It's the truth. Your side wants twitter and its massive base all to yourself, so you can laugh at the proles having to play on lesser platforms.
And you want Twitter and it’s massive base to use for your own benefit, not for the benefit of the people that CREATED IT.
Their whole stated purpose is to be an open discussion platform, but they have decided right leaning views aren't for discussion.
Their benefit is getting paid, which what I want to do will not impact one iota.
They decide what it means to be an open discussion platform, not you. Allowing people to be assholes and harass others suppresses openness. Don’t like it? Find somewhere else to be an asshole.
Twitter isn’t paid by you assholes so you have zero authority to tell them what to do. It’s just a selfish desire on your part to get what you want.
They don't get to bend reality. if they want to be a left wing echo chamber, they should state it.
They only go after people on the right for "being assholes".
Twitter is paid by advertisers who take my viewing interest and capitalize it.
I want Fox News to admit they’re a propaganda organ of Republicans and not “Fair and Balanced”. You’re welcome to your opinion about what people should and shouldn’t do, but forcing your opinion on your opponents and not your allies is, well, fascist.
The irony of accusing them of bending reality while you guys are wailing and moaning for being kicked off for promoting lies like “stop the steal” is just too rich.
As soon as CNN admits the same.
The difference is the interaction of people being part of Twitters product, and them ignoring their own supposed mission statement to be SJW cucks.
Cheering on censorship because it isn't your side being censored is actually fascist.
The difference is that you don’t like how Twitter kicks off your tribe members for being assholes.
I note you don’t deny that people are being assholes, you just complain that others are assholes too, as if that has ever worked.
Their mission statement is to be an open platform and they state, in plain English for everyone to see, that allowing harassment would prevent participation. So before you get all high and mighty about what Twitter claims, maybe you should have done your own reading first.
And on another note, since when do you think that government has the authority to force people to abide by their “mission statement”? Oh, that’s right. When it affects you.
Spoiled brat. You should have been taught to take care of your toys or else they’ll get taken away.