All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Hollie]

When did pal'istan become a state?

Link?

Of course not.

The never answered question.



What pally land is occupied?

Link?

Of course not.

The never answered question.

 

[P F Tinmore]

When did pal'istan become a state?

Link?

Of course not.

The never answered question.



What pally land is occupied?

Link?

Of course not.

The never answered question.

Answered many times.

Sorry you missed it.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Amid Russia Tensions, China’s Advanced Communications Equipment Aid To Syria Has Israel Worried​

 

[P F Tinmore]

It's Now Illegal To Be 'Disloyal'??​

 

[P F Tinmore]

How A Pro-Israel Lobby Group Spent Millions To Sway Democratic Primaries​

Summer Lee addresses supporters​

 

[rylah]

How A Pro-Israel Lobby Group Spent Millions To Sway Democratic Primaries​

She didn't say what she was quoted saying?

 

[rylah]

It's Now Illegal To Be 'Disloyal'??​

Do you really believe espionage and murder in coffeeshops,

is only "disloyalty" that was legal before?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Palestinian Flags Aren’t Illegal in Israel They Still Get Torn Down​

 

[P F Tinmore]

On the Ground for Palestine - July 2, 2022​

 

[P F Tinmore]

Israel approves status updates for 4,000 Palestinians​

 

[Hollie]

Answered many times.

Sorry you missed it.

You copied and pasted your silly version of invented history.

Sorry you feel conspiracy theories are relevant.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: No Development
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

(COMMENT)

I must admit, you have me at somewhat of a disadvantage. I've looked all over for the Armistice Agreement with the Palestinian Arabs or the Arab Higher Committee. I do not see any such agreement that promises or agrees to any set of conditions

​

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians, such as those that believe along similar lines as that of P F Tinmore will never be anything more than the engine that drags the Arab Palestinians through the pain of history. All they have manage to accomplish is to hold back any positive development. And they Arab Palestinians really do not have any real expectation of a future comparable to that of the Israelis.
.

Most Respectfully,
R

There is no legal requirement for Palestine to accept partition.

The Armistice Agreements tell us that Palestine is still there inside its International borders, Palestine is still intact.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

There is no legal requirement for Palestine to accept partition.

The Armistice Agreements tell us that Palestine is still there inside its International borders, Palestine is still intact.

No one signed any armistice agreements with Palestine.

Palestine is still intact.

Dude!

 

[RoccoR]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: No Development
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,


(PREFACE)...WOW. A two-sentence reply and BOTH sentences are incorrect.

There is no legal requirement for Palestine to accept partition.

(COMMENT)

The Palestinians were NOT a party to any agreement. So, of course, they were no requirements at all (Voluntary of Otherwise). The attitude adopted by Palestinian then, which they still maintain now, → has achieved them exactly what?

The Armistice Agreements tell us that Palestine is still there inside its International borders, Palestine is still intact.

(COMMENT EXAMPLE)

(INFO FIRST: Jordanian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, April 3, 1949.) 2. This Agreement, having been negotiated and concluded in pursuance of the resolution of the Security Council of 16 November 1948 calling for the establishment of an armistice in order to eliminate the threat to the peace in Palestine and to facilitate the transition from the present truce to permanent peace in Palestine, shall remain in force until a peaceful settlement between the Parties is achieved except as provided in paragraph 3 of this article.​

The Armistice Agreement was superseded by the 1994 "Treaty of Peace Between the State of Israel and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan." Article 3 establishes the International Boundary. Furthermore "[T]he permanent, secure and recognized international boundary between Israel and Jordan, without prejudice to the status of any territories that came under Israeli military government control in 1967."

The Armistice Lines will be historically recorded for posterity. But the Armistice is overtaken by events.

The Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) were NOT a Party to the Armistice or the Treaty. If the International borders, (British Government of" Palestine is still intact, it is only because you found a history book.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Hollie]

There is no legal requirement for Palestine to accept partition.

The Armistice Agreements tell us that Palestine is still there inside its International borders, Palestine is still intact.

You might as well roll out your ''Treaty of Lausanne invented the Magical Kingdom of Pally'land'', silliness.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: No Development
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,


(PREFACE)...WOW. A two-sentence reply and BOTH sentences are incorrect.


(COMMENT)

The Palestinians were NOT a party to any agreement. So, of course, they were no requirements at all (Voluntary of Otherwise). The attitude adopted by Palestinian then, which they still maintain now, → has achieved them exactly what?


(COMMENT EXAMPLE)

(INFO FIRST: Jordanian-Israeli General Armistice Agreement, April 3, 1949.) 2. This Agreement, having been negotiated and concluded in pursuance of the resolution of the Security Council of 16 November 1948 calling for the establishment of an armistice in order to eliminate the threat to the peace in Palestine and to facilitate the transition from the present truce to permanent peace in Palestine, shall remain in force until a peaceful settlement between the Parties is achieved except as provided in paragraph 3 of this article.​

The Armistice Agreement was superseded by the 1994 "Treaty of Peace Between the State of Israel and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan." Article 3 establishes the International Boundary. Furthermore "[T]he permanent, secure and recognized international boundary between Israel and Jordan, without prejudice to the status of any territories that came under Israeli military government control in 1967."

The Armistice Lines will be historically recorded for posterity. But the Armistice is overtaken by events.

The Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) were NOT a Party to the Armistice or the Treaty. If the International borders, (British Government of" Palestine is still intact, it is only because you found a history book.

Most Respectfully,
R

International borders are inviolable.

The UN has no authority to change them.

Jordan has no authority to change them.

 

[Hollie]

International borders are inviolable.

The UN has no authority to change them.

Jordan has no authority to change them.

Borders have changed throughout history.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Borders have changed throughout history.

Only by treaty.