All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

Hollie

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
39,283
Reaction score
4,857
Points
1,130
40,000 Palestinian Workers Crossed Illegally into Israel Despite Lockdown


WOW, that wall really works.:laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301:
WOW, those poor, oppressed Pal’istanians™ aren’t as poor or as oppressed as the propagandists claim. :laughing0301::laughing0301::laughing0301:
 

P F Tinmore

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
60,960
Reaction score
2,728
Points
1,815
ICC rules it has jurisdiction over war crimes in the Palestinian territories

 

Hollie

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
39,283
Reaction score
4,857
Points
1,130
ICC rules it has jurisdiction over war crimes in the Palestinian territories
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?

Do you think that Yahya Sinwar, Khalid Mashal or Ismail Haniya will provide direct testimony?
 

P F Tinmore

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
60,960
Reaction score
2,728
Points
1,815
ICC rules it has jurisdiction over war crimes in the Palestinian territories
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?

Do you think that Yahya Sinwar, Khalid Mashal or Ismail Haniya will provide direct testimony?
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?
Sure, but it doesn't matter. The crimes are taking place in Palestine where the court does have jurisdiction.
 

Hollie

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
39,283
Reaction score
4,857
Points
1,130
ICC rules it has jurisdiction over war crimes in the Palestinian territories
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?

Do you think that Yahya Sinwar, Khalid Mashal or Ismail Haniya will provide direct testimony?
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?
Sure, but it doesn't matter. The crimes are taking place in Palestine where the court does have jurisdiction.
What crimes?

What makes you believe the ICC has jurisdiction, other than their unilateral decision to decide so?
 

Toddsterpatriot

Diamond Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
65,315
Reaction score
13,382
Points
2,180
Location
Chicago
ICC rules it has jurisdiction over war crimes in the Palestinian territories
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?

Do you think that Yahya Sinwar, Khalid Mashal or Ismail Haniya will provide direct testimony?
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?
Sure, but it doesn't matter. The crimes are taking place in Palestine where the court does have jurisdiction.
The crimes are taking place in Palestine where the court does have jurisdiction.

That is awesome!!!

Who are the first Hamas terrorists they'll be prosecuting?
 

P F Tinmore

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
60,960
Reaction score
2,728
Points
1,815
ICC rules it has jurisdiction over war crimes in the Palestinian territories
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?

Do you think that Yahya Sinwar, Khalid Mashal or Ismail Haniya will provide direct testimony?
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?
Sure, but it doesn't matter. The crimes are taking place in Palestine where the court does have jurisdiction.
The crimes are taking place in Palestine where the court does have jurisdiction.

That is awesome!!!

Who are the first Hamas terrorists they'll be prosecuting?
I don't know. Hamas is on the agenda but they are not worried. Israel is freaking out.

That should tell us something.
 

Toddsterpatriot

Diamond Member
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
65,315
Reaction score
13,382
Points
2,180
Location
Chicago
ICC rules it has jurisdiction over war crimes in the Palestinian territories
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?

Do you think that Yahya Sinwar, Khalid Mashal or Ismail Haniya will provide direct testimony?
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?
Sure, but it doesn't matter. The crimes are taking place in Palestine where the court does have jurisdiction.
The crimes are taking place in Palestine where the court does have jurisdiction.

That is awesome!!!

Who are the first Hamas terrorists they'll be prosecuting?
I don't know. Hamas is on the agenda but they are not worried. Israel is freaking out.

That should tell us something.
Hamas is on the agenda but they are not worried.

That tells me they'll ignore Hamas war crimes.
 

P F Tinmore

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
60,960
Reaction score
2,728
Points
1,815
ICC's "Landmark Decision" Could Open Door to Prosecuting Israel for War Crimes in Palestine

 

toastman

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2012
Messages
16,422
Reaction score
2,167
Points
245
ICC rules it has jurisdiction over war crimes in the Palestinian territories
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?

Do you think that Yahya Sinwar, Khalid Mashal or Ismail Haniya will provide direct testimony?
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?
Sure, but it doesn't matter. The crimes are taking place in Palestine where the court does have jurisdiction.
The crimes are taking place in Palestine where the court does have jurisdiction.

That is awesome!!!

Who are the first Hamas terrorists they'll be prosecuting?
I don't know. Hamas is on the agenda but they are not worried. Israel is freaking out.

That should tell us something.
Israel is freaking out ? Link ?
 

Mac-7

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
24,598
Reaction score
17,609
Points
2,365
Since 60s Fan started a propaganda thread where he posts links to Hasbara sites, I thought that there should be a thread that does the same thing from the opposite perspective. Articles from Electronic Intifada, Arab news sources, Muslim news sources are acceptable for this thread.

Here is one that is astonishing. Israeli soldiers in uniform are attacking American students in the U.S. This is unbelievable. Can you imagine any other country's soldiers going on an American university campus to harass Americnas?

Israeli soldiers harass students on US campus

I do t see what your complaint is

where were the Israeli soldiers on uniform?

I didnt see any

I only saw and heard angry leftists shouting at supporters of Israel
 

RoccoR

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2010
Messages
10,623
Reaction score
2,862
Points
290
Location
Reynoldsburg, OH
RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: ICC External Interference
⁜→ P F Tinmore, Hollie, et al,

BLUF: I think this might very well trigger a backlash against the ICC.

ICC rules it has jurisdiction over war crimes in the Palestinian territories
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?
Do you think that Yahya Sinwar, Khalid Mashal or Ismail Haniya will provide direct testimony?
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?
Sure, but it doesn't matter. The crimes are taking place in Palestine where the court does have jurisdiction.
(CONTRADICTION)

◈ On the one-hand, the ICC supports the notion that:

✦ The UNGA Resolution 67/19 recognising Palestine as a State, in its paragraph 1 states that the UNGA: “Reaffirms the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and to independence in their State of Palestine on the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967”.

◈ On the other-hand, the ICC supports the notion that:
✦ The UNGA, in its Resolution 67/19 (29 November 2012) upgraded Palestine from “observer entity” to “non-member observer State ”.

(FINE POINT of DISTINCTION)

It stated that “ruling on the territorial scope of its jurisdiction, the Chamber is neither adjudicating a border dispute under international law nor prejudging the question of any future borders. The Chamber’s ruling is for the sole purpose of defining the Court’s territorial jurisdiction”

(THE DOUBLE EDGE OF THE SWORD)

The Prosecutor states that war crimes were committed by:

◈ The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) as well as
◈ Members of Hamas and Palestinian Armed Groups (“PAGs”).

At this time it appears that the crimes targeted by the Prosecution are:

◈ Wilful killings, torture, inhuman treatment or serious injury to body or health;
◈ Intentionally attacking objects or persons using the emblems of the Geneva Conventions;
◈ Intentionally attacking civilians and civilian objectives or using protected persons as shields;
◈ Depriving protected persons of the right to a fair trial;
◈ Outrages to personal dignity; and
◈ Transfer by occupying Power of its own population into occupied territory.

(COMMENT)

I think the intention of the Prosecutor, although thinly vailed, is to make it appear (plausible denial) that both parties to the conflict are being investigated. This is to avoid the allegation that the Prosecutor is engaged in the wrongful use of legal authority with the intent to inflict harms on the Israels (a party to the conflict). The Prosecutor knows damn well that any specific members of the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) and the various Palestinian Armed Groups (“PAGs”) will be hard to identify.

(IMO) This is equivalent to an attempt to bankrupt Israel and plunder its wealth. This would not be the first time judicial authority would be focused upon the Jewish People. It is an effort to destroy the most highly developed nation within the Middle East North African (MENA) Region. It is an attempt to afford the Arab Palestinians a windfall profit and to weaken, if not overrun, Israel with penalties for it defense against Arab Aggression since 1948. It supports the Hamas belief that no part of the land of Palestine shall be compromised or conceded, irrespective of the causes, the circumstances, and the pressures and no matter how long the occupation lasts. Hamas rejects any alternative to the full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea. HAMAS considers null and void:


◈ The Balfour Declaration,
◈ The British Mandate Document, t
◈ The UN Palestine Partition Resolution,
◈ and whatever resolutions and measures that derive from them or are similar to them.

HAMAS → considers the establishment of “Israel” is entirely illegal and contravenes the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people

The significance of the date, 14 July 2014, is the complaint lodged by Palestine at the UN is, in regard, since 7 July 2014 launch of "Operation Strong Cliff" then Operation Protective Edge, Israel. The Arab Palestinians alleged that the Occupying Power brutally attacked the territories. What went unsaid is that since the first of the year (2014) the Hostile Arab Palestinians launched 450 rockets into Israel. About 250
(out of the 450 rockets) were launched in the three weeks prior to the decision to activate Operation Protective Edge.

It will be interesting to see how Israel will respond to the Jurisdictional Decision.


1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 

P F Tinmore

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
60,960
Reaction score
2,728
Points
1,815
RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: ICC External Interference
⁜→ P F Tinmore, Hollie, et al,

BLUF: I think this might very well trigger a backlash against the ICC.

ICC rules it has jurisdiction over war crimes in the Palestinian territories
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?
Do you think that Yahya Sinwar, Khalid Mashal or Ismail Haniya will provide direct testimony?
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?
Sure, but it doesn't matter. The crimes are taking place in Palestine where the court does have jurisdiction.
(CONTRADICTION)

◈ On the one-hand, the ICC supports the notion that:

✦ The UNGA Resolution 67/19 recognising Palestine as a State, in its paragraph 1 states that the UNGA: “Reaffirms the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and to independence in their State of Palestine on the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967”.

◈ On the other-hand, the ICC supports the notion that:
✦ The UNGA, in its Resolution 67/19 (29 November 2012) upgraded Palestine from “observer entity” to “non-member observer State ”.

(FINE POINT of DISTINCTION)

It stated that “ruling on the territorial scope of its jurisdiction, the Chamber is neither adjudicating a border dispute under international law nor prejudging the question of any future borders. The Chamber’s ruling is for the sole purpose of defining the Court’s territorial jurisdiction”

(THE DOUBLE EDGE OF THE SWORD)

The Prosecutor states that war crimes were committed by:

◈ The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) as well as
◈ Members of Hamas and Palestinian Armed Groups (“PAGs”).

At this time it appears that the crimes targeted by the Prosecution are:

◈ Wilful killings, torture, inhuman treatment or serious injury to body or health;
◈ Intentionally attacking objects or persons using the emblems of the Geneva Conventions;
◈ Intentionally attacking civilians and civilian objectives or using protected persons as shields;
◈ Depriving protected persons of the right to a fair trial;
◈ Outrages to personal dignity; and
◈ Transfer by occupying Power of its own population into occupied territory.

(COMMENT)

I think the intention of the Prosecutor, although thinly vailed, is to make it appear (plausible denial) that both parties to the conflict are being investigated. This is to avoid the allegation that the Prosecutor is engaged in the wrongful use of legal authority with the intent to inflict harms on the Israels (a party to the conflict). The Prosecutor knows damn well that any specific members of the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) and the various Palestinian Armed Groups (“PAGs”) will be hard to identify.

(IMO) This is equivalent to an attempt to bankrupt Israel and plunder its wealth. This would not be the first time judicial authority would be focused upon the Jewish People. It is an effort to destroy the most highly developed nation within the Middle East North African (MENA) Region. It is an attempt to afford the Arab Palestinians a windfall profit and to weaken, if not overrun, Israel with penalties for it defense against Arab Aggression since 1948. It supports the Hamas belief that no part of the land of Palestine shall be compromised or conceded, irrespective of the causes, the circumstances, and the pressures and no matter how long the occupation lasts. Hamas rejects any alternative to the full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea. HAMAS considers null and void:


◈ The Balfour Declaration,
◈ The British Mandate Document, t
◈ The UN Palestine Partition Resolution,
◈ and whatever resolutions and measures that derive from them or are similar to them.

HAMAS → considers the establishment of “Israel” is entirely illegal and contravenes the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people

The significance of the date, 14 July 2014, is the complaint lodged by Palestine at the UN is, in regard, since 7 July 2014 launch of "Operation Strong Cliff" then Operation Protective Edge, Israel. The Arab Palestinians alleged that the Occupying Power brutally attacked the territories. What went unsaid is that since the first of the year (2014) the Hostile Arab Palestinians launched 450 rockets into Israel. About 250
(out of the 450 rockets) were launched in the three weeks prior to the decision to activate Operation Protective Edge.

It will be interesting to see how Israel will respond to the Jurisdictional Decision.


1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
It will be interesting to see how Israel will respond to the Jurisdictional Decision.
Bibi is out playing the anti-Semite card.

Israel and its lackeys in the US are saying that the court does not have jurisdiction. However, the prosecutor says it does and a panel if judges just ruled that it does.

I hope they post videos of the proceedings. This will be interesting.
 

Hollie

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
39,283
Reaction score
4,857
Points
1,130
RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: ICC External Interference
⁜→ P F Tinmore, Hollie, et al,

BLUF: I think this might very well trigger a backlash against the ICC.

ICC rules it has jurisdiction over war crimes in the Palestinian territories
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?
Do you think that Yahya Sinwar, Khalid Mashal or Ismail Haniya will provide direct testimony?
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?
Sure, but it doesn't matter. The crimes are taking place in Palestine where the court does have jurisdiction.
(CONTRADICTION)

◈ On the one-hand, the ICC supports the notion that:

✦ The UNGA Resolution 67/19 recognising Palestine as a State, in its paragraph 1 states that the UNGA: “Reaffirms the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and to independence in their State of Palestine on the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967”.

◈ On the other-hand, the ICC supports the notion that:
✦ The UNGA, in its Resolution 67/19 (29 November 2012) upgraded Palestine from “observer entity” to “non-member observer State ”.

(FINE POINT of DISTINCTION)

It stated that “ruling on the territorial scope of its jurisdiction, the Chamber is neither adjudicating a border dispute under international law nor prejudging the question of any future borders. The Chamber’s ruling is for the sole purpose of defining the Court’s territorial jurisdiction”

(THE DOUBLE EDGE OF THE SWORD)

The Prosecutor states that war crimes were committed by:

◈ The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) as well as
◈ Members of Hamas and Palestinian Armed Groups (“PAGs”).

At this time it appears that the crimes targeted by the Prosecution are:

◈ Wilful killings, torture, inhuman treatment or serious injury to body or health;
◈ Intentionally attacking objects or persons using the emblems of the Geneva Conventions;
◈ Intentionally attacking civilians and civilian objectives or using protected persons as shields;
◈ Depriving protected persons of the right to a fair trial;
◈ Outrages to personal dignity; and
◈ Transfer by occupying Power of its own population into occupied territory.

(COMMENT)

I think the intention of the Prosecutor, although thinly vailed, is to make it appear (plausible denial) that both parties to the conflict are being investigated. This is to avoid the allegation that the Prosecutor is engaged in the wrongful use of legal authority with the intent to inflict harms on the Israels (a party to the conflict). The Prosecutor knows damn well that any specific members of the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) and the various Palestinian Armed Groups (“PAGs”) will be hard to identify.

(IMO) This is equivalent to an attempt to bankrupt Israel and plunder its wealth. This would not be the first time judicial authority would be focused upon the Jewish People. It is an effort to destroy the most highly developed nation within the Middle East North African (MENA) Region. It is an attempt to afford the Arab Palestinians a windfall profit and to weaken, if not overrun, Israel with penalties for it defense against Arab Aggression since 1948. It supports the Hamas belief that no part of the land of Palestine shall be compromised or conceded, irrespective of the causes, the circumstances, and the pressures and no matter how long the occupation lasts. Hamas rejects any alternative to the full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea. HAMAS considers null and void:


◈ The Balfour Declaration,
◈ The British Mandate Document, t
◈ The UN Palestine Partition Resolution,
◈ and whatever resolutions and measures that derive from them or are similar to them.

HAMAS → considers the establishment of “Israel” is entirely illegal and contravenes the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people

The significance of the date, 14 July 2014, is the complaint lodged by Palestine at the UN is, in regard, since 7 July 2014 launch of "Operation Strong Cliff" then Operation Protective Edge, Israel. The Arab Palestinians alleged that the Occupying Power brutally attacked the territories. What went unsaid is that since the first of the year (2014) the Hostile Arab Palestinians launched 450 rockets into Israel. About 250
(out of the 450 rockets) were launched in the three weeks prior to the decision to activate Operation Protective Edge.

It will be interesting to see how Israel will respond to the Jurisdictional Decision.


1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
It will be interesting to see how Israel will respond to the Jurisdictional Decision.
Bibi is out playing the anti-Semite card.

Israel and its lackeys in the US are saying that the court does not have jurisdiction. However, the prosecutor says it does and a panel if judges just ruled that it does.

I hope they post videos of the proceedings. This will be interesting.
You hope they post videos? I'm assuming that means you will litter the forum with more youtube videos.
 

P F Tinmore

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
60,960
Reaction score
2,728
Points
1,815
RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: ICC External Interference
⁜→ P F Tinmore, Hollie, et al,

BLUF: I think this might very well trigger a backlash against the ICC.

ICC rules it has jurisdiction over war crimes in the Palestinian territories
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?
Do you think that Yahya Sinwar, Khalid Mashal or Ismail Haniya will provide direct testimony?
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?
Sure, but it doesn't matter. The crimes are taking place in Palestine where the court does have jurisdiction.
(CONTRADICTION)

◈ On the one-hand, the ICC supports the notion that:

✦ The UNGA Resolution 67/19 recognising Palestine as a State, in its paragraph 1 states that the UNGA: “Reaffirms the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and to independence in their State of Palestine on the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967”.

◈ On the other-hand, the ICC supports the notion that:
✦ The UNGA, in its Resolution 67/19 (29 November 2012) upgraded Palestine from “observer entity” to “non-member observer State ”.

(FINE POINT of DISTINCTION)

It stated that “ruling on the territorial scope of its jurisdiction, the Chamber is neither adjudicating a border dispute under international law nor prejudging the question of any future borders. The Chamber’s ruling is for the sole purpose of defining the Court’s territorial jurisdiction”

(THE DOUBLE EDGE OF THE SWORD)

The Prosecutor states that war crimes were committed by:

◈ The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) as well as
◈ Members of Hamas and Palestinian Armed Groups (“PAGs”).

At this time it appears that the crimes targeted by the Prosecution are:

◈ Wilful killings, torture, inhuman treatment or serious injury to body or health;
◈ Intentionally attacking objects or persons using the emblems of the Geneva Conventions;
◈ Intentionally attacking civilians and civilian objectives or using protected persons as shields;
◈ Depriving protected persons of the right to a fair trial;
◈ Outrages to personal dignity; and
◈ Transfer by occupying Power of its own population into occupied territory.

(COMMENT)

I think the intention of the Prosecutor, although thinly vailed, is to make it appear (plausible denial) that both parties to the conflict are being investigated. This is to avoid the allegation that the Prosecutor is engaged in the wrongful use of legal authority with the intent to inflict harms on the Israels (a party to the conflict). The Prosecutor knows damn well that any specific members of the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) and the various Palestinian Armed Groups (“PAGs”) will be hard to identify.

(IMO) This is equivalent to an attempt to bankrupt Israel and plunder its wealth. This would not be the first time judicial authority would be focused upon the Jewish People. It is an effort to destroy the most highly developed nation within the Middle East North African (MENA) Region. It is an attempt to afford the Arab Palestinians a windfall profit and to weaken, if not overrun, Israel with penalties for it defense against Arab Aggression since 1948. It supports the Hamas belief that no part of the land of Palestine shall be compromised or conceded, irrespective of the causes, the circumstances, and the pressures and no matter how long the occupation lasts. Hamas rejects any alternative to the full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea. HAMAS considers null and void:


◈ The Balfour Declaration,
◈ The British Mandate Document, t
◈ The UN Palestine Partition Resolution,
◈ and whatever resolutions and measures that derive from them or are similar to them.

HAMAS → considers the establishment of “Israel” is entirely illegal and contravenes the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people

The significance of the date, 14 July 2014, is the complaint lodged by Palestine at the UN is, in regard, since 7 July 2014 launch of "Operation Strong Cliff" then Operation Protective Edge, Israel. The Arab Palestinians alleged that the Occupying Power brutally attacked the territories. What went unsaid is that since the first of the year (2014) the Hostile Arab Palestinians launched 450 rockets into Israel. About 250
(out of the 450 rockets) were launched in the three weeks prior to the decision to activate Operation Protective Edge.

It will be interesting to see how Israel will respond to the Jurisdictional Decision.


1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
It will be interesting to see how Israel will respond to the Jurisdictional Decision.
Bibi is out playing the anti-Semite card.

Israel and its lackeys in the US are saying that the court does not have jurisdiction. However, the prosecutor says it does and a panel if judges just ruled that it does.

I hope they post videos of the proceedings. This will be interesting.
You hope they post videos? I'm assuming that means you will litter the forum with more youtube videos.
It will be fun watching Israel's shysters bob and weave.
 

Hollie

Platinum Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
39,283
Reaction score
4,857
Points
1,130
RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: ICC External Interference
⁜→ P F Tinmore, Hollie, et al,

BLUF: I think this might very well trigger a backlash against the ICC.

ICC rules it has jurisdiction over war crimes in the Palestinian territories
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?
Do you think that Yahya Sinwar, Khalid Mashal or Ismail Haniya will provide direct testimony?
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?
Sure, but it doesn't matter. The crimes are taking place in Palestine where the court does have jurisdiction.
(CONTRADICTION)

◈ On the one-hand, the ICC supports the notion that:

✦ The UNGA Resolution 67/19 recognising Palestine as a State, in its paragraph 1 states that the UNGA: “Reaffirms the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and to independence in their State of Palestine on the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967”.

◈ On the other-hand, the ICC supports the notion that:
✦ The UNGA, in its Resolution 67/19 (29 November 2012) upgraded Palestine from “observer entity” to “non-member observer State ”.

(FINE POINT of DISTINCTION)

It stated that “ruling on the territorial scope of its jurisdiction, the Chamber is neither adjudicating a border dispute under international law nor prejudging the question of any future borders. The Chamber’s ruling is for the sole purpose of defining the Court’s territorial jurisdiction”

(THE DOUBLE EDGE OF THE SWORD)

The Prosecutor states that war crimes were committed by:

◈ The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) as well as
◈ Members of Hamas and Palestinian Armed Groups (“PAGs”).

At this time it appears that the crimes targeted by the Prosecution are:

◈ Wilful killings, torture, inhuman treatment or serious injury to body or health;
◈ Intentionally attacking objects or persons using the emblems of the Geneva Conventions;
◈ Intentionally attacking civilians and civilian objectives or using protected persons as shields;
◈ Depriving protected persons of the right to a fair trial;
◈ Outrages to personal dignity; and
◈ Transfer by occupying Power of its own population into occupied territory.

(COMMENT)

I think the intention of the Prosecutor, although thinly vailed, is to make it appear (plausible denial) that both parties to the conflict are being investigated. This is to avoid the allegation that the Prosecutor is engaged in the wrongful use of legal authority with the intent to inflict harms on the Israels (a party to the conflict). The Prosecutor knows damn well that any specific members of the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) and the various Palestinian Armed Groups (“PAGs”) will be hard to identify.

(IMO) This is equivalent to an attempt to bankrupt Israel and plunder its wealth. This would not be the first time judicial authority would be focused upon the Jewish People. It is an effort to destroy the most highly developed nation within the Middle East North African (MENA) Region. It is an attempt to afford the Arab Palestinians a windfall profit and to weaken, if not overrun, Israel with penalties for it defense against Arab Aggression since 1948. It supports the Hamas belief that no part of the land of Palestine shall be compromised or conceded, irrespective of the causes, the circumstances, and the pressures and no matter how long the occupation lasts. Hamas rejects any alternative to the full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea. HAMAS considers null and void:


◈ The Balfour Declaration,
◈ The British Mandate Document, t
◈ The UN Palestine Partition Resolution,
◈ and whatever resolutions and measures that derive from them or are similar to them.

HAMAS → considers the establishment of “Israel” is entirely illegal and contravenes the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people

The significance of the date, 14 July 2014, is the complaint lodged by Palestine at the UN is, in regard, since 7 July 2014 launch of "Operation Strong Cliff" then Operation Protective Edge, Israel. The Arab Palestinians alleged that the Occupying Power brutally attacked the territories. What went unsaid is that since the first of the year (2014) the Hostile Arab Palestinians launched 450 rockets into Israel. About 250
(out of the 450 rockets) were launched in the three weeks prior to the decision to activate Operation Protective Edge.

It will be interesting to see how Israel will respond to the Jurisdictional Decision.


1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
It will be interesting to see how Israel will respond to the Jurisdictional Decision.
Bibi is out playing the anti-Semite card.

Israel and its lackeys in the US are saying that the court does not have jurisdiction. However, the prosecutor says it does and a panel if judges just ruled that it does.

I hope they post videos of the proceedings. This will be interesting.
You hope they post videos? I'm assuming that means you will litter the forum with more youtube videos.
It will be fun watching Israel's shysters bob and weave.
I can understand your position as one derived from insensate Jew hatreds but why do you believe ''Israel's shysters bob and weave? Firstly, I will suppose you're a righteous follower of Arab-Moslem propaganda intended to denigrate the "hook-nosed shyster Jews''. Your language is stereotypical of those associated with an identifiable politico -religious ideology. Secondly, my experience is that the ICC has an inherent bias and will tend to focus on the 2014 scuffle between Israel and the Islamic terrorist attackers, primarily attached to Hamas. Remember that the scuffle started with the capture and killing of three Israeli teenagers. That the ICC can self-determine it has authority makes their ''jurisdiction'' questionable.

Are you readying your youtube video collection?
 

P F Tinmore

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 6, 2009
Messages
60,960
Reaction score
2,728
Points
1,815
RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: ICC External Interference
⁜→ P F Tinmore, Hollie, et al,

BLUF: I think this might very well trigger a backlash against the ICC.

ICC rules it has jurisdiction over war crimes in the Palestinian territories
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?
Do you think that Yahya Sinwar, Khalid Mashal or Ismail Haniya will provide direct testimony?
Did you know that Israel is not a signatory to the ICC Cult?
Sure, but it doesn't matter. The crimes are taking place in Palestine where the court does have jurisdiction.
(CONTRADICTION)

◈ On the one-hand, the ICC supports the notion that:

✦ The UNGA Resolution 67/19 recognising Palestine as a State, in its paragraph 1 states that the UNGA: “Reaffirms the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and to independence in their State of Palestine on the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967”.

◈ On the other-hand, the ICC supports the notion that:
✦ The UNGA, in its Resolution 67/19 (29 November 2012) upgraded Palestine from “observer entity” to “non-member observer State ”.

(FINE POINT of DISTINCTION)

It stated that “ruling on the territorial scope of its jurisdiction, the Chamber is neither adjudicating a border dispute under international law nor prejudging the question of any future borders. The Chamber’s ruling is for the sole purpose of defining the Court’s territorial jurisdiction”

(THE DOUBLE EDGE OF THE SWORD)

The Prosecutor states that war crimes were committed by:

◈ The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) as well as
◈ Members of Hamas and Palestinian Armed Groups (“PAGs”).

At this time it appears that the crimes targeted by the Prosecution are:

◈ Wilful killings, torture, inhuman treatment or serious injury to body or health;
◈ Intentionally attacking objects or persons using the emblems of the Geneva Conventions;
◈ Intentionally attacking civilians and civilian objectives or using protected persons as shields;
◈ Depriving protected persons of the right to a fair trial;
◈ Outrages to personal dignity; and
◈ Transfer by occupying Power of its own population into occupied territory.

(COMMENT)

I think the intention of the Prosecutor, although thinly vailed, is to make it appear (plausible denial) that both parties to the conflict are being investigated. This is to avoid the allegation that the Prosecutor is engaged in the wrongful use of legal authority with the intent to inflict harms on the Israels (a party to the conflict). The Prosecutor knows damn well that any specific members of the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS) and the various Palestinian Armed Groups (“PAGs”) will be hard to identify.

(IMO) This is equivalent to an attempt to bankrupt Israel and plunder its wealth. This would not be the first time judicial authority would be focused upon the Jewish People. It is an effort to destroy the most highly developed nation within the Middle East North African (MENA) Region. It is an attempt to afford the Arab Palestinians a windfall profit and to weaken, if not overrun, Israel with penalties for it defense against Arab Aggression since 1948. It supports the Hamas belief that no part of the land of Palestine shall be compromised or conceded, irrespective of the causes, the circumstances, and the pressures and no matter how long the occupation lasts. Hamas rejects any alternative to the full and complete liberation of Palestine, from the river to the sea. HAMAS considers null and void:


◈ The Balfour Declaration,
◈ The British Mandate Document, t
◈ The UN Palestine Partition Resolution,
◈ and whatever resolutions and measures that derive from them or are similar to them.

HAMAS → considers the establishment of “Israel” is entirely illegal and contravenes the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people

The significance of the date, 14 July 2014, is the complaint lodged by Palestine at the UN is, in regard, since 7 July 2014 launch of "Operation Strong Cliff" then Operation Protective Edge, Israel. The Arab Palestinians alleged that the Occupying Power brutally attacked the territories. What went unsaid is that since the first of the year (2014) the Hostile Arab Palestinians launched 450 rockets into Israel. About 250
(out of the 450 rockets) were launched in the three weeks prior to the decision to activate Operation Protective Edge.

It will be interesting to see how Israel will respond to the Jurisdictional Decision.


1611604183365.png

Most Respectfully,
R
It will be interesting to see how Israel will respond to the Jurisdictional Decision.
Bibi is out playing the anti-Semite card.

Israel and its lackeys in the US are saying that the court does not have jurisdiction. However, the prosecutor says it does and a panel if judges just ruled that it does.

I hope they post videos of the proceedings. This will be interesting.
You hope they post videos? I'm assuming that means you will litter the forum with more youtube videos.
It will be fun watching Israel's shysters bob and weave.
I can understand your position as one derived from insensate Jew hatreds but why do you believe ''Israel's shysters bob and weave? Firstly, I will suppose you're a righteous follower of Arab-Moslem propaganda intended to denigrate the "hook-nosed shyster Jews''. Your language is stereotypical of those associated with an identifiable politico -religious ideology. Secondly, my experience is that the ICC has an inherent bias and will tend to focus on the 2014 scuffle between Israel and the Islamic terrorist attackers, primarily attached to Hamas. Remember that the scuffle started with the capture and killing of three Israeli teenagers. That the ICC can self-determine it has authority makes their ''jurisdiction'' questionable.

Are you readying your youtube video collection?
What's with the Jew hatred shtick? Have you played all of your anti-Semite cards? :laugh::laugh::laugh:
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top