Again, why did Kamala lose?

[el midgetron]

 

[Arlette]

A good example of the stupidity of Americans.

Guess they thought they can do better under Trump. Voters trusted Trump more on the economy. It's crazy but true. Another thing that caused Harris the election was the amount of bullshit that's in circulation out there. People can't tell truth from a lie anymore.

 

[Arlette]

I’d argue the democrats should roll back support for unions and give them a taste of unchecked republicans. It’s politics.

No. They have to improve their behavior

 

[Independent thinker]

Liberals voted for her mainly because she was a woman, and a POC.
She had no qualifications or experience to recommend her.
She had no realistic policy plans.
She was unable to articulate the few ideas that she did have.
She was asking America to buy "a pig in a poke" (no insult intended).
She was not charismatic, and barely likeable and too elitist for middle America.

There were a few threads on here asking lefties reasons for why they would vote for Harris, with the stipulation being they couldn't say because she's not Trump. Almost no one could list any reasons why they would vote for her.

 

[Oddball]

Again, why did Kamala lose?​

The 15 million fake votes couldn't be inserted this time, without the nation blowing up.

 

[Rawley]

Liberals voted for her mainly because she was a woman, and a POC.
She had no qualifications or experience to recommend her.
She had no realistic policy plans.
She was unable to articulate the few ideas that she did have.
She was asking America to buy "a pig in a poke" (no insult intended).
She was not charismatic, and barely likeable and too elitist for middle America.

I think you have it covered.

 

[Rawley]

There were two main reasons. 1. She is a woman. 2. People are blaming the administration for item prices

You're admitting that your party is misogynistic? Rather bold. Kudos.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Not on the constant demand that everything is because of sexism.

He didn't state or imply that. He gave more than one reason.

So you're making silly errors.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Guess they thought they can do better under Trump.

The guy who laughed at and praised the idea of them all being fired, if they went on strike. The guy who said a child could do their jobs. The guy who said he would rather fire people than pay overtime.

Low information voters.

 

[IM2]

Liberals voted for her mainly because she was a woman, and a POC.
She had no qualifications or experience to recommend her.
She had no realistic policy plans.
She was unable to articulate the few ideas that she did have.
She was asking America to buy "a pig in a poke" (no insult intended).
She was not charismatic, and barely likeable and too elitist for middle America.

Bullshit.

America showed that it is still very much a racist and sexist country. We have probems and this election is not a good thing.

 

[Arlette]

The guy who laughed at and praised the idea of them all being fired, if they went on strike. The guy who said a child could do their jobs. The guy who said he would rather fire people than pay overtime.

Low information voters.

Yup. That guy. Don't expect an explanation from me. I don't get it

 

[Couchpotato]

2 things that most Americans are so utterly ignorant of they have no idea what any policy would or would not accomplish even in the most broad sense.

Or even what the real effects of them are in their current circumstances.

And it's the candidate's job to explain it. Something she obviously failed to do at least failed to do well enough. "Trump's a Nazi" isnt a policy or reason to vote for a candidate for the majority of the country. Especially when he's already been President and wasnt a Nazi then.

 

[Couchpotato]

Bullshit.

America showed that it is still very much a racist and sexist country. We have probems and this election is not a good thing.

People are allowed to disagree with a black woman's political stances without being racist and or sexist. That type of thinking is precisely what drives people away from your point of view. If your only response to me not agreeing with you is that Im racist youve lost the argument.

 

[citygator]

No. They have to improve their behavior

Unions gave Dems no credit for support. Id show the unions what no support looks like in return. Like i said its politics.

 

[Arlette]

Unions gave Dems no credit for support. Id show the unions what no support looks like in return. Like i said its politics.

No. It's doing the right thing. We gotta be better than the party of bigots, crackpots and grifters.

 

[FA_Q2]

He didn't state or imply that. He gave more than one reason.

So you're making silly errors.

Yes he did.

 

[citygator]

No. It's doing the right thing. We gotta be better than the party of bigots, crackpots and grifters.

I get that point of view, and its admirable. But all it gets you is a seat on the sidelines where you can make no difference. People need to see what an unchecked republican party does. I'd unleash them.

 

[JusticeHammer]

Describe what this LGBT agenda is.

Forcing it down our throats. No matter how you sugar coat it, they ain't normal.

 

[OKTexas]

Liberals voted for her mainly because she was a woman, and a POC.
She had no qualifications or experience to recommend her.
She had no realistic policy plans.
She was unable to articulate the few ideas that she did have.
She was asking America to buy "a pig in a poke" (no insult intended).
She was not charismatic, and barely likeable and too elitist for middle America.

It's really simple, hate doesn't sell.

.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Yes he did.

False. He mentioned it as a reason, not the only reason.

And he was correct.