advocate it's ok to discriminate against people.

So it's ok to deny electricity, heat, food gas and other things to gay people?

Do you realize that it can be applied to you too?

What would you do if someone bought the electric company in your area and decided they didn't want to sell electricity to you based on their religion?

How are you going to have electricity?

Or apply it to food, gas etc. What would you do if someone took that from you just because their version of their religion says you're bad?

Or how would you like it if a muslim denied you basic necessities of life based on your religion?

America doesn't condone discrimination. We have specific laws against it.

You have all the right in the world to believe what you want but you have absolutely no right to force it on anyone else and deny them basic necessities of life.

Why don't actually read the whole thread instead asking a flurry of questions I've already covered? I never once stated anyone should be denied the basic services of life, if you had read the entire thread you would know that already.

I'm sure that most people are like me.

They read the thread and reply to the posts they want to reply to as they're reading the thread.

I don't read a whole thread then go back to find the posts that I want to reply to. I'm pretty sure most people do that.

If you want to advocate to take people's rights from them simply because they're gay then you are advocating discrimination against your fellow American citizen.

Which isn't what real Americans do. They stand up to discrimination.

Except if its against white Christians. **** those people.

White Christians are covered under Title II of the Civil Rights Act. I can't refuse to serve a white Christian in any of the 50 states. He can refuse to serve me in over half. Doesn't seem quite right does it?

 

[Seawytch]

Missouri Pastor's Fiery Speech Against Equal Rights for Homosexuals

Be sure to watch to the end, Rabbi

 

[The Rabbi]

Finally Rabbi posts the truth

You're that desperate for a win huh? This is a religion for you, like a Moonie, there's nothing else that really matters, you are a slave to militant homosexuality.

And you are a slave to militant heterosexuality-and bigotry-and ignorance.

How so? I don't live in the homosexual threads and don't sue people that don't like me.

If you dont fully support the gay agenda then you are a bigot, a homophobe, a racist, and a Nazi. That's how this works.

Nope...but when you equate gays to pedophiles and fight tooth and nail against gay equality...yeah, your'e a bigot.

See. The only reason to oppose the gay agenda is bigotry. This is how you demonize your opposition and delegitimize them. It is right out of Alinsky.

 

[The Rabbi]

I already gave answers to these concerns.

So you advocate it's ok to discriminate against people.

So it's ok to deny electricity, heat, food gas and other things to gay people?

Do you realize that it can be applied to you too?

What would you do if someone bought the electric company in your area and decided they didn't want to sell electricity to you based on their religion?

How are you going to have electricity?

Or apply it to food, gas etc. What would you do if someone took that from you just because their version of their religion says you're bad?

Or how would you like it if a muslim denied you basic necessities of life based on your religion?

America doesn't condone discrimination. We have specific laws against it.

You have all the right in the world to believe what you want but you have absolutely no right to force it on anyone else and deny them basic necessities of life.

Why don't actually read the whole thread instead asking a flurry of questions I've already covered? I never once stated anyone should be denied the basic services of life, if you had read the entire thread you would know that already.

I'm sure that most people are like me.

They read the thread and reply to the posts they want to reply to as they're reading the thread.

I don't read a whole thread then go back to find the posts that I want to reply to. I'm pretty sure most people do that.

If you want to advocate to take people's rights from them simply because they're gay then you are advocating discrimination against your fellow American citizen.

Which isn't what real Americans do. They stand up to discrimination.

Except if its against white Christians. **** those people.

White Christians are covered under Title II of the Civil Rights Act. I can't refuse to serve a white Christian in any of the 50 states. He can refuse to serve me in over half. Doesn't seem quite right does it?

I dont see what the issue is. But white Christians are discriminated against all the time. Gays, not so much.

 

[Seawytch]

So you advocate it's ok to discriminate against people.

So it's ok to deny electricity, heat, food gas and other things to gay people?

Do you realize that it can be applied to you too?

What would you do if someone bought the electric company in your area and decided they didn't want to sell electricity to you based on their religion?

How are you going to have electricity?

Or apply it to food, gas etc. What would you do if someone took that from you just because their version of their religion says you're bad?

Or how would you like it if a muslim denied you basic necessities of life based on your religion?

America doesn't condone discrimination. We have specific laws against it.

You have all the right in the world to believe what you want but you have absolutely no right to force it on anyone else and deny them basic necessities of life.

Why don't actually read the whole thread instead asking a flurry of questions I've already covered? I never once stated anyone should be denied the basic services of life, if you had read the entire thread you would know that already.

I'm sure that most people are like me.

They read the thread and reply to the posts they want to reply to as they're reading the thread.

I don't read a whole thread then go back to find the posts that I want to reply to. I'm pretty sure most people do that.

If you want to advocate to take people's rights from them simply because they're gay then you are advocating discrimination against your fellow American citizen.

Which isn't what real Americans do. They stand up to discrimination.

Except if its against white Christians. **** those people.

White Christians are covered under Title II of the Civil Rights Act. I can't refuse to serve a white Christian in any of the 50 states. He can refuse to serve me in over half. Doesn't seem quite right does it?

I dont see what the issue is. But white Christians are discriminated against all the time. Gays, not so much.

Yeah, we can tell by the links you provided to all these white Christians being denied service.

 

[The Rabbi]

Why don't actually read the whole thread instead asking a flurry of questions I've already covered? I never once stated anyone should be denied the basic services of life, if you had read the entire thread you would know that already.

I'm sure that most people are like me.

They read the thread and reply to the posts they want to reply to as they're reading the thread.

I don't read a whole thread then go back to find the posts that I want to reply to. I'm pretty sure most people do that.

If you want to advocate to take people's rights from them simply because they're gay then you are advocating discrimination against your fellow American citizen.

Which isn't what real Americans do. They stand up to discrimination.

Except if its against white Christians. **** those people.

White Christians are covered under Title II of the Civil Rights Act. I can't refuse to serve a white Christian in any of the 50 states. He can refuse to serve me in over half. Doesn't seem quite right does it?

I dont see what the issue is. But white Christians are discriminated against all the time. Gays, not so much.

Yeah, we can tell by the links you provided to all these white Christians being denied service.

Links are in my sig line.
It is well known white Christians are persecuted for their faith. Ask the clerk in KY about it.

 

[Seawytch]

You're that desperate for a win huh? This is a religion for you, like a Moonie, there's nothing else that really matters, you are a slave to militant homosexuality.

And you are a slave to militant heterosexuality-and bigotry-and ignorance.

How so? I don't live in the homosexual threads and don't sue people that don't like me.

If you dont fully support the gay agenda then you are a bigot, a homophobe, a racist, and a Nazi. That's how this works.

Nope...but when you equate gays to pedophiles and fight tooth and nail against gay equality...yeah, your'e a bigot.

See. The only reason to oppose the gay agenda is bigotry. This is how you demonize your opposition and delegitimize them. It is right out of Alinsky.

Because it is. There is no other reason. It's pure, unadulterated bigotry. (Okay, unless it's self loathing homophobia)

 

[The Rabbi]

And you are a slave to militant heterosexuality-and bigotry-and ignorance.

How so? I don't live in the homosexual threads and don't sue people that don't like me.

If you dont fully support the gay agenda then you are a bigot, a homophobe, a racist, and a Nazi. That's how this works.

Nope...but when you equate gays to pedophiles and fight tooth and nail against gay equality...yeah, your'e a bigot.

See. The only reason to oppose the gay agenda is bigotry. This is how you demonize your opposition and delegitimize them. It is right out of Alinsky.

Because it is. There is no other reason. It's pure, unadulterated bigotry. (Okay, unless it's self loathing homophobia)

Yes of course. ANyone who disagrees with you can only be motivated by hate.
In truth homosexuals are the most hateful people out there. Live and let live? Hell no. My way or the highwway. They make ISIS look like boy scouts. Oops, cant say boy scouts.

 

[Seawytch]

How so? I don't live in the homosexual threads and don't sue people that don't like me.

If you dont fully support the gay agenda then you are a bigot, a homophobe, a racist, and a Nazi. That's how this works.

Nope...but when you equate gays to pedophiles and fight tooth and nail against gay equality...yeah, your'e a bigot.

See. The only reason to oppose the gay agenda is bigotry. This is how you demonize your opposition and delegitimize them. It is right out of Alinsky.

Because it is. There is no other reason. It's pure, unadulterated bigotry. (Okay, unless it's self loathing homophobia)

Yes of course. ANyone who disagrees with you can only be motivated by hate.
In truth homosexuals are the most hateful people out there. Live and let live? Hell no. My way or the highwway. They make ISIS look like boy scouts. Oops, cant say boy scouts.

I didn't say hate, I said bigotry. Sometimes bigotry is rooted in hate, many times it's not, it's simply ignorance.

 

[Seawytch]

I'm sure that most people are like me.

They read the thread and reply to the posts they want to reply to as they're reading the thread.

I don't read a whole thread then go back to find the posts that I want to reply to. I'm pretty sure most people do that.

If you want to advocate to take people's rights from them simply because they're gay then you are advocating discrimination against your fellow American citizen.

Which isn't what real Americans do. They stand up to discrimination.

Except if its against white Christians. **** those people.

White Christians are covered under Title II of the Civil Rights Act. I can't refuse to serve a white Christian in any of the 50 states. He can refuse to serve me in over half. Doesn't seem quite right does it?

I dont see what the issue is. But white Christians are discriminated against all the time. Gays, not so much.

Yeah, we can tell by the links you provided to all these white Christians being denied service.

Links are in my sig line.
It is well known white Christians are persecuted for their faith. Ask the clerk in KY about it.

She wasn't persecuted for her faith, she was thrown in jail for contempt of court after refusing to do her job and for foisting her religious beliefs on the taxpaying public. She didn't want a religious accommodation, she ordered the people that work for her not issue licenses when they were happy to do so in her stead.

The only link in your sig line is to google. Fail.

 

[rightwinger]

No...we got our win. We won marriage equality and it has caused you bigots to pitch a fit and fall into it. But that's okay...history repeats. Racist bigots existed and tried to use religion just like anti gay bigots. History will not treat the anti gay bigots any kinder than it treats the racist ones.

Moron. Sexual preference isn't a race, you proved my point. Living a lie is your life.

Yet we still have morons telling people who they can marry

the word "marriage" has had a clear meaning for thousands of years. A union of two men or two women, or six men and four women is not a marriage.

it is a mutual support contract that allows for the passage of assets and tax benefits for those legally committed to each other. But it is not a marriage. That is the entire issue here, the use of the word "marriage"

No one (except a few on the far right) object to gays being able to legally commit to each other and to have the tax benefits of such commitment. But no matter how many times you libs push it, a gay commitment is not a marriage.

Just because we discriminated for thousands of years doesn't mean we should continue doing so

Each society should have the right to decide what marriage should be. Our society has done just that

almost right, society did not decide it, 5 out of 9 old farts in black robes decided it.

"society" in the blue state of California voted it down twice.

We the People......gave them that authority in our Constitution

The same courts that used to rule gays could not marry

 

[rightwinger]

If you dont fully support the gay agenda then you are a bigot, a homophobe, a racist, and a Nazi. That's how this works.

Yep. And nobody is supposed to realize that only a couple of years ago all major Democrats stood for traditional marriage, so we were all homophobes and bigots.

Society changes

Conservatives do not

 

[Redfish]

Moron. Sexual preference isn't a race, you proved my point. Living a lie is your life.

Yet we still have morons telling people who they can marry

the word "marriage" has had a clear meaning for thousands of years. A union of two men or two women, or six men and four women is not a marriage.

it is a mutual support contract that allows for the passage of assets and tax benefits for those legally committed to each other. But it is not a marriage. That is the entire issue here, the use of the word "marriage"

No one (except a few on the far right) object to gays being able to legally commit to each other and to have the tax benefits of such commitment. But no matter how many times you libs push it, a gay commitment is not a marriage.

Just because we discriminated for thousands of years doesn't mean we should continue doing so

Each society should have the right to decide what marriage should be. Our society has done just that

almost right, society did not decide it, 5 out of 9 old farts in black robes decided it.

"society" in the blue state of California voted it down twice.

We the People......gave them that authority in our Constitution

The same courts that used to rule gays could not marry

yes, that's true. But you said that society as a whole made that decision. That is not what happened.

Now, if you want to hold a national referendum on it then the results of that would be society deciding.

 

[Redfish]

If you dont fully support the gay agenda then you are a bigot, a homophobe, a racist, and a Nazi. That's how this works.

Yep. And nobody is supposed to realize that only a couple of years ago all major Democrats stood for traditional marriage, so we were all homophobes and bigots.

Society changes

Conservatives do not

The basics of human right and wrong do not change. Human anatomy and biology have not changed.

 

[rightwinger]

Yet we still have morons telling people who they can marry

the word "marriage" has had a clear meaning for thousands of years. A union of two men or two women, or six men and four women is not a marriage.

it is a mutual support contract that allows for the passage of assets and tax benefits for those legally committed to each other. But it is not a marriage. That is the entire issue here, the use of the word "marriage"

No one (except a few on the far right) object to gays being able to legally commit to each other and to have the tax benefits of such commitment. But no matter how many times you libs push it, a gay commitment is not a marriage.

Just because we discriminated for thousands of years doesn't mean we should continue doing so

Each society should have the right to decide what marriage should be. Our society has done just that

almost right, society did not decide it, 5 out of 9 old farts in black robes decided it.

"society" in the blue state of California voted it down twice.

We the People......gave them that authority in our Constitution

The same courts that used to rule gays could not marry

yes, that's true. But you said that society as a whole made that decision. That is not what happened.

Now, if you want to hold a national referendum on it then the results of that would be society deciding.

It is exactly what happened "as a whole"
Doesn't mean unanimous and those opposing the rights of gays are now on the outside looking in
And not too happy

 

[rightwinger]

If you dont fully support the gay agenda then you are a bigot, a homophobe, a racist, and a Nazi. That's how this works.

Yep. And nobody is supposed to realize that only a couple of years ago all major Democrats stood for traditional marriage, so we were all homophobes and bigots.

Society changes

Conservatives do not

The basics of human right and wrong do not change. Human anatomy and biology have not changed.

Your view of "right and wrong" is now wrong
You are wrong to force your views on others and are wrong to tell others who they are allowed to love

 

[The Rabbi]

Except if its against white Christians. **** those people.

White Christians are covered under Title II of the Civil Rights Act. I can't refuse to serve a white Christian in any of the 50 states. He can refuse to serve me in over half. Doesn't seem quite right does it?

I dont see what the issue is. But white Christians are discriminated against all the time. Gays, not so much.

Yeah, we can tell by the links you provided to all these white Christians being denied service.

Links are in my sig line.
It is well known white Christians are persecuted for their faith. Ask the clerk in KY about it.

She wasn't persecuted for her faith, she was thrown in jail for contempt of court after refusing to do her job and for foisting her religious beliefs on the taxpaying public. She didn't want a religious accommodation, she ordered the people that work for her not issue licenses when they were happy to do so in her stead.

The only link in your sig line is to google. Fail.

Of course she was persecuted for her faith. By homos. The case against her was brought by a pair from California. Do they not have marriage certificates in California that these two faygolas had to travel half way across the country to Dumbfuck KY to get a marriage certficate? Of course not. It was a set up to persecute this woman.
I note the new GOP governor has issued EOs that makes everyone happy. OK everyone except the fagghaddis who wanted this woman's head on a plate. And **** them.

 

[Redfish]

the word "marriage" has had a clear meaning for thousands of years. A union of two men or two women, or six men and four women is not a marriage.

it is a mutual support contract that allows for the passage of assets and tax benefits for those legally committed to each other. But it is not a marriage. That is the entire issue here, the use of the word "marriage"

No one (except a few on the far right) object to gays being able to legally commit to each other and to have the tax benefits of such commitment. But no matter how many times you libs push it, a gay commitment is not a marriage.

Just because we discriminated for thousands of years doesn't mean we should continue doing so

Each society should have the right to decide what marriage should be. Our society has done just that

almost right, society did not decide it, 5 out of 9 old farts in black robes decided it.

"society" in the blue state of California voted it down twice.

We the People......gave them that authority in our Constitution

The same courts that used to rule gays could not marry

yes, that's true. But you said that society as a whole made that decision. That is not what happened.

Now, if you want to hold a national referendum on it then the results of that would be society deciding.

It is exactly what happened "as a whole"
Doesn't mean unanimous and those opposing the rights of gays are now on the outside looking in
And not too happy

then you should have no problem with a referendum in every state to resolve it once and for all. Your contention that a majority agree with gay marriage is not proven by recent polling.

The polls say that a majority support tolerance and equal rights for gays, but not marriage. and since you are determined to increase the muslim population in the US, you can count on gays being thrown off rooftops in muslim communities------------------in the name of islam.

 

[Redfish]

If you dont fully support the gay agenda then you are a bigot, a homophobe, a racist, and a Nazi. That's how this works.

Yep. And nobody is supposed to realize that only a couple of years ago all major Democrats stood for traditional marriage, so we were all homophobes and bigots.

Society changes

Conservatives do not

The basics of human right and wrong do not change. Human anatomy and biology have not changed.

Your view of "right and wrong" is now wrong
You are wrong to force your views on others and are wrong to tell others who they are allowed to love

I don't care that you love your boyfriend, RW. I think that's just great.

YOU are wrong to force YOUR views on others and to tell others what unions they MUST sanction.

 

[The Rabbi]

If you dont fully support the gay agenda then you are a bigot, a homophobe, a racist, and a Nazi. That's how this works.

Yep. And nobody is supposed to realize that only a couple of years ago all major Democrats stood for traditional marriage, so we were all homophobes and bigots.

Society changes

Conservatives do not

The basics of human right and wrong do not change. Human anatomy and biology have not changed.

Your view of "right and wrong" is now wrong
You are wrong to force your views on others and are wrong to tell others who they are allowed to love

The irony is impressive. The stupidity even more so.
No one ever told anyone else who they can and cant love. Another red herring from the bath houses.