- Dec 6, 2009
- 78,563
- 4,345
- 1,815
Nice deflection. Where is the relevance?RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
※→ ILOVEISRAEL, P F Tinmore, Toddsterpatriot, Shusha, rt al,
(COMMENT)And they want “ Right of Return?”Hamas and Israel Are in a Perilous Cycle. Is War a Miscalculation Away?
A gradual shortening of time between skirmishes until a major conflict erupts is a pattern experienced all to well between the belligerents.
The reoccurrence rate is gradually becoming shorter; ≈ 5000 → ≈ 4000 → ≈ 3000 → below 2000 ≈ below 1000 days. However, the current rate of deterioration is currently on the rise. It has now been (depending on the perspective):
- From and including: Monday, June 5, 1967 (Six Day War) → To, but not including Saturday, October 6, 1973 ⇒ Result: 2315 days (Yom Kipper War)
- From and including: Saturday, October 6, 1973 (Yo, Kipper War) → To, but not including Wednesday, December 9, 1987 ⇒ Result: 5177 days (First Intifada)
- From and including: Wednesday, December 9, 1987 (First Intifada) → To, but not including Thursday, September 28, 2000 ⇒ Result: 4677 days (Second Intifada)
- From and including: Thursday, September 28, 2000 (Second Intafada) → To, but not including Saturday, December 27, 2008 ⇒ Result: 3012 days (Cast Lead)
From and including: Saturday, December 27, 2008 (Cast Lead) → To, but not including Wednesday, November 14, 2012 (Pillar Defense) ⇒ Result: 1418 days- From and including: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 (Pillar Defense) → To, but not including Sunday, June 8, 2014 (Protective Edge) ⇒ Result: 571 days
What has changed? The on-going investigation by the Prosecutor for the International Criminal Court. The Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) are attempting to incite the Israelis into another major border-crossing operation. The HoAP want to set the conditions such that the Israelis are viewed as the aggressor against an unarmed civilian gathering. The bait is out there but the Israelis are not biting.
✪ From and including: Sunday, June 8, 2014 (Protective Edge) → To, but not including Friday, September 7, 2018 (Present Day) ⇒ Result: 1552 days
✪ From and including: Sunday, June 8, 2014 (Protective Edge) → To, but not including Friday, March 30, 2018 (Right to Return March) ⇒ Result: 1391 days
(COMMENT)111The Palestinians are a nation of people who are citizens of a territory defined by international borders.The Palestinians are a nation of people who are citizens of a territory defined by international borders.Wait, what? Are you saying that basic, universal, inalienable rights belong to some peoples, but not to others? What is your criteria for that? Other than Jooooooos?!There are UN resolutions reaffirming those inalienable rights for Palestinians.
I haven't seen anything for Israelis.
Got some links?
The Jews are foreign colonial settlers.
Citizens of a territory? LOL!
Territories aren't nations. Palestine isn't a nation. Never has been.
At the rate the Palestinians are screwing up, if they ever become a nation, it will be the size of Lichtenstein.
1. From Ottoman subjects into Palestinian citizens Turkish subjects habitually resident in the territory of Palestine upon the 1st day of August, 1925, shall become Palestinian citizens. This is what Article 1, Clause (1) , of the 1925 Palestinian Citizenship Order declared with regard to those persons who formed, according to domestic law, the first ‘Palestinians’.
As already concluded in Chapter III above, the ‘Palestinian people’ had been defined according to international law on 6 August 1924, the date at which the Treaty of Lausanne was enforced. Hence, the just quoted clause was a mere declaration of pre-existing international law. This clause refers to the automatic, or ipso facto, acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by those persons resident in Palestine who had replaced their former Turkish, or Ottoman, nationality. Although the term ‘ipso facto’ is not literally employed, it should be easily understood as the clause is a direct application of Article 30 of the Treaty of Lausanne, 1923, which stated that “Turkish subjects habitually resident in territory which... is detached from Turkey will become ipso facto... nationals...”. Thus, Turkish individuals who were covered by this clause became Palestinians by the operation of law without further action.
https://doc.rero.ch/record/9065/files/these.pdf
The flaw here, of course, is that the term "Palestine," during that time period, was defined as the successor government entrusted to the British via the Mandate.
PARTI - PRELIMINARY Palestine Order in CouncilThe Treaty of Lausanne did not even mention "Palestine," let alone define the meaning of the Palestinian People. The language used was applicable to millions of former Turkish subjects habitually resident in a number of territories under varions mandates. It did not just apply to "territories to which the Mandate for Palestine.
Order may be cited as "The Palestine Order in Council, 1922."
The limits of this Order are the territories to which the Mandate for Palestine applies, hereinafter described as Palestine.
"The High Commissioner" shall include every person for the time being administering the Government of Palestine.
Most Respectfully,
R