RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ P F Tinmore,
et al:
BLUF: These are two valid pieces of incidental conditions and events. BUT, "Public Opinion" is not a matter of consideration in the Rule of Law (RoL). And the considerations of one country are NOT the principles by which the considerations should be addressed.
Despite Jewish organizations’ efforts to smear Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar, rightwing Israeli thinktank finds that 31 percent of US Jews would vote for them.
mondoweiss.net
A new survey conducted by EKOS Research Associates shows that an overwhelming majority of Canadians would support International Criminal Court (ICC) investigation of Israel.
mondoweiss.net
(COMMENT)
FIRST: As far as what will be discussed and what will NOT be discussed is inconsequential. You have a voice, so speak. But, as I always have to remind you, PLEASE check your facts.
In
A/RES/3379 (XXX)(Elimination of all forms of racial discrimination)(1975) states: "
Determines that zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination." Upon reflection, and for a number of different reasons, the UN General Assembly should not have come to this determination. And what the pro-Arab Palestinian Movements fail to present is that
A/RES/46/86 (Elimination of racism and racial discrimination)(1991) "Decides to
revoke the determination contained in its resolution 3379 (XXX)." This question about the connection
(if any) between "Zionism" and "racism" has been asked and answered. The fact that the Arab Palestinians today, some three decades later, are making a bid on this claim once again, is ridiculous. It is tantamount to purposefully misrepresenting the information.
Investigation of "War Crimes."
Parry & Grant Encyclopaedic Dictionary of International Law said:
war crimes Generally defined as violations of the laws or customs of war. Thus, art. 6(b) of the Charter of the (Nuremberg) International Military Tribunal of 8 August 1945 ( 82 U.N.T.S. 279 ) included within the Tribunal’s jurisdiction ‘ War crimes: namely, violations of the laws or customs of war. Such violations shall include, but not be limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation to slave labour or for any other purpose of civilian populations of or in occupied territory, murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the seas, killing of hostages, the plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.’ War crimes are the earliest instances of international criminal law—and form the core of international humanitarian law. See Freidman, The Law of War: A Documentary History ( 1972 ); Dunlap, Pritchard, and Carey, International Humanitarian Law: Origins 2003.
SOURCE: Oxford University Press, Inc., Copyright © 2009, Page 670
A list of the
Customary and International Humanitarian Law Rules (C&IHL Rules) are the keys to understanding "War Crimes." The selective enforcement of the C&IHL Rules (only Investigatinging Israel) is in itself the exact opposite of the intent of the fair and justice concepts.
Probably more than 90% of the civilian fatalities could have been avoided if the Arab Palestinian Leadership followed these to rules in particular.
There would have been "NO CLASH" between the opponents if the Arab Palestinian Leadership had not chosen to employ thousands of civilians to charge the Israeli Border Perimeter. The question here is: Is any country permitted to defend its borders?
The Canadians have to ask themselves: Does the "Arrow of Law" run only in one direction? Should the Arab Palestinians be given a free pass, but the Israels must be prosecuted for defending their sovereign territory? How do Canadians want to be perceived in terms of the application of the law?
Finally, what do the Canadians expect to accomplish?
Most Respectfully,
R
electronicintifada.net
