All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

[Toddsterpatriot]

IOF destroys homes, water tank in West Bank

Israeli occupation forces (IOF) on Monday demolished three Palestinian homes and a water tank in the West Bank districts of Jenin and Bethlehem.

english.palinfo.com

BETHLEHEM/JENIN, (PIC)

Israeli occupation forces (IOF) on Monday demolished three Palestinian homes and a water tank in the West Bank districts of Jenin and Bethlehem.

Local sources said that two Israeli bulldozers, accompanied by IOF soldiers, stormed Khirbet Sakariya area in Bethlehem and demolished two Palestinian homes inhabited by Ni’man As’ad and Luay As’ad and their families.

Meanwhile in Jenin, the IOF demolished a home of five Palestinians in Farasin village and destroyed a water tank used by the village’s residents for drinking and watering crops.

Read more at
IOF destroys homes, water tank in West Bank
@Copyright The Palestinian Information Center

Demolished the shit out of them!!

 

[P F Tinmore]

Palestinian woman injured in IOF raid succumbs to her wounds

The Palestinian young woman Dalia Samoudi, 23, was pronounced dead on Friday afternoon a few hours after she was shot by Israeli occupation forces (IOF) during a dawn raid on Jenin district in the West Bank.

english.palinfo.com

The IOF at daybreak raided al-Jabriyat neighborhood in Jenin, broke into several Palestinian homes, and searched them amid heavy firing of live ammunition, tear gas canisters, and stun grenades.

The martyr’s family said that Samoudi woke up at dawn to feed her new-born baby, and when she heard the clashes she rushed to close the window to protect her infant from the tear gas before an IOF-fired live bullet hit her in the chest.

Read more at
Palestinian woman injured in IOF raid succumbs to her wounds
@Copyright The Palestinian Information Center

 

[P F Tinmore]

Israel is too weak to launch a new offensive against Gaza

Israeli war jets struck several targets in the north of the Gaza Strip on Sunday.

english.palinfo.com

On Tuesday morning, the occupation forces opened fire on Palestinian areas inside the Gaza Strip. The army claimed that its soldiers opened fire at balloon launchers, from where Palestinians planned to launch explosive balloons towards Israeli settlements near the besieged territory. By Tuesday evening, the Israeli media had reported that at least 60 balloons had been launched from Gaza, setting fire to more than 250 acres across the nominal border.

The balloons are meant to be a deterrent to Israel, and a reminder that it should commit to the understandings about easing its siege imposed on the Gaza Strip. Given such rhetoric from the Israeli establishment, though, I spoke to senior Israeli and Palestinian observers to see what they think; the conclusion is that Israel is too weak to carry out its threats.

Read more at
Israel is too weak to launch a new offensive against Gaza
@Copyright The Palestinian Information Center

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Israel is too weak to launch a new offensive against Gaza

Israeli war jets struck several targets in the north of the Gaza Strip on Sunday.

english.palinfo.com

On Tuesday morning, the occupation forces opened fire on Palestinian areas inside the Gaza Strip. The army claimed that its soldiers opened fire at balloon launchers, from where Palestinians planned to launch explosive balloons towards Israeli settlements near the besieged territory. By Tuesday evening, the Israeli media had reported that at least 60 balloons had been launched from Gaza, setting fire to more than 250 acres across the nominal border.

The balloons are meant to be a deterrent to Israel, and a reminder that it should commit to the understandings about easing its siege imposed on the Gaza Strip. Given such rhetoric from the Israeli establishment, though, I spoke to senior Israeli and Palestinian observers to see what they think; the conclusion is that Israel is too weak to carry out its threats.

Read more at
Israel is too weak to launch a new offensive against Gaza
@Copyright The Palestinian Information Center

Nominal border?

 

[RoccoR]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ Toddsterpatriot, et al,

BLUF: The term "Nominal Law" is tricky, in that many believe it is an obsolete term.

Nominal border?

(COMMENT)

I am told that the term "Nominal" indicates that the was a reprisal allowed under Customary Law. Reprisal action is no longer considered legal.

A/RES/25/2625 [Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States (1970)] essentially says that any demarcation must be respected the same as a border.

Every State has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate the existing international boundaries of another State or as a means of solving international disputes, including territorial disputes and problems concerning frontiers of States.

Every State likewise has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate international lines of demarcation, such as armistice lines, established by or pursuant to an international agreement to which it is a party or which it is otherwise bound to respect. Nothing in the foregoing shall be construed as prejudicing the positions of the parties concerned with regard to the status and effects of such lines under their special regimes or as affecting their temporary character.

States have a duty to refrain from acts of reprisal involving the use of force.
SOURCE: A/RES/25/2625 (1970)

While the Hostile Arab Palestinians find themselves above the law, Israel is in a legal dilemma between following the law and the government's responsibility for self-defense and territorial integrity.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[rylah]

Israel is too weak to launch a new offensive against Gaza

Israeli war jets struck several targets in the north of the Gaza Strip on Sunday.

english.palinfo.com

On Tuesday morning, the occupation forces opened fire on Palestinian areas inside the Gaza Strip. The army claimed that its soldiers opened fire at balloon launchers, from where Palestinians planned to launch explosive balloons towards Israeli settlements near the besieged territory. By Tuesday evening, the Israeli media had reported that at least 60 balloons had been launched from Gaza, setting fire to more than 250 acres across the nominal border.

The balloons are meant to be a deterrent to Israel, and a reminder that it should commit to the understandings about easing its siege imposed on the Gaza Strip. Given such rhetoric from the Israeli establishment, though, I spoke to senior Israeli and Palestinian observers to see what they think; the conclusion is that Israel is too weak to carry out its threats.

Read more at
Israel is too weak to launch a new offensive against Gaza
@Copyright The Palestinian Information Center

That's what Hamas thinks,
but the result is the opposite.

And now what? How long will Qatar pay them off, until not giving a?
If you look carefully, Hamas is loosing power, they're no more than vassals for higher bid.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ Toddsterpatriot, et al,

BLUF: The term "Nominal Law" is tricky, in that many believe it is an obsolete term.

Nominal border?

(COMMENT)

I am told that the term "Nominal" indicates that the was a reprisal allowed under Customary Law. Reprisal action is no longer considered legal.

A/RES/25/2625 [Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States (1970)] essentially says that any demarcation must be respected the same as a border.

​

Every State has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate the existing international boundaries of another State or as a means of solving international disputes, including territorial disputes and problems concerning frontiers of States.​

​

Every State likewise has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate international lines of demarcation, such as armistice lines, established by or pursuant to an international agreement to which it is a party or which it is otherwise bound to respect. Nothing in the foregoing shall be construed as prejudicing the positions of the parties concerned with regard to the status and effects of such lines under their special regimes or as affecting their temporary character.​

​

States have a duty to refrain from acts of reprisal involving the use of force.​

SOURCE: A/RES/25/2625 (1970)​

​

​

While the Hostile Arab Palestinians find themselves above the law, Israel is in a legal dilemma between following the law and the government's responsibility for self-defense and territorial integrity.

Most Respectfully,
R

Every State likewise has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate international lines of demarcation, such as armistice lines, established by or pursuant to an international agreement to which it is a party or which it is otherwise bound to respect.

The agreements prevent the movement of military forces. Palestine has no military forces.

Palestine was not a party to the agreements.

The armistice lines were specifically not to be political or territorial boundaries. They do not change Palestine's international borders.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ Toddsterpatriot, et al,

BLUF: The term "Nominal Law" is tricky, in that many believe it is an obsolete term.

Nominal border?

(COMMENT)

I am told that the term "Nominal" indicates that the was a reprisal allowed under Customary Law. Reprisal action is no longer considered legal.

A/RES/25/2625 [Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States (1970)] essentially says that any demarcation must be respected the same as a border.

​

Every State has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate the existing international boundaries of another State or as a means of solving international disputes, including territorial disputes and problems concerning frontiers of States.​

​

Every State likewise has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate international lines of demarcation, such as armistice lines, established by or pursuant to an international agreement to which it is a party or which it is otherwise bound to respect. Nothing in the foregoing shall be construed as prejudicing the positions of the parties concerned with regard to the status and effects of such lines under their special regimes or as affecting their temporary character.​

​

States have a duty to refrain from acts of reprisal involving the use of force.​

SOURCE: A/RES/25/2625 (1970)​

​

​

While the Hostile Arab Palestinians find themselves above the law, Israel is in a legal dilemma between following the law and the government's responsibility for self-defense and territorial integrity.

Most Respectfully,
R

Every State likewise has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate international lines of demarcation, such as armistice lines, established by or pursuant to an international agreement to which it is a party or which it is otherwise bound to respect.

The agreements prevent the movement of military forces. Palestine has no military forces.

Palestine was not a party to the agreements.

The armistice lines were specifically not to be political or territorial boundaries. They do not change Palestine's international borders.

Palestine was not a party to the agreements.

Because they weren't a nation then, aren't a nation now.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Scottish “friend of Israel” faked anti-Semitism for years

A pro-Israel lobbyist in Scotland may lose his teaching job over a series of anti-Semitic posts he has admitted making.

Edward Sutherland is being investigated by the Scottish teaching regulator, The Daily Record reported on Sunday.

Sutherland is head of religious and moral education at the Belmont Academy in Ayr.

A leading figure in the Confederation of Friends of Israel, Sutherland created a fake Facebook profile and used it to post anti-Semitism online.

Using the profile, he posed as a Palestine solidarity activist.

Scottish "friend of Israel" faked anti-Semitism for years

Anti-Palestinian activist Edward Sutherland may lose teaching job over anti-Semitic posts.

electronicintifada.net

 

[P F Tinmore]

How universities serve as outposts of Israeli colonial control

Enforcing Silence: Academic Freedom, Palestine and the Criticism of Israel, edited by David Landy, Ronit Lentin and Conor McCarthy, Zed Books (2020)

Few in academia today are better placed than Rabab Abdulhadi to narrate the administrative tyrannies and legal harassment which are the plight and bane of many professors.

Abdulhadi, an associate professor at San Francisco State University, was the target of three failed lawsuits filed by the pro-Israel Lawfare Project which aimed to silence her advocacy of Palestinian rights.

Her foreword to this collection of essays on the efforts of Israel and its supporters to suppress academic speech is apt: “I did not see my story as my private property or a particular experience; it reflected and represented the collective stories of public intellectuals inside and outside the academy who sought to speak up for justice in and for Palestine.”

How universities serve as outposts of Israeli colonial control

Academic freedom arguments to protect speech on Palestine are insufficient.

electronicintifada.net

 

[Hollie]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
⁜→ Toddsterpatriot, et al,

BLUF: The term "Nominal Law" is tricky, in that many believe it is an obsolete term.

Nominal border?

(COMMENT)

I am told that the term "Nominal" indicates that the was a reprisal allowed under Customary Law. Reprisal action is no longer considered legal.

A/RES/25/2625 [Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States (1970)] essentially says that any demarcation must be respected the same as a border.

​

Every State has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate the existing international boundaries of another State or as a means of solving international disputes, including territorial disputes and problems concerning frontiers of States.​

​

Every State likewise has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate international lines of demarcation, such as armistice lines, established by or pursuant to an international agreement to which it is a party or which it is otherwise bound to respect. Nothing in the foregoing shall be construed as prejudicing the positions of the parties concerned with regard to the status and effects of such lines under their special regimes or as affecting their temporary character.​

​

States have a duty to refrain from acts of reprisal involving the use of force.​

SOURCE: A/RES/25/2625 (1970)​

​

​

While the Hostile Arab Palestinians find themselves above the law, Israel is in a legal dilemma between following the law and the government's responsibility for self-defense and territorial integrity.

Most Respectfully,
R

Every State likewise has the duty to refrain from the threat or use of force to violate international lines of demarcation, such as armistice lines, established by or pursuant to an international agreement to which it is a party or which it is otherwise bound to respect.

The agreements prevent the movement of military forces. Palestine has no military forces.

Palestine was not a party to the agreements.

The armistice lines were specifically not to be political or territorial boundaries. They do not change Palestine's international borders.

You're a bit confused with the terms you use. "Palestine has no military forces'' is an ill defined term because ''Palestine" has no sovereign territory over which a representative government has control.

Hamas has a ''military wing'' but that is little more than a loose assembly of Islamic terrorists who occasionally walk around in silly fashion parades wearing military style uniforms,

It's been said that Hamas even has a ''navy''. Although, that navy seems to consist of some skiffs with outboard motors.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Master’s student, Tasneem Al- Qadi, under interrogation: Detention extended whilst banned from meeting her lawyer

Master’s student, Tasneem Al- Qadi, under interrogation: Detention extended whilst banned from meeting her lawyer

The Israeli occupation continues to suppress all means of activism against the occupation. Palestinians, including human rights defenders, activists, artists and students remain subject to prosecution and arrests by the Israeli occupation forces (IOF). In an attempt to break the will of those...

www.addameer.org

 

[P F Tinmore]

At least two Palestinians were injured and many others suffocated from teargas today, as Israeli occupation forces attacked several protests against Israeli settlements and against the UAE-"Israel" normalization deal.

 

[Hollie]

Islamist agitators agreed to remove themselves from Israeli land after being confronted by Israeli police.

 

[P F Tinmore]

We have experienced Army raids on our home in the Middle of the night getting our front door smashed in. Before you could get out of the bed the soldiers were in the room. It is a awful experience and what their family go through is terrible.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Israeli soldiers raid out house.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Arrest Hamada and spray pepper inside the house

 

[P F Tinmore]

HOME - Days of Palestine

daysofpalestine.com

Israeli settlers today attacked shepherds and cut olive trees in Masafer Yatta in the south of the West Bank, while others set up a mobile home on land in Beita town in the north of the West Bank as a prelude to taking over the land, according to Palestinian sources.

In Masafer Yatta, settlers from the illegal Maon settlement attacked shepherds as they were grazing their sheep in the open fields and forced them to take their sheep and leave the area, according to Fouad al-Imour, a local activist.

He said that in another incident, settlers from the illegal Mitpze Yair and Susyia settlements, built on expropriated Palestinian land in Masafer Yatta, cut hundreds of olive trees in the area.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Gaza: Israel shells Hamas posts as rockets fired

Escalation of military action in Gaza continues for the eleventh day with rockets and tank fire

www.middleeasteye.net

End the blockade and the balloons will stop.

 

[rylah]

HOME - Days of Palestine

daysofpalestine.com

Israeli settlers today attacked shepherds and cut olive trees in Masafer Yatta in the south of the West Bank, while others set up a mobile home on land in Beita town in the north of the West Bank as a prelude to taking over the land, according to Palestinian sources.

In Masafer Yatta, settlers from the illegal Maon settlement attacked shepherds as they were grazing their sheep in the open fields and forced them to take their sheep and leave the area, according to Fouad al-Imour, a local activist.

He said that in another incident, settlers from the illegal Mitpze Yair and Susyia settlements, built on expropriated Palestinian land in Masafer Yatta, cut hundreds of olive trees in the area.