All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

[P F Tinmore]

 

[louie888]

PressTV-‘Israeli rabbis involved in selling babies’

A recent report has revealed that a network of Israeli rabbis has been actively involved in the underground baby trafficking trade and smuggling pregnant women from the occupied territories to the United States to sell their newborn babies there.

Great, we get to add child trafficking to the list of these wonderful people.

 

[Indeependent]

You mean the Europeans that converted to Judaism? Their homelands were the nations they were citizens of in Europe.

Sure, sweetie, whatever you say.
All the Catholics became Jews and all the Jews became Catholics.
You are a special type of insane.

Those in Palestine practicing other religions converted to Christianity in the years following the establishment of Christianity as the Roman state religion in the late 4th century, most people know that. They had to in order to live in Jerusalem and its enivrons.

Did you know there are other cities in Israel other than Jerusalem?
Did you know that the majority of Jews during both temples did not live in Jerusalem?
Do you realize how stupid you appear to be every time you infer that Jerusalem is the only city in ancient Israel?

Do you realize how stupid you are to not know that those that practiced Judaism converted to Christianity along with those that practiced Paganism and Samaritanism and other religions when Christianity became the Roman state religion? Even Zionist scholars know it.

Native Population almost wholly descended from Jews who had been forcibly converted to Christianity, and later Islam, not Arab in origin

In Palestine the "small" number of Arab invaders who had been imported by the Arabian conquerors were wiped out by disease. Thus the "myth" of the "Palestinian Arab" descending "from the Arab conquerors" appears to be factually incorrect for all but perhaps a few. Supporting Hogarth, Hitti, and Lewis, the Reverend Parkes found that

Native Population almost wholly descended from Jews who had been forcibly converted

No.

 

[Indeependent]

Those in Palestine practicing other religions converted to Christianity in the years following the establishment of Christianity as the Roman state religion in the late 4th century, most people know that. They had to in order to live in Jerusalem and its enivrons.

Did you know there are other cities in Israel other than Jerusalem?
Did you know that the majority of Jews during both temples did not live in Jerusalem?
Do you realize how stupid you appear to be every time you infer that Jerusalem is the only city in ancient Israel?

Do you realize how stupid you are to not know that those that practiced Judaism converted to Christianity along with those that practiced Paganism and Samaritanism and other religions when Christianity became the Roman state religion? Even Zionist scholars know it.

Native Population almost wholly descended from Jews who had been forcibly converted to Christianity, and later Islam, not Arab in origin

In Palestine the "small" number of Arab invaders who had been imported by the Arabian conquerors were wiped out by disease. Thus the "myth" of the "Palestinian Arab" descending "from the Arab conquerors" appears to be factually incorrect for all but perhaps a few. Supporting Hogarth, Hitti, and Lewis, the Reverend Parkes found that

Native Population almost wholly descended from Jews who had been forcibly converted

So you're whining because Jews are stealing land from Jews?

Stealing is stealing. It doesn't matter the perps or victims.

In this case, definitley perps.

 

[Hollie]

PressTV-‘Israeli rabbis involved in selling babies’

A recent report has revealed that a network of Israeli rabbis has been actively involved in the underground baby trafficking trade and smuggling pregnant women from the occupied territories to the United States to sell their newborn babies there.

Great, we get to add child trafficking to the list of these wonderful people.

Well, if you dun' seen it on PressTV, it must be true.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Former Princeton law professor and UN human rights investigator: ‘International law is with the Palestinians’

On “all the major issues, international law is strongly on the side of Palestinians,” stated former United Nations human rights investigator and emeritus professor of international law at Princeton university, Richard A. Falk.

During a conference titled “Palestine, Apartheid and Future” at Istanbul’s Sebahattin Zaim University on Wednesday 16 August, Falk clarified that “whether it is a matter of the illegal settlement, the blockade of Gaza, the annexation of Jerusalem, the diversion of water, the use of excessive force, very important issue, the right of return of refugees,” it is clear that international law is with the Palestinians.

Former Princeton law professor and UN human rights investigator: 'International law is with the Palestinians'

 

[Hollie]

Is Israel or Hamas Breaking International Law in Gaza?

Is Israel or Hamas Breaking International Law?


If one peers through the fog of talk and looks at how states act, one can discern the bottom-line legal positions that count. Few states are willing to sanction or penalize Israel for its treatment of Gaza. That’s because supporting Hamas could translate into legal precedents that do not serve states’ interests. If you think of the Palestinians in Gaza as members of Israel’s population, then support for Hamas means support for the principle that internal populations may rise up, demand independence, and use violent means if their demands are rejected. Does China want Tibetans to cite such a precedent? Do the Turks want that for the Kurds? No, they do not. States have accepted few restrictions in theory, and virtually none in practice, on their ability to deal with insurgencies and related threats by unhappy populations under their control. So whatever moral claims the Palestinians in Gaza might advance, and however much sympathy they gain in other countries, they will not find a real ally in international law.

 

[Hollie]

UN chief rejects Richard Falk's ESCWA report accusing Israel of 'apartheid' - UN Watch


U.N. chief Antonió Guterres rejected a report published by ECSWA, a Beirut-based agency of the world body— ECSWA—comprised entirely of 18 Arab states, which accuses Israel of “apartheid.”

The report’s chief author is Richard Falk, a former U.N. official who was condemned repeatedly by the UK and other governments for antisemitism.

In 2011, Falk was also denounced by his own boss, former U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon, for espousing 9/11 conspiracy theories which accused the U.S. government, instead of Al Qaeda, of perpetrating the 9/11 terror attacks.

The new report, said Guterres’ spokesman, “does not reflect the views of the Secretary‑General.”

U.S. ambassador Nikki Haley blasted the report, and called on the UN to withdraw it:

The United States is outraged by the report of the UN Economic and Social Commission for Western Asia (ESCWA). That such anti-Israel propaganda would come from a body whose membership nearly universally does not recognize Israel is unsurprising. That it was drafted by Richard Falk, a man who has repeatedly made biased and deeply offensive comments about Israel and espoused ridiculous conspiracy theories, including about the 9/11 terrorist attacks, is equally unsurprising. The United Nations Secretariat was right to distance itself from this report, but it must go further and withdraw the report altogether. The United States stands with our ally Israel and will continue to oppose biased and anti-Israel actions across the UN system and around the world.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Is Israel or Hamas Breaking International Law in Gaza?

Is Israel or Hamas Breaking International Law?


If one peers through the fog of talk and looks at how states act, one can discern the bottom-line legal positions that count. Few states are willing to sanction or penalize Israel for its treatment of Gaza. That’s because supporting Hamas could translate into legal precedents that do not serve states’ interests. If you think of the Palestinians in Gaza as members of Israel’s population, then support for Hamas means support for the principle that internal populations may rise up, demand independence, and use violent means if their demands are rejected. Does China want Tibetans to cite such a precedent? Do the Turks want that for the Kurds? No, they do not. States have accepted few restrictions in theory, and virtually none in practice, on their ability to deal with insurgencies and related threats by unhappy populations under their control. So whatever moral claims the Palestinians in Gaza might advance, and however much sympathy they gain in other countries, they will not find a real ally in international law.

This guy bases his conclusions on Israeli say so, not on actual facts.

 

[Hollie]

Is Israel or Hamas Breaking International Law in Gaza?

Is Israel or Hamas Breaking International Law?


If one peers through the fog of talk and looks at how states act, one can discern the bottom-line legal positions that count. Few states are willing to sanction or penalize Israel for its treatment of Gaza. That’s because supporting Hamas could translate into legal precedents that do not serve states’ interests. If you think of the Palestinians in Gaza as members of Israel’s population, then support for Hamas means support for the principle that internal populations may rise up, demand independence, and use violent means if their demands are rejected. Does China want Tibetans to cite such a precedent? Do the Turks want that for the Kurds? No, they do not. States have accepted few restrictions in theory, and virtually none in practice, on their ability to deal with insurgencies and related threats by unhappy populations under their control. So whatever moral claims the Palestinians in Gaza might advance, and however much sympathy they gain in other countries, they will not find a real ally in international law.

This guy bases his conclusions on Israeli say so, not on actual facts.

You base your nonsense claims on false premises buttressed by willful ignorance.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Is Israel or Hamas Breaking International Law in Gaza?

Is Israel or Hamas Breaking International Law?


If one peers through the fog of talk and looks at how states act, one can discern the bottom-line legal positions that count. Few states are willing to sanction or penalize Israel for its treatment of Gaza. That’s because supporting Hamas could translate into legal precedents that do not serve states’ interests. If you think of the Palestinians in Gaza as members of Israel’s population, then support for Hamas means support for the principle that internal populations may rise up, demand independence, and use violent means if their demands are rejected. Does China want Tibetans to cite such a precedent? Do the Turks want that for the Kurds? No, they do not. States have accepted few restrictions in theory, and virtually none in practice, on their ability to deal with insurgencies and related threats by unhappy populations under their control. So whatever moral claims the Palestinians in Gaza might advance, and however much sympathy they gain in other countries, they will not find a real ally in international law.

This guy bases his conclusions on Israeli say so, not on actual facts.

You base your nonsense claims on false premises buttressed by willful ignorance.

Not so. One of his first statements based on Israeli say so is:

Hamas had fired numerous missiles onto Israeli territory,...​

This is not true.

 

[Hollie]

Is Israel or Hamas Breaking International Law in Gaza?

Is Israel or Hamas Breaking International Law?


If one peers through the fog of talk and looks at how states act, one can discern the bottom-line legal positions that count. Few states are willing to sanction or penalize Israel for its treatment of Gaza. That’s because supporting Hamas could translate into legal precedents that do not serve states’ interests. If you think of the Palestinians in Gaza as members of Israel’s population, then support for Hamas means support for the principle that internal populations may rise up, demand independence, and use violent means if their demands are rejected. Does China want Tibetans to cite such a precedent? Do the Turks want that for the Kurds? No, they do not. States have accepted few restrictions in theory, and virtually none in practice, on their ability to deal with insurgencies and related threats by unhappy populations under their control. So whatever moral claims the Palestinians in Gaza might advance, and however much sympathy they gain in other countries, they will not find a real ally in international law.

This guy bases his conclusions on Israeli say so, not on actual facts.

You base your nonsense claims on false premises buttressed by willful ignorance.

Not so. One of his first statements based on Israeli say so is:

Hamas had fired numerous missiles onto Israeli territory,...​

This is not true.

It is true. You may wish to parade your ignorance like a Hamas terrorist parades his ski mask, but don't expect others not to point at laugh at your buffoonery.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Is Israel or Hamas Breaking International Law in Gaza?

Is Israel or Hamas Breaking International Law?


If one peers through the fog of talk and looks at how states act, one can discern the bottom-line legal positions that count. Few states are willing to sanction or penalize Israel for its treatment of Gaza. That’s because supporting Hamas could translate into legal precedents that do not serve states’ interests. If you think of the Palestinians in Gaza as members of Israel’s population, then support for Hamas means support for the principle that internal populations may rise up, demand independence, and use violent means if their demands are rejected. Does China want Tibetans to cite such a precedent? Do the Turks want that for the Kurds? No, they do not. States have accepted few restrictions in theory, and virtually none in practice, on their ability to deal with insurgencies and related threats by unhappy populations under their control. So whatever moral claims the Palestinians in Gaza might advance, and however much sympathy they gain in other countries, they will not find a real ally in international law.

This guy bases his conclusions on Israeli say so, not on actual facts.

You base your nonsense claims on false premises buttressed by willful ignorance.

Not so. One of his first statements based on Israeli say so is:

Hamas had fired numerous missiles onto Israeli territory,...​

This is not true.

It is true. You may wish to parade your ignorance like a Hamas terrorist parades his ski mask, but don't expect others not to point at laugh at your buffoonery.

Nice rant, but you made no attempt to refute my statement.

 

[Hollie]

Is Israel or Hamas Breaking International Law in Gaza?

Is Israel or Hamas Breaking International Law?


If one peers through the fog of talk and looks at how states act, one can discern the bottom-line legal positions that count. Few states are willing to sanction or penalize Israel for its treatment of Gaza. That’s because supporting Hamas could translate into legal precedents that do not serve states’ interests. If you think of the Palestinians in Gaza as members of Israel’s population, then support for Hamas means support for the principle that internal populations may rise up, demand independence, and use violent means if their demands are rejected. Does China want Tibetans to cite such a precedent? Do the Turks want that for the Kurds? No, they do not. States have accepted few restrictions in theory, and virtually none in practice, on their ability to deal with insurgencies and related threats by unhappy populations under their control. So whatever moral claims the Palestinians in Gaza might advance, and however much sympathy they gain in other countries, they will not find a real ally in international law.

This guy bases his conclusions on Israeli say so, not on actual facts.

You base your nonsense claims on false premises buttressed by willful ignorance.

Not so. One of his first statements based on Israeli say so is:

Hamas had fired numerous missiles onto Israeli territory,...​

This is not true.

It is true. You may wish to parade your ignorance like a Hamas terrorist parades his ski mask, but don't expect others not to point at laugh at your buffoonery.

Nice rant, but you made no attempt to refute my statement.

Nice dodge but your islamo-tap dance to avoid addressing my comments is pretty typical for you.

 

[louie888]

Hollie

He is correct. you never refuted...

Hamas had fired numerous missiles onto Israeli territory,...

This is not true.

 

[Hollie]

Hollie

He is correct. you never refuted...

Hamas had fired numerous missiles onto Israeli territory,...

This is not true.

You're clueless.

You are an accomplice to cluelessness. But, you knew that.

 

[louie888]

Nice refutation, thanks, I needed a giggle.

 

[Hollie]

Nice refutation, thanks, I needed a giggle.

Thanks. I knew you would shuffle off when you are confronted with an argument that goes over your head.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Is Israel or Hamas Breaking International Law in Gaza?

Is Israel or Hamas Breaking International Law?


If one peers through the fog of talk and looks at how states act, one can discern the bottom-line legal positions that count. Few states are willing to sanction or penalize Israel for its treatment of Gaza. That’s because supporting Hamas could translate into legal precedents that do not serve states’ interests. If you think of the Palestinians in Gaza as members of Israel’s population, then support for Hamas means support for the principle that internal populations may rise up, demand independence, and use violent means if their demands are rejected. Does China want Tibetans to cite such a precedent? Do the Turks want that for the Kurds? No, they do not. States have accepted few restrictions in theory, and virtually none in practice, on their ability to deal with insurgencies and related threats by unhappy populations under their control. So whatever moral claims the Palestinians in Gaza might advance, and however much sympathy they gain in other countries, they will not find a real ally in international law.

This guy bases his conclusions on Israeli say so, not on actual facts.

You base your nonsense claims on false premises buttressed by willful ignorance.

Not so. One of his first statements based on Israeli say so is:

Hamas had fired numerous missiles onto Israeli territory,...​

This is not true.

Hamas had fired numerous missiles onto Israeli territory,...

This is not true.

Where did the missiles go?

 

[Shusha]

According to Tinmore, Israel does not exist. So its literally impossible to fire rockets at Israel.