All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

Status
Not open for further replies.
With a gathering or world leaders for the Holocaust meet, one might expect islamic terrorists to stage attacks.




Sign up to the Daily Edition newsletter | The Times of Israel



WITH WORLD LEADERS GATHERED IN JERUSALEM
Egypt said involved in ‘intensive efforts’ to rein in Hamas, end balloon attacks

IDF beefs up defenses amid fears Gaza terror groups intend to fire rockets to disrupt international Holocaust meet on Thursday, avenge killing of 3 Palestinians
By TOI STAFF and AGENCIESToday, 1:21 am 1

A spokesman for the armed wing of Gaza-ruling Hamas terror group talks to the press in the town of Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, November 11, 2019. (AP Photo/ Hatem Moussa)
 
[ And British Christianity continues to show.....no need to wonder why ]

Prince Charles in Bethlehem: ‘It breaks my heart’ to see Palestinian suffering

Speech by heir to the UK throne, urging ‘freedom, justice, equality,’ described by TV station as ‘biggest show of support ever’ for the Palestinians by a member of the royal family

(full article online)

Prince Charles in Bethlehem: ‘It breaks my heart’ to see Palestinian suffering
 
Arab Sheikh Finds Shelter in Jewish Settlement



He's not the only one running from the PA death sentence,
but among the few who dared go public.
 
Last edited:
  • The head of Palestine’s de facto sitting government was in Malaysia for a courtesy visit to the country’s Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad
  • Hamas chief Ismail Haniyeh says the Trump administration’s ‘deal of the century’ will end any hope of a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict
Beware Trump’s ‘deal of the century’, warns Hamas chief in Malaysia




Palestine’s de facto head of government recently given the Bum’s Rush out of Gaza’istan by the Egyptian government is in a panic with the status quo in jeopardy,

Hamas has a decades old Islamic terrorist syndicate financed by UNRWA and a decades old criminal enterprise to protect. Their established Islamic terrorist infrastructure is under threat with any possible change to the status quo.
 
A new report issued on Monday by the research institute NGO Monitor found that eight Palestinian NGOs, which receive support from Western nations, maintain ties to the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), a terrorist organization.

NGO Monitor claimed that the Netherlands, Switzerland, Spain, Germany, France, Ireland, Norway, and Belgium funneled millions of dollars to the Palestinian groups. The support was not limited to EU countries as the US, Canada and Japan were also among the donors. UN-OCHA and UNICEF were among the international organizations who also donate.

Over 70 current and former staff, board members, and general assembly members, as well as senior management and founders at these NGOs have direct ties to the PFLP, the report found.

(full article online)

Western world nations support terror-linked Palestinian NGOs - report
 
WATCH: Incitement to Genocide of Jews
Widespread Inside
US Mosques

Exactly what happened in the mosques in France 15 years ago is happening today in the U.S., says Israeli investigative journalist and Arab Affairs expert Zvi Yehezkeli.

In this video, Yehezkeli, who went undercover in the U.S. last year, says anti-Semitism and incitement to genocide of Jews have become prevalent in mosques across the country, while the American government remains unaware.

The Jewish community has not responded either, he adds.

 
Territorial conflicts have existed throughout history. But the establishment of the United Nations, whose core principles include the inviolability of borders and the inadmissibility of the use of force to change them, led to the proliferation of protracted conflicts. Previously, sustained control over territory led to eventual acceptance of the prevailing power’s claims to sovereignty. Today, the United Nations prevents recognition of such claims but remains largely incapable of influencing the status quo, leaving territories in an enduring twilight zone. Such territories include, but are not limited to: Crimea, Donbas, Northern Cyprus, the West Bank, Kashmir, The Armenia-Azerbaijan Conflict, South Ossetia, Abkhazia, Transnistria, and Western Sahara.3

The problem is not simply that the United Nations, United States, European Union, private corporations, and NGOs act in a highly inconsistent manner. It is that their policies are selective and often reveal biases that underscore deeper problems in the international system. For example, Russia occupies territories the United States and European Union recognize as parts of Ukraine, Georgia, and Moldova, yet Crimea is the only Russian-occupied territory subject to Western sanctions. By contrast, products from Russian-controlled Transnistria enter the United States as products of Moldova, and the European Union allows Transnistria to enjoy the benefits of a trade agreement with Moldova. The United States and European Union demand specific labeling of goods produced in Jewish settlements in the West Bank and prohibit them from being labeled Israeli products. Yet products from Nagorno-Karabakh – which the United States and European Union recognize as part of Azerbaijan – freely enter Western markets labeled as products of Armenia.

Today, several occupying powers try to mask their control by setting up proxy regimes, such as the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) or similar entities in Transnistria and Nagorno-Karabakh. While these proxies do not secure international recognition, the fiction of their autonomy benefits the occupier. By contrast, countries that acknowledge their direct role in a territorial dispute tend to face greater external pressure than those that exercise control by proxy.

(full article online)

FDD | Occupied Elsewhere
 
Territorial conflicts have existed throughout history. But the establishment of the United Nations, whose core principles include the inviolability of borders and the inadmissibility of the use of force to change them, led to the proliferation of protracted conflicts. Previously, sustained control over territory led to eventual acceptance of the prevailing power’s claims to sovereignty. Today, the United Nations prevents recognition of such claims but remains largely incapable of influencing the status quo, leaving territories in an enduring twilight zone. Such territories include, but are not limited to: Crimea, Donbas, Northern Cyprus, the West Bank, Kashmir, The Armenia-Azerbaijan Conflict, South Ossetia, Abkhazia, Transnistria, and Western Sahara.3

The problem is not simply that the United Nations, United States, European Union, private corporations, and NGOs act in a highly inconsistent manner. It is that their policies are selective and often reveal biases that underscore deeper problems in the international system. For example, Russia occupies territories the United States and European Union recognize as parts of Ukraine, Georgia, and Moldova, yet Crimea is the only Russian-occupied territory subject to Western sanctions. By contrast, products from Russian-controlled Transnistria enter the United States as products of Moldova, and the European Union allows Transnistria to enjoy the benefits of a trade agreement with Moldova. The United States and European Union demand specific labeling of goods produced in Jewish settlements in the West Bank and prohibit them from being labeled Israeli products. Yet products from Nagorno-Karabakh – which the United States and European Union recognize as part of Azerbaijan – freely enter Western markets labeled as products of Armenia.

Today, several occupying powers try to mask their control by setting up proxy regimes, such as the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC) or similar entities in Transnistria and Nagorno-Karabakh. While these proxies do not secure international recognition, the fiction of their autonomy benefits the occupier. By contrast, countries that acknowledge their direct role in a territorial dispute tend to face greater external pressure than those that exercise control by proxy.

(full article online)

FDD | Occupied Elsewhere

Great article, Sixties.
 
Mahmoud Abbas’s map is a lie, as it suggests that the entire land, from the river to the sea (depicted on the first map), is, or was at some point, theirs, and that any proposal which involves a Jewish state within this territory, is, by definition, a Palestinian territorial compromise. It further falsely implies that the current US peace plan (represented by the fourth map) would grant them territory equal to 15% of “their” land. Palestinians who use this map are attempting to convince people that Jews have been gobbling up more and more “Palestinian land” by creating a false history in which Israel had supplanted a pre-existing Palestinian state.

However, the first map simply shows British Mandatory Palestine (minus Transjordan): that is, land controlled by the British from 1920-48, which previously was controlled by the Ottoman Turkish Empire. In fact, none of pre-1948 “Palestine” was ever under the political authority or Palestinians/Arabs.

The second map represents the 1947 UN Partition Plan, suggesting the borders of independent Arab (Palestinian) and Jewish states. Arab/Palestinian leadership rejected the plan, whilst the Jewish leadership accepted it. When Israel declared independence in May, 1948, these were the borders that were going to represent their state. However, Arabs, who opposed any independent Jewish state, launched a war of annihilation, which they lost and resulted in armistice lines that gave Israel more territory, depicted in the third map.

The third map represents the boundaries from 1949 until 1967, with the West Bank and east Jerusalem controlled by Jordan and Gaza controlled by Egypt. Neither country, during that time, created a Palestinian state in those territories. In June 1967, Arab armies again tried unsuccessfully to destroy the Jewish state. The Arab defeat resulted in Israeli control of the West Bank, Gaza and east Jerusalem. (Israel withdrew its military from large areas of the West Bank in the 90s, and completely withdrew from Gaza in 2005).

The fourth map is supposed to represent the current US peace offer, but even that represents a lie, as it omits the access roads connecting what would be Palestinian territory, as well as parts of southern Israel that would become part of Palestine.

(full article online)

://ukmediawatch.org/2020/02/02/daily-mail-legitimises-four-palestinian-maps-that-lie/
 
There's a PA sharia judge laying down the islamo-party line on who's naughty or nice.



Top PA official threatened: Whoever accepts Trump’s peace plan - "the filth of the century" - "will pay the price of treason" | PMW Analysis

Top PA official threatened: Whoever accepts Trump’s peace plan - "the filth of the century" - "will pay the price of treason"


Nan Jacques Zilberdik | Feb 4, 2020
  • Top PA official encouraged Martyrdom:
Better to fight and die as Martyrs than to accept Trump’s deal – “We welcome death for Allah”

A few days prior to US President Trump’s revelation of his peace plan, top PA official Mahmoud Al-Habbash, who is Supreme Shari’ah Judge and Chairman of the Supreme Council for Shari'ah Justice, warned that acceptance of Trump’s deal is “humiliating,” and “shameful,” and even threatened that whoever does accept it “will pay the price of treason.”
 
It seems the "Country of Pal'istan" (which, as we know was invented by the Treaty of Lausanne in 1924), is ramping up islamic terrorist attacks aimed at Israelis.

Drive-by shootings, car ramming, etc., all encouraged, aided and abetted by the government.

That sounds more like an islamic terrorist / organized crime syndicate than the expected islamic paradise where dreams come true.



Shooting attack in West Bank hours after Temple Mount attack

An Israeli soldier was wounded in a drive-by shooting attack near the West Bank settlement of Dolev in the third attack against Israeli troops in less than 12 hours.
 
Israel’s Foreign Minister Yisrael Katz congratulated Al-Jazeera presenter Faisal al-Qasim who said that “Zionism was the most successful project in the 20th century.”

Al-Qasim often publishes polls for his 5.5 million followers on Twitter on various issues.

In a previous tweet, al-Qasim commented that the Zionist project succeeded, unlike the failed Arab projects, an assertion that angered many of his followers “who considered the tweet a kind of praise for the Zionists.”

(full article online)

Al Jazeera Poll: 82 Percent Say ‘Israel More Advanced and Successful’ than Arab Regimes
 
According to the advertisement, the photo marathon will take place from March 22 to March 28 and “priority will be given to photographers who did not visit the occupied Palestinian territory previously.”

After the marathon, the photos will be exhibited in “Palestine and Europe.”

Matan Peleg, CEO of the pro-Israel watchdog organization Im Tirtzu, blasted the EU and called on it to end its “sick obsession” with Israel.

“This is yet another instance in which the European Union is using the hard-earned taxes of its citizens in order to slander and delegitimize Israel,” said Peleg.

“Instead, the EU should be asking what happened to the millions of euros they gave to the Palestinian Authority, other than going toward paying the salaries of terrorists,” continued Peleg.

(full article online)

New EU Project Invites Photographers to ‘Occupied Palestinian Territory’
 
The very latest Pali scam comes right outvof the Pallywood playbook.
Palestinian Fauxtography of the Day: Baby in the Box Edition



Palestinian Fauxtography of the Day: Baby in the Box Edition
By
David Lange
-
February 11, 2020
2310
A palestinian “journalist” has tweeted this heartbreaking photo from Gaza:



Except it isn’t – from Gaza, that is. It is from Idomeni, Greece.











Surely if Gaza was as bad as these propagandists claim, it should be easy to find an authentic photo from there, instead of constantly trying to pass of photos from other parts of the world
 
So I guess they will not be visiting Jewish communities? No balanced picture here, eh?

I cannot wait to see what photographs they will produce. Will they have someone throw rocks at IDF soldiers or taunt them in the way the Tamimi’s know best? That will surely produce some really good photographs of the “occupation army” at work.

Or perhaps they will photograph Jewish NGOers joining Arabs in planting young olive trees in their land-grabbing activism on behalf of the PA.

In any case, the candidate for the trip must send, together with his or her photography portfolio, a:

[Motivation letter (please include your motivation behind your participation and the means to be employed to ensure a wide dissemination of the outcome of this visit in Europe)]

Now, I would love to see the submitted motivation letters. Will we see overt or covert hatred of the Jews (disguised as hatred of Israel in the latter case)? Perhaps it will be more in terms of love for the underdog, in this case, the poor Arabs who have not been successful in getting rid of the Jews in what they consider Islamic land.

In a press release,

Matan Peleg, CEO of the pro-Israel watchdog organization Im Tirtzu, blasted the EU and called it to end its “sick obsession” with Israel.

This is yet another instance in which the European Union is using the hard-earned taxes of its citizens in order to slander and delegitimize Israel, said Peleg.

Instead the EU should be asking what happened to the millions of euros they gave to the Palestinian Authority, other than going toward paying the salaries of terrorists,” continued Peleg.

The EU needs to end its sick obsession with the Jewish state and stop funding anti-Israel projects and NGOs. Israel is not a punching bag for them to take out their anti-Semitic aggression on, concluded Peleg.

Maybe one day, instead of “#EU4PALESTINE”, we will see: #EU4TIBET or #EU4CHRISTIANSOFNIGERIA or any of the other true occupations or ongoing genocides around the globe.

(full article online)

Is This the EU's Response to Birthright? | Israel Diaries
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top