Dot Com
Nullius in verba
Good questionHow can there be any more melting if global warming stopped in 1998 and almost every bit of the data are falsified?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Good questionHow can there be any more melting if global warming stopped in 1998 and almost every bit of the data are falsified?
As bad as a threat to the infrastructure is, the threat of melting clathrates, or frozen methane deposits, is far worse. Methane converts to O2 and CO2 in the atmosphere, and melting permafrost all over the world is going to trigger Runaway Global Warming, where it won't matter if we stop ALL burning of fossil fuels over night, Global Warming will increase on a feedback loop and the oceans will rise 300 feet or more.
Its likely already too late as we passed the 400 ppm of CO2 a year ago and 350 ppm was thought to be the max at which catastrophe could be avoided.
Ignore the bugwits that deny Global Warming, every human being on Earth is going to get a detailed horrific education on it in the next few years.
I also wonder the Medieval Warm Period, which was supposedly global and toasty hot, had no effect on the permafrost. But then, that's only a problem for the deniers, as they're the only ones claiming the MWP was global.
A wonderful thing about climate science is how everything fits together. Each discipline reinforces the others. The poor deniers, OTOH, have to kludge together a mess of contradicting conspiracy theories.
How can there be any more melting if global warming stopped in 1998 and almost every bit of the data are falsified?
That is apparent, yes.I also wonder the Medieval Warm Period, which was supposedly global and toasty hot, had no effect on the permafrost. But then, that's only a problem for the deniers, as they're the only ones claiming the MWP was global.
A wonderful thing about climate science is how everything fits together. Each discipline reinforces the others. The poor deniers, OTOH, have to kludge together a mess of contradicting conspiracy theories.
If it weren't global...why do you suppose it left such a strong signal in the vostok ice cores...taken in antarctica?
And I tell you what hairball...you name a geographical region...and I will provide you with multiple peer reviewed, published studies that find that the MWP was warmer than the present.
How can there be any more melting if global warming stopped in 1998 and almost every bit of the data are falsified?
I also wonder the Medieval Warm Period, which was supposedly global and toasty hot, had no effect on the permafrost. But then, that's only a problem for the deniers, as they're the only ones claiming the MWP was global.
A wonderful thing about climate science is how everything fits together. Each discipline reinforces the others. The poor deniers, OTOH, have to kludge together a mess of contradicting conspiracy theories.
Good questionHow can there be any more melting if global warming stopped in 1998 and almost every bit of the data are falsified?
They've found MWP signatures in proxies from EVERY continent on the planet.
They've found MWP signatures in proxies from EVERY continent on the planet.
Again, no. A short temp spike at some single location in that period is not a "MWP proxy". The temperature going up for that whole period would be a MWP proxy. That's not there.
They've found MWP signatures in proxies from EVERY continent on the planet.
Again, no. A short temp spike at some single location in that period is not a "MWP proxy". The temperature going up for that whole period would be a MWP proxy. That's not there.
It didn't. That would be a denier myth.
They've found MWP signatures in proxies from EVERY continent on the planet.
Again, no. A short temp spike at some single location in that period is not a "MWP proxy". The temperature going up for that whole period would be a MWP proxy. That's not there.
do you know how long it takes for permafrost to melt? NopeHow can there be any more melting if global warming stopped in 1998 and almost every bit of the data are falsified?