This is what lawfare looks like.

[berg80]

If we're going to hold that standard, then the liberals can stop calling J6 an insurrection. It's now been downgraded to just a protest.

You can call it anything you like. It doesn't change the historical record of what happened.

 

[Papageorgio]

Well, that's the opposite of what's happening but your failure to comprehend the situation does not surprise me.

No it isn’t, it is common but your lack of knowledge is not surprising.

 

[postman]

So Comey is playing games.

No, the government is playing games.
None of the charges in the indictment involve classified material.

The government is just using classified material to slow down the process, because of the special way classified material is handled in federal court.

The government is stalling, because they know the faster Comey gets to a jury, the faster his innocence is proven.

 

[PeanutGallery]

Well, that's the opposite of what's happening but your failure to comprehend the situation does not surprise me.

And your reading comprehension of the conversation that I was responding to fails you, but then again, it is you we're talking about. Nobody will mistake you as having intellectual gravitas.

 

[postman]

the Classified Information Procedures Act (CIPA). See Title 18, U.S.C. App III.

CIPA is a procedural statute; it neither adds to nor detracts from the substantive rights of the defendant or the discoery obligations of the government. Rather, the procedure for making these determinations is different in that it balances the right of a criminal defendant with the right of the sovereign to know in advance of a potential threat from a criminal prosecution to its national security.

 

[berg80]

And your reading comprehension of the conversation that I was responding to fails you, but then again, it is you we're talking about. Nobody will mistake you as having intellectual gravitas.

If gratuitous insults are all you have I'll just move on.

II.

The government’s defamation of lead defense counsel provides no basis
to grant the government’s motion.

The government’s assertion that Mr. Comey “used current lead defense
counsel to improperly disclose classified information,” and the implicit assertion
lead defense counsel and Mr. Comey engaged in criminal activity by doing so, is provably false and in any event provides no basis to grant the motion to
expedite.

 

[dudmuck]

LOL, Moron-er apparently didn't look at the make up of the No Kings protestors yesterday. Lines of retirement home busses delivering folks that Soros paid to come protest. The fact that most of them thought they were going for a day in the park doesn't seem to matter.

 

[berg80]

Court rejects Virginia redistricting in a blow to Democrats' counter to Trump, GOP​

The Supreme Court of Virginia on Friday struck down the congressional redistricting approved by voters in April. The ruling is a major setback for Democrats' attempt to counter the pro-GOP reshuffling of voting maps led by President Trump.

Commonwealth voters last month approved — by a 52% to 48% margin — a constitutional amendment to allow redistricting. But responding to a lawsuit brought by Republicans, the Virginia high court found that the Democratic-led legislature made procedural errors in how it placed the question on the ballot.

https://www.npr.org/2026/05/08/nx-s1-5805193/redistricting-virginia-trump-midterms

Ironic, isn't it, that Dems in VA tried to do the right thing by seeking the approval of the voters rather than pass legislation like Repub states have done.

One side having respect for the democratic process while the other tries to rig the midterms.

 

[Delldude]

BTW, I take it as a point of personal pride when the minions don't reply cuz they are too afraid to engage on the subject.

Not to ruin your day.....

FBI investigation says Trump was correct....then what?

Mass suicide on the left?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Court rejects Virginia redistricting in a blow to Democrats' counter to Trump, GOP​

The Supreme Court of Virginia on Friday struck down the congressional redistricting approved by voters in April. The ruling is a major setback for Democrats' attempt to counter the pro-GOP reshuffling of voting maps led by President Trump.

Commonwealth voters last month approved — by a 52% to 48% margin — a constitutional amendment to allow redistricting. But responding to a lawsuit brought by Republicans, the Virginia high court found that the Democratic-led legislature made procedural errors in how it placed the question on the ballot.

https://www.npr.org/2026/05/08/nx-s1-5805193/redistricting-virginia-trump-midterms

Ironic, isn't it, that Dems in VA tried to do the right thing by seeking the approval of the voters rather than pass legislation like Repub states have done.

One side having respect for the democratic process while the other tries to rig the midterms.

they had no choice the constitution of Virginia spells out how to change it. They couldnt just do it in thee legislature and they had to wait to hold the vote till after the election. They didnt do that the Court was right on its ruling.

You guys are retarded that you cant understand that at all.

 

[westwall]

Court rejects Virginia redistricting in a blow to Democrats' counter to Trump, GOP​

The Supreme Court of Virginia on Friday struck down the congressional redistricting approved by voters in April. The ruling is a major setback for Democrats' attempt to counter the pro-GOP reshuffling of voting maps led by President Trump.

Commonwealth voters last month approved — by a 52% to 48% margin — a constitutional amendment to allow redistricting. But responding to a lawsuit brought by Republicans, the Virginia high court found that the Democratic-led legislature made procedural errors in how it placed the question on the ballot.

https://www.npr.org/2026/05/08/nx-s1-5805193/redistricting-virginia-trump-midterms

Ironic, isn't it, that Dems in VA tried to do the right thing by seeking the approval of the voters rather than pass legislation like Repub states have done.

One side having respect for the democratic process while the other tries to rig the midterms.

The dems tried to turn a purple state into a blue one through political corruption.

They have already done that in 6 states. Now the repubs are finally fighting back, and you cry like a little girl.

 

[DonGlock26]

The dems tried to turn a purple state into a blue one through political corruption.

They have already done that in 6 states. Now the repubs are finally fighting back, and you cry like a little girl.

It's about time the GOP found its back bone.

 

[struth]

Court rejects Virginia redistricting in a blow to Democrats' counter to Trump, GOP​

The Supreme Court of Virginia on Friday struck down the congressional redistricting approved by voters in April. The ruling is a major setback for Democrats' attempt to counter the pro-GOP reshuffling of voting maps led by President Trump.

Commonwealth voters last month approved — by a 52% to 48% margin — a constitutional amendment to allow redistricting. But responding to a lawsuit brought by Republicans, the Virginia high court found that the Democratic-led legislature made procedural errors in how it placed the question on the ballot.

https://www.npr.org/2026/05/08/nx-s1-5805193/redistricting-virginia-trump-midterms

Ironic, isn't it, that Dems in VA tried to do the right thing by seeking the approval of the voters rather than pass legislation like Repub states have done.

One side having respect for the democratic process while the other tries to rig the midterms.

If the Dems in Va had respect for the democratic process they wouldn’t of violated the law in trying to get their redistricting map through

 

[Papageorgio]

Court rejects Virginia redistricting in a blow to Democrats' counter to Trump, GOP​

The Supreme Court of Virginia on Friday struck down the congressional redistricting approved by voters in April. The ruling is a major setback for Democrats' attempt to counter the pro-GOP reshuffling of voting maps led by President Trump.

Commonwealth voters last month approved — by a 52% to 48% margin — a constitutional amendment to allow redistricting. But responding to a lawsuit brought by Republicans, the Virginia high court found that the Democratic-led legislature made procedural errors in how it placed the question on the ballot.

https://www.npr.org/2026/05/08/nx-s1-5805193/redistricting-virginia-trump-midterms

Ironic, isn't it, that Dems in VA tried to do the right thing by seeking the approval of the voters rather than pass legislation like Repub states have done.

One side having respect for the democratic process while the other tries to rig the midterms.

Apparently they didn’t try to do the right thing because the court rejected it. That’s funny!

 

[Dante]

meh

co_conspirators

 

[Dante]

Apparently they didn’t try to do the right thing because the court rejected it. That’s funny!

The court rejected it for what reason? Not for any inane reasons your able to claim here

 

[berg80]

they had no choice the constitution of Virginia spells out how to change it.

Here's the thing that tells you you're wrong. The vote was 4-3. If one justice had a different opinion the vote by the people would have been sustained.

So there was a choice in the matter............and the people lost.

 

[berg80]

Virginia Officials Ask Supreme Court to Restore Voting Map Drawn by Democrats​

Democratic leaders in Virginia asked the Supreme Court on Monday to allow the state to use a congressional map drawn by Democrats and approved by voters in a referendum in April.

In an emergency application, the state’s attorney general and other officials urged the justices to overturn a decision by the Virginia Supreme Court, which ruled last week that the redistricting process had violated the state’s Constitution, a major setback for Democrats in a fierce battle over which party will control the U.S. House.

In their filing on Monday, Virginia state officials claimed that the ruling by the state’s Supreme Court had amounted to “judicial defiance” of the will of the voters to create a new district map. The officials asserted that the state court was “deeply mistaken” on “critical issues of federal law with profound practical importance to the nation.”

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/05/11/us/politics/supreme-court-virginia-redistricting.html?campaign_id=60&emc=edit_na_20260511&instance_id=175432&nl=breaking-news&regi_id=65145149&segment_id=219692&user_id=fecdfdffdaaa11107b72f0f4f6e429cc

I had a bit of a chuckle at the idea the conservatives on the Court would rule against the R's. Not with the most radically partisan court since Dred Scott.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

The court rejected it for what reason? Not for any inane reasons your able to claim here

they rejected it because it violates the constitution dumb ass.

 

[Papageorgio]

The court rejected it for what reason? Not for any inane reasons your able to claim here

I never stated a reason, got anything else or are you going to continue to be your usual moronic self?