Again, why did Kamala lose?

[FA_Q2]

She was a lousy candidate. Democrats knew it, but were forced to go along with it, because no one wanted to be seen as the one getting in the way of a woman of color.

I wonder if that was the driving force behind them unifying around her so quickly. That would explain a bit.

 

[berg80]

She lost because it was impossible for any thinking person to trust her 11th hour switches in positions

PROJECTION ALERT!

 

[berg80]

She lost because it was impossible for any thinking person to trust her 11th hour switches in positions on so many things and because all thinking people knew in their gut that she would continue the march toward totalitarianism we have seen for some time now. And likely millions who aren't politically savvy enough to come from that perspective were savvy enough to know their lives were not better under Obama/Biden or Biden/Harris. And their lives were better under Trump.

If you're honest you'd admit you have no idea what trump is actually going to do other than order the DoJ to void his indictments.

 

[Billiejeens]

I wonder if that was the driving force behind them unifying around her so quickly. That would explain a bit.

Of course it was

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Because people largely ignorant, are easily manipulated by snake oil salesmen and belive all kinds of bullshit like you do.

This is the typical response. If America chooses Trump, then America is stupid, America is racist, America hates women, America loves Hitler, America is fascist, blah blah blah.

 

[Woodznutz]

Because people largely ignorant, are easily manipulated by snake oil salesmen and belive all kinds of bullshit like you do.

Naw. Kamala was focused on a Pollyana future while ignoring the mess America is facing. She blithely painted her version of "Kamalot" which was unrealistic from the get-go.

Take the $50,000 tax credit for startups. Only startups that show a profit could take advantage of that, 90 percent of which will fail. She was incentivizing failure while at the same time castigating successful businesses who are able to pay new hires good wages and benefits immediately. Half of her campaign centered on things economic, things that she clearly doesn't understand.

 

[Rogue AI]

It did. Trump lost the only election he ever ran against a guy - Biden who was a weak campaigner. He beat Nikki, Kamala, and Hillary.

And DeSantis, Jeb Bush, Chris Cristy, the list goes on. You are simply wrong.

 

[Edgetho]

Liberals voted for her mainly because she was a woman, and a POC.
She had no qualifications or experience to recommend her.
She had no realistic policy plans.
She was unable to articulate the few ideas that she did have.
She was asking America to buy "a pig in a poke" (no insult intended).
She was not charismatic, and barely likeable and too elitist for middle America.

Again, why did Kamala lose?​

Because dimocraps SUCK.

Not being smart-alec. They just do. For decades, most Conservatives stayed out of politics. It is a nasty business and most of us just let the Vultures fight it out among themselves. Including Republicans. They mostly suck, too.

But dimocraps changed. They went from the slightly corrupt, slight socialist FDR to the full-blown socialist "Command Economy" Fascists they are today.

Republicans haven't changed all that much but we has our share of asswipes. The Bush Boys, Cheney, The Turtle, Mitch the Bitch but overall, they were mostly ineffectual cucks.

Then the Bastard Son of Frank Marshall Davis came along.

FDR might not have like our economic system in 1932. A lot of people didn't. Capitalism had failed all of us. But he loved the Country. So did Truman. So did JFK, who was the very last Democrat. The Peanut was an idiot but he still loved the Country. Bill The Rapist Clinton didn't love anything. Not his country and certainly not The People of the USA.

The Bastard Son of Frank Marshall Davis? He HATED our Country. Still does. Not only hated the Country, hated The People as well. Sill does.

He manipulated Ubercunt -- A Major, Major America Hater, into the nomination in 2016 and in 2020 put Sponge Brains Shits Pants in Office.

I don't know if Biden Hates the USA as much as obama or not. I doubt it. But he was never his own man. Just like Kamaltoe was never her own woman. Puppets on a string.

People saw through it. Why would people elect someone who hates them?

Even the dimocrap scum that vote for them. They hate them, they look down their noses at them even more than they do us.

And why not? Spineless, gutless, lazy, stupid, dishonest sell-outs. They're just there for the Free Shit™ and dimocrap scum politicians know it. They'll back-stab them faster than they can see coming. dimocrap scum back-stabbed Black Males, Hispanics, women, Muzzies, even their own President.

Why would people vote for back-stabbing scum?

So conservatives decided they had to get off their asses and vote and, more importantly, to keep dimocrap scum from cheating enough to steal this election, too.

I'm bored now

 

[Woodznutz]

She lost because it was impossible for any thinking person to trust her 11th hour switches in positions on so many things and because all thinking people knew in their gut that she would continue the march toward totalitarianism we have seen for some time now. And likely millions who aren't politically savvy enough to come from that perspective were savvy enough to know their lives were not better under Obama/Biden or Biden/Harris. And their lives were better under Trump.

And there also millions who strongly opposed a political party whose No. 1 agenda item is a right to kill your unborn baby for ANY reason, who approved horrible policies like DEI and CRT, taking parental rights away so that children could be transgendered, who condoned vulgar entertainment and obscene parades for kids, etc.

Hopefully it is a new day in America and for the foreseeable future all of that will become a distant ugly memory.

I'm very hopeful. If Trump is anywhere close to normal, he will want a positive legacy. He can only obtain that by being a good president for the whole nation. That said he still has to crack a few eggs in order make his omelet. I think that one of his strengths is the ability to prioritize things, something that Kamala lacked. Kamala thought that dessert should be served first instead of the meat and potatoes.

 

[FA_Q2]

I'm very hopeful. If Trump is anywhere close to normal, he will want a positive legacy. He can only obtain that by being a good president for the whole nation. That said he still has to crack a few eggs in order make his omelet. I think that one of his strengths is the ability to prioritize things, something that Kamala lacked. Kamala thought that dessert should be served first instead of the meat and potatoes.

I am not. Trump is massively vindictive. I expect much of the administration to be used as a cudgel to get back at anyone he is unhappy with starting with Biden/Harris and Zelensky.

 

[jotathought]

There were two main reasons. 1. She is a woman. 2. People are blaming the administration for item prices

She is divisive, she is radical with her policy positions, she wasn't selected by the people, she didn't connect with Americans, she didn't answer questions to provide any level of depth, she relied on abortion and "but Trump" in her movie set of a campaign -- which was fake and catered by the elite.

I'm one of the popular vote, and I approve this message.

 

[Edgetho]

I am not. Trump is massively vindictive. I expect much of the administration to be used as a cudgel to get back at anyone he is unhappy with starting with Biden/Harris and Zelensky.

I pray you are right

 

[Edgetho]

She is divisive, she is radical with her policy positions, she wasn't selected by the people, she didn't connect with Americans, she didn't answer questions to provide any level of depth, she relied on abortion and "but Trump" in her movie set of a campaign -- which was fake and catered by the elite.

I'm one of the popular vote, and I approve this message.

Song for dimocrap scum today --

elo telephone line - Search Videos

www.bing.com

 

[Mac1958]

The biggest reasons were the same two reasons discussed throughout the campaign: Inflation and the border. Voters blamed her and the party for both.

The secondary reason was America's general opinion of the Dems right now.

 

[Couchpotato]

She was a terrible candidate with extreme policy views, divisive and chose to hang out with the elite, blame Trump for everything, while not answering questions to relate to the American people she was supposed to represent. Throw on top that the candidate the people voted for was thrown out of office and the new candidate was selected by Democrat leadership.

Actually her inability to stick to a policy position and/or articulate why she "evolved" other than political expediency hurt her a lot. She needed to be the change candidate but never said how she would have been different than Biden. She's just not very likable. She's terrible on the border.

 

[Foxfyre]

If you're honest you'd admit you have no idea what trump is actually going to do other than order the DoJ to void his indictments.

We have four years of experience with Donald Trump and almost all of that was exemplary. No reason to think the next four years won't be a repeat and improvement on that.

 

[jotathought]

Actually her inability to stick to a policy position and/or articulate why she "evolved" other than political expediency hurt her a lot. She needed to be the change candidate but never said how she would have been different than Biden. She's just not very likable. She's terrible on the border.

Well stated.

 

[DGS49]

She lacked the native intelligence to explain her policy shifts, and both she and her handlers knew it, which is why they shielded her from any real press conferences or interviews.

The policies that remain were unpopular.

 

[AntonToo]

Naw.

Naw.

 

[Foxfyre]

I am not. Trump is massively vindictive. I expect much of the administration to be used as a cudgel to get back at anyone he is unhappy with starting with Biden/Harris and Zelensky.

Please cite a single time, a single bit of evidence, that Trump ever used the power of his office to take revenge on anybody. Just didn't happen. It is not his nature and he of all people is on the record as being eager to stop the weaponization of government against political opposition/enemies that is the hallmark of the Obama and Biden administrations.

Those expecting Trump to go after his political enemies are likely to be very disappointed.