All Doubts About Obama....Removed.

No. Liberal stupidity frustration alert.

You ******* idiots got your asses handed to you on the 4th and you still won't learn. Your ideologies were rejected hook, line and sinker.

Right right, except in the national election, where 59% of voters voted Dems won handily. Compared to this years abysmal 39%.
 
"Reagan and Bush Offer No Precedent for Obama's Amnesty Order

If facts are your "stock in trade", why are you parroting utter bullshit about Obama's EO being an "amnesty order"?
 
Facts are my stock in trade.

The proof of same is that you are not able to find anything I've posted that isn't false.

The same, of course, cannot be said of your posts.
facts are your stock in trade - and yet before seeing the contents of an executive order or viewing the legal justification for it you're going to declare it unconsitutional.

no, facts are not your stock in trade - although that bolded statement may be the most true thing you've ever said.





"Reagan and Bush Offer No Precedent for Obama's Amnesty Order
Reagan and Bush acted in conjunction with Congress and in furtherance of a congressional purpose."
Reagan and Bush Offer No Precedent for Obama s Amnesty Order - The Atlantic
great! Thats not what Obama is doing...So we can move on from this
 
How is giving 5million illegal immigrants immunity from deportation not giving 5million illegal immigrants defacto amnesty? I'm missing the difference between this EO and defacto amnesty.
 
Boy, I bet the people who have had all their doubts removed by their biased media outlets just can't WAIT to slam me to smithereens when Obama's EO comes out so they can show me the amnesty section. I bet they will be panting like little dogs for its arrival on their monitors. They will jump all over that thing and read it and then rush here to crush me.

It's going to be a great day for them.
 
How is giving 5million illegal immigrants immunity from deportation not giving 5million illegal immigrants defacto amnesty? I'm missing the difference between this EO and defacto amnesty.
The backpedaling begins.

It's nice to see the facts are finally leaking through that there will be no path to citizenship or legal status in Obama's EO.

Hey, can you tell us the difference between a stay of execution for a retrial and a pardon which releases a death row inmate from prison?

It's like that.
 
It's funny, really. A hack media outlet says Obama is granting amnesty, and the rubes don't question it. They drink it right up, never asking for proof, and they won't read the EO when it becomes available so as to avoid having their fantasy shattered.

bi80le.jpg

Blah blah blah, USA Today stated that Obama's EO may give citizenship to millions. There are rubes on both sides.
Link?

Ok, here is the photo of the USA Today article, I erred when I said it claimed to give citizenship, but as to your post, it does claim amnesty does it not? Of course if you want to claim that USA Today is a hack media outlet then you win because I can't argue that. There are as I stated, rubes on both sides.
 

Attachments

  • image.webp
    image.webp
    282.3 KB · Views: 66
Damn, we went and executed that guy and it turns out he was innocent.

Damn, we deported that guy and Congress went and passed legislation which would have given him a path to citizenship.

Like that.
 
How is giving 5million illegal immigrants immunity from deportation not giving 5million illegal immigrants defacto amnesty? I'm missing the difference between this EO and defacto amnesty.
The backpedaling begins.

It's nice to see the facts are finally leaking through that there will be no path to citizenship or legal status in Obama's EO.

Hey, can you tell us the difference between a stay of execution for a retrial and a pardon which releases a death row inmate from prison?

It's like that.
I'm not backpedaling. Who said Obama's defacto amnesty declarations were anything more than a temporary stays? Course while these 5million are on our soil they are having "Americano" babies, god bless them, and many are sucking on the democrat laid out welfare teat, and some of them are even being given voter registration cards and voting.
 
And USA Today does say "Legal Status". That rag is definitely not a right wing newspaper.
Obama's EO will grant neither legal status nor a path to citizenship, which is what amnesty is.

It will defer deportation of those who will probably receive a path to citizenship or legal status once the Republicans get to work and do what the American people are telling them to do.
 
How is giving 5million illegal immigrants immunity from deportation not giving 5million illegal immigrants defacto amnesty? I'm missing the difference between this EO and defacto amnesty.
The backpedaling begins.

It's nice to see the facts are finally leaking through that there will be no path to citizenship or legal status in Obama's EO.

Hey, can you tell us the difference between a stay of execution for a retrial and a pardon which releases a death row inmate from prison?

It's like that.
I'm not backpedaling. Who said Obama's defacto amnesty declarations were anything more than a temporary stays? Course while these 5million are on our soil they are having "Americano" babies, god bless them, and many are sucking on the democrat laid out welfare teat, and some of them are even being given voter registration cards and voting.
A temporary stay is not amnesty. Simple as that.

The hacks have been screaming "amnesty" like good little bird brain parrots.
 
How is giving 5million illegal immigrants immunity from deportation not giving 5million illegal immigrants defacto amnesty? I'm missing the difference between this EO and defacto amnesty.

He will only be able to protect them for 2 years at most. That is of course unless Congress can pass some kind of, er, um, what is it that Congress is suppose to do? Oh Yeah, pass laws........
 
And USA Today does say "Legal Status". That rag is definitely not a right wing newspaper.
I'd fire the editor and the reporter who allowed such a blatant error to appear on the front page.
 
And USA Today does say "Legal Status". That rag is definitely not a right wing newspaper.
Yes, they are being given a "temporary" legal status. Some / many of them will be given permanent legal status if they say the right words, such as "I fear for my life if I go back." Ding ding... give that illegal a voter card, welfare, and permanent status as a political refugee. Course before that happens we will have to spend about 50-100k on each illegal to make them feel comfortable while we are telling them how to become a refugee.
 
15th post
How is giving 5million illegal immigrants immunity from deportation not giving 5million illegal immigrants defacto amnesty? I'm missing the difference between this EO and defacto amnesty.

He will only be able to protect them for 2 years at most. That is of course unless Congress can pass some kind of, er, um, what is it that Congress is suppose to do? Oh Yeah, pass laws........
And what happens when his army of lawyers prove that 4million of the 5million are political refugees? See Cuban and Haitian boat lifts.
 
And USA Today does say "Legal Status". That rag is definitely not a right wing newspaper.
Obama's EO will grant neither legal status nor a path to citizenship, which is what amnesty is.

It will defer deportation of those who will probably receive a path to citizenship or legal status once the Republicans get to work and do what the American people are telling them to do.

That's all fine and dandy, but my point about USA Today was your contention that those of us on the right were rubes and believed what our right wing media outlets tell us. I pointed out that there are rubes on both sides and media outlets on both sides that are saying "amnesty", "legal status", all the things that the EO May or may not be.

Hallucinations? That's just bull shit.
 
. Some / many of them will be given permanent legal status if they say the right words, such as "I fear for my life if I go back." Ding ding... give that illegal a voter card, welfare, and permanent status as a political refugee.

That is already in the law. That has nothing to do with Obama's EO.
 
And USA Today does say "Legal Status". That rag is definitely not a right wing newspaper.
Obama's EO will grant neither legal status nor a path to citizenship, which is what amnesty is.

It will defer deportation of those who will probably receive a path to citizenship or legal status once the Republicans get to work and do what the American people are telling them to do.

That's all fine and dandy, but my point about USA Today was you contention that those of us on the right were rubes and believed what our right wing media outlets tell us. I pointed out that there are rubes on both sides and media outlets on both sides that are saying "amnesty", "legal status", all the things that the EO May or may not be.

Hallucinations? That's just bull shit.
Oh, I most certainly do not dispute there are rubes on both sides. In other topics, you will find me kicking left wing rubes in the nuts. Rubes on both sides are dragging this country under.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom