Marener
Platinum Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 26,868
- 12,610
- 973
The people of the United States whom they attempted to defraud.How so? Who are the victims?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The people of the United States whom they attempted to defraud.How so? Who are the victims?
Probably in the post from you I quoted back to you and called a lie.
Geez dude. This is like talking to a child.
Actually I also explained why it was a lie.Liar. Gee, that was easy.
Like the 74 million voters Congress disenfranchised by not investigating the election? When is their trial?The people of the United States whom they attempted to defraud.
WTF are you talking about? Since those 74 million voters had their votes counted, they weren't disenfranchised at all.Like the 74 million voters Congress disenfranchised by not investigating the election? When is their trial?
See. Look at you pretending a misspelling is something more because you don't have an argument for why Trump being indicted and charged isn't actually an indication of criminality.Naw and just because you're stupid, doesn't mean I have to listen to your garbage. You don't know the difference between repel and rappel but you think you're a legal scholar. LMFAO.
1) Using a word that has no relation to the meaning you wish to convey is not a "misspelling"See. Look at you pretending a misspelling is something more because you don't have an argument for why Trump being indicted and charged isn't actually an indication of criminality.
I didn't say a charge indicates guilt you illiterate dipshit, I suggested it indicates criminality. It's hard to argue being a fraudulent elector or plotting to present fraudulent electors isn't a crime when people have already pled guilty in court for their role and have admitted to doing just that. You imagine we're here debating with you whether it is a crime. Newsflash, it is. People have already begun cooperating with prosecutions with regards to that crime. That isn't in dispute. That's objective reality. We're here trying to explain to you thick Bingos exactly why it is a crime. Since you seem confused.1) Using a word that has no relation to the meaning you wish to convey is not a "misspelling"
2) This is America--We are INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. A charge means NOTHING as you morons are soon to find out. Please stop trying to be a legal scholar, it makes you look stupid---oh wait
So fucking what? Did it happen? Could it have? We will never know but none of it was illegal.WTF are you talking about? Since those 74 million voters had their votes counted, they weren't disenfranchised at all.
Not like the millions of Americans Trump tried to disenfranchise by clearing out their votes with his fake electors. Read the Eastman memo. You clearly never have.
DocumentCloud
www.documentcloud.org
My pejoratives don't change the fact that people have already pled guilty to this scheme. That Trump is begging the Supreme Court to offer him immunity because being the President makes him a special little Snowflake, isn't going to help any of these other low level fucktards who don't have a chance at Presidential immunity.You should learn to use a dictionary--they were ALTERNATE electors. The msm is not a dictionary. BTW, just run along, you lost it when you resorted to pejoratives because you were incapable of making a logical point. Baseless accusations are not a point either.
All of it was illegal and an attempt to deprive Americans of their votes.So fucking what? Did it happen? Could it have? We will never know but none of it was illegal.
Take a break. This was already covered in the post re: there is already a process in place for presidential "high crimes and misdemeanors" It is called impeachment--as opposed to kangaroo court political persecution. Now go back to your basement and study Mr. Outhouse legal scholar.My pejoratives don't change the fact that people have already pled guilty to this scheme. That Trump is begging the Supreme Court to offer him immunity because being the President makes him a special little Snowflake, isn't going to help any of these other low level fucktards who don't have a chance at Presidential immunity.
All of it was illegal and an attempt to deprive Americans of their votes.
The fact that you don't care shows us that laws mean nothing to you.
I showed you the Trump conspiracy to deprive millions of Americans of their votes.
That's the process to remove corrupt sitting Presidents from office. Criminal prosecution is how we deal corrupt people, even if they happened to have been President that one time.Take a break. This was already covered in the post re: there is already a process in place for presidential "high crimes and misdemeanors" It is called impeachment--as opposed to kangaroo court political persecution. Now go back to your basement and study Mr. Outhouse legal scholar.
Yes it was because it did not happen and if it did the courts you talk about so much would have to decide. There was no crime. You people protest too much and it is going to fuck you up.I showed you the Trump conspiracy to deprive millions of Americans of their votes.
Your response was:
"So fucking what"
It's okay to break the law if someone catches you first.Yes it was because it did not happen and if it did the courts you talk about so much would have to decide. There was no crime. You people protest too much and it is going to fuck you up.
I am saying the legality of what they might have done has not been determined. Until it is there is no crime. You are trying to say if Trump remained president it would not have been challenged in court? That would not have happened.It's okay to break the law if someone catches you first.
That's your claim here.
You don't give a shit about the law. "So fucking what" is exactly what you said.